The Tenderness of Christ - Full of Grace and Truth
For 30 years I tried to live good enough to please God. I found though, no matter how much I did, there was the thought that suggested I could do more. No matter how much I didn’t do, a thought suggested there was more I shouldn’t do.
I couple of years ago, I heard Brennan Manning speak on the ‘The Tenderness of Christ’. I liked many things he said but as he was emphasizing the tenderness part, my mind resisted it as I thought about, not only the goodness of God, but also the severity. But for some reason, I just couldn’t let the thought go and decided to read the Gospels to see for myself if what he was saying was true. What I found has changed my life.
Right off the start I noticed Jesus spoke with compassion to masses in the Sermon on the Mount, and I thought, okay, here’s the goodness part. What I was about to pick up on, I had never seen before. I had always wondered why Jesus had compassion on some and yet was so hard on others; for the first time, it was about to make sense to me.
He had compassion on the masses but He hammered the Pharisees. Why?
Mt. 9:36, ‘When He saw the crowds, He had compassion on them, because they were harassed and helpless, like sheep without a shepherd’.
Mt. 12:7, ‘If you had known what these words mean, ‘I desire mercy, not sacrifice,’ you would not have condemned the innocent’.
The Pharisees and teachers of the law, had become so consumed with following the letter of the law and demanded the same from the masses, they lost site of the fact they were supposed to be caring shepherds. Instead of helping, they heaped on more and more rules, making it impossible for anyone to measure up to a life that pleased God.
Where I used to wonder why Jesus had compassion on some and was so hard on others, I now know. I believe it was one of the reasons He came. He had seen it for hundreds of years and had all He could take. When He came, He immediately had compassion on those who had been harassed, and immediately lit in to those who had done the harassing.
So how did this change my life? As Jesus was against the harassing then, He is against it today. The thoughts that have demanded perfection for 30 years have not been Him. As the Pharisees harassed the masses, so satan harasses us. If he can keep our focus on all that we should and shouldn’t do, we will be stuck in an endless loop. You cannot do enough that there isn’t just a little bit more that you can do.
Mt. 11:28 – 30, ‘Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy and my burden is light’.
There is a rest from all the demands. It is the very thing that Jesus secured for us by enduring all that He endured. Until we find it, we feel it is on us to measure up. Once we find it, it is ours to enjoy.
In a recent thread (around 12-15-08 in the Articles and Sermon category), ‘The New Birth’ by T. Austin Sparks, he explains it this way:
It is not that I have decided that I shall not do these things, that I have drawn up a list of things which I should do and should not do, can do or cannot do, ought to do and ought not to do. It is simply that there has taken place in me something which has made these differences and I am following the law of another life which is at work within, and it is no merely legalistic thing at all.
When we come to Christ, not just once, but regularly, we He puts on us, His yoke. His yoke is easy and with it there is rest. Satan would have us ware a yoke of legalism, but not Christ. He was against it then, He is against it now.
I write this in relation to recent threads, in which some seem to still be placing on others the yoke of legalism. Sad for two reasons: that they are trying to place it on others and that they themselves are still wearing it.
In the recent thread regarding makeup, though there were some very good comments, there were many that troubled me. Obviously it troubled Greg too, since it and a few others are locked up. I think that was good. I felt Paul West’s first post, as he lead with a quote from Chris was a gracious representation of truth. The following is a clip from that post:
If you don't feel right about it...then don't wear it...because you need to have a clear conscience before God. If you feel the liberty to wear it, then do as your conscience dictates as you direct your heart, mind, soul and strength with real Biblical modesty toward God.
________________________________________
I think this sums it up nicely. We have to be very careful when offering absolutes on non salvific matters, for the hills in this land are known for their slippery slopes. Personally, I don't tell believers what they can or can't do, whether they can dance or not, or wear blush, or use hair gell, or nice clothes or get earrings or grow a beard or lift weights. I point them instead to God, to ask God - that is, if He is their Father. These are all very delicate matters that God Himself, in time, speaks into the life of the believer. God, who is light, gives personal light on these subjects, and then it becomes a matter of obedience to the light in that particular segment of the school of God.
Not to be sarcastic, but maybe the example will emphasize the point of how that thread went down hill. I could not help but to think of the story of the woman who was caught in adultery and brought to Jesus by those wearing the yoke of legalism. I could see Jesus saying, ‘neither do I condemn thee, go and sin no more’, and as she is walking away, Jesus says, ‘wait, is that makeup your wearing’.
Oh, we have got to get the point where we are gracious. It is the love of God that constrains us. If there is something that God does not want me to do, He is able to let me know it. It is not my place to tell others they shouldn’t do it. You would have thought rbetty had asked if she could work the streets with her makeup.
There is so much more I would like to say, but I have intruded too much already on anyone’s time who might possibly read this far. I fear if we do not get a grip on this, the SI forum could self destruct.
I think it would be a good discipline when we reply on a thread that involves a question, that we reply to the one who asked the question. If we want to have an additional comment regarding something that someone else said, it should be in addition to the comment we make to the original. I would hope part of our goal as we reply, especially to a question, is to engage the one who asked it into the discussion.
One final point; when a person posts a thought, let’s not pick it apart. Paul West had a very good reply that got picked apart. There will be times we have to raise a little caution, but we are all here hopefully to learn and grow, but as there might be one thing to pick at there is usually several to highlight. There is much need, when our comments are read by who knows how many, for them to be full of grace and truth.
John 1:14, 15 ‘The Word became flesh, and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory… who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
