Regarding the historical development of the doctrine of the Holy Trinity:
To what extent was Apostle Paul aware of the deity of Christ, and if he made any attempt to reconcile this with monotheism?
Why wasn't Paul clearer on this issue?
Regarding the historical development of the doctrine of the Holy Trinity:
To what extent was Apostle Paul aware of the deity of Christ, and if he made any attempt to reconcile this with monotheism?
Why wasn't Paul clearer on this issue?
Paul said that in Christ all the fullness of the
Deity dwells in bodily form. [Colossians 2:9-10]
Paul used GOD our Savior and Christ our Savior
interchangeably. Paul believed in One Lord, One
faith, One baptism, One GOD and Father of all
who is over all and through all and in all.
[see Ephesians 4:5-6] Paul revealed the mystery
of godliness; GOD was manifest in the flesh,
vindicated in the Spirit, beheld by angels,
proclaimed among the nations, believed on in
the world, taken up in glory. {I Timothy 3:16]
Thanks. But the deity of Christ (and by extension, the doctrine of the Holy Trinity) is largely implicit than explicit among Paul's epistles. In contrast, John is very explicit about it.
Was Paul aware of the implications of Jesus being God for Judaistic monotheism?
Why Paul wasn't clearer on the deity of Christ Jesus and the doctrine of the Holy Trinity?
Keep in mind that the apostle Paul's letters were what scholars call, "occasional letters." They were generally written in an ad hoc nature, and addressed issues as they needed to be addressed. If a particular topic did not need to be addressed, he did not bring it up. It seems he probably left his churches with a sufficient knowledge of this issue, and did not need to discuss it by letter.
Hi,
My understanding that 'the doctrine of the Holy Trinity' was a response to heresy being suggested to the Church by outsiders, especially those who did not have the deep understanding of who God is which He had committed to the descendents of Abraham - Romans 3:1 What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit [i]is there[b]unto them were committed the oracles of God
So, in the scriptures I quote below, I just want to get you thinking.
Deu 6:4, in the Sacred Names Bible (KJV) states 'Hear, O Israel: YHVH our ELOHIYM is one YHVH:' In Genesis 1, ELOHIYM is the only name God gives Himself (It appears 32 times in that chapter), and in Hebrew, this plural is not limited to three.
For interest, consider Rev 3:1, Rev 4:5, Rev 5:6, Zech 3:9, Eze 43:2, Rev 1:15. Of course there is great symbolism in seven, and three, but perhaps modern Bible students are missing something that was immediately understood by the early Church?
There is also an interesting opposite in this verse: Matt 12:45.
Compare
Lev 18:2 Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, I am the LORD your God. 3 After the doings of the land of Egypt, wherein ye dwelt, shall ye not do: and after the doings of the land of Canaan, whither I bring you, shall ye not do: neither shall ye walk in their ordinances... 27 (For all these abominations have the men of the land done, which [i]were[b]That the land spue not you out also, when ye defile it[i]were[i]them
and: Zech 13:2, in light of Jesus Christ's reference to 'this wicked generation'.
1 Cor 14:10, 1 Cor 8:4 As concerning therefore the eating of those things that are offered in sacrifice unto idols, we know that an idol [i]is[i]there is[i]there is but[i]are[i]are
Acts 17 from the Sacred Names Bible elucidates further:
23 For as I passed by, and beheld your devotions, I found an altar with this inscription, TO THE UNKNOWN GOD. Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, him declare I unto you.
24 ELOHIYM that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is YHVH of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands;
25 Neither is worshipped with men's hands, as though he needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things;
26 And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;
27 That they should seek YHVH, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us:
28 For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring.
29 Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of ELOHIYM, we ought not to think that the divinity is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man's device.
30 And the times of this ignorance ELOHIYM winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent:
Really, what I'm trying to show, is that 'the doctrine of the Holy Trinity' could be considered as a rather limited representation of ELOHIYM revealed by the whole of scripture, (which obviously, I have not quoted in full! ;-))and, by itself, does not express anything of our relationship with God through Christ, as He does, in John 17:21 That they all may be one; as thou, Father, [i]art
10 For it became him, for whom [i]are[i]are[i]are
14 Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil; 15 And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage. 16 For verily he took not on [i]him the nature of[i]him[i]his[i]pertaining
2 Thessalonians 2:16 Now our Lord Jesus Christ himself , and God , even our Father , which hath loved us , and hath given us everlasting consolation and good hope through grace ,
Here is the Trinity in full view. Jesus Christ=The Kurios Christos Autos, God the Father=Theos Patter, and the Person of everlasting consolation, the Comforter-Aionios Paraklesis, who is the Holy Spirit Comforter.
John 14:16 And I will pray the Father , and he shall give you another Comforter , that he may abide with you for ever ;
Comforter=Parakletos, Our new birth has put all three in us, The Spirit of Christ in you, The Holy Spirit not just with us, but in us, The Father and His Nature birthed in us by the Incorruptable Seed, Jesus Christ, both making Their abode with us.
Paul speaks of One God in three Persons always and makes the mystery known "Christ in you the Hope of Glory" always in all His epistles.
"Phillip have you been with me so long and not seen the Father". If you have seen Me you see Him."
In Christ by the Father's Seed, sealed by the Holy Spirit
Phillip
Thank you all for your responses.
Perhaps it comes down to God - in His infinite wisdom - not having the Bible as a textbook of bullet points. Doctrines are by and large extracted from the biblical text - unfortunately not everyone concurs on what is to be extracted.
not having the Bible as a textbook of bullet points. Doctrines are by and large extracted from the biblical text
This quote is astute, and an important observation. A great deal of theology is derivative. This is my own personal opinion, and I am sticking my neck out in an unusual manner for myself on this forum. But it has become a bit of a bother to me when people approach the Word placing the lens of a theological structure in front of interpretation. I think that theology like this needs to generally be in the backseat, because no-one likes a backseat driver. It seems odd how people can give more importance to a theological system (and believe me when I am an equal opportunity offender here, I have no one particular that seems to take precedence over any other in my mind.) than the Bible give importance to itself.
I did not take Calculus, (Differential, and Integral) until way after I had learned to add, subtract, multiply, divide, use fractions, understand variables, develop Algebra, synthetic division, geometry, trigonometry, then I was ready for the calculus. And even then, the real life application of that calculus was iffy and tentative at best. Theology is like the calculus of our faith in a lot of ways, and in many circles it seems that you cannot gain fellowship amongst a set of believers lest you first become inundated with their brand of calculus first. This is not true in all cases, but amongst some it is.
1 John says that a basis of our fellowship is if we "Walk in the light as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and truly our fellowship is with him." It does not say anywhere in the word that our fellowship with one another has anything to do with adhering to the Calculus of the faith before we even know what a whole number is...
I know that this is not what you were posting about Castling...but your statement made me want to build on it a little bit.
Thank you for the statement :)
It's not recalled which preacher was heard saying it, but it's amusing NTL:
"Most all of you do not even understand how two shall become one flesh, so let's stick to the basics."
*brazenly staring*
Have you ever considered God being a decanity?
Let's see:
1. Father
2. Son
3. The consolate (aka Holy Spirit)
4. the seven spirits of the Lamb (Rev. 5:6)
Have fun
with that one.
CIAO!
G
Edited: for one mispelled word
The Roman Catholic New Theological Dictionary makes a number of frank admissions regarding the creation of the concept of "the trinity."
Concerning the Scriptural teaching on the nature of the Holy Spirit, in its article, "Trinity," it acknowledges:
"As such, the Spirit is never
the explicit object of New Testament
worship, nor is the Spirit ever
represented in New Testament
discourse as interacting
in an interpersonal way
with the Father
and the Son."
In the same article, further down, modern Catholic scholars, discussing the background of orthodox teaching on the Trinity, confess pagan influences upon their theology:
" Christians... conversant with
the then dominant philosophy of
middle-Platonism seized the opportunity
to proclaim and elucidate the Christian
message in a thought form which was
meaningful to the educated classes of
the widespread Hellenistic society.
Confident that the God they
[the pagan Greek philosophers]
preached was the Father of Jesus Christ
and the salvation they proclaimed was
that of Jesus, the apologists adapted
much of the Hellenic worldview...
[Tertullian made] the first known
use of the term "trinity" (p. 1054).
Tertullian and Origen were Catholic theologians who flourished in the last part of the second century and the beginning part of the third. Neither of them was even born until well over a century after the founding of the New Testament Church on the day of Pentecost. They were the ones who laid the foundations of Catholic (and later Protestant) teaching regarding the Trinity and the nature of God.
The Bible nowhere describes God as a trinity. Rather, the Bible reveals the truth of a Family that takes its name from God the Father, i.e., the Family of God (Ephesians 3:14-15) into which human beings might ultimately be born at the resurrection (Romans 8:16-17).
CIAO!
g
re: Phanetheus
The debate over Trinitarian doctrine has been carried out too many times - especially by the likes of Philologos and JeremyHulsey.
The only thing which matters at the day is the Word. I'm not sure why you're quoting the Catholic dictionary, much less "modern" Catholic scholars.
And what better way to have revelation of His Word, understanding of His being, and experience of His character, than to ask directly of Him?
"If anyone wills to do His will, he shall know concerning the doctrine..." (John 7:17, also c.f. John 8:31-32, John 16:13)
re: Areadymind
I fully agree with you that no creed or theological system should supersede the Word of God. They are only useful in so far as they are rooted in the Word anyway.
Perhaps not everyone concurs on what is to be extracted, because not everyone relies on God for interpretation & understanding. Lack of reliance on God is really an issue of human pride.
Hallo Castling.
You wrote:
The debate over Trinitarian doctrine has been carried out too many times - especially by the likes of Philologos and JeremyHulsey.
g:
There is no interest in debate, however,there is interest in gaining a clear perspective of alternate views from my own experience relative to scripture: the big picture STS.
If somebody can show me from the scriptures that there is a trinity, i'm on board. This topic has never been a matter of discussion here.
Will have to look into the info on Philologos and JeremyHulsey.
c:
I'm not sure why you're quoting the Catholic dictionary, much less "modern" Catholic scholars.
g:
(See previous response and following)
i began to look into the idea behind the thread after reading it, and that is why it is used. Further research since has indicated clearly that the doctrine was indeed invented by the catholics. What better way to find out about anything than to first go to the source of any invention?
Why does anybody look for doctrinal ideas outside of what is written in the scriptures?
i suppose another question relative in analogy is: why would anybody watch the news on tv, then read the newspaper, then check on the internet regarding issues of interest?
c:
And what better way to have revelation of His Word, understanding of His being, and experience of His character, than to ask directly of Him?
g:NONE that are known here...especially when the source is unseen.
It is desired that you will note that in the book of John predominantly, (as well as the other gospels), Jesus often speaks in the grammatic tense known as 3rd person. Please consider this in references therefrom regarding the holy spirit
Please answer why God could not be a decanity?
...and in closing, some more food for thought:
The scriptures state that "my people shall know my name", yet the term "holy spirit" is merely a title.
If the holy spirit is a person individuated yet united with the Father and the Son, what is His name?
There are more where that came from, but we can take this one step at a time.
May God give us all further insight
into His nature and expressions
of the same,
Gregg
Col. 1:9-10,13-17
Regarding the historical development of the doctrine of the Holy Trinity: To what extent was Apostle Paul aware of the deity of Christ, and if he made any attempt to reconcile this with monotheism? Why wasn't Paul clearer on this issue?
We need to be aware when speaking of "the doctrine of the Holy Trinity" or even "the Trinity" we are using terms not found in the Bible. It is easy to get heated and emphasize that Christians must believe things that are never even stated in the Bible. We need to believe all the truths in the Bible. It is clear that the Bible never takes the time to emphasize formally any three-part equivalence between Father, Son, and Holy Spirit the way "doctrinal statements" do. There are equivalences in the Scriptures to be sure, but they are always more vague than the emphasis and clarity that many men try to force on them. Stick with the word of God. It will lead you clearer and keep you purer than "doctrinal statements".
Ephesians 4:4
"There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling;
5. One Lord, one faith, one baptism,
6. One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all.
7. But unto every one of us is given grace according to the measure of the gift of Christ."
There are many more.....
Ephesians 4:4-6 "There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling; one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all.
Hi Tom! Not sure what you had in mind by this Scripture, so this reply is not necessarily for you but just for the discussion.
What this Scripture is saying:
- There is one Body.
- There is one Spirit.
- There is one Hope.
- There is one Lord.
- There is one Faith.
- There is one Baptism.
- There is one God and Father of all.
What this Scripture is not saying:
That the Body and the Spirit and the Hope are a "trinity", or that the Lord and the Faith and the Baptism are a trinity, or that any other combination of the above are any type of trinity or mysterious unity. It is just saying each is unique in the world. There is only one of each, just like there is only one Way. Same idea.
Here are some previous discussions regarding Trinitarian doctrine on this forum - which I submit to your prayerful consideration:
Forum Threads:
The Trinity - what are your views?
https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=184&forum=36&start=0&viewmode=flat&order=0
The Trinity/Oneness Question
https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&order=0&topic_id=445&forum=36&post_id=&refresh=Go
Should we believe the Trinity?
https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=1783&forum=36&9
Trinity and TD Jakes
https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=5951&forum=36&42
Trinity and Hebrew grammar
https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=242&forum=36&start=20&26
Christ was only God inside the flesh?
https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=365&forum=36&3
Trinity Questions
https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?mode=viewtopic&topic_id=13694&forum=36&start=0&viewmode=flat&order=0
History of the Trinity
https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=6505&forum=40&15
Specific Articles:
History of Trinitarian Doctrine - Philologos
https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=6505&forum=40&15
KingJimmy on the Trinity
https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?mode=viewtopic&topic_id=30862&forum=36&start=30&viewmode=flat&order=0 &
https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?mode=viewtopic&topic_id=30862&forum=36&start=40&viewmode=flat&order=0
Audio Sermons:
That They May be One - Art Katz (Audio Sermon)
https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/mydownloads/singlefile.php?lid=7149&commentView=itemComments
Roger Wilco.
It appears that you have gone to a bit of work to foreward the above. Though the sermon may not be listened to, all the texts will be read and we can be back at it, hashing this thing out, thought it seems trinitarians are approaching the scriptures from a Westerners understanding, and believe accordingly.
We might never come to agreement on this issue simply due to this fact.
Whether or not this be the case, we each need to ask ourselves how actively has the Spirit of Christ manifested in our own lives.
God will not do anything in contradiction of His Word.
If one does not experience God through His Spirit akin to that which is testified in Acts, somebody is believing the wrong things. God never honors that which stands in opposition to the way he has, does, and will reveal himself.
Ps. 138:2
CIAO!
g
II Cor. 5:16
Q.E.D. ?
Over and out.
-STOP 30-
This discussion is locked.