BSBKJVWEBYLTASVBBEWMBT4TDBY|HymnsMusicDonate
Menu
Devotional

You may smite another—and never touch him! -watson

sermonindex Sep 14, 2007


[b]You may smite another—and never touch him![/b]

(Thomas Watson, "The Ten Commandments")

The tongue which at first was made to be an organ
of God's praise—has now become an instrument of
unrighteousness. God has set two natural fences to
keep in the tongue—the teeth and lips.

"Not slanderers." 1 Timothy 3:11

In the Greek it is, "not devils." The same word signifies
both a slanderer and a devil. Some think it is no great
matter, to misrepresent and slander others; but it is to
act the part of a devil. This is a great sin; and I wish
I could say it is not common.

The heathen, by the light of nature, abhorred the sin
of slandering. Diogenes used to say, "Of all wild beasts,
a slanderer is the worst." Antonius made a law, that if
a person could not prove the crime he reported another
to be guilty of, he should be put to death.

The Scripture calls slandering, smiting with the tongue.
"Come, and let us smite him with the tongue." Jer 18:18
You may smite another—and never touch him!

The scorpion carries his poison in his tail;
the slanderer carries his poison in his tongue!

Job calls slander "the scourge of the tongue." As a
rod scourges the back, so the slanderer's tongue
scourges the name.

Eminence is commonly blasted by slander.

Holiness itself is no shield from slander. The lamb's
innocence will not preserve it from the wolf. Christ,
the most innocent upon earth, was reported to be
"a glutton and a drunkard." Matthew 11:19

"The tongue inflicts greater wounds than the sword."

No physician can heal the wounds of the tongue!

To pretend friendship to a man, and slander him,
is most odious.

We must not only not raise a false report—but refuse
to hear it. He who raises a slander—carries the devil
in his tongue! He who receives a slander—carries the
devil in his ear!

You may kill a man in his name as well as in his person.
Some are reluctant to take away their neighbor's goods;
but better take their wares out of their shop—than take
away their good name! This is a sin for which no reparation
can be made; a blot in a man's name, being like a blot on
white paper, which can never be gotten out.

Surely God will punish this sin. If idle words shall be
accounted for, shall not unjust slanders? Oh therefore,
take heed of this sin!

G
ginnyrose Sep 15, 2007

hmm, thought provoking piece. Indeed it is like a two-edged sword: cuts whichever way you swing it.

You wrote:

To pretend friendship to a man, and slander him, is most odious.

And now I have a question: how does one deal with this type of situation? The next paragraph gives a sober answer:

He who receives a slander—carries the devil in his ear!
Still the question remains...

Somehow the scriptue that tells us to refrain from socializing with people who are professing Christians but are guilty of unrepentant sin seems to resonate here.(1Cor. 5:11: But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such a one no not to eat.)

I think I will have to save this to my files for future meditation....

ginnyrose

sermonindex Sep 16, 2007


You may kill a man in his name as well as in his person.
Some are reluctant to take away their neighbor's goods;
but better take their wares out of their shop—than take
away their good name! This is a sin for which no reparation
can be made; a blot in a man's name, being like a blot on
white paper, which can never be gotten out.

This, is religious persecution of such a deep nature that only those who have experienced it can fully understand it. To have a friend turn on you and betray you with their tongue, to have false accusations thrown at you..

I echo Ginnyrose's words: 'What can be done, what should be done in response?' For the one who is the subject of this it seems best they that be still and let God be their defense. But what is the responders of those that look of and understand what is happening? What is their responsibility? Ought they also take the position of being still, or should they stand up and protect the reputation of the innocent person being slandered?

What ought to be done?

This discussion is locked.

Archived
1 of 3 posts