2009/3/10 10:01
I have kind of read through the different posts and different opinions and thoughts. It is good I believe to sharpen each other with counsel and keep focused on our deliverer.
I have wondered whether to join this conversation but this seemed to be an encouragement to do so. I believe David Wilkerson is a brave and godly man, I also believe John Piper is a brave and godly man. I respect them both and am intimidated by neither. I wonder if folks have heard of "Intrusion Ethics"? I think it is a term which has come from modern Reformed teachers but I have my own spin on it and thought I would share it here.
I am part way through a book that I am writing and this is an excerpt from one of the chapters. Normally I never read posts as long as this one will be but tell me what you think about this...
[color=0033FF]"Let me introduce you to the idea of ‘Intrusion Ethics’. ‘Oh help’ I hear you cry! Most big ideas are much simpler than they sound. Why did God allow his covenant to be constantly disregarded and the nation of Israel to become more and more pagan. We are raising a question here that surfaces in the thoughts of anyone who takes the Bible seriously or looks at the world in which we live; why doesn’t God do something? Long before this time God had promised the land of Canaan to Abraham but gave an interesting reason as to why Abraham would not immediately possess the land. Apparently other events in other peoples were part of God synchronising of events; But in the fourth generation they shall return here, for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet complete.” Gen 15:16. Abraham’s descendants’ possession of the land would be synchronised with God’s judgements upon the inhabitants of Canaan. Our refusal to bring our lives into line with God’s pattern will have consequences; this is an unchanging fact of revelation. And yet so many cruel dictators have died in comfort in their beds and appear to have escaped God’s judgements. How can we understand this? Why did God not stop Hitler or Stalin or Idi Amin with an instant judgement?
Paul gives us one answer to this puzzling question in Romans; Does not the potter have power over the clay, from the same lump to make one vessel for honor and another for dishonor? What if God, wanting to show His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, and that He might make known the riches of His glory on the vessels of mercy, which He had prepared beforehand for glory, Rom 9:21-23. In one sense that is an end of the matter. God is God and he will do want he wills. “Intrusion Ethics” is not arguing with Paul’s Spirit inspired words in Romans, but there is an old question that an old ‘friend of God’ once asked; Far be it from You to do such a thing as this, to slay the righteous with the wicked, so that the righteous should be as the wicked; far be it from You! Shall not the Judge of all the earth do right? Gen 18:25. There follows a fascinating conversation between God and his friend which we do not have time to pursue other than to remark that this was a conversation between friends and not a bartering encounter in a bazaar.
In the setting of the Canaanites it seems that God was ever reluctant to visit his judgement on the atrocities that were performed there masquerading as religion. While there is the slightest possibility of repentance he hold back his wrath even though he knows that they will not change. There is a wonderful stastement about the nature of God’s love in the gospel according to John; …when Jesus knew that His hour had come that He should depart from this world to the Father, having loved His own who were in the world, He loved them to the end. And supper being ended, the devil having already put it into the heart of Judas Iscariot, Simon’s son, to betray Him, Jesus, knowing that the Father had given all things into His hands, and that He had come from God and was going to God, rose from supper and laid aside His garments, took a towel and girded Himself. John 13:1-4. One of those whose feet he washed, having loved him to the end, was Judas Iscariot. If God then is so reluctant to act in judgement why does he ever do so? This is where the idea of “Intrusion Ethics” come in. At best it is a ‘best fit’ answer to the question, it is not the last word on the subject.
“Intrusion Ethics” makes a very clear distinction between the age in which we live in which God allows us to benefit from ‘Common Grace’ and the coming age of the ‘Consummation’ or final judgement. The fact that we are still alive in spite of our sinfulness is due to God’s ‘common grace’ towards our race. Even those who have not come into God’s favour through Christ are benefiting from this time of ‘common grace’. Even though we deserve judgement and instant retribution for our sin we are still here because of God’s unmerited love towards us, His grace. Why? Well Peter expresses it like this; The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some count slackness, but is longsuffering toward us, not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance. 2Pet 3:9. There is however another era that is on its way, and here we return to Paul; He has appointed a day on which He will judge the world in righteousness by the Man whom He has ordained. He has given assurance of this to all by raising Him from the dead. Acts 17:31.
So, if God is waiting for ‘another day’ why does he ever bring judgement now? These judgements are ‘intrusions’ of the ‘ethics’ of the coming age of Consummation into our days of Common Grace, or so the idea “Intrusion Ethics” states it. Some of God’s judgements which ‘intrude’ into this era of common grace are glimpses of a future day. They are ‘anticipations’ of the era of Consummation. One day this will be the norm and not the exception. These judgements then are examples of another day and a constant warning that the day of the Consummation and Final Judgement will arrive. They serve as rare examples of God’s character in his attitude to sin and the sinner, an attitude that will be revealed in all its awesome fulness on a coming day. They are Judgement Day in miniature and very rare. Isaiah declares one of these ‘out of the ordinary’ periods of coming judgement; For the LORD shall rise up as in mount Perazim, he shall be wroth as in the valley of Gibeon, that he may do his work, his strange work; and bring to pass his act, his strange act. Is 28:21 KJV.
Perhaps we should add a word of caution. We need to be very cautious in what we declare to be an act of God’s anticipatory judgement. It is folly to try to map specific sins to specific events although many Christians will attempt it. Notice in these verses the way in which the Lord refuses to link a specific sin with a ‘strange act’ but insists that the final day of judgement will surely come; Or those eighteen on whom the tower in Siloam fell and killed them, do you think that they were worse sinners than all other men who dwelt in Jerusalem? I tell you, no; but unless you repent you will all likewise perish. Luke 13:4-5."[/color]
The next question is do we dare make this connection between 'that sin' and 'this catastrophe'? I know the Bible writers do it but then they were verbally inspired.