Mr. Hitchens doesn't like much of anything and religion is an easy target. Nothing new:
.
“Religion has caused more misery to all of mankind in every stage of human history than any other single idea” Madelyn O'Hair.
Ms. O'Hair hated God, too. but i think her criticism of prayer in public schools was good for the faith and brought the subject of religion into the public. (and public prayer in school probably never saved anyone)
So, when Mr. Hitchens criticizes Christianity, he not only brings the subject into public domain, but also he lays out his rationale for arguement.
For example, he criticizes Jesus' teaching of "love your enemies" as being suicidal, . . of not being in the best interests of the individual. It is easy to see that he has interpreted this teaching by assuming the worst possible circumstances about it: that the person has to bear their throat to their enemy, or some such nonsense. He doesn't examine the societal implications of this teaching at all. so it is easy to criticize from this lazy point of view.
i say, let him ramble on in his alcoholic stupor. he makes it easy to see the flaws in his approach.
in the end he will come crawling on hands and knees saying he didn't really mean it. just testing us for our own good, or some such.
Ms. O'Hair's critcism of religion in general is much more valid, although i cannot imagine the void in life if there was no God or spiritual realm or religion . . . if we were just so many atoms bouncing around randomly.
Indeed, the Crusades, the witch trials, and way too many other examples of misery caused by religion exist.
But, what a horrible idea, a world without the love of God!
bub