"The kingdom of heaven is like treasure hidden in a field. When a man found it, he hid it again, and then in his joy went and sold all he had and bought that field.
"Again, the kingdom of heaven is like a merchant looking for fine pearls. When he found one of great value, he went away and sold everything he had and bought it. Matt. 13: 44- 46
Who is the precious treasure in these two parables? Of course, we all assume that it is Jesus.
However, I have recently been challenged to rethink this assumption (which I will explain later). Could the treasure not possibly be souls for the kingdom, and the “man” be Christ? This would make sense in context of Matthew 13: The “man” in all the other parables is Christ: He is the sower of seed, he is the one who planted the mustard seed in the field; he is the harvester. Clearly Christ is the one doing the action and humans are the ones receiving the action. In the parable of the lost coin and the lost sheep, we see this emphasis again. We see it in many other scriptures:
"I have loved you with an everlasting love;
I have drawn you with unfailing kindness. Jer. 31:3
”I will search for the lost and bring back the strays. I will bind up the injured and strengthen the weak, but the sleek and the strong I will destroy.” Ezekiel 34:16
”Christ redeemed us… “ Gal. 3:13
“There is no one who seeks God … But now apart from the law the righteousness of God has been made known, to which the Law and the Prophets testify.”
Rom. 3:11,21
Interestingly the NIV, in a footnote, tries to cover over the obvious inconsistency that is created by the traditional view, saying, “Jesus did not imply that one can purchase the kingdom with money or good deeds.” I suggest that there would be no need to say those words if we consider that the word “purchase” refers to what CHRIST did. After all, he did purchase the Kingdom with his blood.
”And they sang a new song, saying: "You are worthy to take the scroll and to open its seals, because you were slain, and with your blood you purchased for God members of every tribe and language and people and nation. ” Rev. 5:9
So why do we not see these parables that way? Could it be because the natural human bent is to put ourselves in the “actor’s” role? We place much focus on what WE are to do regarding the role of salvation. After all, much of our Christian life is “we” focused rather than Christ-focused. So when the interpretation is not explicit, as in the case of these parables, we miss it – that is - if we look through natural self view.
What d’ya think? Go back and read the parables through this different "lens". Does it fit?
Diane
