Ruthies
Nov 30, 2007
Are you not ashamed ?
Are you not ashamed ?
Huh?
What are you speaking of? :-(
Yea, I think some clarification would be useful.
Who? What? Where? When?
Krispy
Ruthies ruthlessly fishing! ;-)
KrispyKrittr wrote:
Yea, I think some clarification would be useful.Who? What? Where? When?
Krispy
Ruthies wrote:
Are you not ashamed ?
chandras, is that you? the length, style and confused threads is very similar. Just a feeling i have.
I had the same feeling that it is chandras.
If he has been removed from the forum, he will not be feeling too pleased with anyone, hence the question and lack of clarification, which is his signature.
God bless.
Thought the same thing... didn't want to say anything though
Ahhh... not sure why that didnt occur to me. Probably cuz I stayed up too late last night watching that Packers-Cowboys game last night. Little slow on the trigger this morning.
I think you're right tho. All the admins have to do is check the IP address.
Krispy
check ruthies reply on the post thread " who pay taxes in america". :-) the structure of wording used.
Why doesn’t it occur to anyone that this fellow, beginning this thread, in fact is right??
The offence is committed, but with gentleness and prayer.
MarkOne
Writing, exposing ones thoughts in a forum like this is in a sense quite dangerous.
What lies behind a person’s words? What kind of experiences lies at the root of his words? Does he simply express himself poorly? Is he ill-tempered? Does he want to provoke, even to be mean.
What filters does the reader use? Is he – or she – easily offended. Does the reader take in what is written in the same mood and mode as the writer? Is it even possible?
Folks, there are so many things to take heed to that we should stop writing at once if it were not for grace and kindness.
Be patient and learn kind-heartedness.
An observer.
... all of this is true, but apparently this thread was started by someone who is disgruntled. If this is who some suspect it is, the person was not interested in abiding by the rules of the thread, and that is why they were locked out.
My opinion on this is that the person was here with the intention of stirring things up among the brethren... and they are continuing to do so.
This thread should simply be ignored.
Krispy
On the contrary, Krispy. . .
This thread, if handled with generosity, would be one among the very few which would be an opening to spiritual growth and revival talks.
This thread, if handled with generosity, would be one among the very few which would be an opening to spiritual growth and revival talks.
Well, I would argue that you are dismissing a lot of good threads and testimonies on this forum. As has been stated by the admins of this forum lately, it is hard to arrive here at this forum and draw an accurate conclusion about what is going on here in a short period of time. There have been many many things over the course of several years that you may or may not be privy to.
I would give it some time and some research before you criticize the forum so generally... which you are doing, albeit in a nice and gracious way.
By the way... welcome! I'm glad your here!
Krispy
Dear Krispy,
I have been observing for a long, long time. . .
Not to provoke, but you are coming to a conclusion which only proves my posting regarding how we are looking at and understanding another man’s postings.
Just because I haven’t posted before does not mean that I am unfamiliar with lines of thoughts, manners and procedures.
The main intent of this web site is revival – one of the least discussed subjects.
Thank you for a kind welcome. . .
WithTheWind
This discussion is locked.