I'd like to hear others' thoughts on something.
If anyone finds this confusing I hope you will not be too troubled by it. I've been a little perplexed over a discussion I had.
A man told me that the Lord had two "natures" united in "one person" - one "nature" being human and the other being divine.
John says "the Word became flesh"
So I think the first man must be wrong.
His answer was roughly that the Son was divine and unless he had two natures united in his "one person" his divinity would have been diminished.
I think that this view obscures what John said about the incarnation of the Lord and that we would end up understanding scripture according to these two natures in the same way as if there were two persons in Jesus. That would be more horrible than I can imagine!
"This is what the LORD says— Israel's King and Redeemer, the LORD Almighty: I am the first and I am the last; apart from me there is no God."
"Listen to me, O Jacob, Israel, whom I have called: I am he; I am the first and I am the last."
"Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last. I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever!"
"These are the words of him who is the First and the Last, who died and came to life again."
The First and the Last died and was dead. I never heard that just one of his natures died while "his person" or his "divine nature" remained unharmed. I believe the whole Son of God was crucified and died for us.
I would gladly hear anyone's thoughts on this as long as they were in agreement with scripture. I would also gladly receive correction by scripture if it is warranted. This is not something I've ever given much thought until the past couple days.
Thanks,
Ben
