BSBKJVWEBYLTASVBBEWMBT4TDBY|HymnsMusicDonate
Menu
Theology

Is there a King James version..just minus the Thee's & Thou's?

S
Silo Jan 15, 2010

I love the King James version but don't read it because I'm thrown off by the THEE and THOU and THUS. But I wonder if there's any bible that just excludes those words? Thanks.

NKJV changes many words as well.

sermonindex Jan 15, 2010


I don't know if there is, but, the use of Thee, Thou etc, ye and you, enables the reader to distinguish exactly when the writer is speaking to, or about, the singular or plural.

I recommend you check out Ron Bailey's www.biblebase.com, and find his helpful information sheet on how to understand them, rather than that you dispense with them.

:-)

C
Christisking Jan 15, 2010

Yes - Ray Comfort did a version that is the KJV minus the "Thee's and Thou's" - it is a very good version - I have used it in the past - you can find it here

[url=http://www.evidencebible.com/]http://www.evidencebible.com/[/url]

God bless,

Patrick
[url=http://jonahproject.org/index.php?option=com_frontpage&Itemid=1]The Jonah Project[/url]

M
MityDisciple Jan 15, 2010

Yes there is one and it's great. It's called the sword bible erkjv (easy reading King James Bible)Swordbible.org.
It has red letter in OLD testament also. It does not change the text. It's great to read and compare with the kjv, eventually you end up just reading the king james cuz you'll see that it reads much better when your used to it.

A lot of people end up switching to the new king james version which is not quite the same. I would recomend the NASB over the NKJV. But try this one out if you can get your hands on one. A good study bible could be of help too. The thomas nelson kjv study bible is pretty good, the commentaries are a bit off. But there is the meaning of archaic words in the middle collums.

A word of warning, when you get the flow of reading the King James you might just never read another translation again.:)
Always pray before you read too ask the holy-spirit to reaveal to you what God is trying to say to you.

God Bless You in your reading of the word...

S
Santana Jan 15, 2010

I'll have to try pressing thru the thee's and thou's. helpful info here.

sermonindex Jan 18, 2010


I had an afterthought about the matter of KJV over other versions, which is, if we factor in that 'James' is the Anglicisation of JACOB, how many people would make more effort to read it just once (at least) if it were commonly known as

'King Jacob's Authorised Version'?


Now, in so commenting, I am not making claims for the Christian testimony, (or, notions of 'the divine right of kings') of King James (Jacob), I (of England) & VI (of Scotland), but he seems to have been God's man for the English speaking nations, at that time on earth, to establish that it is okay to have the word of God in one's own language, which of course, is how it was originally written. On the other hand, perhaps the [i]vernacular - James -[/i] of an overtly Jewish name, did in fact, give the translation even wider acceptance.

G
Goldminer Jan 18, 2010

I will tell you another great version, the Darby version. They went back and tried to make it as close to the orginal as possible and still readable.

sermonindex Jan 18, 2010

If you truly understood WHY the "thees, thous and ye's" are in there you would not want to remove them... you would embrace them

In most of England, at the time the KJV came about, for the most part the people did not speak with these words. It had already faded out. The English language had evolved to the point where it really was not a whole lot different than it is now. There were pockets of England where they were still used these phrasings to a small extent, but generally it was not so.

The translators chose to use those words. And for good reason. I would recommend you go dig and study... and find out why.

Krispy

M
Mondello Jan 28, 2010

When I first started to read God's word, I read the Living Bible. The reason was because it was easy to understand. I later came to discover that there were things about this bible that bothered me, so I switched to the New King James. The longer I served God, the closer I wanted to get to the purity of the word, and that meant putting away the more modern translations. I got myself a regular King James bible with commentary by Finis Dake, using the commentary to help me through the parts I did not understand. Now I rarely read the Dake commentary unless I'm doing a study. Just for reading, I have come to most appreciate the standard King James version with no commentary. I get much more out of the bible just reading a plain King James than I do from any of the other bibles.

The point I'm making is that there really is no substitute for the standard King James, complete with thee, thou, and thus. It may be difficult at first to get used to, but it's well worth it.

B
BenBrockway Jan 28, 2010

I'd HIGHLY recommend the Message....

;-)

S
Santana Jan 28, 2010

I don't know about the Message but ummmm....

I will tough it out and go down the narrow path and accept the Thee's and thou's.

I will not be intimidated! =)

sermonindex Jan 28, 2010

I enjoy the King James very much and when you read the "ye" I just read it as "you". You'll get the hang of it after a while. However, I have often thought to do up a personal copy of the bible without these.

The verb "eth" has been removed from the New King James and other so called translations. This is a very important verb and it should carry the same weight when translating into our common vernacular. For example.

John 3:16 could read.

For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever [continually] believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.

I've used the word "continually" as this is what is meant for the verb "eth". It's to Persistently, Habitually, believe, not just "believes" as the other translations say. In saying just believe really weakens the commandments when it says to "Love the LORD your God and CLING to Him". This is what it means to "believeth" in Jesus. It's to throw ourselves at the mercy seat, which is Christ.

Eventually through time, the English language will evolve into different patterns of speech. In 500 years it will be even harder to decipher the King James Version or anything English for that matter.

I would like to see our generation read the King James bible without the poetic Elizabethan pronouns and changing none of the other words as there is absolutely nothing wrong with them. Preserving the King James version to me is like preserving the memory of William Tyndale who was martyred for translating the bible into English, we must tread carefully.

sermonindex Jan 28, 2010

I don't know about the Message but ummmm.... I will tough it out and go down the narrow path and accept the Thee's and thou's. I will not be intimidated! =)
Forgive me, but I have read portions of the Message bible and the way this guy does his wording makes me laugh.
God created the Heavens and Earth—all you see, all you don't see. Earth was a soup of nothingness, a bottomless emptiness, an inky blackness. God's Spirit brooded like a bird above the watery abyss. 3-5 God spoke: "Light!" And light appeared. God saw that light was good and separated light from dark. God named the light Day, he named the dark Night. It was evening, it was morning— Day One. 6-8 God spoke: "Sky! In the middle of the waters; separate water from water!" God made sky. He separated the water under sky from the water above sky. And there it was: he named sky the Heavens; It was evening, it was morning— Day Two. 9-10 God spoke: "Separate! Water-beneath-Heaven, gather into one place; Land, appear!" And there it was. God named the land Earth. He named the pooled water Ocean. God saw that it was good. 11-13 God spoke: "Earth, green up! Grow all varieties of seed-bearing plants, Every sort of fruit-bearing tree." And there it was. Earth produced green seed-bearing plants, all varieties, And fruit-bearing trees of all sorts. God saw that it was good. It was evening, it was morning— Day Three. 14-15 God spoke: "Lights! Come out! Shine in Heaven's sky! Separate Day from Night. Mark seasons and days and years, Lights in Heaven's sky to give light to Earth." And there it was. 16-19 God made two big lights, the larger to take charge of Day, The smaller to be in charge of Night; and he made the stars. God placed them in the heavenly sky to light up Earth And oversee Day and Night, to separate light and dark. God saw that it was good. It was evening, it was morning— Day Four. 20-23 God spoke: "Swarm, Ocean, with fish and all sea life! Birds, fly through the sky over Earth!" God created the huge whales, all the swarm of life in the waters, And every kind and species of flying birds. God saw that it was good. God blessed them: "Prosper! Reproduce! Fill Ocean! Birds, reproduce on Earth!" It was evening, it was morning— Day Five. 24-25 God spoke: "Earth, generate life! Every sort and kind: cattle and reptiles and wild animals—all kinds." And there it was: wild animals of every kind, Cattle of all kinds, every sort of reptile and bug. God saw that it was good. 26-28 God spoke: "Let us make human beings in our image, make them reflecting our nature So they can be responsible for the fish in the sea, the birds in the air, the cattle, And, yes, Earth itself, and every animal that moves on the face of Earth." God created human beings; he created them godlike, Reflecting God's nature. He created them male and female. God blessed them: "Prosper! Reproduce! Fill Earth! Take charge! Be responsible for fish in the sea and birds in the air, for every living thing that moves on the face of Earth." 29-30 Then God said, "I've given you every sort of seed-bearing plant on Earth And every kind of fruit-bearing tree, given them to you for food. To all animals and all birds, everything that moves and breathes, I give whatever grows out of the ground for food." And there it was. 31 God looked over everything he had made; it was so good, so very good! It was evening, it was morning— Day Six.
It reads out like a data sheet or from a mindless automaton.

L
lovejt Jan 28, 2010

Try New American Standard and compare it with KJV. Use both in your studies.

This discussion is locked.

Archived
1 of 14 posts