BSBKJVWEBYLTASVBBEWMBT4TDBY|HymnsMusicDonate
Menu
Articles

Menace of the Religious Movie by A.W. Tozer

H
heartablaze Apr 17, 2007

This sermon has been brought to my attention. The respected A.W. Tozer is its author. It is about what he describes as a sin to make films of any sort, especially of the religious sort. When Tozer wrote this sermon, it was in the early years of film, but it still can apply today if he is right. Please, read it, and struggle through it with me.
[color=0000FF][url=http://www.touchet1611.org/TozerReligiousMovie.html]Menace of the Religious Movie[/url][/color]

It seems to this one that he is only responding to a new technology in a manner that fundamentalists have in the past:with hate or confusion. He loses the idea that it is a way that our culture now communicates ideas in a way other than in the past or in a different people; it is not unlike using logic, a method Paul used to speak to the Greeks.
I will expand on my argument later, but I'd love to hear what any of my brothers and sisters in the Lord have to say about it, whatever way you go.

May God bless you.

N
Nile Apr 17, 2007

I just finished listening to the sermon (found [url=https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/mydownloads/singlefile.php?lid=13545]here[/url]).

He didn't seem hateful or confused to me - on the contrary he presented his argument with scriptural and historical backing.
Specifically which of his points do you disagree with?
What about his point on acting...where is acting ever approved of or used in the Bible?

C
Compton Apr 17, 2007

double post

C
Compton Apr 17, 2007

Hi Brother,

Have you seen some of the religous movies of Tozer's day? They were sinfully bad! Bad costumes, extra-biblical sentiment...yuck. ;-)

Seriously I've had questions about Tozer's article as well. (By the way, I've never thought of Tozer as a fundamentalist!) There is perhaps a related attitude found in the early church fathers, such as Tertullian, who had a general disdain for all theater...partially because the theater gave "lessons in fornication" and partially because it depicted violence and strife with no reality. (Interestingly he seem to feel that violence for the sake of entertainment was the worst use of violence of all...even worse then actual warfare.)

Tertullian would be beside himself if he could see the modern world! We are a video saturated culture, which is something different then saying we are a visual people. We seem to express all our ideas, even our faith in God, through the historically unique technological medium of moving pictures, sound, and music. We trust film; not nessicarily as a fact telling medium...but as a truthfully expressive medium...we use film to authenticate reality!

Every meaningful issue today has become become pop culture in film. I'm not talking about fantasy and fiction movies...but of movies dealing with "real life." We make movies about the experiences of other people and this seems to expand our knowledge about these experiences too. But these constant intense film experiences are actually a culture of unreality that insulates us from the reality of life.

Yet film is trusted. For instance consider Al Gore's recent Global Warming film. The ideas have been around for a while now...but once Vice President Gore made a "documentary" global warming has become suddenly mainstream. (Untill the next big documentary comes along...)

So perhaps herein lies Tozers concern. In our television/film media age people no longer seem to percieve what is real anymore...instead they simply open their minds and recieve any truth transmitted to them in non-linear video editing and emotionaly stirring sound tracks. Our human susceptibility to having our cortexes imprinted on by the light, color, and sound coming from our iPods may make Al Gore happy, but it certainly would not be enough to satisfy God who wants our hearts and minds more then imprinted, but awakened from our digital dullness to the ultimate and tanglible reality of Jesus Christ. Such a reality can only be experienced first hand in a personal relationship, not second hand through an illusion of relationship with a movie actor.

Just some thoughts trying to understand Tozer brother, and I look forward to reading your thoughts on this interesting topic.

MC

N
Nile Apr 19, 2007

Bump.

I'm really interested in hearing what others think about this article and about movies/entertainment in general.

This discussion is locked.

Archived
1 of 5 posts