What is the proper title of someone who not only studies the bible, but also the lives of people like Martin Luther, David Brainerd and Charles Spurgeon?
I would call this person a Historian who specializes in Church History.
An excellent historian will check out all the available facts and present his/her findings. It is very different from the way a news reporter operates. A news reporter often, because of time constraints, cannot check out all the facts before publishing his/her story, hence the errors in their reports.
I love history since it teaches us a lot about human nature -it does not change; it teaches us how God is not mocked - whatsoever a man sows he shall reap; that God is faithful and man is not, hence not worthy of worship and even any adulation - sometimes. It teaches us and we do well to study it and take lessons. The wise person said that "one thing we learn from history is that we do not learn from history": people insist on making the same mistakes!
History has gotten a bad rap from most people. And one contributing factor that gives it a bad name is because of the way it is taught. Too many history teachers are too intent on having the students memorize names, dates: and know you have learned history! For many people this is a "Lord, have mercy!" situation. So people are turned off.
Another thing that turns people off is that they do not want to learn from the lessons history teaches. They declare the historians to be biased, having an axe to grind. No doubt this can happen but facts are facts and we must allow them to minister to us, else we will repeat the same errors or sins.
A personal story: several years ago I compiled a genealogy book of my maternal great-grandparents and all their descendants, totalling almost 1500 persons. I interviewed the old people, got family stories to flesh out the hard cold facts of births, marriages and deaths. Anyhow, there are a lot of people who have adopted children. One family did NOT, no, insisted I do NOT indicated which children are adopted. And yes, everyone knows they are but do not put it in a genealogy book!! Their reasoning is because they are family. Emotionally they are right, but genealogy is blood relations. And one also needs to know that when a person died from an illness whether there is a genetic problem present which contributed to it. And I have been asked for help in compiling this info (although it is interspersed in the book - it is easier to ask the compiler then do all the reading yourself). Anyhow, some people do NOT like facts to be written down. I got inspiration from the Biblical writers where God had recorded facts, flattering and otherwise, mostly otherwise and how did He inspire the writers to do it. Great lessons there - for the historian (EDIT) and the reluctant historian.
My opinion...and I love history.
ginnyrose