This is reliy bothering me, if we would only get rid of these rediculous theories(theology/doctrines) we could see God as we should and the atheists would be able to reconcile the God of the Bible with what THEY think a good God would do.
This is not a "fairness" issue, but a justice issue.
No one has yet explained these injustices that some men put to God by their theology/doctrines.
Please explain each point.
[b]1:
[b]2:
The non-elect have no grace to be saved because the Atonement is not for them.
They were never suposed to be saved in the first place, which makes them created only to be distroyed in hell.
Therefore, they are not in hell for what they have done, but in hell for that wich they were created for.
[b]3:
Man is condemned for that wich is unavoidable.
[b]4:
Man is guilty for what God will not do.
This puts the blame on God for not giving them the ability to obey the command to repent and to put his faith in/on Christ.
[b]5:
This is God making man candemned before the crime of sin by the law of "Federal Headship of Adam".
By this, God made the very nature of man to be sin by the law of "Federal Headship of Adam" which HE Himself instituted, this causes the very nature of man to be sin, hence the "sin nature".
[b]6:
This means that He chose the world that has sin over the one that didn't. This, in turn, means that He wanted sin to exist, & yet condemns for that which HE wills.
When the truth is that God could not have made a world woith out sin and not infringe on free will.
(He couldn't have made a world with no sin by making a world with no laws, God is not lawless)
[b]7:
Some say this as true.
[b]8:
(Man is guilty for what God pre-ordains to be.)
I never did get a point by point explaination, if there is any.
