BSBKJVWEBYLTASVBBEWMBT4TDBY|HymnsMusicDonate
Menu
General

Why did God repent?

sermonindex Sep 20, 2007

Why did God repent?

I do not understand why God would repent for making Saul king. Please help.

1 Sam.15:11; "It repenteth me that I have set up Saul to be king: for he is turned back from following me, and hath not performed my commandments .And it grieved Samuel; and he cried unto the LORD all night."

1 Sam.15:35; "And Samuel came no more to see Saul until the day of his death: nevertheless Samuel mourned for Saul: and the LORD repented that he had made Saul king over Israel."

P
philologos Sep 21, 2007

It repenteth me that I have set up Saul to be king: for he is turned back from following me, and hath not performed my commandments

Isn't this the answer to your question?

N
Nile Sep 21, 2007

God repented because He was sorry He had set Saul as king. He was sorry because Saul turned his back on Him.
Now ask yourself: if God knew He would be sorry, why did He set us Saul as king to begin with?

sermonindex Sep 21, 2007

This is why I do not understand.

It appears that God was upset and mad about what Saul did.

So did not God know in advance what Saul was going to do?

HELP!

sermonindex Sep 21, 2007

freecd said

It appears that God was upset and mad about what Saul did.

So did not God know in advance what Saul was going to do?

freecd, God knew exactly what was going to happen:

"Then all the elders of Israel gathered themselves together, and came to Samuel unto Ramah, And said unto him, Behold, thou art old, and thy sons walk not in thy ways: now make us a king to judge us like all the nations. But the thing displeased Samuel, when they said, Give us a king to judge us. And Samuel prayed unto the LORD.

"And the LORD said unto Samuel, Hearken unto the voice of the people in all that they say unto thee: for they have not rejected thee, but [i]they have rejected me, that I should not reign over them...[/i]

"Now therefore hearken unto their voice: howbeit yet protest solemnly unto them, and shew them the manner of the king that shall reign over them...

-long description of Saul's atrocities-

[b]"And ye shall cry out in that day because of your king which ye shall have chosen you; and the LORD will not hear you in that day.[/b]

"Nevertheless the people refused to obey the voice of Samuel; and they said, Nay; but we will have a king over us...

"And the LORD said to Samuel, Hearken unto their voice, and make them a king. And Samuel said unto the men of Israel, Go ye every man unto his city."

As to the scripture you're worried about...

"It repenteth me that I have set up Saul to be king: for he is turned back from following me, and hath not performed my commandments .And it grieved Samuel; and he cried unto the LORD all night." (1 Sam.15:11)

"And Samuel came no more to see Saul until the day of his death: nevertheless Samuel mourned for Saul: and the LORD repented that he had made Saul king over Israel." (1 Sam.15:35)

...please consider the fact that "repent" means, among other things, "regret".

1. The elders desire a human ruler (Saul) over a Divine Ruler (God).

2. The Lord, via Samuel, warns them of the evils of kings (read the whole chapter cited above) but allows them the freedom to choose their own destiny.

3. They choose to have a king.

4. God disagrees, but respects their decision.

5. Being God, He knows who's the best man for the job: Saul. He also knows that even though Saul is the best Israelite around and thus, the only candidate for kingship, he's still a sinner and, being a sinner, will abuse his kingly authority.

6. Power twists Saul into a tyrant, as the Lord knew it would.

The Lord regrets the fact that the Jews favor, and request, a man's authority over God's. He regrets it, but He gives them a king because they want one. He regrets setting Saul up as king.

But He did it anyway because His people asked Him for it.

When God says He regrets setting God up as king, He's not saying, "Whoops! That didn't work out like I had hoped!"

He's saying, "I don't like to do this. I regret having to do this. But if you really want an earthly king instead of Me, I'll give you one. Keep in mind he's a sinner just like all of you. And he'll be corrupted by power. You're praying for the wrong thing, and I hate answering these types of prayers, but it's the only way you're going to learn... I regret that I have to do this..."

Does this make sense?

P
philologos Sep 21, 2007

God repented because He was sorry He had set Saul as king. He was sorry because Saul turned his back on Him.
Now ask yourself: if God knew He would be sorry, why did He set us Saul as king to begin with?

Ah, is that what this question is really about? Is it yet another piece of Open Theism propaganda or is it a genuine question?

Even on a very human level of foreknowledge this would still make sense. I may know, with a fairly high degree of certainty, that someone is going to make a decision which will bring sorrow, but that doesn't mean I foreordained it or that I didn't know about it.

The grace of God is such that he is prodigal and pours his love into many a situation that he knows will not profit by it. Judas had his feet washed and was given the choicest morsel from the table. In human terms this was a complete waste of effort. God's grace is such that even empowers a younger son to rebel and bring about an inevitable series of events... but he still gave the younger son his inheritance.

He knew of the fall before creation but that didn't stop him pouring his creative love into a world that would ultimately reject him... and it didn't surprise him either.

If you really want to pursue the theme of Open Theism you ought to answer some of the points in my posts on the matter [url=https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=19409&forum=36&52]here.[/url]

R
roadsign Sep 21, 2007

So did not God know in advance what Saul was going to do?

Is it not part of God's master plan to let humankind face the consequences of their deepest longings. We cannot deny that Israel deeply wanted a king, like the other nations, but they just refused to "get it" - that it was a bad idea - until they experienced the consequences.

I prefer the word "regret" which is used in the NASB and other translations - even "grief". Cannot our almighty sovereign God himself feel grief over his own choices - because of man's chronic bent to sin, not because he "goofed". (Which I cannot accept).

Diane

P
PaulWest Sep 21, 2007

We cannot deny that Israel deeply wanted a king, like the other nations, but they just refused to "get it"

True, and God even addressed this as far back as Deuteronomy, some 400 years before Samuel:

"When thou art come into the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, and shalt possess it, and shalt dwell therein, and shalt say, 'I will set a king over me, like all the nations that are about me...'" (Deuteronomy 17:14)

We know already there's going to be trouble -- [i]"like all the nations around us[/i]." It was God's design for Israel to be holy, and not to be as the other nations around them, yet God also knew the inclination of man's wicked heart.

Cannot our almighty God himself feel grief over his own choices - because of man's chronic bent to sin

I agree with Diane. The 'repenting' of God over the demise of Saul is the same 'repenting' He expressed before He brought the great flood in Genesis. Some theologicans have described this as a deep grieving, like a mother weeping over her dear child who committed suicide. God's grief is not because of any mistake on God's part, but because of the mistakes of the children he so loves.

I remember once watching a video of Jeffrey Dahmer (a canabalistic serial killer); and he was being interviewed in prison with his father at his side. On the father's face you could see the intense grief, the mental torture, the agony of perhaps trying to figue out [i]how[/i] his son could do what he did. But in the midst of it all, you still saw love. I began to see something of God in all that. Here we have a pained father, who acknowledges the guilt of his own son and accepts that life in prison or death is just treatment for his crimes, and his grief is twofold:

1. For the fact that he gave life to such a person that has caused such incalculable damage and loss to others, and;

2. That it was done by his son [i]whom he still loves[/i].

Are these two reconcilable? Anyone in these forums who has ever touched the heart of God knows what grief is. God is a grieving Father, even right now. I don't think we have the full capabilities to understand this magnitude of grief, this abysmal regret as over 100,000 souls fall daily to hell. About four years ago, I was able to experience a fraction of this hurt and I'll never, ever forget it. The insufferable sense of the loss alone is enough to wreck your felicity on earth forever. But the most staggering thing is that the greatest sense of loss is felt by God Himself, and not by the chained souls who have refused Christ or shunned His precepts and mocked His judgments.

N
Nile Sep 21, 2007

I prefer the word "regret" which is used in the NASB and other translations - even "grief". Cannot our almighty sovereign God himself feel grief over his own choices - because of man's chronic bent to sin, not because he "goofed". (Which I cannot accept).

God didn't "goof", He was willing to take a chance for love.

P
philologos Sep 21, 2007

The Hebrew word [url=http://cf.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=H05162&Version=KJV]nacham[/url] which is translated as repent is onomatopoeic and has the sound of a groan in it.

This is the predominant sense of the OT word 'repent'.

Are you suggesting that God was 'wrong' and having 'made a mistake' had to correct it? What kind of a god is this?

N
Nile Sep 21, 2007


philologos wrote:
Are you suggesting that God was 'wrong' and having 'made a mistake' had to correct it? What kind of a god is this?

No one is suggesting that.

This discussion is locked.

Archived
1 of 11 posts