i'm not implying anything. i just found this and here it is... although they make it pretty clear.
there is a place where i put ***text*** that is MY words, not quotes from the excerpt.
origional FULL article found here;[url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,510937,00.html]Right Here
----------------------------------------------[u]U.N. 'Climate Change' Plan Would Likely Shift Trillions to Form New World Economy
--Friday, March 27, 2009
--By George Russell
excerpt;[i]
Print A United Nations document on "climate change" that will be distributed to a major environmental conclave next week envisions a huge [b]reordering[i]) [b]of the world economy, likely involving trillions of dollars in wealth transfer
Those and other results are blandly discussed in a discretely worded United Nations "information note" on potential consequences of the measures that industrialized countries will likely have to take to implement the Copenhagen Accord, the successor to the Kyoto Treaty, after it is negotiated and signed by December 2009. The Obama administration has said it supports the treaty process if, in the words of a U.S. State Department spokesman, it can come up with an "effective framework" for dealing with global warming.
The 16-page note, obtained by FOX News, will be distributed to participants at a mammoth negotiating session that starts on March 29 in Bonn, Germany, the first of three sessions intended to hammer out the actual commitments involved in the new deal.
In the stultifying language that is normal for important U.N. conclaves, the negotiators are known as the "Ad Hoc Working Group On Further Commitments For Annex I Parties Under the Kyoto Protocol." Yet the consequences of their negotiations, if enacted, would be nothing short of world-changing.
[b]Getting that deal done has become the United Nations' highest priority,
------------------------------------
EDIT: made it look better and less confusing
