jordanamo wrote:
HomeFree89 wrote:Hi Jordan,
I don't think it's "anti-intellectual" not to read the junk of the world so I can see what it's all about or so I can combat it more effectively. If we know the Word like we're supposed to and are lead by the Spirit we won't need to read (watch or listen to) the world's things to be able to show it's false.
Jordan
Before I go on, I will respond to what it is you replied directly. One doesn't read what the "world" puts out to combat it or understand it-- but because we care about people and wish to maintain dialogue in the spirit of Jesus. Not to "convert" them. But even then-- there's a multitude of reasons. One could also be just pure entertainment (gasp)-- like sports! There doesn't have to always be these nice reasons for watching stuff the world puts out. Because we are in this world-- not of it! (Of course this is not justifying everything the world puts out, or saying that we should watch anything it puts out (i.e. pornography)-- This is just in general terms I speak.)
You said that you would not read or watch something if it was put out by an atheist. I ask-- what about a Hindu, Mormon, Buddhist, Muslim, or even for some Christians-- a (gasp) Roman Catholic? Will you likewise not read anything they write or produce whatever the form? Sounds like your digging a hole for yourself and only Christians are allowed to enter. A dangerous mindset, one I used to share, so I understand, but very disconcerting nonetheless.
How in the world do you expect to engage the world if you will not listen and dialogue with it? If you came across an atheist, would you just say "Sorry, I cannot listen to you, you are an atheist, apart of the world, an agent of Satan"? This is what you basically are saying, and it disconcerts me, as that is exactly the spirit of the Pharisees in the NT.
Do you think Jesus told the Prostitutes, "sorry, you are of the Devil, I cannot have fellowship with darkness!"-- Do you think he said to tax collectors "I know that some of you are atheists-- get away, I will not listen to you!"-- No. He had proper dialogue with them. They flocked to him and he hung around them. The religious people of the day scorned him for this that he would dare even try to have dialogue with such "unfruitful works of darkness"!
It is true indeed, you can find some verses to support your view-- but those you'll have to isolate from most of their contexts, and you will have to ignore the Spirit represented throughout Jesus' ministry.
I ask you again to reconsider what it is that you said. No dialogue with atheists? Muslims, or Catholics? It's a theological disaster I say.
Jordan
Brother, I read this before I went to church and it's been on my heart all day since then. I believe you're falling into grave error here.
I believe you can have dialogue with unbelievers, but we don't have to read their books or watch their TV programs to keep it open with them.
When I witness to people I don't just have a presentation that I rattle off, I listen to their side too. When I witness to a New Ager, I listen to what he believes and why he believes it, but I don't go out and read their books. What can we give the world through reading their materials?
What do you think it means to not have fellowship with unfruitful works of darkness?
It concerns me how you are defending an atheist and his writing so strongly. Where's the biblical model for this? Yes, Jesus ate with sinners, but He didn't follow in their activities or read what they read.
If you believe that what I'm saying is wrong, please show me from the Bible where I'm erroring and I'll give it a look.
So, you can have dialogue with unblievers, but it doesn't have to be through means of their entertainment.
Jordan