Dear Brothers and Sisters
I had my first dialog with Jehovah's Witnesses today. They left me one of their pamphlets last week which I combed through. They came back today and we talked over what I thought. My goal was to explain to them that I stood firmly on the deity of Christ and the Trinity, but in a loving way, and as well to find out some more about why they believed certain things, all of which we did.
I have studied some JW beliefs years back but never put what I learned to use, so I ended up doing a re-study. They do believe that Jesus was a created being, so I asked them what Scriptures they relied on and they replied with Col 1:15, that Jesus was "the firstborn of every creature."
I tried to explain how the Scriptures describe Jesus in the beginning with God, "and the Word was God." I tried to kindly explain that it seemed very odd that every English translation of the Bible from Wycliffe through the King James all said this same thing, not to mention all the modern versions do, as well, but that their version altered the text to bend towards their belief. One of the gentlemen tried to explain that their version was changed to keep up with the changing language, to which I replied that I had no problem with the 14th century Wycliffe version much less the King James (this is the text of the 1395 Wycliffe version for John 1:1 in case you are curious: In the bigynnyng was the word, and the word was at God, and God was the word.)
It seemed as if they were more focused on getting us to agree, which there was much that we did, but I wanted to get more to the matter of these differences, in a loving way, of course, as I explained that I thought they were critical doctrines. I lost track of time but I think we went at least thirty minutes. I thought John 1:1 was the best but they didn't seem phased by it, and said they would bring back some material on John 1:1.
Some Scriptures I brought up were:
-Genesis 1:2, showing the Spirit has creative power (they do not believe the Holy Ghost has a personality, they believe only in an "active force")
-Isaiah 9:6 depicting Jesus as the everlasting Father (they believe this is referring to Jesus as the father of those who enter the kingdom only)
-Micah 5:2 and John 1:1, that Jesus is from "everlasting" and has always been (they believe Jesus was created)
The thing that threw me was that I am so used to explaining the gospel message or some particular doctrine, but in "contending for the faith" they would just agree if I brought up original sin, the coming Kingdom, the sacrificial atonement, the resurrection, etc. We didn't quite get to Hell but I think we might next time (JW do not believe in a literal Hell).
They are supposed to come back so if anyone has any good Scriptures, especially people that are former Jehovah's Witnesses, please post.
