Rwegenast wrote:
Okay who ever it was that wrote they couldn't back up speaking in tongues in the scripture...UMMMM Have you read ACTS...
I hope you don't take offence, but this displays a little ignorance of the topic. The question isn't whether or not "glossolalia" is Biblical, but whether or not it is the same as what is passed off as "tongues" in the modern day church. I don't know if you realise this, but people actually went away from Azusa St thinking that they could go away to foreign countries and preach in the native languages of the lands they were in. Do you believe this? If not, then at what point does the "extremity" become "too extreme"?
Regarding Acts, when was the last time you spoke in tongues, and had people hear the praises of God in their own native languages? If the answer is "never", then you'll realise why this is being discussed.
On a more "administrative bend", next time you comment, click on "Reply" rather than "post new thread", and your comment will go into the thread being discussed.:-)