It’s tricky isn’t it, knowing the difference between being critical and being discerning. We sure need to get better at discerning, as our tendency is to be overly trusting – in the sense that we want to follow after man. These days our lofty illusions about fellow “Christians” are being shattering. Alas, even our favorite heroes have serious blind spots. I think we are waking up and getting the glitter out of our eyes – thankfully, really….. After all, you can’t have revival with stardust in your eyes. I’m afraid, that no matter how tidy we try to be, this waking-up process tends to be messy, as is mixed with buried pride, anger, and disappointment, self-righeousness, and even shock. It looks like a “critical spirit” at times, but it may very well really be all part of the God’s wake-up call. We cannot afford to stay “nice” and pretend all is nice like we did in the past. God is not pleased with that false righteousness.
I’d be reluctant to paint a broad stroke “critical spirit”. Also it can be confusing, as it’s hard to tell who are the “offenders”. Now how does one not get critical about all the ones who seem critical? That’s tricky. Maybe it helps to view each other as works in progress – at different stages. God brings conviction in his time.
.. and the mods do a pretty careful job of policing.
Diane, found it difficult to excerpt this and thanks also to Chris not by way of exclusion of the others here.
It is [i]tricky[/i].
I think we are waking up and getting the glitter out of our eyes – thankfully, really….. After all, you can’t have revival with stardust in your eyes.
I couldn't agree more Diane and as you mentioned it is messy as well. We have tread over this ground fairly often enough in the past. For those who have tarried here awhile this is familiar, for those more recent not a surprise reaction and a fair amount of assumption to be expected.
Speaking briefly with Greg the other day made mention of how these more 'controversial' matters tend to come in waves ('seasons' I think it was couched). It is very interesting ... [i]why[/i] it is so. Found it difficult even this morning how to address these things, the David Hogan matter being peculiarly up in the forefront of thoughts and prayers. The outcome is a large set of questions, but to reiterate, I do think it is good to get these things out into the open and question it from a variety of standpoint...
What keeps coming back is this matter of opposing 'camps' and how they are defended. The unwillingness sometimes to back down or to consider\\reconsider especially if a matter is to really be looked at truthfully a great deal of it is subject to opinion, is [i]opinion[/i], good, bad, indifferent...
It does ultimately break down into a new challenge and level of honesty ... We get offended and the reaction is [i]Defend![/i]
Now how does one not get critical about all the ones who seem critical?
It looks like a “critical spirit” at times
To say that it is not at times evident would be as false as saying that it is always a misunderstanding. Both happen.
What to measure by? Before that, this matter is front and center;
Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ. Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?
1Co 1:12,13
And...
For ye are yet carnal: for whereas there is among you envying, and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal, and walk as men? For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I am of Apollos; are ye not carnal? [b]Who then is Paul[/b], and [b]who is Apollos[/b], but ministers by whom ye believed, even as the Lord gave to every man? I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase. So then neither [b]is he[/b] that planteth [b]any thing[/b], neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase. Now he that planteth and he that watereth [b]are one[/b]: and every man shall receive his own reward according to his own labour. For [b]we are labourers [u]together[/u] with God[/b]: ye are God's husbandry, ye are God's building.
1Co 3:3-9
Looking at this afresh, perhaps the answer I am attempting to forward is expressed better than I could state it.
What I did want to say is; What does the Lord say about all this? Have we not yet recognized a very telling aspect? That the Lord is greatly silent? As if He would leave us to sort it all out amongst ourselves? A frightening prospect no?
Considering the amount of exposure inwardly that we must come to grips with, what do the outward manifestations tell us about our .... selves? First, that there is so much of a consideration for those same selves up against a more self-effacing proscription that Paul uttered, [i]"Who then is Paul"?[/i] In essence 'nobody', or the way he put it [i]anything[/i], "of no consequence" seems to be the consideration.
We get off into a pro\\con - Liberal\\conservative -either\\or - miracles\\holiness - both\\and - ecumenicism\\compromise - and I know it is redundant that I am want to keep bringing this forward ... but is it not [i]SELF[/i]? And [i]self opinion[/i] that causes us to overlook things that need to be addressed (because we have something, someone to defend) or that we go another route of being 'critical' and [i]offensive[/i] because we have forgotten just how offensive we are to the Lord. The [i]best[/i] of us [u]still[/u], are an offense to the Lord when we think that we have outgrown that possibility. It's pride, pure and simple ...
1Jo 1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.
Far too often I think we give ourselves an 'out' on this without truly pausing and pondering on it. The sense is, "Of course, but .... let me rush on to my point, my opinion".
How do we get the real, demanding grip of this truth;
[i]From whence come wars and fightings among you? come they not hence, even of your lusts that war in your members? Ye lust, and have not: ye kill, and desire to have, and cannot obtain: ye fight and war, yet ye have not, because ye ask not. Ye ask, and receive not, because ye ask amiss, that ye may consume it upon your lusts. Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God. Do ye think that the scripture saith in vain, The spirit that dwelleth in us lusteth to envy? But he giveth more grace. Wherefore he saith, God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble. Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you. Draw nigh to God, and he will draw nigh to you. Cleanse your hands, ye sinners; and purify your hearts, ye double minded. Be afflicted, and mourn, and weep: let your laughter be turned to mourning, and your joy to heaviness.
Humble yourselves in the sight of the Lord, and he shall lift you up. Speak not evil one of another, brethren. He that speaketh evil of his brother, and judgeth his brother, speaketh evil of the law, and judgeth the law: but if thou judge the law, thou art not a doer of the law, but a judge.[/i]
Jam 4:1-11
[i]And[/i], still deal with that which needs to be addressed? The 'critical spirit' seems to be contained within what James spoke of.
[i]yet ye have not, because ye ask not. Ye ask, and receive not, because ye ask amiss, that ye may consume it upon your lusts.[/i]
Is it truly because we "Ask [u]not[/u]"? Prayer, lack of prayer or prayer that is asking "amiss"?
It seems so. I know that it is my downfall when it is neglected, rushed through ... because "I have an opinion!" :-?
I am not completely free from this matter of wanting to [i]defend[/i], it has the tendency to rise up even here because of a great love for the saints, because of the great wealth of [i]thought[/i] contained here ... I can get a little disturbed hearing newcomers (and we love and welcome all) making off the cuff statements about this "board" without any real penetration into what goes on here .. It is understood, but this is no mere "board", no mere "chit-chat", "chat room", pulpit for agendas and extravagances, anything goes ... prophet-eering, bullying, condescending, patronizing ... I digress. It can get grievous at times. But to go back to Diane's 'trickiness', it is so. It is often bloody to get cut to the quick but so necessary! It is to be exposed and challenged even as one is bringing forth challenging matters. [i]IF[/i] we might look at it that way. Really, there is no need of defending anything here, the messages and speakers can stand on their own merit, these are but mere men who we tend to gravitate towards because they gravitate us closer to the Lords thought and hence their "greatness" if we must put it that way.
The most telling part in my experience here is how infrequently really it is to hear, "I think I got this wrong" without the proverbial "But" attached as an addendum. It does happen, Praise God, but it is telling just how closely we can hold on to things to save face, shun humility, admit error, admit we may not have the whole picture, that we may be pretending much more more than we let on to. We form an opinion about a man and\\or his ministry from what information we gather and make [i]that[/i] the proscription of [i]fact[/i]. It is not 'fact' but assumption and can be as much presumption to come alongside as a 'supporter' under a guise of "Knowing" him personally as those who are labeled 'critical' with the same set of assumptions. That sounds confusing even to me...
Things that are said, that are written, taught, ought to be able to be addressed without this sense of being offended or defending and maybe the largest looming matter is to [i]have to have[/i] a final conclusion to everything, especially when it comes to mens (ladies as well) character...
1Co 2:11 For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God.
We neither have to 'criticize' unduly nor compromise anything. The requirement is honesty. Not to go beyond, not to buttress one thing over another. Not to pretend and not to inflame. Test we ought and assume nothing that we do not in fact [i]know[/i]. Discuss it, wrestle with it, chew on it .... (Ponder, contemplate) and if the result is, as it often is, one of "I don't know", leave it at that, why go beyond it? Is there not a whole vast reservoir of this in each of us? Things still held in abeyance? The things of the Lord that are still yet undeveloped and full of wonder, those that we know are just out of reach, those that need a lot of work, the war of the natural and the spiritual that we struggle with, the things we know that we don't know, the things which we know we will never know [i]this side of heaven[/i]. Ever wondered about that? Could not a large part of that be an assumption? We may not know some matters even [i]then[/i]. Does that trouble us? I certainly hope not. What is our faith but in great part a matter of trusting that which is beyond us and reserved to God alone. The future is heavily guarded despite our 'prophets' often forward crystal-ball gazing ... (Not a slight...). And I am happy for it by and large. We are ultimately helpless but not without the greatest and only Help their is in life. We are cast upon the Lord, we are indeed [i]children[/i] and yet how hard it is to accept that sometimes, being so self-sufficient, [i]apart from Me you can do nothing[/i]. Why, we can do plenty! And we do. What the worth of it is though in the end is truly [i]nothing[/i]. What lasts? What will endure ... [i]forever[/i]? How to keep before us this ultimate matter of things eternal ...
Could wish for a nice tidy end to this rambling ...
The Lord knows [i]all these things[/i].
The Lord sees.
Better than we!
We are not combatant's against each other.
[i]"we are labourers [u]together[/u] with God[/i]"
Are we? Is this our motivation and compelling? Or are we more controversial over controversy? We love it! Some of us ... Will we admit it?
We [u]must[/u] truly die to ourselves! It is the trouble with us. We still don't want to hear it, we would rather [i]defend[/i] it! Mere creeatures! How ridiculous we can be, how seriously we take [i]ourselves[/i]!
Give your - self - away! The Lord knew what He meant when He said;
Mat 10:39 He that findeth his life shall lose it: and he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it.
It's a truth! Wonderful, paradoxical truth. You do find it! As it was meant to be, not as we attempt to work it out on our own. There is something tremendous about falling out into trust in the Lord, it's 'dangerous' and a scandal to the natural man, it chaff's at it, recoils from it, [i]that[/i] is a great part that must just die.
Human effort! The sheer folly for any spiritual attainment. It can't be recycled, it must be destroyed and re-created, "born again" of a different 'substance' if that is not to crass.
How did I end up here? On this tangent? Well, just a bit more since I am 'boasting' somewhat foolishly.
Miracles.
Signs and wonders.
Power.
[i]Whose[/i] is it?
Does it still happen?
Should we not examine and test ... 'criticize' it?
Why most certainly!
Accept them without question? Without "proof"?
How do we prove them anyway?
With evidence. Tricky again. Either it is seen first hand or something other than sight must make an application. Character is an evidence. Humility is an evidence.
Boasting, parading, drawing attention to ones self is ... suspect, no?
What about ... [i]effect[/i]?
What is the ... [i]point[/i]?
Mat 12:38 Then certain of the scribes and of the Pharisees answered, saying, Master, we would see a sign from thee.
Mat 12:39 But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas:
That is not the be all, end all of the matter.
But what are these things ... for?
Cold shivers?
Entertainment?
What is the point of being for instance "slain in the spirit"? Chris alluded to this in his experience with Mr. Hogan and I too had a similar 'experience' with Benny Hinn and Rex Humbard (My personal hand to head ... silliness). And what was the 'effect' and 'outcome'?
Nothing.
And I was highly expecting, especially after so much manipulation ... I played along with it in my ignorance and frankly, disappointment. Perhaps it was productive after all, it began reinforcing the troubling aspect that had already begun, "[i]this is nonsense[/i]".
We are children in the right regard but we ought not be gullible and without studying and studying ourselves in light of that study.
People being raised from the dead?
Possible?
Actual?
Doubtful?
This is a [i]TALL[/i] order.
And we are to accept it without question?
Take note in scripture, was there disputing that it actually [i]happened[/i]? Even amongst the religious leaders? Was it not [i]By what power[/i]? And ...
[i]Then gathered the chief priests and the Pharisees a council, and said, What do we? for this man doeth many miracles. If we let him thus alone, all men will believe on him: and the Romans shall come and take away both our place and nation.[/i] Joh 11:47,48
More so, [i]who[/i] did the re-telling of these things? The healing's and miracles. Ever notice that? (The Lord having a bit of a different authority and purpose notwithstanding). Was it the disciples speaking of "And I, Paul laid handkerchiefs ..." Or "I passed by and my shadow ..." No. There was a purposeful disassociation;
[i]The same heard Paul speak: who stedfastly beholding him, and perceiving that he had faith to be healed, Said with a loud voice, Stand upright on thy feet. And he leaped and walked.
And when the people saw what Paul had done, they lifted up their voices, saying in the speech of Lycaonia, The gods are come down to us in the likeness of men. And they called Barnabas, Jupiter; and Paul, Mercurius, because he was the chief speaker. Then the priest of Jupiter, which was before their city, brought oxen and garlands unto the gates, and would have done sacrifice with the people. Which when the apostles, Barnabas and Paul, heard of, they rent their clothes, and ran in among the people, crying out,
And saying, Sirs, why do ye these things? We also are men of like passions with you, and preach unto you that ye should turn from these vanities unto the living God, which made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all things that are therein: Who in times past suffered all nations to walk in their own ways. Nevertheless he left not himself without witness, in that he did good, and gave us rain from heaven, and fruitful seasons, filling our hearts with food and gladness. And with these sayings scarce restrained they the people, that they had not done sacrifice unto them. [/i] Act 14:9-18
How different than the often open boasting of these things in our day? That is if they are even believable. It's a re-direct and a distraction. Again, for what purpose?
"To the Lord"?
"For the Lords glory"?
"It's all the Lord's doing" ...
Is it? Or is it an afterthought, a safeguard, ([i]"Need to make sure I give God the glory on this or they won't believe me") That sounds harsh and critical but it often reeks of this.
If the Lord is going to get the glory for anything that [i]we[/i] do (difficult word there) we are going to have to get well out of the way and well before that even in our thoughts. I most certainly believe and recognize the miraculous both in the more outward 'show' but profoundly in the inward ... By God, I am a walking miracle! That is no boast, it is a incredible puzzlement that I will never fully comprehend. IF the Lord decided to heal someone through this peculiar man that I am, I can guarantee you I would be positively frightened out of my wits and would run as fast as I could to find some place to hide and weep that God could stoop to such a level as to do something that tremendous. That's my sense anyway.
There is just as much a portion that some matters ought to be just a matter of course when God is present, a peaceful, non-surprise aspect. For instance in Revival, having never been in one it would still seem a normal course for both awesome, reverential fear, weeping in repentance ... How else could one react having been exposed in such a fashion? Other than the hardest of hearts... Times of refreshing, mercy and forgiveness ... God love poured out. This all seems rather normative or at least it ought to be.
I just do not comprehend this flippancy of such vast proportions though in matters of Gods workings, whatever they might be. It is to bring the Holy down to the level of profane. To practically make sport of it and an entertainment value. No particular reason, just so that people are or "feel blessed". It seems to defy so much of what we do know of the Lords ways and character.
Sorry for the length.