Thank-you, Christian and Taylor.
I did find this and it is beginning to make sense:
"an angry countenance - a backbiting tongue; drives it away, discourages and silences it. When a man puts on a stern countenance, a frowning and angry look, on such who bring him slanderous reports and idle tales of their neighbours, and reproach and backbite them, it checks them, and puts a stop to their practices; whereas listening to them, and especially with an air of pleasure, encourages them in them; were there not so many that take pleasure in hearing those talebearers and backbiters, were they more roughly dealt with, as the blustering north wind does with the rain, there would not be so much of this evil practised.."
This concept runs counter to what one might consider proper. That must have been the mental block that kept me from understanding this interpretation.
Thanks again so kindly, brothers. I appreciate it.
ginnyrose