BSBKJVWEBYLTASVBBEWMBT4TDBY|HymnsMusicDonate
Menu
Theology

End-Time View

G
Giggles Dec 23, 2009

I was curious as to what end-time views are represented here on SermonIndex, not for debating purposes but to get a feel for where the Body stands at large on this issue.

If you would care to comment, it would be greatly appreciated.

As far as the millenium: pre, a, or post.

If pre-millennial, where do you see the rapture: pre-trib, mid-trib, or post-trib.

I realize there are other views, but these seem to be the dominant ones. If yours isn't listed please post it anyway. Again, I'm not looking to hash it out over which view is superior, but merely learn which we are persuaded to hold on to as fellow believers.

*Edited for spelling errors*

sermonindex Dec 23, 2009

I believe pre-milleniual is the more apostolic view.

As for the timing of the rapture I will not dis-fellowship with brothers over this issue. I am more towards a post-trib stance but I do hope sometimes it is pre-trib. I will not argue with God when I am being raptured :)

H
HeartSong Dec 23, 2009

I will not argue with God when I am being raptured :)

:-) :-) :-)

sermonindex Dec 23, 2009

Pre -Millennial and post trib rapture.

B
BeYeDoers Dec 23, 2009

I would consider myself post-trib pre-amill. I am historicist on most of Revelation, with some idealism mixed in. I believe we are still before the "millenium", but I don't believe the millenium will be a literal thousand years or a literal earthly kingdom, but it will be visible for the sorting out for judgment.

Make sense? doesn't to me either ;-)

L
Lysa Dec 23, 2009

Like, Greg, I don't argue about timing and such (anymore, I used to though).

I hold to a belief in premillennialism.

I'm not convinced of a "rapture" but I do believe in the resurrections; one at the beginning of Christ's 1,000 year reign and one at the end.

God bless you brother if you believe differently!

PS: (edit) A lot of people do not agree with me on this point but this is just how the Lord allowed me to see it. Live as to attain the first resurrection. His word says, "[i]blessed and holy is he that has part in the first resurrection[/i]."

A
Areadymind Dec 23, 2009

I am pre-millenial, and am against getyour-prophecy-and-eschatilogical-understanding-from-the-newsism.

I bet that is the longest ism someone has ever made up here...

Revelation is fundamentally about Jesus Christ, and I think a lot of people miss the verse that points that out at the beginning. It seems to me that the forest is missed for the trees a lot. I am always blessed when I just take what Revelation says at face value. I honestly am often troubled a bit at how the Church and politicians have used Eschatology to further ideological and political agendas. I have a hard time reconciling that in my mind to be honest.

I can learn a great example from the two witnesses, I want to worship like those in Heaven, I want to ask myself which letter and which church I am sitting in, The 144,000 are the most amazing followers of Jesus and I want to be like them. I want to come out of Babylon by faith just like Abraham did, and I cannot wait until the New Jerusalem is established. I long to eat from the tree of life, free from sin. I long to see God make everything right. Where I fit into all that is beyond me...God knows. I trust he will do right when He sits in his holy sanctuary and no-one can enter as he pours out his wrath.
Above all things, I want Jesus physical rule and reign...there will be nothing like it. I long for this more deeply in my heart than any other thing in life. Jesus is my King, my Lord and my God forever and ever to the glory of God the Father...

sermonindex Dec 23, 2009

:-P Oh LORD, I hope this thread stays sane. After I drop this bomb maybe it won't. :-P

I hold to the Preterist view, which I believe is more accurate to Apostolic teaching (sorry Greg).

There are no "gap theories" and "this generation" means THAT generation that heard it since it was that generation that was asking the questions.

There was a resurrection of the saints that occurred AFTER Christ rose from the grave (at what point is uncertain). I believe in a "catching away", but not how the mainstream portrays it. However, I am like Greg, I won't dis-fellowship with anyone on this issue.

It's important to me that Christ is living and ruling now, not in some future kingdom of God in Jerusalem.

A
Areadymind Dec 23, 2009

Not a bomb at all. There are so many views on this that you would have to live in a cave if we disfellowshiped with everyone over it. I agree too that I want Christ Ruling now just as much brother.

The bible is clear though that the hope of his return is purifying.

W
wayneman Dec 23, 2009

Oh LORD, I hope this thread stays sane. After I drop this bomb maybe it won't.

I hold to the Preterist view, which I believe is more accurate to Apostolic teaching


If that doesn't bring Dogma Enforcement down on you, I can't imagine what would. Expect a visit from the Fundamafia tonight.

I am pan-trib: however it pans out...

K
KingJimmy Dec 23, 2009

I believe what Art Katz does about the end-times. Pre-mil, post-trib, the Jews going through a second holocaust, the near destruction of the modern state of Israel, the church coming to maturity and provoking the same Jews who have been exiled throughout the nations unto salvation.

A
Areadymind Dec 24, 2009

I am still really considering a lot of the things Art Katz said...it is a lot to chew on and digest, and certainly not a common belief, I cannot help thinking though, that his views dramatically seem to reflect the consistent nature and heart of God in so many ways. I am excited about the next book that Burning Bush is going to release in a few weeks about this exact topic.

sermonindex Dec 24, 2009

Eschatology has always highly interested me, especially since it's one of the things that the Lord used powerfully to instill the fear of God in me and draw me to Christ for salvation.

I believe in Historic Premillenialism. It's historic because it traces back all the way through church history to the Apostolic church. It's Premillenial because it says that Jesus Christ will return literally and physically before the literal Millennium. The rapture, the first resurrection, and the Second Coming happen at the same time (after the final tribulation). The restoration of God's chosen nation, Israel, is on the horizon in this view, as they cry out for salvation toward the end of the tribulation, believe in Christ, and see Him come in the clouds to rescue them in the nick of time before they're all exterminated.

A good website promoting this position was put together by brother Eli (who sometimes posts on these forums). You can find it here: http://www.olivetdiscourse.com/ -There are also some good articles from recognized men in church history.

A very good explanation of different end-time viewpoints, along with a good case for Premillennialism, can be found in Wayne Grudem's Systematic Theology, for those interested. Grudem presents the main schools of thought along with their reasoning from the Scriptures, but then explains why he believes Historic Premillennialism to be correct.

I believe this is similar to (or identical to) the view Art Katz held.

A
ADisciple Dec 24, 2009

I would like to suggest to all of us that the Lord Jesus is very likely-- almost certainly, I would say-- going to appear in a way that we are not expecting... and which has the potential to be a stumblingblock to those who have pretty much made up their minds they know His itinerary.

It's better to seek very earnestly to simply be abiding in Him, now. That vantage point, and that alone alone, when He appears, shall enable us to see and understand clearly and not be put to shame.

"And NOW, little children abide in Him, that when He shall appear, we may have confidence and not be ashamed before Him at His coming" (1 Jn. 2.28).

sermonindex Dec 24, 2009

No way Deepthinker, I knew there was something funny about you :) Can I ask you when you came to your preterist position?.......brother Frank

H
Heydave Dec 24, 2009

Hi Deepthinker,

I won't fall out with you over this. Your bomb has no dynamite! ;-)

There was a resurrection of the saints that occurred AFTER Christ rose from the grave (at what point is uncertain). I believe in a "catching away", but not how the mainstream portrays it. However, I am like Greg, I won't dis-fellowship with anyone on this issue.
I know we've crossed this issue before so I won't say any more than what I was reading last night.

2Ti 2:16 But shun profane [and] vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness.
2:17 And their word will eat as doth a canker: of whom is Hymenaeus and Philetus;
2:18 Who concerning the truth have erred, saying that the resurrection is past already; and overthrow the faith of some.

H
Heydave Dec 24, 2009

Hi ADisciple,

I would like to suggest to all of us that the Lord Jesus is very likely-- almost certainly, I would say-- going to appear in a way that we are not expecting... and which has the potential to be a stumblingblock to those who have pretty much made up their minds they know His itinerary.
I agree that we don't know all the detail and that there is a danger in being dogmatic about the exact sequence of events, however......

1Th 5:4 But ye, brethren, are not in darkness, that that day should overtake you as a thief.
5:5 Ye are all the children of light, and the children of the day: we are not of the night, nor of darkness.
5:6 Therefore let us not sleep, as [do] others; but let us watch and be sober.
5:7 For they that sleep sleep in the night; and they that be drunken are drunken in the night.
5:8 But let us, who are of the day, be sober, putting on the breastplate of faith and love; and for an helmet, the hope of salvation.
5:9 For God hath not appointed us to wrath, but to obtain salvation by our Lord Jesus Christ,

As believers if we are walking in the light and awake we should NOT be surprised!

Mat 24:27 For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.

It won't be something quiet like the first coming.

Every Blessing. Have a good Christmas!

D
davym Dec 24, 2009

It's very interesting to hear different views on this.

Whatever view, it'll be wonderful when the Lord returns, whenever that may be.

I'm pre-trib, pre-millenial myself. Granted there is very little Scripture to support a pre-trib position. However one thing that I often ponder is that the tribulation period is a period of judgement. As Christians (truly born again believers) we have been judged at Calvary so it makes no sense to judge us again.

This is just a thought and I'm sure many of you will see error here.

Merry Christmas everybody.

David

T
twayneb Dec 24, 2009

I will have to fall on the side of,,,

No special secret pre-trib rapture
A resurrection of the saints and catching away sometime toward the middle or latter half of the tribulation.
I think the preterist view is rather odd scripturally, but it doesn't cause me to stop loving and respecting my brother. Just can't reconcile his view.

As I heard someone say, it seems as though the prophetic books are beginning more and more to read like yesterday's newspaper. One thing I do believe, it is time to look up, for my redemption draweth nigh.

Heard an interesting quote attributed to Benjamin Netanyahu when speaking with someone who was talking to him about Jesus being the Messiah, which he, as a Jew, does not believe. He said, "I am not sure about that, but when the Messiah does come I will ask Him, sir, have you visited our country before?" I guess when Jesus does return we will all be 100% sure about our eschatology.

Travis. :-)

A
ADisciple Dec 24, 2009


Heydave wrote:
I agree that we don't know all the detail and that there is a danger in being dogmatic about the exact sequence of events, however......

1Th 5:4 But ye, brethren, are not in darkness, that that day should overtake you as a thief.
5:5 Ye are all the children of light, and the children of the day: we are not of the night, nor of darkness.
5:6 Therefore let us not sleep, as [do] others; but let us watch and be sober.
5:7 For they that sleep sleep in the night; and they that be drunken are drunken in the night.
5:8 But let us, who are of the day, be sober, putting on the breastplate of faith and love; and for an helmet, the hope of salvation.
5:9 For God hath not appointed us to wrath, but to obtain salvation by our Lord Jesus Christ,

As believers if we are walking in the light and awake we should NOT be surprised!

Mat 24:27 For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.

It won't be something quiet like the first coming.

Every Blessing. Have a good Christmas!

Hi Dave,
It wasn't so much the sequence of events as the Way He shall appear that I had in mind as being something unexpected... and which His own would find difficult to grasp.

Even the first time He appeared it was necessary that a man be sent before Him to prepare the people. There was a well established theology back then as to how the Messiah was supposed to appear. He didn't appear that way. Those who received John the Baptist's ministry were ready for Him, and received Him in His appearing. Those who did not... crucified Him.

And so in our day, we deeply need this preparing ministry similiar to John the Baptist... to prepare the way of the Lord. I notice the tense in Matthew 17.11. "Elias truly SHALL come first, and restore all things." Then He went on to say that yes, Elijah had come already, preceding His first appearing. John the Baptist.

But "Elijah" is yet to come prior to His second appearing, prior to "the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD" (Mal.4.5).

I want to have the kind of heart that is teachable, and open to receive, if and when some God-sent ministry in the spirit of "Elijah" comes along and begins to wash the eyes of my understanding, washing misconceptions away.

...I believe the passage you quoted from Thessalonians is very pertinent.

...A very blessed Christmas to you, too, Dave... and to all of you!

This discussion is locked.

Archived
1 of 141 posts