BSBKJVWEBYLTASVBBEWMBT4TDBY|HymnsMusicDonate
Menu
Theology

One True and Living God

sermonindex Oct 24, 2007


Everett said, in the Who is JESUS? thread

I know God is one no matter what, even when in heaven the lamb comes to take the scroll out of the hand of the Father. That completely boggles my mind but Jesus did say that he was in the Father and the Father was in him. The body of Jesus is obsolete as to that fact that it can't be added to make 2 persons just because the the lamb has two set of hands in heaven and the Father has two set of hands in heaven. The Holy Spirit is obsolete as to the fact that it can't add up to make three persons because the Holy Spirit is the spirit of God the Father which is of his own being.

I think we have the same concept of who God is but the way we describe it is where we don't agree.

Bro, I do believe you need to think with your spirit to tune into the unity in the Godhead.

The best way I ever saw it explained by a lay Christian is this, that rather than trying to fit the Godhead into 1 + 1 + 1 (which leads to the incorrect answer of 3), it makes more sense to think of Him as 1 x 1 x 1 = 1.

What do you think of that?

E
Everett Oct 24, 2007

Wow! I never heard anyone put it that way.

To go even deeper just as 1 times 1 is incapable of producing 2 or 3 (or a number higher or greater than 1) so is God. Even though God may be in the original Hebrew as plural and he has 3 distinct offices which he has manifested himself in he will always remain 1 for it is impossible for 1 to be multiplied by itself to produce a greater number like 2 or 3. Even though there is the Father, the Son and The Holy Spirit, they all are 1 as to the same number (Ex: one number 1 vs 3 ones) and if you multiply the 1 by its own number 2 times you can't get a higher number.

Heres another illustration: We will liken God to a pencil ( I know it is horrible but just for the sake of this illustration). If the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit were 3 separate pencils then they would be 3 separate pencils (three separate Gods). Since the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit are one they are of that same one pencil. They are the same pencil (Christ is of God and is God)( the Holy Spirit is the spirit of God and is God) You can divide the pencil into three half's but they are still the one pencil just divided into three parts for different uses. The top of the head of the one pencil would have an eraser but not a sharpened tip at the bottom. The top and bottom of the middle of the one pencil would have no eraser neither a sharpened tip. The tail of the one pencil would have a sharpened tip at the bottom but no eraser at the top. The head of the one pencil would need to ally with the tail of the one pencil because the tail would need a eraser and the head would need some sharpened lead. The middle of the one pencil could be sharpened on both ends thus creating a double edged sword-like pencil of the one pencil making it comparable to the Word of God himself who is quick and powerful sharper than any double edged sword. Of course this is just a theory, hopefully you can get my concept on how God the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit are of the same substance (pencil) and if need be extracted for our sake because of the immensity of God's substance in order so that we can see the different roles and offices God fulfills (that we might know him better in this) by himself throughout the ages and how he works salvation with his own arm by using methods that are beyond us for his ways are higher than our ways and his thoughts higher than our thoughts.

Am i getting this? Did I properly apply this illustration?

M
mizpeh Oct 24, 2007

My favorite Trinitarian analogy of God was written by Tertullian when he described the Father as the sun, the Son as the ray, and the Spirit as the apex in Against Praxeas.

But still the tree is not severed from the root, nor the river from the fountain, nor the ray from the sun; nor, indeed, is the Word separated from God. Following, therefore, the form of these analogies, I confess that I call God and His Word -- the Father and His Son -- two. For the root and the tree are distinctly two things, but correlatively joined; the fountain and the river are also two forms, but indivisible; so likewise the sun and the ray are two forms, but coherent ones. Everything which proceeds from something else must needs be second to that from which it proceeds, without being on that account separated: Where, however, there is a second, there must be two; and where there is a third, there must be three. Now the Spirit indeed is third from God and the Son; just as the fruit of the tree is third from the root, or as the stream out of the river is third from the fountain, or as the apex of the ray is third from the sun. Nothing, however, is alien from that original source whence it derives its own properties. In like manner the Trinity, flowing down from the Father through intertwined and connected steps, does not at all disturb the Monarchy, whilst it at the same time guards the state of the Economy.

sermonindex Oct 24, 2007

Our - The Church's - greatest problem is when we begin to read the writings of others.

Oh, of course there are times when it can aid us in finding a clearer representation of a truth, that helps our minds to come to some point of understanding of a Biblical reality or Truth, but I believe two problems have come that have turned people from seeing the Tri-Unity or Co-Equality of The Three in One.

It can be shown through Scripture only - there's no question about that and my personal belief is that is the very best method, because it is His Living Word.

Why people are frightened away from the Triune belief is straying from Scripture only and having fear placed in them from some history or just the writings of others, past or present.

The second reason many have problems with seeing the Triune belief is because in their spirit, they have seen those who do believe it, take away from the absolute Co-Equality of Father, The Word and The Spirit, by over-emphasizing one against the other.
That has bothered me also and why I left the Pentecostal Churches, though I still believe in the Baptism and the gifts.

The cesstationists, have feared the Spirit - the Pentecostals have over-emphasised the Spirit and as such, taking much of The Glory and emphasis that Jesus Himself should receive, which is the most grievious thing in the Church.

So, many have over compensated and given it all to Jesus and saw the co-equality as making Jesus a "lesser god" than The Father. Like a todum pole in authority levels.

I suppose I have more sympathy for Oneness people because I've seen both of these in most groups I've been in.

But what is most important here, is to keep His Word the highest final authority in all things.

The Triune Nature of God is in There and can be seen or proved by it alone. Most other arguments can be taken down by another argument or analogy, what have you.
But His Word and it's grammar stands - and only choice alone on the individual's part will cause them to not choose to see or not see The Truth contained within it.
We are dealing with choice, yet because of the over and under emphasis of Jesus in the church, I do have a bit more sympathy for those who call themselves anti-trinitarian. They do have strong arguments that have truth in it - of just how equal The Logos/Jesus is to the Father and yes, Jesus is called the Father also, so that is where the confusion can come in.
But until He returns, we do have in The Word, the order in which God and Christ has drawn out the order of things, such as how we are to pray.

And to the penetcostals, how we are not to over-emphasis The Spirit.

And to the cesstationists and legalists, how we are not to under-value the need for The Spirit.

So, back to The Scriptures.

The Word of GOD is complete and is the only Divinely Inspired writing that we have. Thank GOD, His Mercy has protected it for us, through the ages.

E
Everett Oct 24, 2007

Yes, let us get back to the word. For it is our only guide that is incapable of leading us astray. Let us study it, taste it, eat of it and swallow it whole like a scroll. Let us get full of the word, rightly dividing the word of truth.

"Oh God give us more understanding of thy word. We don't need any more stored up dusty head knowledge but bright illuminated quickening understanding of thy word so that when we express and explain the wonders and truths of God with other people the spirit in them would confirm to their spirit that what is being said is the genuine unadulterated word of truth. Amen"

E
Everett Oct 26, 2007

I came across this passage in the book of Job the other day and it really caught my attention. What is he trying to say? It seems so profound but I can't grasp it.

Job 28: 7-28

"There is a path which no fowl knoweth, and which the vulture's eye hath not seen:

8The lion's whelps have not trodden it, nor the fierce lion passed by it.

9He putteth forth his hand upon the rock; he overturneth the mountains by the roots.

10He cutteth out rivers among the rocks; and his eye seeth every precious thing.

11He bindeth the floods from overflowing; and the thing that is hid bringeth he forth to light.

12But where shall wisdom be found? and where is the place of understanding?

13Man knoweth not the price thereof; neither is it found in the land of the living.

14The depth saith, It is not in me: and the sea saith, It is not with me.

15It cannot be gotten for gold, neither shall silver be weighed for the price thereof.

16It cannot be valued with the gold of Ophir, with the precious onyx, or the sapphire.

17The gold and the crystal cannot equal it: and the exchange of it shall not be for jewels of fine gold.

18No mention shall be made of coral, or of pearls: for the price of wisdom is above rubies.

19The topaz of Ethiopia shall not equal it, neither shall it be valued with pure gold.

20Whence then cometh wisdom? and where is the place of understanding?

21Seeing it is hid from the eyes of all living, and kept close from the fowls of the air.

22Destruction and death say, We have heard the fame thereof with our ears.

23God understandeth the way thereof, and he knoweth the place thereof.

24For he looketh to the ends of the earth, and seeth under the whole heaven;

25To make the weight for the winds; and he weigheth the waters by measure.

26When he made a decree for the rain, and a way for the lightning of the thunder:

27Then did he see it, and declare it; he prepared it, yea, and searched it out.

28And unto man he said, Behold, the fear of the LORD, that is wisdom; and to depart from evil is understanding."

One thing I also noticed in the book of Job is that at the end God never rebuked the mysterious character named Elihu. I'm guessing Elihu was correct in his opinion or else God would have rebuked him too as well as Job's three friends. In fact the arguments Elihu uses at the end sound strikingly similar to everything God says to dumbfound Job. Check it out:

Elihu said in Job 37:14-24:

"Hearken unto this, O Job: stand still, and consider the wondrous works of God.

15Dost thou know when God disposed them, and caused the light of his cloud to shine?

16Dost thou know the balancings of the clouds, the wondrous works of him which is perfect in knowledge?

17How thy garments are warm, when he quieteth the earth by the south wind?

18Hast thou with him spread out the sky, which is strong, and as a molten looking glass?

19Teach us what we shall say unto him; for we cannot order our speech by reason of darkness.

20Shall it be told him that I speak? if a man speak, surely he shall be swallowed up.

21And now men see not the bright light which is in the clouds: but the wind passeth, and cleanseth them.

22Fair weather cometh out of the north: with God is terrible majesty.

23Touching the Almighty, we cannot find him out: he is excellent in power, and in judgment, and in plenty of justice: he will not afflict.

24Men do therefore fear him: he respecteth not any that are wise of heart."

Then immediately after the words of Elihu above God answers Job out of the whirlwind using similar words:

Job 38:3-16

"Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge?

3Gird up now thy loins like a man; for I will demand of thee, and answer thou me.

4Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding.

5Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched the line upon it?

6Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof;

7When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?

8Or who shut up the sea with doors, when it brake forth, as if it had issued out of the womb?

9When I made the cloud the garment thereof, and thick darkness a swaddlingband for it,

10And brake up for it my decreed place, and set bars and doors,

11And said, Hitherto shalt thou come, but no further: and here shall thy proud waves be stayed?

12Hast thou commanded the morning since thy days; and caused the dayspring to know his place;

13That it might take hold of the ends of the earth, that the wicked might be shaken out of it?

14It is turned as clay to the seal; and they stand as a garment.

15And from the wicked their light is withholden, and the high arm shall be broken.

16Hast thou entered into the springs of the sea? or hast thou walked in the search of the depth?"

Elihu seems like some mysteries character. He is not mentioned with Jobs three friends in the beginning of chapter 2. He is not mentioned at the end. Only when Job's three friends have nothing else to say and yet condemned Job then is the WRATH OF ELIHU KINDLED. He was angry they had found no answer and yet condemned Job and that Job in his own eyes considered himself righteous.

After Elihu was done speaking then suddenly God came and answered Job out of the whirlwind but where did Elihu go? At the end God says to Job's three friends the same thing it says Elihu was saying.

God:
"And it was so, that after the LORD had spoken these words unto Job, the LORD said to Eliphaz the Temanite, My wrath is kindled against thee, and against thy two friends: for ye have not spoken of me the thing that is right, as my servant Job hath."

Elihu:
"Then was kindled the wrath of Elihu the son of Barachel the Buzite, of the kindred of Ram: against Job was his wrath kindled, because he justified himself rather than God.

3Also against his three friends was his wrath kindled, because they had found no answer, and yet had condemned Job.

4Now Elihu had waited till Job had spoken, because they were elder than he.

5When Elihu saw that there was no answer in the mouth of these three men, then his wrath was kindled."

It seems like after God took care of Job so that he repented of his self righteousness, Job had to pray for his friends so that they will be restored for their accusations against Job but where did Elihu go? Mysterious, huh? He is no where to be found. Elihu said that he was speaking on God's behalf. He spoke of a whirlwind coming from the south and fair weather from the north. He spoke of how Job spoke words without knowledge just as God said to Job out of the whirlwind. I don't know but there is a mystery between Elihu and the LORD answering Job out of the whirlwind. I got to do more studying but if God gives you insight on this. Please share with my. God Bless

sermonindex Oct 26, 2007


dorcas wrote:

Bro, I do believe you need to think with your spirit to tune into the unity in the Godhead.

The best way I ever saw it explained by a lay Christian is this, that rather than trying to fit the Godhead into 1 + 1 + 1 (which leads to the incorrect answer of 3), it makes more sense to think of Him as 1 x 1 x 1 = 1.

Hi Linn

1 x 1 x 1 = 1, That's really neat, as our American brethren would say!

I wonder if God's nature is best illustrated in mathematical terms by multiplication rather than addition. For example, Isaiah Isa 9:7 [i][color=000066]"Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end..."[/color][/i] to me describes an exponential increase, not a linear one - the [i]rate[/i] of increase keeps increasing!

Is the universe really expanding, faster and faster, as many astronomers believe? In the light of these thoughts it would make sense theologically!

Blessings

Jeannette

sermonindex Oct 26, 2007


Everett wrote:
Yes, let us get back to the word. For it is our only guide that is incapable of leading us astray. Let us study it, taste it, eat of it and swallow it whole like a scroll. Let us get full of the word, rightly dividing the word of truth.

"Oh God give us more understanding of thy word. We don't need any more stored up dusty head knowledge but bright illuminated quickening understanding of thy word so that when we express and explain the wonders and truths of God with other people the spirit in them would confirm to their spirit that what is being said is the genuine unadulterated word of truth. Amen"

AMEN!!!

Thank you Everett

See the pm I sent you...

Jeannette

sermonindex Oct 26, 2007


JOb 387 When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?
I thought this was interesting... 'all the sons of God'. I've not noticed it before.

sermonindex Oct 26, 2007

Hi Jeannette,

I wonder if God's nature is best illustrated in mathematical terms by multiplication rather than addition.
I hate to say this, but multiplication is a short form of addition. It is the number 1 which behaves differently (as does water, in fact, biologically and chemically) than other numbers given the same treatment. I suppose God is saying He is base 1. 1 x 1 x 1 is 'one to the power of three' (I can't get a cubed sign from this formatting, I don't think...)

Is the universe really expanding, faster and faster, as many astronomers believe?
Indeed it is. I had a fabulous conversation with my son recently, who has a strong interest in theoretical physics. He was explaining the 'omega theory' to me, which draws in words such as 'finite', 'infinite', 'reality' and 'intelligence', as well as expansion and contraction.

I've been planning to start a thread inviting any theoretical physicists watching SI who'd be prepared to explain how they see this theory - not so much in biblical terms necessarily - but as connecting with the truth of the existence of Jesus Christ, God Incarnate.

The way it was explained to me, there would necessarily be what could be called [i]an [u]alpha[/u] point[/i], (although that had not been so named within the theory), which would have to be of the same constitution as the omega point. There, in human terms, the Man Jesus in all His human flawlessness seemed to present Himself as the only possible key (alpha and omega) and to being able to dispel all dissonance within the [u]entire[/u] Universe. Amen. :-)

I liked that my son has no problem with the existence and perfection of the historical Jesus, and therefore, no difficulty with seeing how if He was God, this theory could still hold true. The problem it would leave for his atheism was ... nowhere possible to hide from the truth God [i]did[/i] indeed create [i]everything[/i].

E
Everett Oct 27, 2007

Article on the nature of the One True and Living God.

THE NATURE OF GOD

" "God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth" (John 4:24).

To continue our study of the oneness of God, it is essential that we learn more about the nature of God. Of course, our small human minds cannot discover or comprehend all there is to know about God, but the Bible does describe many important characteristics and attributes that God possesses. In this chapter we will discuss some of the attributes of God that make Him God - those forming an essential part of His nature. We will also study some of the ways in which God has revealed His nature to mankind, particularly through visible manifestations.

God Is a Spirit

Jesus proclaimed this truth in John 4:24. The Bible reveals it consistently, from Genesis 1:2 ("And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters") to Revelation 22:17 ("And the Spirit and the bride say, Come"). Hebrews 12:9 calls God the Father of spirits.

What is a spirit? Webster's Dictionary includes in its definition of the word the following: "A supernatural, incorporeal, rational being usu. invisible to human beings but having the power to become visible at will… a being having an incorporeal or immaterial nature." [2] The Hebrew word translated as spirit is ruwach, and it can mean wind, breath, life, anger, unsubstantiality, region of the sky, or spirit of a rational being. The Greek word translated as spirit, pneuma, can mean a current of air, breath, blast, breeze, spirit, soul, vital principle, disposition, angel, demon, or God. [3] All three definitions emphasize that a spirit does not have flesh and bones (Luke 24:39). Similarly, Jesus indicated that the Spirit of God does not have flesh and blood (Matthew 16:17). So, when the Bible says that God is a Spirit, it means that He cannot be seen or touched physically by human beings. As a Spirit, he is an intelligent, supernatural Being who does not have a physical body.

God Is Invisible

Since God is a Spirit, He is invisible unless He chooses to manifest Himself in some form visible to man. God told Moses, "Thou canst not see my face: for there shall no man see me, and live" (Exodus 33:20). "No man hath seen God at any time" (John 1:18; I John 4:12). Not only has no man ever seen God, but no man can see God (I Timothy 6:16). Several times the Bible describes God as invisible (Colossians 1:15; I Timothy 1:17, Hebrews 11:27). Although man can see God when He appears in various forms, no man can see directly the invisible Spirit of God.

God Is Omnipresent (Everywhere Present)

Because God is a Spirit He can be everywhere at the same time. He is the only Spirit that is truly omnipresent; for all other spirit beings such as devils, angels, and Satan himself can be confined to specific locations (Mark 5:10; Jude 6; Revelation 20:1-3).

Although God is omnipresent, we cannot equate Him with the nature, substance, or forces of the world (which would be pantheism), because He does have individuality, personality, and intelligence.

Solomon recognized God's omnipresence when he prayed at the dedication of the Temple, saying, "Behold, the heaven and heaven of heavens cannot contain thee" (I Kings 8:27; see II Chronicles 2:6; 6:18). God declared His omnipresence by saying, "The heaven is my throne, and the earth is my footstool" (Isaiah 66:1; see also Acts 7:49). Paul preached that the Lord is "not far from every one of us: For in him we live, and move, and have our being" (Acts 17:27-28). Perhaps the most beautiful description of God's omnipresence is found in Psalm 139:7-13: "Whither shall I go from thy spirit? or whither shall I flee from thy presence? If I ascend up into heaven, thou art there: if I make my bed in hell, behold, thou art there. If I take the wings of the morning, and dwell in the uttermost parts of the sea; Even there shall thy hand lead me, and thy right hand shall hold me. If I say, Surely the darkness shall cover me; even the night shall be light about me. Yea, the darkness hideth not from thee; but the night shineth as the day: the darkness and the light are both alike to thee. For thou hast possessed my reins: thou hast covered me in my mother's womb."

If God is omnipresent, why does the Bible describe Him as being in heaven? Here are several reasons. (1) This teaches that God is transcendent. In other words, He is beyond human understanding and He is not limited to this earth. (2) It refers to the center of God's reasoning and activity - His headquarters, so to speak. (3) It refers to God's immediate presence; that is, the fulness of God's glory and power, which no mortal man can see and live (Exodus 33:20). (4) Also, it may refer to the visible manifestation of God to the angels in heaven. It cannot mean God lacks omnipresence, is limited to one place, or is limited to a body.

Similarly, when the Bible says God came to earth or appeared to a man, it does not negate His omnipresence. It simply means the focus of His activity has shifted to earth at least as far as a certain individual or a certain situation is concerned. When God comes to earth, heaven is not empty. He is still just as much in heaven as ever. He can act simultaneously in heaven and on earth, or at several locations on earth. It is very important that we recognize the magnitude of God's omnipresence and not limit it by our human experience.

Does God Have a Body?

Since God is an invisible Spirit and is omnipresent, He certainly does not have a body as we know it. He did assume various forms and temporary manifestations throughout the Old Testament so that man could see Him. (See the section on theophanies later in this chapter.) However, the Bible does not record any permanent bodily manifestation of God until Jesus Christ was born. Of course, in Christ, God had a human body and now has a glorified, immortal human body.

Outside of temporary manifestations of God and outside of the New Testament revelation of God in Christ, we believe scriptural references to the eyes, hands, arms, feet, heart, and other bodily parts of God are examples of figurative language or anthropomorphisms (interpretations of the nonhuman in terms of the human so that man can understand).

In other words, the Bible describes infinite God in finite, human terms in order that we may better comprehend Him. For example, the heart of God denotes His intellect and His emotions, not a blood-pumping organ (Genesis 6:6; 8:21). When God said heaven was His throne and earth was His footstool, He described His omnipresence, not a pair of literal feet propped up on the globe (Isaiah 66:1). When God said His right hand spanned the heavens, He described His great power and not a large hand stretching through the atmosphere (Isaiah 48:13). "The eyes of the LORD are in every place" does not mean that God has physical eyes in every location but indicates His omnipresence and omniscience (Proverbs 15:3). When Jesus cast devils out by the finger of God, He did not pull down a giant finger from heaven, but He exercised the power of God (Luke 11:20). The blast of God's nostrils was not literal particles emitted by giant heavenly nostrils, but the strong east wind sent by God to part the Red Sea (Exodus 15:8; 14:21). In fact, literal interpretation of all the visions and physical descriptions of God would lead to the belief that God has wings (Psalm 91:4). In short, we believe God as a Spirit does not have a body unless He chooses to manifest Himself in a bodily form, which He did in the person of Jesus Christ. (See Chapter 4 - JESUS IS GOD.)

Some say that in the Old Testament God had a spirit body visible to other spirit beings such as angels. They raise this hypothesis because human spirits seem to have a recognizable form visible to other spirits (Luke 16:22-31) and because some passages indicate the angels and Satan could see a visible manifestation of God in the Old Testament (I Kings 22:19-22; Job 1:6). However, God did not need a spirit body to do this because He could have manifested Himself at various times to other spirits just as He did to man. One key verse of Scripture implies that ordinarily God is not visible even to spirit beings unless He chooses to manifest Himself in some way: "God was manifest in the flesh… seen of angels" (I Timothy 3:16). At the least, if God did have some type of spirit body He certainly was not confined to it like other spirit beings are confined to their bodies; for then He would not be truly omnipresent. For example, God's omnipresence means He could have appeared simultaneously to men on earth and to angels in heaven. Also, we must realize that in New Testament times God has chosen to reveal Himself fully through Jesus Christ (Colossians 2:9). There is no possibility of separating God and Jesus, and there is no God visible outside of Jesus.

God is Omniscient (All Knowing)

Psalm 139:1-6 teaches us that God knows everything, including our movements, thoughts, paths, ways, and words. Job confessed, "I know that thou canst do everything, and that no thought can be withholden from thee" (Job 42:2). God has complete knowledge of everything, including foreknowledge of the future (Acts 2:23). Like omnipresence, omniscience is an attribute that belongs solely to God. He is "the only wise God" (I Timothy 1:17). The Bible does not identify any other being (including Satan) who can read all the thoughts of man, foresee the future with certainty, or know everything there is to know.

God is Omnipotent (All Powerful)

God calls Himself the Almighty many times throughout the Bible (Genesis 17:1; 35:11, etc.). He has all the power there is, and no being can exercise any power unless God allows it (Romans 13:1). Again, only God is omnipotent, for only one being can have all power. First Timothy 6:15 describes God as "the blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings, and Lord of lords." The saints of God in heaven will proclaim "Alleluia: for the Lord God omnipotent reigneth" (Revelation 19:6). God beautifully describes His great omnipotence in Job, chapters 38 to 41.

The only limitations God has are those He willingly places on Himself or those resulting from His moral nature. Since He is holy and sinless, He abides by His own moral limitations. Therefore, it is impossible for God to lie or contradict His own Word (Titus 1:2; Hebrews 6:18).

God is Eternal

God is eternal, immortal, and everlasting (Deuteronomy 33:27; Isaiah 9:6; I Timothy 1:17). He is the first and the last (Isaiah 44:6). He had no beginning and will have no ending; other spiritual beings, including man, are immortal as far as the future is concerned but only God is eternal in the past and future.

God is Immutable (Unchanging)

God's character and attributes never change: "I am the LORD, I change not" (Malachi 3:6). It is true that God sometimes repents (changes His course of action in relation to man), but this is only because man changes his actions. God's nature remains the same; only His future course of action changes to respond to the changes of man. For example, the repentance of Nineveh caused God to change His plans to destroy that city (Jonah 3:10). Also, the Bible sometimes speaks of God repenting in the sense of grieving or sorrowing rather than in the sense of changing His mind (Genesis 6:6).

God Has Individuality, Personality, and Rationality

God is an intelligent being with a will (Romans 9:19) and reasoning ability (Isaiah 1:18). He has an intelligent mind (Romans 11:33-34). That God has emotions is indicated from the fact that man is an emotional being, for God created man in His own image (Genesis 1:27). The essential emotional nature of God is love, but He has many emotions such as delight, pity or compassion, hatred of sin and zeal for righteousness (Psalm 18:19; Psalm 103:13; Proverbs 6:16; Exodus 20:5). He is slow to anger, but He can be provoked to anger (Psalm 103:8; Deuteronomy 4:25). God can be grieved (Genesis 6:6) and blessed (Psalm 103:1). Of course, His emotions transcend our emotions, but we can only describe Him by using terms that describe human emotions. (For further proof that God is an individual being with personality and rationality, see the discussions in this chapter of God's omniscience and His moral attributes.)

God's Moral Attributes

"God is love" (I John 4:8, 16). Love is the essence of God; it is His very nature. God has many other qualities and attributes, many of which stem from His love.
Table 1: God's Moral Nature
1\tlove\tI John 4:8
2\tlight\tI John 1:5
3\tholiness\tI Peter 1:16
4\tmercy\tPsalm 103:8
5\tgentleness\tPsalm 18:35
6\trighteousness\tPsalm 129:4
7\tgoodness\tRomans 2:4
8\tperfection\tMatthew 5:48
9\tjustice\tIsaiah 45:21
10\tfaithfulness\tI Corinthians 10:13
11\ttruth\tJohn 17:17
12\tgrace\tPsalm 103:8

These moral attributes of God are nor contradictory, but work in harmony. For example, God's holiness required an immediate separation between God and man when man sinned. Then, God's righteousness and justice required death as the penalty for sin, but God's love and mercy sought pardon. God satisfied both justice and mercy by the death of Christ at Calvary and the resulting plan of salvation.

We enjoy the benefits of God's mercy when we accept the atoning work of Christ and apply it to our lives through faith. When we accept and obey by faith God's plan of salvation, God imputes the righteousness of Christ to us (Romans 3:21-5:21). Therefore, God can justly forgive us of sin (I John 1:9) and can restore us to communion with Him without violating His holiness.

The death of the innocent, sinless Christ and the imputation of Christ's righteousness to us satisfy God's justice and holiness. If, however, we reject Christ's atonement, then we are left to face God's judgment alone. In this case His holiness demands separation from sinful man and His justice demands death for sinful man. So justice and mercy are complementary, not contradictory, aspects of God's nature, as are holiness and love. If we accept God's love and mercy He will help us satisfy His justice and holiness. If we reject God's love and mercy we must face His justice and holiness alone (Romans 11:22).

Of course, the above list does not exhaust the qualities of God. God is transcendent and no human can comprehend Him fully. "For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts" (Isaiah 55:8-9). "O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out! For who hath known the mind of the Lord? or who hath been his counsellor?" (Romans 11:33-34).

Theophanies

One way that God revealed Himself in the Old Testament and dealt with man on man's level was through the use of theophanies. A theophany is a visible manifestation of God, and we usually think of it as temporary in nature. As we have seen, God is invisible to man. To make Himself visible, He manifested Himself in a physical form. Even though no one can see the Spirit of God, he can see a representation of God. Below are some ways in which God chose to manifest Himself in the Old Testament.

God appeared to Abraham in a vision, as a smoking furnace and burning lamp, and as a man (Genesis 15:1; 15:17; 18:1-33). In this last instance, God and two angels appeared in the form of three men (18:2) and ate food provided by Abraham. The two angels left to go to Sodom while God remained to talk to Abraham (Genesis 18:22; 19:1).

God appeared to Jacob in a dream and as a man (Genesis 28:12-16; 32:24-32). On the latter occasion Jacob wrestled with the man and proclaimed, "I have seen God face to face." The Bible also describes this appearance as "the angel" (Hosea 12:4).

God appeared to Moses in a cloud of glory and in fire on Mount Sinai, spoke to him face to face in the Tabernacle, and revealed to him His back (partial glory), but not His face (all His glory) (Exodus 24:12-18; 33:9-11; 33:18-23). These references to God's face and God's glory probably are metaphoric of the presence of God and could apply to many different types of manifestations.

God manifested Himself in the sight of all Israel through thunder, lightnings, a cloud, a voice of a trumpet, smoke, fire, and earthquakes (Exodus 19:11-19; Deuteronomy 5:4-5, 22-27). He also showed His glory and sent fire from His presence in the sight of all Israel (Leviticus 9:23-24; 10:1-2).

Job saw God in a whirlwind (Job 38:1; 42:5).

Various prophets saw visions of God (Isaiah 6; Ezekiel 1:26-28; 8:1-4; Daniel 7:2, 9; Amos 9:1). To Ezekiel He appeared in the form of a man, enveloped in fire. To Daniel He appeared in a night vision as the Ancient of Days. Many other verses of Scripture tell us that God appeared to someone but do not describe in what manner He did so. For example, God appeared to Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Samuel (Genesis 12:7; 17:1; 26:2, 24; 35:9-15; I Samuel 3:21). Similarly, God descended on Mount Sinai and stood with Moses, revealed Himself to seventy-four leaders of Israel, came down in a pillar of cloud and stood in front of Moses, Aaron, and Miriam, came at night to Balaam, and met Balaam on two other occasions (Exodus 34:5; 24:9-11; Numbers 12:4-9; 23:3-10, 16-24).

In addition to the appearances mentioned above, the Bible records other manifestations that many believe were God Himself. In Joshua 5:13-15, a man with a sword appeared to Joshua and identified himself as the "captain of the host of the LORD." This title and the fact that he did not rebuke Joshua for worshiping him (unlike Revelation 19:9-10; 22:8-10) suggest that this was really a manifestation of God. On the other hand, the wording of this passage leaves open the possibility that Joshua did not worship the captain, but worshiped God for the captain's appearance.

The Angel of the LORD

Some of the numerous appearance of "the angel of the LORD" seem to be theophanies. The angel of the LORD appeared to Hagar, spoke as thought he were God, and was called God by her (Genesis 16:7-13). The Bible says the angel of the LORD appeared to Moses in the burning bush, but then says God talked to Moses on that occasion (Exodus 3; Acts 7:30-38). Exodus 13:21 says the LORD went before Israel in a pillar of cloud, while Exodus 14:19 says the angel of God was with the pillar of cloud. The angel of the LORD appeared to Israel in Judges 2:1-5 and spoke as God. Judges 6:11-24 describes the appearance of the angel of the LORD to Gideon and then says the LORD looked on Gideon. Again, the angel of the LORD appeared to Manoah and his wife, and they believed they had seen God (Judges 13:2-23).

Other visitations of the angel of the LORD do not indicate whether they were manifestations of God Himself or not, although frequently people assume that they were. Examples are the appearances to Abraham at Mount Moriah and to Balaam (Genesis 22:11-18; Numbers 22:22-35). Sometimes the angel of the LORD is clearly not a manifestation of God, but an angel identified as a separate being other than the LORD God. Examples are the appearances to David and to Zechariah (II Samuel 24:16; I Chronicles 21:15-30; Zechariah 1:8-19). (See Chapter 7 - OLD TESTAMENT EXPLANATIONS for further discussion.) The angel of the Lord in the New Testament apparently is nothing more than an angel, and certainly is not Jesus Christ (Matthew 1:20; 2:13; 28:2; Acts 8:26).

In analyzing all these verses of Scripture, some say that the angel of the LORD is always a direct manifestation of God. However, some of the instances mentioned above do not support this view and two of them actually contradict it. Others say the angel of the LORD is a manifestation of God in some instances and not in others. This second view seems to be consistent with the Scriptures.

A third view, however, is that the angel of the LORD is never the LORD but always a literal angel. To support this last view, one would emphasize that angels are mouthpieces, messengers, and agents of God. In other words, this view contends that it is proper to say "the LORD said" or "the LORD did" even though He said or did it through the agency of an angel. Under this view, a description of an act by God in the account of an angelic appearance is simply a shorthand way of saying God acted through the angel. Since the biblical writers make clear at the beginning of the accounts that an angel was the direct agent, no ambiguity or discrepancy needs to exist. In this view, the people that acknowledged the visitation of God were either mistaken in their belief that they had seen God Himself or, more plausibly, they recognized that God was using an angel to speak to them and therefore addressed God through the angel. There is another way to reconcile this third view with verses of Scripture that identify the angel of the LORD with the LORD Himself: namely, the angel visibly appeared but the LORD was also invisibly present. Therefore, references to the LORD acting or talking could mean literally the LORD and not the angel.

In summary, it is evident that the angel of the LORD in the Old Testament was not always God Himself. A person can plausibly argue that the angel of the LORD was never an actual theophany, but he cannot seriously contend that the angel of the LORD was always a theophany. The most simple explanation is that the phrase, "The angel of the LORD," sometimes refers to a theophany of God but at other times denotes nothing more than an ordinary angel.

A trinitarian scholar sums up the predominant view as follows:

"In the Old Testament the angel of the LORD might be only a messenger of God (the Hebrew word itself means messenger), distinct from God himself (2 Sam. 24:16), or he might be identified with the LORD himself speaking in the first person… It is typical of Old Testament theophanies that God cannot be sharply drawn… God is free to make his presence known, even while humans must be protected from his immediate presence." [4]

Melchizedek

Many regard Melchizedek as a theophany (Genesis 14:18). Hebrews 7:3 says he was without father, mother, and descent. This could mean that he was God in human form, or it could mean simply that his genealogical origin was not recorded. Hebrews 7:4 does call him a man. Regardless of whether one considers him to be an ordinary man or a theophany of God in the form of a man, he was a type or foreshadowing of Christ (Hebrews 7:1-17).

The Fourth Man in the Fire

One supposed theophany is the fourth man who appeared in the fire when Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego were cast into the furnace (Daniel 3:24-25). The heathen king Nebuchadnezzar said, "Lo, I see four men loose… and the form of the fourth is like the Son of God" (Daniel 3:25). However, in the original language (Aramaic) there is no definite article before Son; that is, there is no the before Son in this passage. The NIV and TAB render this phrase as "a son of the gods." The king was using heathen terminology and had no knowledge of the future arrival of the only begotten Son of God. Most likely the king saw an angel, for he described this manifestation as an angel (Daniel 3:28). It appears that the phrase "sons of God" can refer to angelic beings (Job 38:7). At the most, what Nebuchadnezzar saw could only be a temporary theophany of God. Certainly, this was not a view of the Son of God described in the New Testament, for the Son had not been born and the Sonship had not begun. (See Chapter 5 - THE SON OF GOD.)

Are There New Testament Theophanies?

The New Testament records no theophanies of God in human form outside of Jesus Christ. Of course, Christ was more than a theophany; He was not just God appearing in the form of a man but He was God clothed with a real human body and nature. The angel of the Lord in Matthew 1:20, 2:13, 28:2 and Acts 8:26 seems to be an angel and nothing more; there is no evidence to the contrary. It is clear in these passages that the angel is not Jesus Christ. This fits in well with the conclusion that the angel of the LORD in the Old Testament was not always the LORD Himself. The only possible New Testament theophany is the dove at the baptism of Christ. (See Chapter 8 - NEW TESTAMENT EXPLANATIONS: THE GOSPEL for a full discussion of the dove and the special reason for its appearance.)

Why this lack of New Testament theophanies? The reason is that there is no need for them. God is fully expressed in Jesus Christ. Jesus fully declares and reveals the Father (John 1:18). Jesus is the express image of the invisible God, the brightness of His glory, and the express image of His person (Colossians 1:15; Hebrews 1:3).

Conclusion

In the Old Testament God chose to reveal aspects of His nature to man through various theophanies. In the New Testament era, the progressive revelation of God through theophanies culminated and found perfect fulfillment in Jesus Christ. This leads us to Chapter 3 - THE NAMES AND TITLES OF GOD and Chapter 4 - JESUS IS GOD and to the great truth that Jesus is the one God of the Old Testament."

This discussion is locked.

Archived
1 of 11 posts