Let us note very specific things in those that defend Witness Lee in their manipulations, when the truth is revealed about them, and tactics and strategems they employ, in this commentary, by examining the false accusatory remarks by the Leeists, who hath not an ear to hear, and are well adept at legal actions, and rationalizing their positions, however still wrong; plus I will address other stuff too, even repeat myself to maintain the position already held so it is not deflected as is being attempted by the Leeists, through various ways of attacks:1. That link does have the book, Against the Tide, look again.2. I am being falsely accussed (by Daniel) of having a vendetta against Witness Lee. Don't believe this lie.3. In the CRI article when Witness is shown saying "Jesus and the Holy Spirit are the same Person", and "Godhead is a Person", and emphasis on successionism, we necessarily must also see that we are an extension of God, which is wrong, for we are not (rather it is a methaphor), nor is the church as Witness Lee members says "Christ is not only the head but also the body" leaving one to conlude God must become the church. This is a different theology. This is the problem with sabellianistic successionism. There is attempts to obfuscate this away, though LSM fails each time, but it cares for more for its organization and legal actions to uphold its one-man cult shop of 1000 careless writings.4. Daniel says "his writings are highly recommended". Rebuke this proclamation in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.5. Daniel says Witness Lee is "not the leader of a cult". Rebuke this in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.6. Daniel says Witness Lee is "certainly very controversial". This is an admittance of truth, though it should not be taken as appealing and profitable controversy, but rather the core of Witness Lee's errors being the source of the controversy. I have no doubt the LSM members pride themselves on such controversy. I view such errors and stepping where you should not put your foot, making yourself a God-man. Rebuke these efforts of playing with fire for as that CRI article shows, each time there is negative consequences.7. Daniel says these books of Lee's are appreciated by thousands of Christians. Remember, even Satan appreciates. A Christian should not appreciate that which is an entry into further deception and that is what the mind-drowning of 1000 Leeist books is all about, feeding some truths so as to later to lead into untruths. That is how cults work. We are all aware of this methodology. Mormons don't come out and say their deep hidden secrets until you are deeply entrenched. I am glad I have been able to show some of them right off the bat.8. I have been accussed by Daniel of not answering clearly, again falsely accussed, falsely blamed by the legal organization of LSM. I merely would rather you read more comprehensive works like Against the Tide, rather than jumping to conclusions and relying on soundbites to form an opinion as the Leeist will love to offer you to propigate Leeism marring Witness Lee to Watchman Nee, that which they so love to do riding on Watchman Nee's coat tails to give Witness Lee credibility, but coming out and saying where Witness Lee and Watchman Nee differ, Witness Lee is right and Watchman Nee is wrong. This is what they say. I have heard this said many a time. It is all trickeries for LSM. Obviously Watchman Nee was right. Witness Lee was wrong on many matters in examining any of it with more depth.9. There is no doubt Witness Lee took over, not just for "a few years" as Daniel tries to suggest, but in reality, for almost 50 years for Nee was jailed for the rest of his life. It was out of Watchman Nee's hands, not approved by Watchman Nee.10. I was just looking at Ministry of God's Word today and CFP uses the word "Person" to describe Jesus Christ, but in these same paragraphs in each instance Witness Lee's version refuses to use the same exact word, which comprises Witness Lee theology. Suttle ways always are the ways of deception.11. The claim of Witness Lee being a man of organization, where Watchman Nee is a man of scholarly and spiritual calling, is shown and revealed in many stories and testimonies, throughout Against the Tide, God-men and Mindbenders, so it is an easy claim to make; no doubt it is observed even today in the well organized system of the LSM website linking matrix to itself that it has generated.12. Remember, the prayer-shouting-reading or prayer-reading is attempted to be justified through Madam Guyon's book, but if you read her book you will find what she teaches and what Leeist teach have absolutely nothing to do with each other at all, none whatsover, of a different character and nature (Guyon being mystical, LSM being aggressive repetitive mindless sedative mantras).13. Daniel says Witness Lee has a highly developed theology. This is deceptive to say this. It is not highly developed in a good way (nor is it even highly developed, but rather quite mindless and shallow and unhealthy not knowing man’s true condition), but in a bad way because it attempts to defend and rationalize existing errors. Notice how Daniel blithes calling the Godhead a Person, because Daniel is not a scholar, Daniel says. Remember, it does not take a scholar to realize that the Godhead is not a Person (but 3 Persons) and that Jesus and the Holy Spirit are not the same Person of the Trinity (but 2 separate Persons). Witness Lee hates to consider this as fact. Even Daniel admits perhaps Witness Lee was "careless". Here again we see some admittance of the truth, though reluctantly. Men who rationalize their errors are not men of God. What Daniel does do is minimize this matter saying "I cannot answer this", “I do not know”, leaving Witness Lee off the hooks, yet at the same time saying it is a "highly developed theology" giving it some highly esteemed value. This is duplictous to say the least. To throw in a comment of Andrew Murray does not solve the problem, in attempt to gain credibility. That was merely a deflection.13. On locality, the simple difference is that while Witness Lee says a city like Los Angeles of millions of people is proper locality. Watchman Nee says, like London, it is broken up into many smaller localities as true locality is like "postal districts". Just like Rome was never referred to as the "church in Rome", only the "Saints in Rome" because Rome had a million people, whereas the next largest city was Jerusalem" of 40,000 people, an acceptable locality of "church in Jerusalem". Some accussed Nee of improper legalized locality, but I have an article of Watchman Nee that shows otherwise; the accusations against Watchman Nee for improper locality have more to do with shallow people marrying Witness Lee with Watchman Nee for the errors came about because of Witness Lee, not Watchman Nee. It is all quite sneaky, how LSM always tries to gain itself credibility this way. Rebuke it in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. The evil spirit loves to run through this modern day city denominationalism. The purpose of true locality is to prevent such denominationalism and upper room pride papacy per city, for example like the denomination, The Local LSM Leeist Church. Remember, modern day city locality is not biblical city locality, and Watchman Nee never held it over others like Witness Lee did, but used helpful examples to talk about proper locality and proper application. That is the difference. I find Witness Lee to be a shallow business-man-for-profit-control-and-power-not-for-God.14. The terminology God-man is wrong, obviously since man is not God. Rebuke and refuse the rationalizations that pour fourth from LSM to exalt this terminology upon themselves.15. I have been asked by Daniel what organization? Living Stream Ministry. How odd to even ask such a question. The consequence of Leeist love for his organization above God is of course the cause of many of his errors or simply part and parcel of a deeper seated unrenewed conscience in Witness Lee and no heart to keep God's Word when trying to make the body of Christ actually Christ himself revealed in Witness Lee’s writings.16. Some additional attempts by Daniel to defend Witness Lee. He said Witness Lee does not sell 1000 books. Order from their website the catalogue itself. They sell over 1000 of Witness Lee's books in that catalogue, but Daniel says only "59 books". When you get deeper into a cult, you only find out these other things later on. With me, Praise the Lord, I am offer the truth NOW and I do not do this for me, but to glorify Jesus Christ at the right hand of the Father.17. Witness Lee's shyness, when coming out of it, is expressed in his outward conduct from the organization creating, to volumous writings, to the sin of the spirit of spiritual pride, thinking he has something others need to get, cause for error, cause for carelessness. Watchman Nee had an IQ that was of the genius level. He always had the highest marks in his class, others always testified to this. Plus it is said Watchman Nee had a photogenic memory, an authentic one. Bottom line - Watchman Nee was the real deal, a true delegated authority, while Witness Lee was a man who rode on Watchman Nee's coat tails and milked it for all its worth and brought much disrepute to Watchman Nee in false accusation through association by past affiliation, that were Witness Lee’s sins, not Watchman Nee’s. To be sure if hypothetically Watchman Nee were alive today he would rebuke much of Witness Lee organization and Witness Lee's writings and Witness Lee’s alterations.18. Witness Lee was simply rejected by the California T. Austin Sparks church because they did not like the Leeist spirit approach towards things, that is all, as should be evident by my commentary here. This is as Daniel says "foul play" indeed.19. Mindbenders was retracted for fear of going broke under the constant legal actions of Lee's organization destroy SCP and attempts at destroying others, but it is a very good book. God-men was only found libellous because of the legal system and financial resources employed in the attack against the good man Dudley, that is all. I have the book. Good book, though it was wrong about the dividing of spirit, soul and body, just as Jim Moran is also wrong about the dividing of spirit, soul and body, just as CRI and Bereans are wrong about the dividing of spirit, soul and body. Watchman Nee got it right in The Spiritual Man. http://www.worldinvisible.com/library/nee/sprtmnv1/1968cont.htm Hiding this truth is unethical of Daniel and LSM's strategems. Man's legal system is not always God's truth. True men of God never defend themselves this way. 20. Daniel's self-proclaiming proclamation that CRI articles always accuses people as the reason to disregard the writing so as not to dig deep and examine the truth,which I will supply next, which I assure you, with a little examination, is, you will agree, a great article, will in no way thwart the truth exposing several errors of Leeism and LSM, for those who hath an ear to hear.21. Jim Moran is being falsely accussed of being a recluse and that he refused to engage in debate as being the cause to avoid his writings. These are just false accusations of the evil spirit, and men should never be so blamed for not arguing or being recluse, and should not be reasons to avoid what Jim Moran wrote. Moreover, now that Jim Moran is dead (how he has died is uncertain and whether LSM had any involvement in that is a question one has the right to ask, even for the police authorities) and his website taken over by LSM, with the claim that his writings are now allowed to be reproduced is balarny legalism manipulations by LSM which is more of the same character of old these past 40 years by Leeist scientology type suing-control methods.22. The Recovery Version scripture itself and notes within are a big picture document of all these errors and rationalizations of defense for LSM and Leeism.
