[i]There is established at Westminster Chapel, in memory of Dr. G. Campbell Morgan, what is known as The Campbell Morgan Memorial Bible Lectureship. A lecture is given each year by different men, in the month of June, in harmony with the Biblical principles which governed Dr. Campbell Morgan's ministry. The Lectures are published each year in order to amplify the spoken Word and extend the influence of the Lectureship.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
When the Trustees who have instituted this Lectureship invited me to deliver the second Lecture, I could not and did not hesitate to comply with their wish. I am deeply sensible of the honour they have done me, and grateful for the opportunity to identify myself with their intention, in concrete ways, to perpetuate the memory of one who, on both sides of the Atlantic, exercised a unique ministry, by voice and by pen, in popularizing interest in and knowledge of the Holy Bible.
The Christian public of London was greatly privileged to have the opportunity for so many years of listening to the preaching and teaching of George Campbell Morgan, and I am confident that the time will never come when Westminster Chapel will cease to be a centre of Biblical instruction and inspiration to all who desire these blessings.
The subject I have chosen for your consideration is in some sense novel, but of the utmost importance for a true apprehension and adequate appreciation of the incomparable and inestimable value of those Sacred Scriptures which we call [i]The Bible
I begin by assuming that but for the Bible Christianity would not have survived. The Bible is the record of a divine revelation, and if there had been no record, no one, after the apostolic age, would have had any means of knowing what that revelation was. Oral tradition would have become more and more corrupt by omissions, additions, and other influences, until, finally, the truth would have been altogether lost.
This observation relates to the recorded New Testament revelation, but it must be evident that except for the Old Testament Writings the entire background of the New Testament revelation would never have been known, for Judaism had misread its own history.
The Biblical record is not the original revelation, but, had there been no record, we would never have known what the revelation had been, or, indeed, that there had been a revelation.
Christians do not worship the Bible, but the God who therein is revealed, but we do realize, or we ought to, that the Bible which makes the redeeming God known to us is, beyond all estimate, our most precious heritage.
Our present task is to try to envisage the obliteration of the Bible, and all traces of it, in our history, literature, art, music, language, social institutions, worship, service, and individual life.
I cannot hope, within the limits imposed by this lectureship, to succeed in so ambitious a task, but perhaps I may start a line of thought which will lead us to renewed thankfulness to God for having given to us such a book as the Bible, and thankfulness also for all who have diligently studied it, and faithfully expounded it.
I do not claim originality for the idea of the obliteration of the Bible, for in a book with the title [i]The Eclipse of Faith[i]The Blank Bible
It tells of a dream a man had, that, on turning to read his Bible, as was his custom, he found only blank pages. On inquiry, he learned that all the Bibles in his neighbourhood were also blanks, and all copies also in the book shops.
Some people, who never looked at the Bible while they had it, became interested in it now that it was lost.
One man who had never read it, said that it was "confounded hard to be deprived of his religion in his old age." Another person greatly mourned the loss of her Bible, because in it, for greater safety, she had deposited £100 in notes, and these, too, had become blanks. All the Bibles in the land were blanks, and the volumes were being sold for day-books and ledgers; and instead of Isaiah, and our Lord's parables, there were orders for silks and satins, cheese and bacon.
Then a movement was set afoot to re-write the Bible from the memories of those who had read and studied it.
A Trinitarian differed from a Unitarian over a critical recension. An Episcopalian did not agree with a Presbyterian that the words bishop and presbyter were interchangeable. A Calvinist had a vivid recollection of Romans ix, and an Arminian had some doubts about some of Paul's sentiments. Husbands remembered what was due from their wives. Undertakers remembered it had been said that there was "a time to mourn." A comedian recalled that it was said there was "a time to laugh." Some young ladies remembered that there was "a time to love," and everybody knew there was "a time to speak," except a Quaker who thought that there was "a time to keep silence."
Protestants and Papists disagreed about many passages, and some infidels thought that the visitation on the Bible was a great mercy, removing a book which promoted idolatry.
This dream begins to show what consternation and confusion would result from the obliteration of the Bible, but the subject can be indefinitely expanded.
Of course, the major disaster would be the loss of the Bible itself, but that would involve so many other losses, the contemplation of which must make the mind to reel, and the heart to faint.
Let us, then, consider some of the influences which this Book has exercised, which would have had no being had there been no Bible.
