In [url=https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=19546&forum=35]another thread
Justification is a one time legal declaration at the point of faith which is given by the Father. The result of this declaration can never be annulled as even Christ said, "And this is the Father's will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day." John 6:39
While I agree that Justification includes the legal declaration at the point of faith in Christ, I am beginning to wonder if that's the end of it. This is something I'm currently wrestling with. We all agree that it is faith alone that saves us, but the requirement of the presence of works is still something of a controversy that is not denied by the strongest argument for "faith alone" (The doctrine of "faith alone" is not something I'm seeking to deny, but wanting to properly understand.)
I take the liberty of assuming that all of us agree that something is required of us in that God expects a fruit of righteousness in those who believe. We all wonder about the profession of faith of the one whose life professes something different. And countless times the Word declares that all will stand before Christ and give an account of their deeds (works) done in the body.
If what was quoted is true then would not the Jew also be justified who, having no works, merely possessed the Law? Would one who was a hearer and not a doer of the Law be justified? And what would we say of God who is justifying the one who possesses the Law merely on the requirement of possession and yet condemning a Gentile whose life is much more exemplary yet only doesn't possess the Law? Wouldn't God be guilty of showing partiality?(Rom.2) And what of the fruitless Christian who looks more like the world than the world yet makes the claim of possessing Christ?
To make clear, I am in no way insinuating that roaringlamb is espousing some form of antinomianism. These are just some questions I've been asking myself as I've been studying Romans.
Right now the way I see justification is that rl is correct in that justification is by grace through faith alone on the work of Christ alone. But I guess the best way to put it is that I differ in the definition of this one time declaration upon faith in Christ in that it has a life long effect on the one believing. To explain, my justification is much more than what happened 17 yrs ago when I surrendered to Christ, but everything else in the life I've lived since then has been the fruit of that surrender, and that is apart of Justification.
I am open to correction and clarification on this and I am curious as to everyone's thoughts on this matter. Thanks.
Blessings,
Jeremy Hulsey
