BSBKJVWEBYLTASVBBEWMBT4TDBY|HymnsMusicDonate
Menu
Theology

Why pray for ones salvation?

J
jlosinski May 14, 2009

Hi all,
I'd like to get the perspective of some of the Arminians on this site: If God enables then allows man to make the choice of salvation or not, why do Christians pray that God would save an unbeliever? According to prevenient grace, God can lead the horse to water, but he won't make him drink. I understand that we can make our desires known to God concerning salvation, but it seems that this is one prayer that He will not answer, unless the sinner makes a free will decision; it seems as though the answer to this type of prayer is completely conditional on the man. I'm not being antagonistic here, I'm probable one of those "strange animals" that Paul Washer refers to in his 10 Indictments sermon, but it has been a question that I've been wanting an answer to.
Grace and Peace,
Joe

F
Friedrick May 15, 2009

My question is why does a Calvanist pray for a soul when the whole of the ordeal is up to God..!

I am not in either camps, but I pray because prayer changes things. Experimentally we know this to be true, it's not only an interpretation of the scripture -it's truth.

Can I save anyone with me prayers? No. Yet I still can pray, "God have mercy on so and so", "God, reveal yourself to so and so"...

Jesus prayed, "Lord forgive them, they know not what they do".

Leonard Ravenhill preaches a sermon (you can find on sermonindex) called "Give me Souls or I'll Die". You might be interested in listening to it.

May the lord lead us away from distracting questions into fervent, real, anguished prayer for souls.

Y
yoadam May 15, 2009

Friedrick,

The question should be: Why does an [b]Armenian[/b] pray for a soul when the "decision to be saved" is up to [b]man[/b]?

If salvation hinges on man's free (supposedly) will, then man will ALWAYS choose NO. Man will tell God "I hate you." Why? Man is totally depraved. As it says in Romans,

\t"None is righteous, no, not one;
11\tno one understands;
\t\tno one seeks for God.
12\tAll have turned aside; together they have become worthless;
\t\tno one does good,
\t\tnot even one."

The truth is man's will is not free, but in bondage to sin. Man can do nothing but sin except God do a sovereign work of salvation in man's heart as Ezekiel describes so clearly,

26 And I will give you a new heart, and a new spirit I will put within you. And I will remove the heart of stone from your flesh and give you a heart of flesh.27 And I will put my Spirit within you, and cause you to walk in my statutes and be careful to obey my rules.

God does all the work. God gets all the glory. Let us not attribute any aspect of our salvation to ourselves-- for Jesus CHOSE US-- we did not choose him. We should praise God for this!

When an armenian prays "God save my friend ____." The armenian is actually exercising a calvinistic belief-- for the armenian in this instance is asking God to violate his friend ____'s free will to save him!

Ironic, no?

Recommended further reading for a "calvinist" perspective:
Jesus' Prayers in John 17
Paul's epistles (Especially Romans & Ephesians)
St. Augustine of Hippo's Anti-Pelagian Writings & On The Predestination of the Saints
Martin Luther's Bondage of the Will
John Calvin's Institutes of Christian Religion
Jonathan Edwards' On the Freedom of the Will
George Whitefield's letters to John Wesley
Charles Spurgeon's defense of Calvinism

Also good preaching from Paul Washer & John Piper.

You can find all this stuff online free. :-)

C
ChrisJD May 15, 2009

Recommended further reading for a "calvinist" perspective:
Martin Luther's Bondage of the Will
Jonathan Edwards' On the Freedom of the Will
Augustine's Anti-Pelagian Writings & Writings
Calvin's Institutes of Christian Religion

The Lord Jesus Christ said:


"My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me. If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or [i]whether[/i] I speak of myself. He that speaketh of himself seeketh his own glory: but he that seeketh his glory that sent him, the same is true, and no unrighteousness is in him."

-from John 7:16-18(KJV)


Did these men claim the same inspiration as the Lord Jesus Christ?

If not, why would they write so much?

Y
yoadam May 15, 2009

Quote:
Recommended further reading for a "calvinist" perspective:
Martin Luther's Bondage of the Will
Jonathan Edwards' On the Freedom of the Will
Augustine's Anti-Pelagian Writings & Writings
Calvin's Institutes of Christian Religion

The Lord Jesus Christ said:

"My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me. If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself. He that speaketh of himself seeketh his own glory: but he that seeketh his glory that sent him, the same is true, and no unrighteousness is in him."

-from John 7:16-18(KJV)

Did these men claim the same inspiration as the Lord Jesus Christ?

If not, why would they write so much?

Hi Chris,

No, of course they did not claim the same inspiration.

1. Define what is writing "so much?"

2. What does writing "so much" have to do with inspiration?

3. Do you believe God uses men? If yes, then I think you should consider the possibility God used these men. Yes, the Holy Spirit is our teacher, however, does God not also give the church men to be teachers?

4. If you do not attend a "Roman" Catholic church today, then you in fact are part of the protest against the RCC whether you like it or not. What I am trying to say is please consider history-- if you did, you would be able to know why you have been influenced to think the way you do. Did you know that Luther is the one who popularized "Sola Scriptura?" That means BIBLE ALONE-- which seems to be what you are in fact referring to, which I also agree with.

Lastly, these men wrote what they did for various reasons, which I believe are godly. For example, Calvin's Institutes were written for discipleship of believers and to help the persecuted believers who he knew were being BURNED ALIVE at the stake in France by the RCC. (By explaining protestant beliefs, Calvin hoped the RCC would realize protestants were not heretics.) The revivalists I mentioned (Spurgeon & Whitefield) wrote what they did for the defense of the gospel. Are these not good reasons to write?

Blessings from God to you! :-)

L
Logic May 15, 2009

jlosinski wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to get the perspective of some of the Arminians on this site: If God enables then allows man to make the choice of salvation or not, why do Christians pray that God would save an unbeliever?
I'm not an Arminian, but I am the furthest from a Clavinist.

I pray that God would save an unbeliever in so much that God would intervine in such a way that the unbeliever comes to the end of himself and finaly submits to God on His terms.

According to prevenient grace, God can lead the horse to water, but he won't make him drink.
[b]Prov 1:23[/b] [color=990000]Turn back at my reproof, lo, I pour forth to you my spirit, I make known my words with you.[/color]
Here, God did all he could do; He poured out His spirit unto them, & made known His words unto them, and He called them.
But, they still refused, so then God is not One to be "walked on", therefore you read Verses 24-31.
[b]Prov 1:24[/b] [color=990000]Because I have called, [b]and you refused[/b]; I have stretched out my hand, and no man regarded;
:25 But you have ignored all my counsel, and would have none of my reproof:
:26 I also will laugh at your calamity; I will mock when your fear comes;
:27 When your terror comes as desolation, and your destruction comes as a whirlwind; when distress and anguish comes upon you.
:28 Then shall they call upon me, but I will not answer; they shall seek me early, but they shall not find me:
:29 Because they hated knowledge, and did not choose the fear of the LORD:
:30 They would have none of my counsel: they despised all my reproof.
:31 Therefore shall they eat of the fruit of their own way, and be filled with their own devices.[/color]

I understand that we can make our desires known to God concerning salvation, but it seems that this is one prayer that He will not answer, unless the sinner makes a free will decision; it seems as though the answer to this type of prayer is completely conditional on the man.
[b]Luk 13:3, Luk 13:3[/b] [color=990000]I tell you, Nay: but, except you repent, you shall all likewise perish.[/color]
It is conditional on the man to repent or not.

L
Logic May 15, 2009


yoadam wrote:
Friedrick,

The question should be: Why does an [b]Armenian[/b] pray for a soul when the "decision to be saved" is up to [b]man[/b]?

If salvation hinges on man's free (supposedly) will, then man will ALWAYS choose NO.

How do you know that man will ALWAYS choose NO?

"None is righteous, no, not one;
11 no one understands;
no one seeks for God.
12 All have turned aside; together they have become worthless;
no one does good,
not even one."

The truth is man's will is not free, but in bondage to sin. Man can do nothing but sin except God do a sovereign work of salvation in man's heart as Ezekiel describes so clearly,

Then man is inocent from the call to repent since (you say)they can not do it in the first place.
Inability or incapability exempts from responcibility.

Man is innocent from sin since (you say) they were born that way and they can not do anything but sin.
Inevitability exempts from responcibility.

God is responcible for the unrepentance and faithlessness of all mankind cince (you say) that God must give repentance first; same with faith.

God would be sending milions to hell for what He has not done for them.

God does all the work. God gets all the glory. Let us not attribute any aspect of our salvation to ourselves-- for Jesus CHOSE US-- we did not choose him. We should praise God for this!
[b]Luke 17:10[/b] [color=990000]So likewise you, when you shall have done all those things which are commanded you[/color] (repentance & putting your faith in/on Jesus)[color=990000], say, We are unprofitable servants: we have done that which was our duty to do.[/color]

When an armenian prays "God save my friend ____." The armenian is actually exercising a calvinistic belief-- for the armenian in this instance is asking God to violate his friend ____'s free will to save him!
Nope, not violating his friend's free will, but persuading and urging him to choose to repent.

A calvinistic belief is that God would save the person even if no one prayes.
Calvinist don't need to pray for a singal thing.

[b]Calvinist to a sinner:[/b] Jesus may have died for you.
[b]Sinner:[/b] What must I do to be saved?
[b]Calvinist[/b] Nothing, you can't do a thing.

Y
yoadam May 15, 2009

Hi Logic,

There are good answers for every point you bring up... and smarter men than us have argued well their points for both sides of this debate (calv... vs armen...) In fact, quite honestly I'm getting burnt out on this arguing already... Soon I'm going to have to drop out of this. But here's some quick thoughts I have in a first response...

My first observation is that you are often confusing calvinism with what is called hyper-calvinism. This is a major error. If you are going to argue against hyper-calvinism, I will stand beside you and HELP you do it. Please research the two and learn to make the distinction. (It would be similar to a hypothetical situation where I would argue that all "classical armenians" or "semi-armenians" (like yourself) are heretics by calling them "pelagians." Now pelagianism is heresy that has deviated much further from the scriptures than either classical armenianism or semi-armenianism. That would be unfair to group the armenian theological camps in along with the pelagian theological camp-- so I will not do that. (But I would say that armenianism can be a slippery slope into roman catholic theology and pelagianism.) So again, please do not confuse calvinism with hyper-calvinism, but if you want to say that calvinism can be a slippery slope into hyper-calvinism-- fine. But let's make the distinctions in this thread to avoid all of the confusion. Now I realize I just used a lot of terms that many will not be familiar with... If you are not, my advice-- forget about ALL OF THIS STUFF and you'll be much happier (lol.) But seriously, look up the terms sometime, (from various sources...), and it will shed much light on this discussion and the different theological views regarding mans role and God's role in salvation.

L
Logic May 15, 2009

yoadam wrote:

My first observation is that you are often confusing calvinism with what is called hyper-calvinism.

Why not go to the logical conclusion with your calvinism, which is hyper-calvinism?

If you are going to argue against hyper-calvinism, I will stand beside you and HELP you do it.
How would you do that with your logical conclusions?

I would argue that all "classical armenians" or "semi-armenians" (like yourself)
I am neither "classical armenian" or even "semi-armenian"

The logical conclusion to armenianism is not good either, therefore do not even go there also.

All I am doing is putting all calvinists & armeninians to their logical conclusions.

If you hold any theology or doctrin that logicaly leads to heresy, throw it out, you can't only go half way.

If it is truth, then the logical conclusion will remain true.

Therefore, if you call yourself a calvinist or an armeninian, I will think that you go all the way to the logical conclusions to them, for that is the reasonable thing to do.

J
jlosinski May 15, 2009

Hey Guys,

I didn't mean for this to turn into another Calvinist/Arminian slugfest like the one we had a few months back on the forum, I was just curious about that particular question, I suppose the closest thing I've gotten from an non-sectarian answer was from Logic:
[i]I pray that God would save an unbeliever in so much that God would intervine in such a way that the unbeliever comes to the end of himself and finaly submits to God on His terms.[/i]

With that being said, I probably demonstrated poor judgement in posting this question and would rather not be responsible for the inevitable debate between brethren that will follow. Praise God that regardless of how we think He does it, He still saves men from His divine judgement.

grace and peace,
Joe

S
savannah May 15, 2009

Question: Why pray for ones salvation?

Answer: Jesus commands to: Mat 9:38; Luke 10:2

Quote:

"...man is inocent from the call to repent since (you say)they can not do it in the first place. Inability or incapability exempts from responcibility...Man is innocent from sin since (you say) they were born that way and they can not do anything but sin.Inevitability exempts from responcibility."

Romans 9:9-23 answers such objections of mere human logic.

Quote:

"God is responcible for the unrepentance and faithlessness of all mankind cince (you say) that God must give repentance first; same with faith."

Again Rom. 9:19-23 answers such objections of mere human logic.

Responsibility assumes accountability, of which God makes clear He is not obligated, Job 33:13

Men are responsible and accordingly accountable (Matt. 12:36; Rom 14:12) as creatures to their Creator, the Potter as He calls Himself in Romans 9:21.

Quote:

"God would be sending milions to hell for what He has not done for them."

Again Rom. 9:14,15 answers such objections of mere human logic.

Quote:

"Luke 17:10 So likewise you, when you shall have done all those things which are commanded you (repentance & putting your faith in/on Jesus), say, We are unprofitable servants: we have done that which was our duty to do."

Prov. 30:6

Rather than adding to His Word as has been done above and being found a liar may we speak His Word faithfully,accurately,fully,and in its context. Salvation nor regeneration is in view in this parable of Jesus' beginning in verse 1 of chapter 17. Read the parable and it will be clear that this is so. Verse 10 ought not be read without verse 9 as the two verses together give us a better application of the intent of Jesus' words in the parable.

Luke 17:9,10 Hath he favour to that servant because he did the things directed? I think not.
Luk 17:10 `So also ye, when ye may have done all the things directed you, say--We are unprofitable servants, because that which we owed to do--we have done.'

The subject is not salvation nor regeneration here.

Here in the following verses we have salvation and regeneration as the subject and we are told that such is impossible with men. Read His Word:

Luke 18:26,27 And they that heard it, said, Who then can be saved? Then he said, The things which are impossible with men, are possible with God.

Matt 19:25,26 When his disciples heard it, they were exceedingly amazed, saying, Who then can be saved? But Jesus beheld them, and said to them, With men this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.

Mark 10:26,27 And they were astonished beyond measure, saying among themselves, Who then can be saved? And Jesus looking upon them, saith, With men it is impossible, but not with God: for with God all things are possible.

Is salvation naturally effected?

According to Jesus' own Words...

ABSOLUTELY NOT! IT IS IMPOSSIBLE!

Quote:

"A calvinistic belief is that God would save the person even if no one prayes.
Calvinist don't need to pray for a singal thing."

Read and learn: Prov 26:4 Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest you be like him yourself.

Quote:

"Calvinist to a sinner: Jesus may have died for you.
Sinner: What must I do to be saved?
Calvinist Nothing, you can't do a thing."

Pro 26:5 Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit.

To this I answer:

A Word to sinners: Rom 5:6 For when we were yet without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly.

Mark 1:15 The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the Gospel.

Amen

M
Miccah May 15, 2009

why do Christians pray that God would save an unbeliever?


Obedience.


[b]1 Thessalonians 5:17[/b]

Y
yoadam May 15, 2009

Hello Logic,

According to prevenient grace, God can lead the horse to water, but he won't make him drink.

Prov 1:23 Turn back at my reproof, lo, I pour forth to you my spirit, I make known my words with you.

Here, God did all he could do; He poured out His spirit unto them, & made known His words unto them, and He called them.
But, they still refused, so then God is not One to be "walked on", therefore you read Verses 24-31.

Prov 1:24 Because I have called, and you refused; I have stretched out my hand, and no man regarded;
:25 But you have ignored all my counsel, and would have none of my reproof:
:26 I also will laugh at your calamity; I will mock when your fear comes;
:27 When your terror comes as desolation, and your destruction comes as a whirlwind; when distress and anguish comes upon you.
:28 Then shall they call upon me, but I will not answer; they shall seek me early, but they shall not find me:
:29 Because they hated knowledge, and did not choose the fear of the LORD:
:30 They would have none of my counsel: they despised all my reproof.
:31 Therefore shall they eat of the fruit of their own way, and be filled with their own devices.

I understand that we can make our desires known to God concerning salvation, but it seems that this is one prayer that He will not answer, unless the sinner makes a free will decision; it seems as though the answer to this type of prayer is completely conditional on the man.

Luk 13:3, Luk 13:3 I tell you, Nay: but, except you repent, you shall all likewise perish.
It is conditional on the man to repent or not.

Aye, that is true, except you repent, you shall all likewise perish. It is just as true as Jesus' teaching on the new birth:
[b]"Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God."[/b]
Is the new birth not something that God does inside of us? Well, then why can not repentance also be something that God does inside of us?

Acts 11:18,
When they heard these things they fell silent. And they glorified God, saying, "[b]Then to the Gentiles also God has granted repentance that leads to life.[/b]" (ESV)

2Tim.2:24-26,24 "And the Lord's servant must not be quarrelsome but kind to everyone, able to teach, patiently enduring evil,25 correcting his opponents with gentleness. [b]God may perhaps grant them repentance leading to a knowledge of the truth,[/b]26 and they may come to their senses and escape from the snare of the devil, after being captured by him to do his will.

Man cannot simply pull himself up by his bootstraps and "repent!" As these scriptures show, even repentance is granted to us as a gift from God. :-)

Are all people called to repent? YES. Should we preach and command all people to repent? YES. Will people repent upon hearing it preached? Yes, but only those who are chosen by God among the elect. Should we only preach to the elect? That would be impossible. Since we do not know who is an elect, we should preach the gospel freely to everyone.

Quote:

yoadam wrote:
Friedrick,

The question should be: Why does an Armenian pray for a soul when the "decision to be saved" is up to man?

If salvation hinges on man's free (supposedly) will, then man will ALWAYS choose NO.


How do you know that man will ALWAYS choose NO?

As I said it is because man is totally depraved since the fall.

Genesis 6:5 Then the LORD saw that the wickedness of man [was] great in the earth, and [that] every intent of the thoughts of his heart [was] only evil continually.

Jer 17:9 The heart [is] deceitful above all [things], and desperately wicked: who can know it?

Romans 3:9-18 What then? Are we better than they? Not at all. For we have previously charged both Jews and Greeks that they are all under sin.
(10) As it is written: "There is none righteous, no, not one; (11) There is none who understands; There is none who seeks after God. (12) They have all turned aside; They have together become unprofitable; There is none who does good, no, not one." (13) "Their throat is an open tomb; With their tongues they have practiced deceit"; "The poison of asps is under their lips"; (14) "Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness." (15) "Their feet are swift to shed blood; (16) Destruction and misery are in their ways; (17) And the way of peace they have not known." (18) "There is no fear of God before their eyes."

Romans 3:23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,

Rom 5:12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:

Romans 5:14-19 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those who had not sinned according to the likeness of the transgression of Adam, who is a type of Him who was to come. (15) But the free gift is not like the offense. For if by the one man's offense many died, much more the grace of God and the gift by the grace of the one Man, Jesus Christ, abounded to many. (16) And the gift is not like that which came through the one who sinned. For the judgment which came from one offense resulted in condemnation, but the free gift which came from many offenses resulted in justification. (17) For if by the one man's offense death reigned through the one, much more those who receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness will reign in life through the One, Jesus Christ.)
(18) Therefore, as through one man's offense judgment came to all men, resulting in condemnation, even so through one Man's righteous act the free gift came to all men, resulting in justification of life. (19) For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so also by one Man's obedience many will be made righteous.

Don't you see it? We are worthy of nothing but hell even if we were to live perfect from our birth, (which is of course impossible), and this is all because we have inherited Adam's sin nature-- when he fell, we all fell. The fact that God chooses to save any of us is completely mind blowing, and all I can say is I will never know why, but I love Him so much more simply because I know how unworthy I am... Well, I guess I do know why it is he chose me, it is "to the praise of his glorious grace" Eph. 1:6. Doesn't that just make you say "wow?" Let's praise Him for this unmerited favor he has shown to us!

The Westminster Confession puts well:

9:3 Man, by his fall into a state of sin, hath wholly lost all ability of will to any spiritual good accompanying salvation (Joh_15:5; Rom_5:6; Rom_8:7): so as, a natural man, being altogether averse from that good (Rom_3:10, Rom_3:12), and dead in sin (Eph_2:1, Eph_2:5; Col_2:13), is not able, by his own strength, to convert himself, or to prepare himself thereunto (Joh_6:44, Joh_6:65; 1Co_2:14; Eph_2:2-5; Tit_3:3-5).

If you still hold that men are able to choose to repent (which would be classified as a "good work")-- then not only are you denying Acts 11:18 and 2 Timothy 2:24-26, but you are outright denying the teaching of total depravity which Paul clearly spends the first three chapters of his epistle to the Romans to set forth! To deny this is to believe in a partial depravity and exalt man higher than he should be, and downplay man's need for a savior. This robs God of His glory! This should cause anyone who believes man can choose to repent to have second thoughts.

Then man is inocent from the call to repent since (you say)they can not do it in the first place.
Inability or incapability exempts from responcibility.

No way. We are guilty before God whether or not we even have an option from God to repent! And to those He has chosen to grant repentance (when they seek for it) it will be granted to them by sheer grace alone! In Adam all of humanity has sinned against the eternal God and therefore eternal punishment is humanity's reward! It is by his grace alone that sinful humanity still walks the earth.

Man is innocent from sin since (you say) they were born that way and they can not do anything but sin.
Inevitability exempts from responcibility.

Do you want justice? If you want justice, then we wouldn't even exist, but perhaps to be tormented along with Adam & Eve in hell. Adam and the whole human race should have been wiped off the face of the planet. We should thank God for his amazing grace in the salvation of the elect-- it is no accident we are referred to as the "[b]beloved[/b]!" It is even a grace that the wicked who are not chosen by God for eternal salvation should live on the this earth and enjoy a nice, sunny day.

God is responcible for the unrepentance and faithlessness of all mankind cince (you say) that God must give repentance first; same with faith.

No, Adam is responsible. (Funny, my name is Adam...) IN ADAM ALL DIE.

Saying God is responsible is not much different than the way Adam blamed Eve for sin and Eve blamed the devil for sin. And the nerve some people have, to actually blame God?

We are completely responsible in Adam, our first parent. The issue is not that we have sinned, but that we have never done anything but sin, and that in us dwells the sin nature which is inherited from ADAM. Any sin or sins we have in us and have committed only further prove the existence of our inherited sin nature from Adam and that God is right in his judgment of mankind.

Now did Adam & Eve have a free will that was not in bondage to sin before the fall? YES. And what did they do? They willingly rebelled against God, and that just so happens to be the case of humanity ever since-- That is why we are all ultimately responsible.

God would be sending milions to hell for what He has not done for them.

God can do what He wants. That's ok, no? God is not obligated to save anyone-- otherwise it would not be called "grace." When Adam fell-- humanity fell. But don't forget about His glorious grace, for God will also be having millions to live in the new Heavens and the New Earth with Him wherein righteousness dwells for eternity because of what Jesus has done for them!

Consider Paul's words in Romans 9:9-23 (ESV). I believe they will tear your arguments in to pieces quite literally. Paul foresaw your reaction to these truths over 1900 years ago.
[b]
As it is written, "Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated."
14\tWhat shall we say then? Is there injustice on God's part? By no means!15 For he says to Moses, "I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion."16 So then it depends not on human will or exertion, but on God, who has mercy.17 For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, "For this very purpose I have raised you up, that I might show my power in you, and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth."18 So then he has mercy on whomever he wills, and he hardens whomever he wills.
19\tYou will say to me then, "Why does he still find fault? For who can resist his will?"20 But who are you, O man, to answer back to God? Will what is molded say to its molder, "Why have you made me like this?"21 Has the potter no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for dishonorable use?22 What if God, desiring to show his wrath and to make known his power, has endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction,23 in order to make known the riches of his glory for vessels of mercy, which he has prepared beforehand for glory---[/b]


Luke 17:10 So likewise you, when you shall have done all those things which are commanded you (repentance & putting your faith in/on Jesus), say, We are unprofitable servants: we have done that which was our duty to do.

To this verse I give a hearty amen. I am an unprofitable, wretched servant, unworthy of the grace God has shown me. Whatever God commands us, He gives the grace for us to do it! When we obey his command to repent, we do it in His strength!
Listen to the puritan John Owen, "To suppose that whatever God requireth of us that we have power of ourselves to do, is to make the cross and grace of Jesus Christ of none effect." Listen to Paul talking about this experience in his letter to the Galations, "20 I have been crucified with Christ. It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me. And the life I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me." (esv)

Quote:
When an armenian prays "God save my friend ____." The armenian is actually exercising a calvinistic belief-- for the armenian in this instance is asking God to violate his friend ____'s free will to save him!

Nope, not violating his friend's free will, but persuading and urging him to choose to repent.

[b]Again, we cannot "choose to repent." Repentance is granted to us from God.[/b]


A calvinistic belief is that God would save the person even if no one prayes.
Calvinist don't need to pray for a singal thing.

Ummm, well this certainly isn't my experience. Since I received assurance from God of my salvation and that I was chosen in Him before the foundation of the world, all I can say is that I have never been more desperate in prayer. Now, does God need my prayer? No. He doesn't need me period! Does He know what we pray before we even begin? Yes. Well, then why on earth do we pray may be a better question?!



Calvinist to a sinner: Jesus may have died for you.

I think there are calvinists on both side of this debate. Myself personally I do lean toward a "limited atonement"-- that is that the atonement was sufficient in itself to be applied to the whole world, but is limited in that it is only applied and specially for the elect. (Which is the majority view within calvinism...) But I do still have questions about both sides.

Psa 85:2 Thou hast forgiven the iniquity of thy people, thou hast covered all their sin. Selah.

Isaiah 53:8 He was taken from prison and from judgment, And who will declare His generation? For He was cut off from the land of the living; For the transgressions of My people He was stricken.

Mat 1:21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.

John 10:14-16 "I am the good shepherd; and I know My sheep, and am known by My own. (15) "As the Father knows Me, even so I know the Father; and I lay down My life for the sheep. (16) "And other sheep I have which are not of this fold; them also I must bring, and they will hear My voice; and there will be one flock and one shepherd.

Finally, Check out John 17:6-10,

6\t"I have manifested your name to the people whom you gave me out of the world. Yours they were, and you gave them to me, and they have kept your word.7 Now they know that everything that you have given me is from you.8 For I have given them the words that you gave me, and they have received them and have come to know in truth that I came from you; and they have believed that you sent me.9 I am praying for them. I am not praying for the world but for those whom you have given me, for they are yours.10 All mine are yours, and yours are mine, and I am glorified in them.

Does it not sound like Jesus intends only to save the chosen ones whom the Father gives Him?


Sinner: What must I do to be saved?
Calvinist Nothing, you can't do a thing.

This is a horrible misrepresentation of Calvinism. This is hyper-calvinism-- this is more calvinistic than John Calvin himself was. What must I do to be saved? Repent toward God and put your faith in the Lord Jesus Christ-- (and whether we realize it or not, when we are "doing" this, it is actually not us, but GOD who is at work within us.)

Now here are the practical implications of this truth, that God grants repentance, and I have not yet found it better preached on than when spurgeon said the following:

If thou feelest thy need of repentance, I will not now say to thee "repent," for I believe there are certain acts that must precede a sense of repentance. I should advise you to go to your houses, and if you feel that you have sinned, and yet cannot sufficiently repent of your transgressions, bow your knees before God and confess your sins: tell him you cannot repent as you would; tell him your heart is hard; tell him it is as cold as ice. You can do that if God has made you feel your need of a Saviour. Then if it should be laid to your heart to endeavour to seek after repentance, I will tell you the best way to find it. Spend an hour first in endeavouring to remember thy sins; and when conviction has gotten a firm hold on thee, then spend another hour—where? At Calvary, my hearer. Sit down and read that chapter which contains the history and mystery of the God that loved and died; sit down and think thou seest that glorious Man, with blood dropping from his hands, and his feet gushing rivers of gore; and if that does not make thee repent, with the help of God's Spirit, then I know of nothing that can. An old divine says, "If you feel you do not love God, love him till you feel you do: if you think you cannot believe, believe till you feel you believe." Many a man says he cannot repent, while he is repenting. Keep on with that repentance, till you feel you have repented. Only acknowledge thy transgressions; confess thy guiltiness; own that he were just if he should destroy thee; and say this, solemnly—
My faith doth lay its hand
On that dear head of thine,
While like a penitent I stand,
And there confess my sin.
-from the sermon entitled, "turn or burn"

C
ChrisJD May 15, 2009

What does writing "so much" have to do with inspiration?


Di you read what the Lord Jesus said?

Y
yoadam May 15, 2009

by ChrisJD on 2009/5/14 22:22:45

What does writing "so much" have to do with inspiration?

Di you read what the Lord Jesus said?

Yes. He certainly did not tell us, "Do not write or read any books over 400 pages lest you surely die." :-(

Y
yoadam May 15, 2009


Miccah wrote:
why do Christians pray that God would save an unbeliever?


Obedience.


[b]1 Thessalonians 5:17[/b]


BINGO :-)

Y
yoadam May 15, 2009

Lol, I just realized this entire time I have been spelling it "armenian" when it should be arminian! hahahha ;-)

L
Logic May 15, 2009

yoadam wrote:
Luk 13:3, Luk 13:3 I tell you, Nay: but, except you repent, you shall all likewise perish.
Aye, that is true, except you repent, you shall all likewise perish. It is just as true as Jesus' teaching on the new birth:
"Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God."

Is the new birth not something that God does inside of us?

The new birth is from faith & repentance first.

However, Thos are not given from God, but are commanded.

[b]You can not get around the fact that[/v] IF they are gifts which God must give, the God is directly responcible for the faithlessness & unrepentance of the world.
Then you have God condemning mankind for that which He did not do.


Man cannot simply pull himself up by his bootstraps and "repent!"
He can & must, for God commanded it.
The command implies ability.
Inability exempts from obligation.
These are facts of reality and reason.


Are all people called to repent? YES. Should we preach and command all people to repent? YES. Will people repent upon hearing it preached? Yes, but only those who are chosen by God among the elect.
Only a tyrant would command someone without giveing the ability.

Those who are [b]not[/b] chosen by God among the elect should not be commanded to repent if God will not give the ability.

Should we only preach to the elect? That would be impossible. Since we do not know who is an elect, we should preach the gospel freely to everyone.
You couldn't say that Jesus died for anyone, otherwise you might be lying, if they happen to be of the non-elect.

You shouldn't tell people to repent, because they might not be able to, it would be cruel.

How do you know that man will ALWAYS choose NO?
As I said it is because man is totally depraved since the fall.
Yes, I know that is what you said.
But, if mankind are "totaly depraved" from conception, then why is God angry with them?

My question of "How do you know that man will ALWAYS choose NO?" is that you are wrong because your theology/doctrine is nonsensical, it does not line up with reason or even reality.

Then man is inocent from the call to repent since (you say)they can not do it in the first place.
No way. We are guilty before God whether or not we even have an option from God to repent!
Reason/common sence tells us that if one can not d a thing, he is exempt from the obligation.

Example:
There is a rule that all people in a certain family must mow the lawn in turn.
Would the 2 year old be required to mow the lawn?
No, of course not, but in your theology, that two year old will be punished for not mowing the lawn.


In Adam all of humanity has sinned against the eternal God and therefore eternal punishment is humanity's reward!
Tell me, how in reality is anyone punished for anything they had no control over?

Man is innocent from sin since (you say) they were born that way and they can not do anything but sin.
Do you want justice?
[b]YES!!![/b]

If you want justice, then we wouldn't even exist, but perhaps to be tormented along with Adam & Eve in hell.
But the people who willfuly repent of their own free will are forgiven because of grace & mercy.
How is danming the repentant a justifiable thing to do?


Adam and the whole human race should have been wiped off the face of the planet. We should thank God for his amazing grace in the salvation of the elect-- it is no accident we are referred to as the "beloved!" It is even a grace that the wicked who are not chosen by God for eternal salvation should live on the this earth and enjoy a nice, sunny day
This god of your theology/doctrine is a sadistic tyrant.

God is responcible for the unrepentance and faithlessness of all mankind cince (you say) that God must give repentance first; same with faith.
No, Adam is responsible.
If only Adam, then why pumish the rest of mankind?

If the answer be, "all in Adam" then who is the inaugurator of this concept?
Who made this "all in Adam" to be?
The inaugurator would be to blaim for the way things are.


Saying God is responsible is not much different than the way Adam blamed Eve for sin and Eve blamed the devil for sin.
No, because the blaim was not on Eve, because Adam was truly responcible.

Your theology/doctrine has no one responcible because they had no control of theire sinfulness, they were born that way, born "totaly depraved"
IF one is born a certain way, he is not responcible or even guilty for being born that way:
BUT your theology/doctrine has mankind guilty and punished for being born a certain way.

With your theology/doctrine, God must be the inaugurator of these concepts, threfore He is the ultimatly to blaim for all those who are damned.

We are completely responsible in Adam, our first parent.
Please explain how.

The issue is not that we have sinned, but that we have never done anything but sin, and that in us dwells the sin nature which is inherited from ADAM.
With your theology/doctrine, we couldn't help it, sin is inevetable, unavoidable...
It is imposible not to sin.

Howis there any guilt in that?

Now did Adam & Eve have a free will that was not in bondage to sin before the fall?
A problem with your theology/doctrine is that you think amnkind is in bondage to sin which can not be reversed by ones willful obediance to God.
[b]Rom 6:16[/b]
[color=990000]Know you not, that to whom you[/color] (choose to) [color=990000]yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants you are to whom you obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?[/color]

They (Adam & Eve) willingly rebelled against God, and that just so happens to be the case of humanity ever since-- That is why we are all ultimately responsible.
We can not be ultimately responsible, because it was inevitable, unavaoidable...

In reality, is anyone responcible fore things that are inevitable or unavaoidable?
No.

L
Logic May 15, 2009

God would be sending milions to hell for what He has not done for them.
God can do what He wants. That's ok, no?
No, God can not be unreasonable as your theology/doctrine is.
God can not do injustice as your theology/doctrine has God doing.

God remains in the bounds of reality, but your theology/doctrine does not keep Him there.

God is not obligated to save anyone-- otherwise it would not be called "grace."
God IS obligated to save those who put theire own faith in/on Jesus and willfully repent.

When Adam fell-- humanity fell.
You can't even prove that from Scripture, but only misinterpreting it.

Consider Paul's words in Romans 9:9-23 (ESV). I believe they will tear your arguments in to pieces quite literally. Paul foresaw your reaction to these truths over 1900 years ago.
This does not tear my arguments in to pieces at all.

[b]Romans 9:13[/b] [color=990000]even as it has been written, "I loved Jacob, and I hated Esau."[/color]
Mal. 1:1-2 Gen 25:23
Two nations are in her womb, not that God hates Esau personally.
The reason why the Spirit says this is because it is to Israel, not the person of Israel which is Jacob.
So far Paul has been proving his point, that a great part of the seed of Abraham are excluded from the special promises of God, even the literal Israel. Paul, now introduces and refutes an objection...ect...

[b]14:[/b] [color=990000]14: What then shall we say? Is there not unrighteousness with God? Let it not be![/color]
Is there injustice with God - Is it unjust in God to give Jacob the blessing rather than Esau? or to accept believers, and them only? God forbid - In no wise.

This is well consistent with justice; for God has a right to fix the terms on which he will show mercy, according to his declaration to Moses as he interceded for all Israel, after they had committed idolatry with the golden calf.
"I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion [all according to the terms I myself have fixed - Namely, on those only who submit to my terms, who accept of it in the way that I have appointed.

The terms & the appointed way is by faith & repentance.

[b]15:[/b] [color=990000]For He said to Moses, "I will have mercy on whomever I will have mercy, and I will pity whomever I will pity."[/color]
Ex. 33:19
There is good reason for which God chooses to be gracious to and to whom HE will show mercy on.
God knows the heart of man. HE knows if & when they will yield or not.

God will be gracious to & show mercy on those HE knows will yield. For this is the character of God.
God is not stating that He is arbitrary, for that is against His character.

It is not saying that He can do anything He wants, just because He is God, for God's character has a boundary.
God has His own reasons for mercy which are based upon standards outside of Himself which has been before creation and are according to His character; He is...
selfless, Just, righteous, loving, compassionate, peaceable, gentle, and easily entreated, full of mercy, without partiality...ect...

[b]16"[/b] [color=990000]So, then, it is not of the one willing, nor of the one running, but of the One showing mercy, of God.[/color]
This verse is pointing out that man's favorite is not always God's favorite.

Abraham willed or desired that it the promise might be given to Ishmael.
Isaac also willed or desired that the promise might be given to Esau.

This verse is in context with Exodus 33:18-20 & Abraham willing that the promise would come through Ishmael as the context proves Genesis 17:18
Moreover, in Genesis 27 Isaac is willing for Esau to have the blessing and Esau "running" to hunt and make Isaac's favorite meal for the blessing.

God also chooses the one which is not wanted or favored by man.
Jacob wanted Rachel because he favored her more than Leah. But God shown HIS favor on Leah by her child bringing the SEED through Judah.

[b]17:[/b] [color=990000]For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, "For this very thing I raised you up, so that I might display My power in you, and so that My name might be publicized in all the Earth."[/color]
As we look the word up in the Hebrew, the word for "stand" also means to "keep alive, continue, remain, repair, tarry, endure, stay, be present...ect...
Therefore the co-text of this vers could read as :
Exod 9:16 "For this sake I keep you alive, in order to make you see My power, and that My name may resound in the entire earth."

Pharaoh is the king of the greatest kingdom on Earth at that time, the thing which takes place between God(or Moses) and Pharaoh can not be done without the whole world knowing it.

As if God is saying, "I let you live, how &/or why whould/could you still rebel?
The saying of Solomon in [b]Ecc 8:11[/b] is true: [color=990000]Because sentence against an evil work is not executed speedily, therefore the heart of the sons of men is fully set in them to do evil."[/color]

IOW, God let Pharaoh to keep living and not judge him speedily to show Pharaoh HIS power in him.
Yet, Pharaoh still is proud and rebellious.
This is why Paul says what he does in Romans 9:18: God had Mercy on Pharaoh by keeping him alive to show him His power & He also hardens pharaoh unintentionally from the circumstance of the plagues.

It does not say that Pharaoh was born for wrath.
Pharaoh hardened his own heart from the circumstances which God brought about because of judgment because of his pride.

[b]18:[/b] [color=990000]So, then, to whom He desires, He shows mercy. And to whom He desires, He hardens.[/color]
God let Pharaoh to keep living to show Pharaoh HIS power in him. Yet, Pharaoh still is proud and rebellious.

This is why Paul says what he does here: God had Mercy on Pharaoh by keeping him alive to show him His power & He also hardens pharaoh by happenstance in the circumstance of the plagues.
God knew Pharaoh would harden his heart & used that situation to HIS advantage.

In 1Sam 6:6, this Scripture actually say that Pharaoh hardened his heart and that God didn't. Why didn't this Scripture say that God did it?
Because Pharaoh actualy did it & not God.

[b]19:[/b] [color=990000]You will then say to me, Why does He yet find fault? For who has resisted His intention?[/color]
Pharaoh hardened his heart as he resisted God & denied HIS sovereignty.
If God's intention was to use us the hardness of pharaoh's heart, who can resist His intention?
However, you Pharaoh was always able to repent & was expected to; same goes for all of creation.

[b]20:[/b] [color=990000]Yes, rather, O man, who are you answering against God? Shall the thing formed say to the One forming it, Why did You make me like this?[/color]Isa. 29:16
Why did You make me like this?
The answer is; You were judged by God, and HE gave you over to your own ways & you took the offer, So God used that instead for HIS purpose.
So, quite your belly aikin' and do what you're supposed to do, REPENT!!!

[b]21:[/b] [color=990000]Or does not the potter have authority over the clay, out of the one lump to make one vessel to honor, and one to dishonor?[/color]
This is not saying that God actually makes vessels specifically for wrath.

The Potter doesn't throw the lump of clay away, but uses the same & makes a new vessel out of it.
The Potter did not mar the clay Himself, but the clay became marred in His hands.
The Potter(God) did all HE could do to keep the clay(Israel) from being marred. He sent Jeremiah(along with all the other prophets) and the clay(Israel) rebelled anyway.
Therefore, the Potter had to reform the clay into a new vessel.
Israel was warned to repent and they did not, that is the clay being marred. God sent them to Babylon because of there repentance, this is the clay being reformed.
See notes on next verse for proof of this.

[b]22:[/b] [color=990000]But if God, desiring to demonstrate His wrath, and to make His power known, endured in much long-suffering vessels of wrath having been fitted out for destruction,[/color]
The Greek word for the word “fitted” is “reformed”.
Fitted to destruction means to be reformed for destruction.
Reformed from a vessel of honor to be a vessel of dishonor.
See notes on Romans 9:21
2 Timothy 2:20-21
Ephesians 2:3
God loves all His creation even those who hate him, that is why God endured in much long-suffering with them. 1Corinth 13:7, "charity (love) bears all things (is patient)

L
Logic May 15, 2009

yoadam wrote:
Whatever God commands us, He gives the grace for us to do it! When we obey his command to repent, we do it in His strength!
According to your own theology/doctrine, this is not true.

You claim that God does not give the grace to repent or to have faith to the non-elect.

When an armenian prays "God save my friend ____." The armenian is actually exercising a calvinistic belief-- for the armenian in this instance is asking God to violate his friend ____'s free will to save him!
Nope, not violating his friend's free will, but persuading and urging him to choose to repent.
Again, we cannot "choose to repent." Repentance is granted to us from God.
Then you have God being dirsectly responcible for the unrepentance & faithlessness of the world, becaus it is up to Him to give such.
Can we get real here?

Finally, Check out John 17:6-10,

6 "I have manifested your name to the people whom you gave me out of the world. Yours they were, and you gave them to me, and they have kept your word.7 Now they know that everything that you have given me is from you.8 For I have given them the words that you gave me, and they have received them and have come to know in truth that I came from you; and they have believed that you sent me.9 I am praying for them. I am not praying for the world but for those whom you have given me, for they are yours.10 All mine are yours, and yours are mine, and I am glorified in them.

Does it not sound like Jesus intends only to save the chosen ones whom the Father gives Him?

This is how the Father give people to His Son:
[b]John 6:45[/b] [color=990000]It is written in the prophets, And they shall be all taught of God. [b]Every man therefore that has heard, and has learned of the Father, comes unto me.[/b] [/color]

Sinner: What must I do to be saved?
This is a horrible misrepresentation of Calvinism. This is hyper-calvinism--
hyper-calvinism is only the logical conclusion to all other forms of calvinism.

This discussion is locked.

Archived
1 of 21 posts