It is my continual prayer that God helps me to stay focused in these last and closing days. To recognize my own sinfulness and to realize my need for His continued grace. You have an obvious burden for the despicable act of abortion, and you are right to have that burden. But do not suppose that there are not others who have the same burden, and other burdens as well, who choose to deal with them according to God's directive.
It is with this in mind I reply to this thread as my goal is not to win a discussion, but to present the truth, as I believe the bible teaches, and to address what I consider to be the misuse of the Scriptures. Least someone who comes across this thread not be given the opportunity to get an untainted perspective and be swept away.
Please know my initial post was more in question form than statement. I meant to point no finger at anyone,
This seems to be an attempt at back peddling on your part. The title of your post as well as the words used in it are unmistakably clear. Your question and post, assumes that the hands are blood stained. You knew exactly the effect you wanted to achieve. If you did not intend to appear to point fingers, or to accuse Christians who pay their taxes as having "Blood Stained" hands, you clearly would have chosen a different approach.
I can assure all that there is no scripture whether it be from Romans 13 or Mathew 22 or from Genesis to Revelation that i do not affirm as true and believe to be God's very word. My post was an attempt to ask questions regarding the application of scriptural directive not to question it's validity...Obviously I failed in that effort.
I don't think anyone suggested that you did not consider Scripture to be valid, what I did say is that you are creating scenarios that in your mind would, by your own words create "exceptions" that would free you from obeying what the Scriptures, that you say you affirm, clearly teach us that we should do. In other words "I know the Scriptures says thus, and I believe it....but....what about so and so...". We must be subject to God's word, not the other way around. We cannot find an interpretation that suits or seems to support our position. That is the same as twisting the scriptures.
One must agree however that just the mere affirmation of scripture is nothing in itself if there is no evidence by faith in it's execution. That could be by prayer as well as some participation in that which one would be directed by the voice of God occupying the believer. As well, the whole of scripture is more revealing than just a few verses taken from it.
You were given several portions of Scripture that you have deliberately chosen not to respond to. The other posters asked you several pertinent questions, based on said Scriptures, that you again did not respond to. Why is that? Instead you again go to your scenarios, and the abortion figures to hammer home your main proposal. Which is , so that we don't forget, that Christians should stop paying taxes or else be guilty of the "Blood" of the innocent children.
Indeed you are so correct in stating that the Child of God cannot just make an affirmation of the Scriptures. Indeed the child of God is directed by God's Spirit and God's voice to execute his faith in the Scriptures. The voice of God does direct the believer you are absolutely correct. So is it your suggestion, that God's voice will direct Him not to do something that the Scriptures says he should do. Would the voice of God contradict what the Word of God teaches? How then are we to know if it is God's voice speaking to us. Not by searching the same Scriptures and making sure that what we are hearing lines up with what the Scriptures teach? You are again making an attempt to bypass the Scriptures in order to justify what is in your heart to do, because you realize the Scriptures do not support what you are proposing. The execution of my faith in the Scriptures, is my obedience to do what it clearly says.
Did not the psalmist, Jeremiah, and Daniel connect themselves to the people who did evil even though their hands may not have been stained? Might they have realized in their humanity and imperfection that there was some guilt no matter how distant that proved them a participant? The smallest inaction that defines omission maybe? Regardless they did not leave themselves out of the call for repentance, even being God's prophets.
You see, this is why I am having serious difficulty with your entire position. As Pastor Voddie Baucham would say, your "slight of hand" use of the Scriptures. In your post, you are clearly proposing, that Christians who pay their taxes to an administration that supports abortion, have "Blood Stained" hands as a direct result of paying their taxes to such an administration. That is the reason why they would be guilty or part of the transgression, is because they pay their taxes. By extension you are clearly suggesting, that if we stop paying taxes we will NOT have "Blood Stained" hands because we are not giving to or supporting, an administration that supports abortion. Is this not what you are proposing? Or will you back peddle on that as well?
Here you use the reference of Daniel praying on behalf of his people and including himself in the transgressions of his people. Do you even realize that this is not the same thing? Do you even realize, that if you stop paying your taxes and in your mind clear yourself as not being part of the "slaughter", from Daniel's perspective you would still have to include yourself in the transgression? Do you even see that? So weather you pay taxes, or don't pay taxes as you propose, you will still have to go to God and ask Him to have mercy on all including yourself as being part of the transgression. So the paying of taxes is not the issue, paying taxes is not what includes you in the transgression. You include yourself in the transgression because you are part of your people. This is according to the reference you used. Do you even see that?
If these murders were held out in public I am almost certain we would take up arms, yes even maybe stop paying taxes to stop it. That however is speculation as we seem to be more than willing to continue in this live and let live mentality while the blood of orphans enters our sewers. Do we not think that Christ who entered the temple and disturbed commerce would not also enter the abortion clinic and take up the cause of His little ones?
Again, your "Slight of Hand" use of the scriptures. You are here suggesting, that Christ's actions in driving out the money changers in the temple, would be the same as we "stopping commerce" by not paying our taxes, and marching into abortion clinics and stopping the abortions from taking place. This type of teaching is not only dangerous, it's not biblical. It is this type of teaching that breathes militant Christians who dress in camouflage, reject governmental authority and the rule of law, and who kill abortion doctors. All the while justifying themselves in their own minds, that they are doing God's will. Christ's purpose for His church is not to drive out evil in this world. It is to be His witness in an evil generation. Christ's church is not to be His instrument of judgement upon sinful men. Your reference to "take up arms" is especially troubling.
Christ actions in the temple, were in connection with His "Father's House". This is key here don't brush over it. The people had turned His "Father's House" into a place for profit. The zeal of His Father's House had eaten Him up according to the Scriptures. It was not in relation to Rome's government, or a brothel in Rome, or the sinful practices in Rome, or anything else. It was His Father's House and it was in the fulfilment of Scripture. You are attempting to use this portion of Scripture, to justify marching into an abortion clinic and stopping paying taxes? You are suggesting that Christ's purpose in the temple was to stop commerce, so we should stop paying taxes?
Why stop at abortion clinics? Do you not know, that abortion is just as sinful as homosexuality, or pornography, or prostitution or adultery, or false religion in God's eyes? God judged two entire sites because of homosexuality. Do you think He considers homosexuality a lesser sin than abortion? According to your reasoning, and this is to illustrate the danger of your teaching, Lets march into the gay bars then, lets burn down the liquor stores, lets make a whip of small chords and beat the prostitutes off the street corners. Do you see where you are going with this teaching? Scripture does not support this type of action.
You seem to be suggesting that a country is an evil place because it performs abortions and by extension if abortions were to stop, the country will be a "Better" place. Do you not see that God's judgement is upon all nations on the earth for their many sinful practices? You have a burden for the scourge of abortion, and my heart goes out to you on that, but do not let your burden lead you astray from what God mandates and God's methods. Even if we were successful in putting a stop to all the wickedness that we could think of in our land, on it's best day, God's judgement upon our land will still be justified, because men's hearts would still be against God. What we can do, and what many have been doing faithfully for many many years, is praying without ceasing for our various nations, and presenting the Gospel of Christ to every creature, that His love might reach some, and His Spirit might grant them repentance and faith so that they might receive the new birth and be saved. But I suppose you would consider this a "live and let live" mentality and "inaction".
No one disagrees, or is minimizing the seriousness of the disturbing blood letting taking place where abortion is concerned, but please understand that all other atrocities in our land are just as filthy in God's eyes, and we as Christians must be very careful how we conduct ourselves, as we live for God and present Christ to fallen men.
God have mercy on your church.