jeremyhulsey
May 25, 2004
thevoice wroteI'd rather have a true revelation of who God is, than theology. Yes and if you judge William Branham sermons by theology, He was mixed up. AndWhy not get his bio book free or his sermons ...and look for discrepancies from the bible point of view, instead of theological point of view.thevoice,I'm REALLY curious. How do you separate Christian theology from the Bible as though they are two different and incompatable fields of study??? Theology gleans from the Scriptures Those passages that teach us about the attributes and nature of God. Now by your own admission, Branham's Theology was messed up. That means that Branham did not have a right view of God(Theology means, the study of God). In fact the bible was not written by theologians, but common people who had a revelation and a relationship with Jesus Christ, but rejected by theologians of the day.To start I'll say that your first propostion is absolutely incorrect. Much of the New Testament was written by the Church's greatest Theologian, the Apostle Paul. Just read Romans, there is yet to be a better Theological work. Many of the writers of the OT had a knowledge of the Scriptures, namely the Torah, that would put most of us today to shame.Your argument that it was the theologians who rejected him is fallacious. Your implication is that their rejection was based upon the fact that they were theologians. The reason people rejected Jesus is because they either refused to believe, or mis-interpreted or mis-used scripture. Branham mis-interpreted and mis-used scripture also. So it is my belief that he too would have been in the crowd that cried crucify[!]. In fact he denied the Lord when he renounced the Triune nature of God.Now if Branham's theology(understanding of God according to Scripture) is messed up; why do you want to read his works?In Christ,Jeremy Hulsey