In case the first one looks confusing, this was from an era when if scripture said one thing and a creed another they would go with the creed. The creeds also consisted of church practice and a whole lot of uncessary stuff. It basically means no ruling creed.No creed but Christ, No book but the Bible,No name but the divine.In essentials, unity;In non-essentials, liberty;In all things, love.Where the Scriptures speak, we speak.Where the Scriptures are silent, we are silent.Not the only Christians, but Christians only.Well they sort of got off of the tracks there over the years, but I think that they had something quite amazing going on. I am going to join this stumbling movement and see if maybe by the end of my life it is heading in the right direction again. I would say though that the independant churches that came out of it are an interesting phenomenon. To have such unity, with no denomination. The sad part is they have unity with each other and scarcely any with any denominations. When I found out about this movement through my school, I realized that the restoration of the church that I was envisioning, was the desire of the founders of this movement. I have decided to join this movement to see about picking up where it has stagnated and left off, and restoring some of the principles that it has forgotten. It got quite a few right, and created the the first widespread non-denominational churches.All to and for HimJohn C. Kelly
