JasonI have been waiting for your reply to my last post that asked you to explain your comments concerning my opinion of the book “Dispensational Truth” by Clarence Larkin. I understand that you might not have had the time yet to respond. However, your comment is so off of what I was trying to inform anyone that was interested in another person opinion on recommended reading, I will respond again to at least clear up my side of this.Your comments about “dispensationalism” and linking it to this book would lead me to believe that you know very little about this work. Dispensational Truth (if you or anyone else would like me to define this term, I will) is really not the main reason to read and study this book. It contains the broadest and most concise information of bible truths that I have ever seen. The past, present and future work of God the Father, His Son Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit are very good. Information gleaned from the bible concerning before the creation of the world, creation of the world and the end of this world. And everything in between is in there. The several very good studies and outlines of books in the bible are well worth reading. A few of them are Genesis, Ezekiel, Daniel, Matthew, and Revelations. Just the look he gives into the spiritual world is good enough reason to look thru this book. Information on Satan, demons, the antichrist, the false prophet, Babylon, the tribulation are covered very well. The mysteries in the bible, covenants, Jewish feast/offering, and the second coming of Christ are covered. The small studies on bible types and numbers should spark at least a little interest in doing a larger study for your self. One of the biggest things I got from this book was how to “rightly divide the Word” concerning the Church, Jew and the Gentile. Even if you only went along with 1/2 of the information in this book it would be worth reading. I could go on and on.I have to wonder why you would make a remark like you did with not follow up with more information. You disrespected my own personal opinion, did injustice to Larkin and his work and you put a question in anyone mind that reads your remarks so they might not even give this book a chance.Why would you want to do this?Mark