You know i don't think way back when the tiny church in Rome began it had any idea or intent of becoming the Nicolaitan type religious institution it evolved into, saddling and riding astride the great expansionist empires of Europe, historically sucking in material tribute from kings, fortune builders and commoners alike ... How did it get like this? ...
Seems to me somewhere along the line some folk began to stray away from the true "first love", "first works", principals of Christ and Chritianity, and began to be motivated by desires of power, personal purpose and prosperity ... When i read the history of Christianity, Catholic and Protestant, i'm always amazed that even thru the ugly history of such abuse, His will, plan and purpose goes marching on ... Regardless people still get saved, but oh in the midst of such unnecessary human pain, carnage and suffering ... Only God can pull off such a feat with/thru and in spite of us ... All praises to His most Holy name!!!
What's prompted my thinking on this is last week i taped and watched the PBS series "The Six Wives of Henry VIII", and "The Virgin Queen (Elizabeth I)" ... Fascinating! ... i guess in my ignorance of English history i'd taken for granted that Protestantism came to England for God's purpose in some heavenly miraculous way for it to eventually birth so many great men of His ... But no, it seems that Protestantism came to England primarily because it's monarch wanted to divorce his wife to marry another, and the Church of Rome (Pope) wasn't having it ... Then it became clear to me that this was the point where the monarch of Britain unseated and unsaddled the church of Rome from off himself, and put his own saddle on Protestanism, making himself alike to a Pope over the Anglican Church, to ride it to his own personal purpose ... That struck me as so dangerous ... i'm afraid to knowingly use Christ, or Christianity, to any benefit to myself for selfish reasons, and i just wonder why everyone isn't ... i fear God, so when i see anyone do this i deduce that they don't ...
The history went on to show all of the sin perpetrated by Henry during his reign, the succession of wives to get an heir to his throne, the extra-marital dalliances, the court intrigues and bearing of false witness toward the murders of others in his way - same with Elizabeth 1 - yet they claimed Christ ... In retrospect neither Rome nor Henry VIII seemed to have Christ in mind towards an end result, and with Elizabeth 1 she seemed more enamoured with English empire than Christ kingdom ...
i'd come to a conclusion a while back (pre-salvation) during my delving into the history of the African slave trade and subsequent European empirical expansion thruout the globe, that all that seems to plague our modern world could be traced back in cause to the Church of Rome and/or the ravenous quests for wealth and prosperity of European empires ... It wasn't until i became a Christian that i began to question whether Catholic or Protestant, how was it possible for them to claim Christ, and Christianity, but yet commit such atrocities of recorded history? ...
For instance why didn't the Church in Rome, in the name of Jesus, stop the empires they ruled over in traffiking human bondage? ... How did the rulers and lawmakers of Protestant England justify, in the name of Jesus, the tragedies associated with the slave trade, and global colonization ... And later how in the world did the bulk of Germany citizentry, the birthplace of Protestantism, ever fall in line with Hitler's ideology? ... Seems this type corruption, religiously, governmentally, and economically, starts from the top, and washes down on and ensnares those not truly grounded in Christ, to the reward of those unscrupulous at the top ... It's seems like the childs game of "follow the leader" ... Seems very few latch onto the true Leader, Christ, and try their best to seperate themselves from such ... This seems to be the historical plight of those like the Pilgrims, and Puritans, fleeing such top down English Protestant corruption by coming to America ...
If i'm in error here please someone correct me, but this has caused me some questions ... It seems there may be different reasons for the undertaking of Christianity betwix the poor, the common everyday working man, the materially rich and powerful, and the rulers of empires, governments and nations ... Not saying all in these so called upper classes are all bad eggs but ...
[b]-
[b]-
"blessed" to the more lowly elements of human society? ...
[b]-
[b]-
i especially ask the latter question as an American, because we came out of Great Britain, with a shared history of what Henry VIII did, that i think is perpetrated even in our own history, namely saddling Christ and Christianity to our own empirical and/or personal advantage ... i believe all things that have transpired have apparently fit into God's will, but from a Christian point of view i often still ponder events in light of such perpertrators espousing Christ and Christian values ... So i wonder ...
[b]-
[b]-
[b]-
[b]-
Seems to me a Christian who's really attempting to be Christlike is in real trouble if we're prone to blindly following human leaders ... Spiritually, governmentally and/or economically "what are their motives and priorities"? ... Are they about the love of Christ and their fellowman to the abasing of "selfish pursuit", or are they about "selfish pursuit" to the abasing of Christ and their fellow man? ... A saint who studies scripture, has Christ as their head, and Holy Spirit as guide know the difference because He said you shall know "them" by their "works/fruit" ... i know nobody's perfect, and i know it ain't easy being a leader in any capacity now-a-days, and i pray for 'em ... But ...
[b]-
[b]-
[b]-
Just recently our Lord showed me something regarding the Church of Ephesus, they looked good on the outside like so many of us American Chrisitians, but He was not pleased with their "motivation" or their "priorities" ... You know Laodicea was blind, but Christ said if they didn't repent He would rebuke and chasten them ... Ephesus on the other hand apparently was not and He told them if they didn't repent, He'd remove them from out of their place ... Yikes! ... Seems Christ is more tolerant of spiritual blindness than He is of wilful spiritual abuse of motive and priority in His name ... Henry VIII was a king who claimed Christ, looking all regal and royal on the outside, but if Chrsit was to have spoken to Him i think He'd a told Him He was really a whited selpulcher, stinking on the inside, giving Him lip service but denying the power thereof, and therefore had something against him ...
[b]-
[b]-
These latter are the kinds of questions i've been asking myself lately ... i find myself more acute in my questioning of my own motives and priorities in Christ ... Are they Christ serving, or self serving? ... Thank God for His "tail tugging" and 1 John 1:9 ...
i know some weary of hearing the necessity of "repentance - repentance - repentance" ... But i wonder, if the Word says we are to die daily, can there ever be to much repenting? ...
Blessings in Christ Jesus!
