Hi Ricky, Paul and Joe,
I was reading some of the doctrines from William Seymour posted here on SI and was surprised to read his stance that those who have remarried were to get out of that adulterous relationship and be either be single or be reconciled to their first husband or wife.
I believe this is close to John Piper's conclusions on this matter.
But I put it to you, what happened to forgiveness in this scenario - that of God being willing to forgive the fornicator, adulterer, homosexual (1 Cor 6:11 And such were some of you. But you were washed, [b]but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God[/b])? I'll leave you to look up verse 9.
Since I joined SI a year ago, there have been several threads, most of which have links back to even older threads. The current one, to which I'll be returning when I have more time online available to me, is 'Marriage, Divorce, Remarriage - towards a biblical perspective'. There you will find links to more than one site where there is useful 'perspective' both on scripture and the kind of things other Christians are saying about this matter.
I know this thread is very long, but, its recent activity began around page 3, and remains very much unfinished. Please bear in mind the effect the Council of Trent (I can't find the page in the thread, but, if you google it, the relevant session (24th, I think) is easy to find) had on the way marriages were conducted, and look carefully at the wording which condemns scripture, gospel and any other power opposing the Church of Rome.
While I understand why it would be much easier just to have a formula for dealing with potential remarriagers, which does not require either repentance on the part of the sinner, or discerment on the part of the minister, I don't believe that's what God calls us to rely on. In the Name of Christ, we are called upon not only to minister righteousness and in righteousness, but also mercy and faith. In so saying I am not disputing that divorce is unhealthy for children and heartbreaking for the divorcees, but, that's why Jesus needed to be THE Great Physician. He was shown to Israel as the fulfilment of Isaiah's prophecy, which you will note, even in Isaiah's own words, includes the healing of the broken-hearted.
[url=https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=1923&forum=36]https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=1923&forum=36[/url]
If you do read the whole thread (slowly), you will eventually hit another plea from the heart by a sister (amongst many) of whom I was one once, who didn't believe in divorce. I wasn't been beaten as some of them are, but my children were being sexually abused. As a survivor of sexual abuse myself, I am convinced that divorce is a far healthier solution for the children involved, than failing to protect them from a sexual abuser. I still have much to say in the above thread, to address this matter scripturally, and will I do, I'll try to repost the link in this thread too. (Or perhaps someone else could remember - Ricky, maybe?)
The short answer on sexual abuse, is that it is out of the same stable as fornication, (adultery) and homosexuality; in simple terms, this is idolatry - the one great worship system alternative to worshipping God. Unless we preach this simple truth as part of the gospel, we will continue to have the church bulging with so-called members who have no idea why they should give up fornication, homosexuality, physical violence within marriage, or child abuse.
God sees the heart. He knows who has done with such forms of worship in truth, is not deceived, and will mete out righteous judgment in the last day.
There is a great lack of real understanding of what a marriage is supposed to be - what constitutes 'marriage' and what does not. I now maintain that unless God makes two people one in reality, their participation in a marriage ceremony doesn't bind them to each other in the way He intends a man and a woman should be 'one'.
Also, take a look at Tyndale's use of the word 'wedlock' in the later pages of the above thread, which makes the traditional understanding of adultery (actually acted out), the delineator for the effective end of a 'marriage'. Formalising this state of affairs (forgive the pun) with a divorce, merely legalises the freedoms of both parties to remarry. What it doesn't do, is make their hearts right with God - but He is always open to hear from them, to forgive, to renew and to make them totally clean from ALL past sins.
I hope you brethren know this, otherwise there is little hope for any of us. Let's not make divorce the second unforgivable sin - and condemn ourselves in the process - as this is not a scriptural stance.