... as well as complete healing from a broken foot one day after the fact], let's just say, "I believe in the power of prayer to heal miraculously".I should add, I horribly injured my foot again this winter and refused to go to the doctor, but trusted in prayer alone. I and the Church prayed for healing but it didn't occur…yet.
Might want to get that x-rayed, doesn't sound like that foot got all that well healed the first time there brother. Generally, if you break a bone and it is reset correctly it will actually become [i]stronger[/i]. And, I might add, what will happen to your family in the event your canceled health coverage and presumption upon God's will if it one day leaves you disabled or an invalid and a burden upon your family?
This is really the gist of the whole situation, including the sad, heart breaking situation now with this family. Reading the article my first instinct was something along the lines of '[i]and where did he assimilate this idea in the first place?[/i]' regarding;
"Neumann, who once studied to be a Pentecostal minister, testified Thursday that he believed God would heal his daughter and he never expected her to die. God promises in the Bible to heal, he said.
"If I go to the doctor, I am putting the doctor before God," Neumann testified. "I am not believing what he said he would do."
There is no end to these shenanigans and the [i]teaching[/i] that runs along the lines of [i]'It's always Gods will to heal'[/i]. There is no promise anywhere explicitly that is not tortured away from the whole of scripture and that cannot be at a minimum dismissed as contradictory by Paul's admonishen to Timothy in
1Ti 5:23 as one example.
The word is presumption. Another example given to the Benny Hinn's of the world that will go by the wayside or be put down as a lack of faith article so they can continue to sell their wares and their [i]version[/i] of interpretation, the verse;
[i]Jesus answered, "Do you say this of your own accord, or did others say it to you about me?"[/i] Joh 18:34
Comes to mind. That is, did this man come to his own conclusions or was it aped by '[i] others say it to you about me?[/i] If he was studying to be a Pentecostal minister as stated the possibility seems strong enough even though that may be a presumption on my part. It's a clever twist on their part to not have faith in [u]their version of faith[/u], not faith in God which need not presume upon Him.
[i] But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel. [/i] 1Ti 5:8
All that the word [i]provide[/i] obligates us to and even to overlook the context in wonder of what made these women widows in the first place, especially if;
[i]Now she that is a widow indeed, and desolate, trusteth in God, and continueth in supplications and prayers night and day.[/i] 1Ti 5:5
Certainly this is not to suggest there was no trusting God prior and yet for all this, how is it that this gets thrown to the dogs;
[b]he hath denied the faith[/b]
Not a [i]lack[/i] of faith but faith [i]denied[/i], it's actually a violation of faith. I didn't intend to start down this road and draw out verses to dispute or haggle over the nuances of them - This is one area where we have covered miles of ground in the past and I for one would like to see some accountability form these so called 'teachers' who put these notions in peoples heads in the first place. The long redundant rant has been that there are serious [b]ramifications[/b] from this nonsense, that which I was at one time even slightly caught up in with the whole WOF camp though it doesn't end with them either, the JW's teach similarly and the alterations and variations are numerous. As far as I am concerned these people are accessories to this tragedy and to many that have come before it and will continue to come long after it.
25 years for ignorance ... I can only shake my head and grieve, too bad there isn't more said as to where he got all this in the first place - Maybe he did derive it all on his own. But hold this tragic example as fire to the feet of the so called "Faith healers" and dealers of this hour and they will only seek to worm their way out of it. They don't care one iota about the fallout, ruined lives and unnecessary suffering of their hearers and 'believers'. There should be justice even in this present world by the 'word-lings' - What else is this admonishen for;
[i]Obey your leaders and submit to them, for they are keeping watch over your souls, as those who will have to give an account. Let them do this with joy and not with groaning, for that would be of no advantage to you.[/i] Heb 13:17
Even Jesus would not offend them nor disobey the 'worldly' powers that be. The pseudo, puppet gov. of the Jews and the Sanhedrin being something else entirely. And Paul as a [u]Roman[/u] citizen sought justice with the same powers that be. This is where Deep Thinker is dead on in his assessment, I concur whole heartedly.
Robby;
Know that in many areas of my city you are no longer allowed to voice those convictions as you are a Christian. We have religion free zones [UW, the capital square, our many abortion clinics…] to protect the people from the intolerant hatred and bigoted homophobic onslaughts of hurtful divisive Christians. So thank God for forums such as this! However I think we have begun to bifurcate in our discussion…
My original query being how do we feel about being thrown in jail [silenced] for bearing our convictions as Christians, in this case, miraculous healings [or lack of] of which I am a delighted recipient. I really didn't know the exact specifics as I mentioned.
25 years? My God! That is just to teach us to stay in our place. This severity of sentencing wouldn't happen in the GLBT community I am sure. The Moslem community? I don’t know, thus my query.
I would once again concur with HeartSong and add:
Joshua 24:15 And if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.
I respect what you have stated here in regards to the misconstrued notions of Christian convictions but feel this is a mixing of wrong metaphors so to speak. We shouldn't craft a complex that makes us 'martyrs' due to our own stupidity or breaking the laws of the land. Using Joshua 24:15 as a defense is akin to abusing it against;
[i]God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth. [/i] Joh 4:24
And the truth is no healing is promised upon presumption and serving the Lord has nothing to do with believing someones else misguided version, 'conviction' of faith or faith healing. Even one's own.* This and others like it is too often used as a scapegoat for good old fashioned common sense. How many times must we hear a defensive posture taken for that which we are responsible for? "[i]I am serving the Lord[/i]" - Are you? Truly? Or are you serving your self ultimately, back-peddling and dismissing your obligation and pining it on the Lord? (I am using the word 'you' in a generative manner).
*[i]Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, [u]rightly dividing[/u] the word of truth.[/i] 2Ti 2:15