BSBKJVWEBYLTASVBBEWMBT4TDBY|HymnsMusicDonate
Menu
Theology

WHO is the CAUSE of sin and WHAT is the SOURCE of sin?

sermonindex Sep 12, 2007

[b]Who[/b] is the [u]cause[/u] of all sin and [b]what[/b] is the [u]source[/u] of all sin?

Is God the cause of sin and is His Sovereignty the source?

Is the Devil the cause of sin and his lies the source?

Is Adam the cause of sin and the loss of freewill the source?

Or each sinner the cause of their own sin and the wrong use of freewill is the source?

[b]My answer is:[/b]

Each sinner is the [u]cause[/u] of [i]their own[/i] sin & the [u]source[/u] of sin is a wrong use of freewill.


[b]LUCIFER ORIGINATED HIS OWN EVIL BY A WRONG USE OF HIS WILL:[/b]

"For thou hast said in thine heart, [b][u]I WILL[/u][/b] ascend into heaven, [b][u]I WILL[/u][/b] exalt my throne above the stars of God: [b][u]I WILL[/u][/b] sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: [b][u]I WILL[/u][/b] ascend above the heights of the clouds; [b][u]I WILL[/u][/b] be like the most High." Isa 14:13-14

[b]SINNERS ORIGINATE THEIR OWN REBELLION BY A WRONG USE OF THEIR WILL:[/b]

"But his citizens hated him, and sent a message after him, saying, We [b][u]WILL NOT[/u][/b] have this man to [b]REIGN[/b] over us." Luke 19:24

"But those mine enemies, which [b][u]WOULD NOT[/u][/b] that I should [b]REIGN[/b] over them, bring hither, and slay them before me." Luke 19:27

[b]SIN IS REBELLION AGAINST THE SOVEREIGN GOD:[/b]

"they [b]REBELLED[/b] against the words of God, and contemned the [b]COUNSEL[/b] of the most high." Ps 107:11

"But the Pharisees and lawyers [b]REJECTED[/b] the [b]COUNSEL[/b] of God against themselves, being not baptized of him." Luke 7:30

"O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, which killest the prophets, and stonest them that are sent unto thee; how often [b][u]WOULD I[/u][/b] have gathered thy children together, as a hen doth gather her brood under her wings, and ye [b][u]WOULD NOT[/u][/b]!" Luke 13:34

Ye stiffnecked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, ye do always [b][u]RESIST[/u] THE HOLY GHOST[/b]: as your fathers did, so do ye." Acts 7:51

R
roaringlamb Sep 12, 2007

This sounds good and all, but has already been declared heresy in the 400s as Pelagius' disciple
Coelestius was trying to spread similar ideas.

Perhaps the points closest to what you are espousing is that Adam's sin only did damage to him, and not to man as a whole. I can see another point that you try to teach as well, which is that men can be sinless. Pelagius believed that even before Christ there were sinless men, and also believed that one could be saved either through the Law or the Gospel. Of course the Apostle Paul had differing thoughts on this as he said that "by the deeds of the law no flesh shall be justified".

Sadly, if one does not accept the headship of Adam's fall, they cannot accept accept the Headship of Christ for His salvation.

Logically your idea fails simply due to the fact that God created satan fully knowing that he would sin against Him and fall. God also created man fully aware that Adam would give into the temptation that satan would bring, and bring death upon man. If you get rid of these points, you teach contrary to the fact that God also ordained Jesus as the Lamb slain before the foundation of the Earth. God had this all factored in before any thing or anyone was created, thus Paul in Ephesians says that we were chosen in Him before the foundations of the world.

You cannot break a link of this chain without it causing questionable ideas about God, and Christ, and the work of salvation.

sermonindex Sep 12, 2007

So are you saying that Adam is the cause of all sin or that God is the cause of all sin?

-----------------

1. Yes Pelagianism was condemned by the Roman Catholic Church. But are you a Catholic? Do you believe that Protestantism is heresy also because it has been condemned by the Roman Catholic Church?

2. Genesis 6:5-6 seems to be saying that if God knew men would use their freewill to sin He would not have created them. Because they have a freewill they have the power of contingent choice, and since those choices are contingent they can only be foreknown as possible but not foreknown as certain.

So God foreknew the possibility of the fall but not the certainty of the fall, since the fall was contingent and not certain.

This goes back to the bible teaching of open theism, that God foreknows certainties as certain and foreknows possibilities as possible. As the bible teaches, the future is partly open (what God lets men determine) and partly settled (what God Himself determines).

3. God is the cause of what He made, but not the cause of what His creation becomes.

God made Lucifer, a good angel, which became a devil.

And God made man with a freewill, capable of choosing good over evil and thus forming their own good moral character.

But God is by no means responsible for what angels and men become. God is responsible for what He made, but He is not responsible for what his creation becomes of their own choosing. What God made was "good" but what His creation has become is evil.

It's kind of like this: Who made your automobile? Suppose it was Chevy. The Chevy manufacturer made their creation with an INTENTION or PURPOSE. That is to provide transportation. But suppose you use your Chevy automobile to run people over!! That was not the INTENTION of the Chevy company, that was not the PURPOSE of it's creator.

You, and not Chevy, are responsible if you use your automobile to run people over.

Likewise God has given us the power to will. Since God created it, God must have an INTENTION or PURPOSE for creating it. And that intention or purpose was so that we would and could choose good over evil. But men use their will to choose evil over the good. That is contrary to the INTENTION of the Creator! That is not the PURPOSE of the will!

And so we ourselves, and not God, are responsible for our own evil choices!

sermonindex Sep 12, 2007

I know that books like Sirach were recognized by and used by the Early Church Fathers and that Sirach was in the original 1611 King James Version.

I am willing to believe in the possibility that Sirach is an inspired book, but I don't know...I need to study it more. It's possible that the Calvinist Reformers took these books out because it was contrary to their theology, just as Luther wanted to remove the book of James.

As I've been studying the writings of Pelagius, I noticed that he quotes out of the book of Sirach as the other Early Church Fathers did. That is because Sirach has such clear and explicit teaches on freewill, something all of the Church Fathers before Augustine universally believed in.

These are verses of interest in our discussion:

[u]Sirach 15:11-12[/u] "Say not thou, It is through the Lord that I fell away: for thou oughtest not to do the things that he hateth. Say not thou, He hath caused me to err: for he hath no need of the sinful man."

[u]Sirach 15:14-16[/u] "He himself made man from the beginning, and left him in the hand of his counsel [freewill]; If thou wilt, to keep the commandments, and to perform acceptable faithfulness. He hath set fire and water before thee: stretch forth thy hand unto whether thou wilt."

[u]Sirach 15:20[/u] "He hath commanded no man to do wickedly, neither hath he given any man licence to sin."

I don't know if Sirach is an inspired book or not, but I know that these verses are teaching sound theology and good doctrine!

R
roaringlamb Sep 12, 2007

1. Yes Pelagianism was condemned by the Roman Catholic Church. But are you a Catholic? Do you believe that Protestantism is heresy also because it has been condemned by the Roman Catholic Church?

This is an unfair question as there are many issues that the Medieval Catholic had right, and even the Reformers did not seek to write off or destroy all that was taught within the Church.

The issue then as is now was how is man saved? Are men born a "blank slate" awaiting for the man to write what he will be, or are men born "dead in sin"?

We must see that the issue is what one makes of original sin, and if one gets this wrong, then the rest will be wrong as well.

And so we ourselves, and not God, are responsible for our own evil choices!

Yes, but our choices are bound to our will, which from the womb is sinful, and simply waiting to break forth into sin. No man can raise himself above his will, and this is why salvation is from God by grace through faith in Christ. The believer is born again and united to the body of Christ, never to be aborted or cast away.

R
roaringlamb Sep 13, 2007

I am willing to believe in the possibility that Sirach is an inspired book, but I don't know...I need to study it more. It's possible that the Calvinist Reformers took these books out because it was contrary to their theology, just as Luther wanted to remove the book of James.

The Reformers were not all Calvinist. There are some differences between Lutheran thought and Theology and Reformed Theology. Mainly the differences are in view of baptism, and the Lord's Table. They agree however in the falleness of man, and the depravity of man.

The Book of Concord was written to stem the influence of a more Calvinistic ideology coming into the Lutheran Church. Phillip Melancthon was leaning more towards the Calvinist view, moreso than the Lutheran.

As for the Apocrypha being left out of the Canon, it was mainly because the Lord did not quote from these books, and neither did the Apostles. There are probably more reasons, but right now they escape me.

I would also encourage you to look at the Coucnil of Orange from 529 AD, it can be found here-
[url=http://www.monergism.com/thethreshold/articles/onsite/councilorange.html]Council of Orange[/url]

Augustine had a different idea of "free will" than you are giving him. His was one that affirmed mans' freedom to move and choose according to their wills, but needed divine grace alone to give them faith to believe in Christ.

T
theopenlife Sep 13, 2007

My brother Jesse, I long for discussions where we will agree, but not so much that I will lay down what seems to be apparent truth.

2. Genesis 6:5-6 seems to be saying that if God knew men would use their freewill to sin He would not have created them. Because they have a freewill they have the power of contingent choice, and since those choices are contingent they can only be foreknown as possible but not foreknown as certain.

Yet scripture says that Christ was slain BEFORE the foundation of the world. He was not literally slain then, but the assurance of His death for SIN was already set irreversibly from BEFORE the creation of man, which undeniably proves that God knew with certainty that man would sin, prior to the creation of man. My Savior was not slain for a possibility.

sermonindex Sep 13, 2007

My brother Jesse, I long for discussions where we will agree, but not so much that I will lay down what seems to be apparent truth.

My sentiments exactly.

Yet scripture says that Christ was slain BEFORE the foundation of the world. He was not literally slain then, but the assurance of His death for SIN was already set irreversibly from BEFORE the creation of man, which undeniably proves that God knew with certainty that man would sin, prior to the creation of man. My Savior was not slain for a possibility.

Re 13:8 - the Lamb SLAIN [u]FROM[/u] the foundation of the world.

1Pe 1:20 - Who verily was FOREORDAINED [u]BEFORE[/u] the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you,

These text seem to be saying that God planned the cross BEFORE the foundation of the world (knowing the possibility of the fall) but that it was not executed, or Christ was not slain, until the foundation of the world (when Adam actually fell).

God planned it before the fall but executed it at the fall.

L
Logic Sep 13, 2007

roaringlamb wrote:
The issue then as is now was how is man saved? Are men born a "blank slate" awaiting for the man to write what he will be, or are men born "dead in sin"?
Since Adame died spiritualy from his own sin, so do we from our first own sin.

[b]Rom 6:23[/b] [color=990000]For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.[/color]
Sinse the "life" is spiritual, then the "death" is spiritual.
As the fact is, Adam only brought physical death.

roaringlamb wrote:
We must see that the issue is what one makes of original sin, and if one gets this wrong, then the rest will be wrong as well.
that is why you are wrong. ;-)

roaringlamb wrote:
Yes, but our choices are bound to our will...
The inclination of our will effects individual choices that we make. The choice that you make will naturally follow your inclination. Consequently, if you love yourself or the world more than the one commanding you, you cannot consistently do things that please the commander. Your decisions are in bondage to your effections and inclinations so that you only do what you have favor towards.
Love God, hate sin; Love yourself and the world, hate God.

roaringlamb wrote:
...which from the womb is sinful, and simply waiting to break forth into sin.
If you are alluding to Psalm 58:3 & Psalm 51:5, first of all, it needs to be initially recognized that this passage is Hebrew poetry. And Hebrew poetry abounds with bold and imaginative figures of speech; it is frequently characterized by a freedom, which departs from customary forms of expression. It is, therefore, a mistake of great magnitude to extract statements from poetical literature and thus employ them as a foundation for doctrinal schemes. [size=xx-small](Wayne Jackson)[/size] http://www.inplainsite.org/html/original_sin_and_the_psalms.html
&
http://www.christiancourier.com/articles/read/does_psalm_58_teach_original_sin

Thyerefore, your assertion is wrong.

roaringlamb wrote:
No man can raise himself above his will...
One is able to be persuaded to move from his original will to will to be in christ.

roaringlamb wrote:
The believer is born again and united to the body of Christ, never to be [b]aborted or cast away[/b].
[b]1Timothy 4:1[/b]
[color=990000]Now the Spirit speaks explicitly, that in the latter times some shall [b]depart from the faith[/b], giving heed to deceitful spirits, and doctrines of demons;[/color]
If we are already [b]born[/b] again, the term "aborted" does not fit into the analogy as one doesn't abort a newborn infant.
Furthermore, HE will not cast away, but one may depart from HIM. [url=http://amimynation.tripod.com/challenge.html]Example[/url]

roaringlamb wrote:
Perhaps the points closest to what you are espousing is that Adam's sin only did damage to him, and not to man as a whole. I can see another point that you try to teach as well, which is that men can be sinless.
Adam did damage to the world by introducing physical death and bringing offence into the world.
However man can only be sinless when pefected, however, man is born sinnless.

roaringlamb wrote:
Sadly, if one does not accept the headship of Adam's fall, they cannot accept accept the Headship of Christ for His salvation.
How so?

[url=http://amimynation.tripod.com/challenge.html]Example[/url]

sermonindex Sep 13, 2007

Tricky question, cannot be easily answered. When defining "Who" is the cause of sin, the answer lies with God and man.

The source of sin is much easier to define. The source of sin is the law. Not to say that the law is sin, but to obey it brings about the actions of sin.

In the garden, one law was given. "Don't eat of this tree". To obey the law by the flesh brings about disobedience. Such a command only causes man to study the very thing that he is commanded not to touch. But if you remove the enmity then the curiosity no longer exist, thus you are free from the law of sin and death.

Man was never created so he can think within himself, "Why can't I sin?", "why can't I eat of this tree?". You tell a child NOT to eat any cookies, but he's is right there waiting for an opportune moment to reach in that cookie jar and grab a cookie. "Why are you denying me these cookies?". But if you remove the flesh that causes the disobedience, there is no more temptation. Thus the cross is our answer to rid ourselves of all the "whys". Instead of "Why can't I?", it's now, "Thine will be done". We are no longer interested in what our flesh wants, but what our Father wants.

Forgive me if I got off topic.

sermonindex Sep 13, 2007

Logic,

I'm really glad that you are on these boards!!

R
roaringlamb Sep 13, 2007

Since Adam died spiritualy from his own sin, so do we from our first own sin.

Brother I will never understand how you can argue that there is "life" in natural man when the Scriptures declare man is "dead in sin".

What do you say to these verses-
Eph 2:1 And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins;

Eph 2:5 Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved;)

Do these not both clearly show that God has to give life to the dead man? It does not say wounded, sick, but dead.

The inclination of our will effects individual choices that we make

And natural man will not choose anything but sin, because that is what his heart is set upon.

Our Lord told people things like the following-
John 5:21 For as the Father raiseth up the dead, and quickeneth them; even so the Son quickeneth whom he will.
John 5:38 And ye have not his word abiding in you: for whom he hath sent, him ye believe not.
John 5:40 And [b]ye will not come to me, that ye might have life.[/b]

Now in contrast to the last verse, look at the next chapter-
John 6:37 [b]All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.[/b]
John 6:44 [b]No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him:[/b] and I will raise him up at the last day.
John 6:64 But there are some of you that believe not. For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not, and who should betray him.
John 6:65 And he said, [b]Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.[/b]

Now consider the words Jesus speaks to the Jews who "believed" in Him, but refused to admit a need to be set free from bondage-

John 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will(desire to) do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
John 8:45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.

Now notice what Jesus says-
John 8:47 [b]He that is of God heareth God's words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God.[/b]

Now in regard to Adam and his offspring, after he fell, there was not only physical death, but spiritual as well. Then in Genesis 5 we read-
"And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, [b]after his image;[/b] and called his name Seth:"(v3)

No longer in the image of God because of Adam's sin, but rather after the image of Adam, sinful and dead in sin. Now what difference there is between this and Cain and Abel, I do not know, but it is safe to say that even those two show the sin that came into man and his descendants.

One is able to be persuaded to move from his original will to will to be in Christ.

Yes and this is the work of God in regeneration of the heart. He removes the heart of stone that hates God and His laws, and replaces it with a heart of flesh that is now alive and has His law written upon it.

This new heart believes in Christ, and will seek to please Him, and follow Him. What was once foolishness(loving and obeying God)is now joyous.

1Timothy 4:1
Now the Spirit speaks explicitly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to deceitful spirits, and doctrines of demons;

But look at what John says about those who go out-
1 John 2:19 They went out from us, but they were not of us; for [b]if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us:[/b] but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.

Adam did damage to the world by introducing physical death and bringing offence into the world.
However man can only be sinless when perfected, however, man is born sinless.

Brother does it not bother you that you are putting forth an idea that has multiple times been labeled heresy by the Church?

Not only did the Protestants find this unscriptural, but so did the Roman Catholics at first. Sadly though they as well as the Church at large today have been taken into the Pelagian captivity and see no harm in it.

How so?

If man has no fallen state in Adam, he needs no salvation in Christ because he can ultimately save himself by his obedience to the Law.

If indeed his sin is only his own, and he is born without sin, then he could perceivably live without sin and be another sinless one could he not? Then there would be multiple saviours, and man would be his own saviour.

Of course this is ludicrous, and I am not saying that this what you're teaching. But you must trace out the conclusions you can come to if in fact what you are saying is true.

Grace and peace to you

sermonindex Sep 13, 2007

Sinners are voluntarily dead in sin, that is the same as saying that sinners are voluntarily void of righteousness.

The bible says that babies are born "innocent", that babies are "innocent blood". And more specifically the bible says that babies in the womb "have not yet done good or evil" Romans 9:11

Each sinner is responsible for his own sin because his own sins are caused by himself. If each sinner did not cause their own sin, it could not be their own sin! And each sinner is responsible for sinning because they had the power not to sin.

So each sinner is the cause of their own sin and a wrong use of freewill is the source of all sin.

Like Pelagius rightly taught, YOU CANNOT BLAME GOD, ADAM, THE DEVIL, or NATURE FOR YOUR OWN VOLUNTARY CHOICES!!

R
roaringlamb Sep 13, 2007

But why do men sin without any regard for their Creator? You keep going around in circles.

I have no problem with God's sovereignty, and man's responsibility, for all man is doomed and is commanded to repent and believe the Gospel. The very fact that men rather hate the Gospel, and want nothing to do with it until God changes their heart should show us the monster that man is in his natural state.

And again, I believe men make voluntary choices, but their choices are bound to their will, and no man will come to Christ until the Father draws him.

sermonindex Sep 13, 2007

All men need the influence of the Spirit or they will not come to Christ.

And all men are bound to act according to their will. But they have control over their will. They can will good or will evil. And all sinners choose to will evil.

The will is under the law of influence and response not cause and effect.

- That is why you find Paul reasoning, persuading, and disputing with sinners in the book of Acts.

- That is why Paul even said that we are Christ's representatives BEGGING sinners to be reconciled unto God.

Because God will not spiritually rape anyone, but God is spiritually influencing all men to have a voluntary relationship with him.

R
roaringlamb Sep 13, 2007

Because God will not spiritually rape anyone, but God is spiritually influencing all men to have a voluntary relationship with him.

God is working to change the hearts of those whom He gave to Christ to pay for their sins. Those whom are not His sheep, will never complain of God's unfairness as they love to sin and will sin on into eternity.

If God does not change the will of a man, he will not seek forgiveness of his sins.

And actually, if you look at the verb for "draw" used in John 6:44, you will find this-
helkuō / helkō
Thayer Definition:
1) to draw, drag off
2) metaphorically, to draw by inward power, lead, impel

So in a sense God is dragging, but because men have a new will it is not contrary to their will at all. No forcing of anything at all.

Perhaps you try to force people to believe, and brow beat them with morals, and then offer them the hopelessness of a Christless religion in which their salvation is based upon their ability to live perfectly, but God does not inflict this upon people.

C
Christinyou Sep 13, 2007

Man is the implementer of sin. Satan is the spreader of sin. Who say sin is sin? God is the author.

James 1:12-17 Blessed is the man that endureth temptation: for when he is tried, he shall receive the crown of life, which the Lord hath promised to them that love him. Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man: But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed. Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death. Do not err, my beloved brethren. Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning.

What is the greatest work God has done? Is it not the Cross. What is the Greatest work Christ has done. It is not to do the will of the Father. The Cross of Christ was His obedience and our salvation. Is it not our obedience to
Christ by Him that is in us.. Who was in Christ?
The Father. Who is in us? The Son. How could we possibly do greater works than He did. By He that is in us. Our personal work is to "present ourselves a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable which is our reasonable service." Then the works of Christ can be done in us by Him and these are the greater works than He has already done. The Body of Christ His Church.


In Christ: Phillip

P
philologos Sep 13, 2007

So are you saying that Adam is the cause of all sin or that God is the cause of all sin?

Jesse
You are never going to get this right until you give due weight to Romans 5 and one man's transgression impacting the whole race. You never seem to take up any of my invitations to identify what you mean by sin. Are you talking about the root or the fruit? Are you talking about something that rules like a tyrant or something that I myself choose to do?

L
Logic Sep 13, 2007

roaringlamb wrote:
Since Adam died spiritualy from his own sin, so do we from our first own sin.

Brother I will never understand how you can argue that there is "life" in natural man when the Scriptures declare man is "dead in sin".

If you read closly, I do not say that natural man has sppiritual life in him, I am saying that he lost it by himself with his own first sin & not with Adam's sin.

roaringlamb wrote:
And natural man will not choose anything but sin, because that is what his heart is set upon.
As I said, one may be persuaded.

roaringlamb wrote:
Our Lord told people things like the following-
John 5:21 For as the Father raiseth up the dead, and quickeneth them; even so the Son quickeneth whom he will.
John 5:38 And ye have not his word abiding in you: for whom he hath sent, him ye believe not.
John 5:40 And ye will not come to me, that ye might have life.
How do you put up with a devilish tyrant that creates man to destroy in hell?
Your interp. of this would be saying [b]John 5:21[/b] For as the Father raiseth up the dead, and quickeneth them; even so the Son quickeneth whom he will.
[b]John 5:40[/b] And I will not let you come to me, that ye might have life

roaringlamb wrote:
Now in contrast to the last verse, look at the next chapter-
John 6:37 All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.
John 6:44 No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day.
John 6:64 But there are some of you that believe not. For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not, and who should betray him.
John 6:65 And he said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.
Again, How do you put up with a devilish tyrant that creates man to destroy in hell?
Whom ever the Father does not give to the son was created for hell and are only doing what they were created to do, and that is to sin.

roaringlamb wrote:
John 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will(desire to) do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
John 8:45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.

Now notice what Jesus says-
John 8:47 He that is of God heareth God's words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God.

Your interp. of this would be saying:
John 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, of whom I created you to be of.
I made him a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
John 8:45 And because I tell you the truth, I don't let you believe me...
John 8:47 He that is of God heareth God's words: ye therefore hear them not, because I created you not of God.

roaringlamb wrote:
Now in regard to Adam and his offspring, after he fell, there was not only physical death, but spiritual as well. Then in [b]Genesis 5[/b] we read-
"And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth:"(v3)

No longer in the image of God because of Adam's sin, but rather after the image of Adam, sinful and dead in sin. Now what difference there is between this and Cain and Abel, I do not know, but it is safe to say that even those two show the sin that came into man and his descendants.

[b]Gen 9:6[/b] [color=990000]Whoever sheds man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.[/color]
[b]James 3:9[/b] [color=990000]With this bless we God, even the Father; and with this curse we men, who are made after the similitude of God.[/color]
God still reguards all manking in HIS image.

roaringlamb wrote:
One is able to be persuaded to move from his original will to will to be in Christ.
Yes and this is the work of God in regeneration of the heart. He removes the heart of stone that hates God and His laws, and replaces it with a heart of flesh that is now alive and has His law written upon it.

This new heart believes in Christ, and will seek to please Him, and follow Him. What was once foolishness(loving and obeying God)is now joyous.


The regeneration of the heartsalvation. Therefore, in that respect, yes one is able to be persuaded to move from his original will to will to be in Christ.

roaringlamb wrote:
1Timothy 4:1 Now the Spirit speaks explicitly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to deceitful spirits, and doctrines of demons;
But look at what John says about those who go out-
1 John 2:19 They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.
He was talking about antichrists.

roaringlamb wrote:
Brother does it not bother you that you are putting forth an idea that has multiple times been labeled heresy by the Church?

Does it not bother you that your god is a devilish tyrant?

roaringlamb wrote:
]Not only did the Protestants find this unscriptural, but so did the Roman Catholics at first. Sadly though they as well as the Church at large today have been taken into the Pelagian captivity and see no harm in it.
I am not fully Pelagian!
I am only Putting fourth common sence as also Lazarus1719.
I'm glad it is not only me who has a level head in this forum.
You are the one putting the guilt of the sin of man onto God, while I am keeping it on man.
Just as the opening post in this thread is to do.

roaringlamb wrote:
If man has no fallen state in Adam, he needs no salvation in Christ because he can ultimately save himself by his obedience to the Law.
I am not denying the fallen state of man, I am only defining it as ones own fault for his own fall, not some distant relitives fault.
Furthermore, I am not claimming that man can save himself by the law.
I am attempting to say that man can only choose to do good if his will is in Christ.

Man has free will; however, while one may will to do good, he is unable to do the good that he wants to do. [b]Rom 7:19[/b] [color=990000]I don't do the good that I actually want to do, but I do the evil that don't want to do.[/color]

For anyone without faith may will to do good or evil, for the natural man can not until he chooses to first have faith in Christ for the ability. Only until man chooses to put his faith in Christ he will stay a slave of sin.
The will is crippled in doing any good until the will is in Christ. After our will is to be in Christ (which is to have faith) we, then, will have a changed life, a new view on life, and a new motive for everything that you do. In these new aspects of your life will become actions or works(fruit) that give a testimony of Christ in you.

Yes, man can have a will to do both good and evil from birth regardless, however as I have shown, forgive me for repeating myself, the will is crippled in doing any good because of the flesh. Only untill the will is in Christ is there any ability to do good, and the only good is in faith and walking after the spirit.

The bottom line is, man wills to do good but is incapable untill he chooses to submit to God.

roaringlamb wrote:
If indeed his sin is only his own, and he is born without sin, then he could perceivably live without sin and be another sinless one could he not?
No!
How would one not sin if one has not faith in Chrisat?
If indeed his sin is only his own, and he is born without sin, He must know Christ to have Eternal Life(John 17:3). He must know Christ in order not to sin and walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit(Rom 8:1b).
Those who are born are born of the flesh and the flesh needs to be delt with.
[b]Rom 8:3-4[/b] [color=990000]For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:
[b]:4[/b] That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.[/color]

L
Logic Sep 13, 2007

philologos wrote:
So are you saying that Adam is the cause of all sin or that God is the cause of all sin?
You are never going to get this right until you give due weight to Romans 5 and one man's transgression impacting the whole race.

I for got who, but some one here gave a good example of Romans 5:
Lets follow the analogy:
1.
by the offence
by the righteousness

2.
of one
of one

3.
judgment came
the free gift came

4.
upon all men
upon all men

5.
to condemnation
unto justification of life

Therefore, in whatever way that judgment cam upon all men, so also justification came upon all men.

If Justification is not forced upon all men, then is condemnation not forced upon all men.

However, both have come upon all men: condemnation through Adam, and justification through Jesus.

It is the individuals choices that determine whether they are condemned or justified.

If you live in sin, which all men will choose to do starting with Adam, you will be condemned.
If you live in God, which some men will choose to do by Jesus,you will be justified.

philologos wrote:
You never seem to take up any of my invitations to identify what you mean by sin. Are you talking about the root or the fruit? Are you talking about something that rules like a tyrant or something that I myself choose to do
Sin is a fruit and the root of the fruit is what ever one is grafted in.

[b]John 15:4b[/b] [color=990000]...As the branch cannot bear fruit by itself, unless it abides in the vine, neither can you, unless you abide in me.[/color]
[b]Romans 11:16b[/b][color=990000]...if the root is holy, so are the branches.[/color]
[b]Romans 11:24[/b] [color=990000]For if you were cut from what is by nature a wild olive tree, and grafted, contrary to nature, into a cultivated olive tree...[/color]

While we were not yet grafted into the cultivated olive tree, we were of our own tree with the root of ourself or in this world. If our root is of ourself or the world, we are selfish &/or worldly.

People do not have a "sin nature" just as an apple tree does not have an apple nature.
All sin is fruit from what man is rooted in, which is of eather three things. Rooted in Christ, the world or self.

Since Christ is the Root/Vine & man a tree/vinebranch.
If man is not grafted into Christ, he is selfish &/or wotldly, because he has his own self as his root. Or he may also be worldly, for that is all he has(John 15:9, 1John 2:15)
This is the cause of all mans wickedness, that man is of the world and selfish and not of Christ and loving.

Therefore, the fruit does not make its nature, nor does the nature deside what its fruit is.

What makes it's fruit is what kind of tree and what it's root is of.
[b]James 1:24[/b] [color=990000]for he studied himself, and has gone away, and immediately he forgot of what [b]kind[/b] he was.[/color]

What ever fruit it bears, the tree still has a tree nature. not an apple nature, oriange nature, banana nature.
The kind of fruit obviously does not change what it is or what nature it has.
However, what ever it is grafted into does change it's fruit, just as my analogy shows, which is of Scripture as I have shown.

What ever fruit man bears, sin or righteousness, it is still human nature.

Just a s a trees nature is to bear fruit, so is mans.

philologos wrote:
Are you talking about something that rules like a tyrant or something that [u]I myself choose to do[/u]?
The second part.
The flesh is what "rules like a tyrant", not sin.

This discussion is locked.

Archived
1 of 35 posts