BSBKJVWEBYLTASVBBEWMBT4TDBY|HymnsMusicDonate
Menu
Theology

Did Peter remain saved during his denial??

sermonindex Jul 14, 2007

A friend of mine shared on a different board a view which I thought was interesting.

I believe a man can be regenerated. I don't believe you can be regenerated, then be degenerated, and then be regenerated again.

In other words, you can't be born again, leave salvation, and come back.

I know this is not an uncommon view. Some on these forums may share with my friends opinion. My question though, how does this fit into the denial of Christ the Apostle Peter repeatedly did?

[b]Consider this facts of this very interesting situation:[/b]

[b]1.[/b] The Father gave Peter a revelation of Jesus being the Christ: Matt 16:16-17, Mark 8:29-10, Luke 9:20

[b]2.[/b] Jesus commissioned Peter (along with Judas and the others) to preach the gospel, heal the sick, and cast out demons: Luke 10:1-16

He called them his sheep (vs 3), affirmed that they were a part of the Kingdom of God (vs 11), and that those who reject them reject Christ (vs 16)

[b]3.[/b] Jesus told Peter his name was written in the book of life:
Luke 10:20

[b]4.[/b] Those who deny Christ before men cannot be presently in a state of salvation and face possible condemnation in the future: Matt 10:33

[b]5.[/b] Peter denied Christ before men: Matt 26:34, Luke 22:34

[b]6.[/b] Peter needed to be converted after this incident: Luke 22:32


[b]Considering these facts, there are only three options:[/b]

[b]1.[/b] Peter was not saved before denying Christ, not while denying Christ, but was saved for the first time after that.

If this is true, why would Jesus assure Peter that His name was written in the book of life, before Peter denied Christ?

Also, it would mean that Christ sent out an unsaved man to preach the gospel, heal the sick, and cast out demons. And that Christ said an unsaved person was a sheep, apart of the Kingdom of God, and His representative. If Peter was of the devil when he did all that, did Satan cast out Satan?

[b]2.[/b] Peter was saved the entire time, during his mission to preach the gospel - cast out demons - and heal the sick, during his denial of Christ, and after his denial of Christ.

Problems with this is that it means a saved person can utterly lie three times about Christ, which Christ said denying Him has eternal consequences, and Revelations 21:8 says all liars without exception face eternal hell.

It also doesn't explain Christ telling people to strengthen the brethren "when thou art converted". How can a man in the state of conversion be converted? Only the unconverted can be converted.

[b]3.[/b] Peter was saved before denying Christ, fell into temporary backslidings - in which he must have been in a condemned condition, and then later was converted again unto Christ.

I believe this last one makes the most scriptural sense. It means that even a genuine Christian can fall into backsliding, during which he is in a state of condemnation, but can be restored to the faith, and thereby his his spiritual soul saved from eternal death.

James 5:19-20: I believe explains this case with Peter.

“Brethren, if any of you do err from the truth, and one convert him; let him know, that ye which converts the sinner from the error of his way shall save a soul from death, and shall hide a multitude of sins.”

While some sin is not unto death, in which a sinner or backslider can repent from and be either converted for the first time or restored to the faith, there is also a sin unto death in which there is no more return, a state of probation when no more enlightenment is possible, and therefore no more repentance can occur.

This sin unto death, in which restoration is impossible, a state of no return, or total apostacy, because no futher enlightenment is possible, is what I believe this scripture speaks of:

Heb 6:4-6: For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.


Anyways, the only answer to the question is one of the 3 I listed, unless anyone else sees a 4th option which I failed to think of?

sermonindex Jul 14, 2007

Peter was saved, because of God's foreknowledge of what Peter 'would do'.

Jesus said to him, Satan has desired to sift you as wheat, but I have prayed for you, and when you are 'recovered', strengthen the brethren.

He knows those which are His.

He knows those who will be faithful unto the end, even if they stumble.

Foreknowledge of what each human being will do from the day they're born until the day they die is how GOD determines Election.
He knew before the foundations of the world what each of us would do and how we would wind up in the end, by our own choices.

Otherwise, freewill is out the window completely.

sermonindex Jul 14, 2007

If our perspective on the salvation of God is simply to remain saved (sin confess..sin confess), then I can see where we might not have any more answers, but...

According to the scripture, God told Israel that He brought them out of Egypt in order to bring them into their inheritance.

8And I am come down to deliver them out of the hand of the Egyptians, and to bring them up out of that land unto a good land and a large, unto a land flowing with milk and honey; unto the place of the Canaanites, and the Hittites, and the Amorites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites.

He brought them out, to bring them in...

This too, is God's plan for every believer. God brought us out of our sin, to bring us into our inheritance..which is Christ. His life. He is our inheritance. The purpose of God is that we might be conformed into the image of His Son.

And failure, coming face to face with the reality of who we are, apart from Christ, is a major part of that process.

When Jacob wrestled with God, he had to confess who he really was. He was Jacob...a deceiver. And then God gave Him a new name.

This is why getting Justification right is so important. If we are not confident in our standing with God, then there is no way that He can begin to show us all of our sin nature, our flesh, our weakness. We will never have rest. We will always think we are condemned.

And so Peter...strong, self-confident, Peter, The one who said he would never forsake Jesus. Peter.

He was brought to a place where his own strength failed. He wanted to be strong. He wanted to stand with Jesus, but he could not find the strength to do it (sound familiar...Romans 7 maybe...) And so He denied Jesus. He failed. He sinned. And it was all the purpose, plan, and the will of God.

Peter's strength had to fail because the kingdom of God does not move forward by the strength of man, or the will of man...."It's not by might, nor by power, but by my Spirit, says the Lord.

sermonindex Jul 14, 2007

by Mahoney
This too, is God's plan for every believer. God brought us out of our sin, to bring us into our inheritance..which is Christ. His life. He is our inheritance. The purpose of God is that we might be conformed into the image of His Son.

And failure, coming face to face with the reality of who we are, apart from Christ, is a major part of that process.

Amen Mahoney,

Rom 8:28, 29 And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose.[b]For[/b] whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.

L
Logic Jul 14, 2007

Lazarus1719 wrote:

[b]3.[/b] Peter was saved before denying Christ, fell into temporary backslidings - in which he must have been in a condemned condition, and then later was converted again unto Christ.

I believe this last one makes the most scriptural sense. It means that even a genuine Christian can fall into backsliding, during which he is in a state of condemnation, but can be restored to the faith, and thereby his his spiritual soul saved from eternal death.

I don't think all backsliddings put one in a state of condemnation.

Salvation is a concept of faith, knowledge, hope and placement, not of initial acts.
Example; if one bears a false witness, is one in a state of condemnation during that lie?

J
JaySaved Jul 14, 2007

I hope these responses have sufficiently answered your question Jesse.

R
roaringlamb Jul 14, 2007

Another point to ponder as well as when in time did this happen. What I mean is was Peter sealed with the Holy Spirit as we read in the Epistles, or was this prior to that being possible?

If we would look at Scripture we would see the following-

Joh 20:22 And when he had said this, he breathed on them, and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost:

This happens after the denial of course, and we also understand that the day of Pentecost was after the denial as well, but at this time had not happened yet. Pentecost opened the door to the universal indwelling of God's people by His Spirit, whereas prior to this it was certain individuals that were sealed, or empowered by the Spirit of the Lord.

Now though the Spirit is the earnest of Heaven, and is in all those who are regenrated.

As siter Annie brought up these verses, I think they answer the question pretty clearly-
Luk 22:32 But I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not: and [b]when thou art converted,[/b] strengthen thy brethren.
Luk 22:33 And he said unto him, Lord, I am ready to go with thee, both into prison, and to death.

Peter was very quick to show the Lord how willing his flesh was, but we know that in the heat of the moment the fleshly boldness wilted, and denied the very One whom Peter said he loved. Thus Jesus makes the point, "when you are converted" or when you are made a different man, strengthen your brethren.

L
Logic Jul 14, 2007

roaringlamb wrote:
Another point to ponder as well as when in time did this happen. What I mean is was Peter sealed with the Holy Spirit as we read in the Epistles, or was this prior to that being possible?

If we would look at Scripture we would see the following-

Joh 20:22 And when he had said this, he breathed on them, and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost:

This happens after the denial of course, and we also understand that the day of Pentecost was after the denial as well, but at this time had not happened yet. Pentecost opened the door to the universal indwelling of God's people by His Spirit, whereas prior to this it was certain individuals that were sealed, or empowered by the Spirit of the Lord.

Now though the Spirit is the earnest of Heaven, and is in all those who are regenrated.

As siter Annie brought up these verses, I think they answer the question pretty clearly-
Luk 22:32 But I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not: and [b]when thou art converted,[/b] strengthen thy brethren.
Luk 22:33 And he said unto him, Lord, I am ready to go with thee, both into prison, and to death.

Peter was very quick to show the Lord how willing his flesh was, but we know that in the heat of the moment the fleshly boldness wilted, and denied the very One whom Peter said he loved. Thus Jesus makes the point, "when you are converted" or when you are made a different man, strengthen your brethren.

[b]Joh 17:3[/b] [color=990000]"Now this is eternal life: that they shall be knowing You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom You sent.[/color]

Peter had eternal life by the relationship he had with Him. While Jesus was on Earth, He was that "earnest of Heaven"

[b]John 15:3 [color=990000][u]Now[/u][/b] you are clean through the word which I have spoken unto you. [/color]
This was said in relation to being in the Vine.
[color=990000]Abide in me, and I in you[/color][Now that you are clean] [color=990000]As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; no more can you, except you abide in me.[/color] [b]John 15:4[/n]

This was said also before Peter's denial in Chapt. 18.

P
PreachParsly Jul 14, 2007

A friend of mine shared on a different board a view which I thought was interesting.

Glad to see I'm a friend! :-)

Here is my response on the other board.

Anyways brother Josh, I was wondering your perspective of the Apostle Peter. Did you affirm one of those 3 options I listed, or is there a 4th option I failed to think of??

My whole system of thinking is probably different than yours...

First, I would say Peter was never regenerated until Pentecost. In my mind regeneration is a new covenant phenomena. How can you be baptized into His death and raised in newness of life before Christ died and resurrected? The new covenant wasn't into effect until Christ blood was shed. If those things aren't true, then what is the difference of the covenants? I can find scriptures in the OT that even use the same language as "receiving a new heart" but if it means the exact same thing then there really isn't any difference between the covenants, maybe you can say there are "new laws" but that's about the extent of it. Since theology is systematic and you reject a few things I embrace, we are going to have obvious differences in this topic.

Regeneration is when the old man has been made inoperatble ie dead and you now have a new man- something only He alone can do. Conversion is when you turn to God. I'm not wanting to debate this with a Calvinist, but my view is the exact opposite of a Calvinist. I believe conversion precedes regeneration. You turn to God, He changes your heart.

So, in my thinking you could never be a true "partaker of the divine nature" until the new covenant, Peter was never regenerated, unregenerated before the Cross and then regenerated after it. But rather was converted, unconverted before the cross and was both converted and regenerated after the cross. I hope I don't sound like I'm making up things as I go, because I'm really not!

James 5:19-20: I believe explains this case with Peter.

“Brethren, if any of you do err from the truth, and one convert him; let him know, that ye which converts the sinner from the error of his way shall save a soul from death, and shall hide a multitude of sins.”

(I know you said the James was written to a synagogue, but it must have been a synagogue that was in the faith, because James assumed their faith 1:2-3; 2:1)

And if James was written to believers, and not to unbelievers, 5:12 declares that believers can actually "fall into condemnation". Besides, none can "err from the truth" but those who are walking in the truth, and none walk in the truth but believers.

I see that admonition in the book of James no different than if I were to write a letter to a church about their faith and at the end I think there may be some that are not really turned to Christ and say "if one of you are away from the faith and another of you convert him, let him know, that he which converteth the sinner from the error of his way shall save a soul from death, and shall hide a multitude of sins."

sermonindex Jul 14, 2007

I believe everyone covered this subject very well.At what point he was saved I don’t believe I could make the call. I would say it is hard to tell. He was following to a degree when he said" Lord we have fished all night and have not caught anything, but he cast out into the deep anyway". Afterwards he seemed to understand he was sinful in doubting Jesus’ instruction to cast out into the deep. He said something along the lines of get away from me for I am a sinful man, after the big catch. He seemed to show some doubt when he said, “Lord if it is you tells me to come to you on the water”. He grew in knowledge when he took his eyes off Jesus and began to sink. He really was crushed when he realized what he had done when he denied Jesus three times and cussed one of those times alluding to convince them he was not a follower of Jesus. He went to sleep while Jesus was praying in the garden but afterwards defended Jesus and cut off the soldier’s ear. I believe it is a picture for all of us who follow and fail. After all that, he followed instructions and waited in the upper room until the winds blew and the tongues of fire fell and filled the room and they were filled with the Spirit and he was one of those who wrote the New Testament under the inspiration of that Spirit for a light unto our feet and a lamp unto our pathway today. It requires the same Spirit to understand the scriptures as it did for the Apostles to write them. On the Day of Pentecost that Spirit was made manifest in Peter when he preached Jesus in the same place Jesus was crucified. Just as Peter, we all can look back at some things we had rather forget about we have done and said, but the main thing is after we believed in our heart and confessed with our mouth have we seen the Holy Spirit's power manifested in our life and we can look back and see we have not quit following HIM. The question we should ask ourselves as believers. Do we see any change in our life? Do we see any change that can only be explained by HIS Spirit and HIS POWER? As the Word says examine ourselves to see if we are of the faith.

edit:
Luke 22:31-34
31 "Simon, Simon, Satan has asked to sift you as wheat. 32 But I have prayed for you, Simon, that your faith may not fail. And when you have turned back, strengthen your brothers."
33 But he replied, "Lord, I am ready to go with you to prison and to death."
34 Jesus answered, "I tell you, Peter, before the rooster crows today, you will deny three times that you know me."

Acts 2:38-41

38 Peter replied, [b][i]"Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins.[/b][/i] And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.[u]39 The promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off-for all whom the Lord our God will call.[/u]
40 With many other words he warned them; and he pleaded with them,[b] "Save yourselves from this corrupt generation."[/b] 41 [b]Those who accepted his message were baptized[/b], and about three thousand were added to their number that day.
(from New International Version)

R
roaringlamb Jul 14, 2007

I think too that it is important to note how we throw out the term "saved" to mean many things.

But the thrust of our question should be when was Peter justified? That is the issue. He may have been justifed before Pentecost simply because he understood who Christ was-
Mat 16:16 And Simon Peter answered and said, [b]Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.[/b]

In the Jewish mind, this was saying, "you are the sin bearer, the deliverer, you are the one who is to free Israel." In the OT the faith in the One to come was counted as righteousness.

Ultimately Peter was "saved" when he was hung on the cross, and entered into glory.

sermonindex Jul 15, 2007

I don't think all backsliddings put one in a state of condemnation.

Salvation is a concept of faith, knowledge, hope and placement, not of initial acts.
Example; if one bears a false witness, is one in a state of condemnation during that lie?

Yes, lying in particular always puts one in a state of condemnation because, since lying is the intention to deceive, and therefore must always be willfull.

Revelations 21:8 says ALL liars will have their part in the lake of fire. It's such a serious sin (as all sin is), because truth is so valuable, and lying is open rebellion against God, and so God makes no exceptions regarding liars (or any rebels/sinners) - they all must repent or perish.

Mistakes and accidents do not put someone automaticly in a state of condemnation. For example, genuinely thinking something is true -spreading that truth - only later to find out you were mistaken. That is not lying, ie the intent to deceive, but was a mistake and accident, in which you cannot be blamed because you acted in accordance with the best of your knowledge, and with a pure intention.

But Heb 10:26-31 in particular says all willfull sins put's someone in a state of condemnation, and they can only be restored through repentance (turning from sin and turning back to Jesus).

I suppose the only alternative is to say that sins cannot harm a Christian, and they can commit countless willfull sins and still have no condemnation. In which case, Christians are lawless and yet without judgment.

But this is so contradictory to the words of Christ who said "not everyone who says Lord Lord will enter the Kingdom of Heaven. But he that DOETH the will of my Father". And also "depart from me, you worker of iniquity (worker of lawlessness) I never knew you."

So Christians are not lawless, and are still in a state of probation; the law must condemn all who willfully break it.

sermonindex Jul 15, 2007

Mistakes and accidents do not put someone automaticly in a state of condemnation. For example, genuinely thinking something is true -spreading that truth - only later to find out you were mistaken. That is not lying, ie the intent to deceive, but was a mistake and accident, in which you cannot be blamed because you acted in accordance with the best of your knowledge, and with a pure intention.

Jesse, sin is sin. Those two places in Revelation about lying is the continual practice and the Liars are in with all those 'other' sins that are ingrained in the person, habitual or continuous practice - making them "Liars" rather than one who makes a mistake, as you said about "other sins" and the other verse says, "whosoever LOVETH and maketh a lie" --- that's continual practice and Loving the sin.

Same with the 1John verses. That is when someone is in a "life-style" of sin, not just a fumbling in our Love for Him by commiting an act against His will one time.

Even fierce struggling cannot be compared to habitual/continuous/willful/lifestyle sin.

sermonindex Jul 15, 2007

If it takes a lifestyle of sin to be condemned, why did it only take one for Adam? And why did only one lie kill Ananias and Safira in the book of Acts?

And what would quality as a "lifestyle of sin"?? Would "sinning every day in word, thought, and dead" be a "lifestyle" or "continual" sin that condemns you?

And if sinning every day isn't a lifestyle of sin, what is? Does it take sinning every hour, or every second, before you have a "lifestyle of sin", before you are "continually sinning"??

And if so, do you agree with me that sinning every minute, every hour, every day most certainly condemns the one who does it? Because such is continuance in sin, a lifestyle of sin?

"The wages of [continual] sin is death" ???

And if one lie doesn't merit condemnation, what about three in a row?

If three in a row is continual lying, then was Peter condemned when he lied three times when he denied knowing Christ?

sermonindex Jul 15, 2007

Jesse, have you ever been afraid or have your faith shaken so that you felt that you weren't believing God for as much as you should ?

Then compare those two things with this ...

Rev 21:8 But [u]the fearful, and unbelieving[/u], and abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.


Brother, Adam ate from The Tree of Good & Evil.

That was never to be seen again, because God closed off Eden from thence forth.

His sin cursed the earth and all mankind.

You cannot compare his "sin" to ours. He was born perfect ... and he embodied all mankind and affected all of mankind forever. You don't.

GOD in HIS Foreknowledge, knew (fortunately) what you will do tomorrow.

Either His blood has covered that when He placed His seal of ownership on you, or you are in and out of Christ with each thought that doesn't Come directly from Him.

We are to come into His Image, not our Image of what we think He's trying to make us.

Each time you do not follow His Voice and leading, you are sinning.

If that's true, then your theory would have us all in continual condemnation.

Missing the mark is the definition for sin.

HE or HIS IMAGE is the Mark.

Wherever you walk or think in your own strength and not by His Leading - you're out of His Will, which is called sinning.

Every thought Jesse. Every thought.

sermonindex Jul 15, 2007

And why did only one lie kill Ananias and Safira in the book of Acts?

And what qualifies as a "lifestyle of sin"??

What qualifies as "continuing in sin"?

It's very important that you share that with me. If the wages of continual sin is death, I need to know what continual sin is.

If the blood of Christ does not cover a lifestyle of sin, what is a lifestyle of sin?

Does a lifestyle of sin, and continual sin, consist in sinning every day?

sermonindex Jul 15, 2007

Jesus said, they do not come to the Light because they Love the darkness.

Like cockroaches. They love their sin.

God is Love --- Satan is Hate.

God is Light --- Satan is darkness.

Those who "walk in the darkness and love it" are an abomination unto the Lord.

There are sinners, who hate their sin, but don't know "how" to come out of it, because they've either not been taught about Jesus at all or they have been taught to save themselves by the letter of the law, rather than the spirit of the law.

He asks for our "will" -- which is "our heart".

HE KNOWS whose heart He has ... but their are those who have hardened their heart to such an extent, they will never come to the light.

They love unrighteousness. And that is far different from someone who is struggling.

One need not sin everyday to be spiritually dead.
It's the condition of the heart.
GOD looks at the heart of men. Look at King David.
I for one had a hard time understanding why GOD would say that "David was a man after God's own heart". Hoy Vey .... a murderer/adulter/bigomist/liar and so on ?

Ha, I had to really stretch on that one, yet Jesus calls Himself the Son of David ... again .... Hoy Vey ... but that is what HE said.
Go figure.

He looks at the heart ... we can but we don't.

The LORD said, all that HE did, we can do.
We just don't believe Him. (which is sin btw).

The first Church had many things happen that needed to be recorded for our admonition.

Ananias and Saphira were HYPOCRITS not just LIARS.

They were phonies. You could probably call those two TARES.

God demonstrated His power through-out the book of ACTS and if we're not living a life as they did, we're sinning.

We're not believing GOD still works that way.

Many "drop-dead" today under the power of a Holy GOD.

As long as we are STRIVING for righteousness, which means ---- TO BE JUST LIKE HIM BY HIS POWER ONLY ---- He knows our hearts in that.

We should always have in us, that Holy fear or reverence that we are Not Like Him.

Walking in the Spirit is His command.

Working for God in the flesh is disgusting to Him. A lifetime of working, thinking, acting in our own strength or flesh or power even FOR GOD is continual sin.

I think inside you already know what "continual/lifestyle sin" is.

sermonindex Jul 15, 2007

He asks for our "will" -- which is "our heart".

I completely agree. And it is a daily choice to deny yourself (your will) and pick up your cross and follow Christ (God's will).

My point is that if someone is not carrying their cross and following Jesus, they cannot be presently in a state of salvation, but must be in a state of condemnation, because they are sinning instead of following Jesus.

Those who seek to save their life will lose it. When Peter denied Christ, he was seeking to save his life, and was not wanting to pick up his cross. He was not presently following Jesus, but later choice to do so and eventually was crucified.

Only those who are presently following Jesus can have the salvation offered in Jesus. But those who leave Jesus for sin, cannot have the salvation offered in Jesus.

GOD looks at the heart of men

That was my point exactly when I distinguished between a mistake and a sin.

God looks at your heart, and judges you by what you knew, by what you were capable of, and by your intention.

There is no occassion for guilt, blame, or fault, when a person's intention is benevolent, when their heart is pure; in other words, if they "mean well" what can they be blamed for? Their heart, or intention, is right. Even though they are imperfect in knowledge, they are pure in heart.

I think inside you already know what "continual/lifestyle sin" is.

Yes I do. It consists in sinning daily instead of dying daily.

Continual/lifestyle of sin would be giving into temptation everytime your tempted, which is daily.

But Christianity starts when a person dies to self when they are tempted, which is daily.

sermonindex Jul 15, 2007

Re:
by Lazarus1719

Quote:
-------------------------------

He asks for our "will" -- which is "our heart".
-------------------------------


I completely agree. And it is a daily choice to deny yourself (your will) and pick up your cross and follow Christ (God's will).

My point is that if someone is not carrying their cross and following Jesus, they cannot be presently in a state of salvation, but must be in a state of condemnation, because they are sinning instead of following Jesus.

Those who seek to save their life will lose it. When Peter denied Christ, he was seeking to save his life, and was not wanting to pick up his cross. He was not presently following Jesus, but later choice to do so and eventually was crucified.

Only those who are presently following Jesus can have the salvation offered in Jesus. But those who leave Jesus for sin, cannot have the salvation offered in Jesus.


Hia Jesse, I don't know what I'm doing up this late tonite. Ha.

I have some problem with you using that term "a state of condemnation" ... that means, if someone botches and dies in car crash, let's say the crash was because he got angry for a moment, then if he dies, he'll go to hell.

That's what "state of condemnation" means to me.

Is that what you mean ? Consigned to hell at that point that they are not perfect ?

What you said above is ... that if we do anything outside of his will we are condemned ?

I think in your good intentions, you have been taught about the letter of the law rather than the spirit of the law, but that is the whole problem in the whole Church.

IF, we understood what "hearing His voice & following Him" was or "walking in the Spirit" as He did ... [b]completely[/b] Dependent on GOD for every word, thought and deed ..... Nothing of ourselves and all of HIM, then how many of us could say we are "like HIM in this world" ?

WE don't just "imitate" HIM, we must allow Him to conform us into His Image.

Death to self doesn't normally happen over nite.
That is what "take up your cross" represents.

Not all can say .... "nevertheless, [u]it is no longer I that live but Christ[/u] that liveth in me and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by [u]the faith of[/u] the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me.

Some few folks pick up on this "walking in His Spirit" more easily. They can come as a little child and have no "knowledge" of thier "own" .... and read the book of Acts lets say, and just say, WOW, I want to walk as they did and I know that only Jesus can speak to me His very thoughts and power. And then they wait and listen for Him every waking minute of the day.

Some folks mock those type people and ask, "Did GOD tell you what to have for dinner tonight ?"

YES - He did as a matter of fact. And HE can and will if we let HIM. I'm not ashamed to answer those type folks. If they want to walk autonomously for the rest of their days, well, they may still be saved, but their works will be burnt up, because they didn't originate from the Him/His Spirit.

So, if becoming like a little child, totally aware of our own ignorance and dependent on Him for every thought and what proceeds those thoughts, then if we step outside of His thoughts, yes, we are sinning, even if the thoughts are not what Church folks call "sinful thoughts".

GOD is calling this last generation to full dependence on HIM, so that they can get through what's coming and be as those who Daniel and John spoke of ... but they can't do it with the letter of the law.

That's why this drawing of the fine line in this conversation is so very important.

If we walk in the Spirit, He will even tell us things to come.

Walking in the Spirit, is losing our own thoughts completely to dependence that HE will direct completely. His sheep will continuously hear His Voice and continously follow Him.

That's nothing of us and all of Him.

But if you say, that one who is not quite there yet is in a state of condemnation ... then you don't understand GOD's Foreknowledge of those that are His and who will be saved in the end.

Could you just rethink what "condemnation" is ?

God does not condemn His Elect. His Elect will make mistakes, but they are His Elect because He Foreknew what their end would be. So they cannot be in a "state of condemnation" ever.

Condemnation means HELL bound.

Hope we can talk more some other time. Church day today.

Thanks brother.
Annie


Edit: Something stil going through my mind.

We're going to HAVE to learn to walk in complete trusting dependence on Him now, or else we'll be fearful & possibly unbelieving when the rubber meets the road soon.
Can't shake that thought and had to spill it out.

Thanks again.
HIS LOVE!

sermonindex Jul 15, 2007

I have some problem with you using that term "a state of condemnation" ... that means, if someone botches and dies in car crash, let's say the crash was because he got angry for a moment, then if he dies, he'll go to hell.

That's what "state of condemnation" means to me.


By "state of condemnation" I mean that if they die in their willfull/intentional sin, they will go to hell.

Eze 18:24 - But when the [b]righteous turneth away from his righteousness, and committeth iniquity,[/b] and doeth according to all the abominations that the wicked man doeth, shall he live? [b]All his righteousness that he hath done shall not be remembered[/b]: in his trespass that he hath trespassed, and in his sin that he hath sinned, [b]in them shall he die.[/b]

If Peter died, while he was in his denial of the Lord, Jesus would deny Peter before the angels of Heaven. Those who deny Christ will be denied by Christ, unless they repent.

Anyone who is in willfull sin must be, for the time being, in a state of condemnation. Only those who have repented (turned from sin) and are in a state of love for God and Jesus (and thus keep His commandments) are in a state of salvation, since God offers grace to all repented sins, but condemns eternally [i]all[/i] willfull sins.

God grants people "time to repent" (Rev 2:21) but there is also a point when a person "sins away their day of grace" and God may kill them on the spot, when all their time to repent is over, and God allows them to die in their willfull sin and go to hell. This is proven by the fact that some do die in impenitence and sin.

And if someone is in sin when Jesus comes back, they must perish. The bride must make herself ready, to be spotless and without fault or blemish. The master of the house will destroy those servants who are in sin when he returns, but will reward those whom he finds watching. Mt 24:46, Lu 12:43

Condemnation means HELL bound.

I agree. They are hell bound unless they repent.

Hope we can talk more some other time. Church day today.

Thanks brother.
Annie

Good night sister.

:-)

This discussion is locked.

Archived
1 of 58 posts