KeithLaMothe
Nov 26, 2004
Thanks for letting us know. Two questions.First, what exactly did Mr.Mouw say, with as much context as is reasonable and possible?Second, does Standing Together Ministries and/or Mr. Zacharias approve of Mr. Mouw's comments?
KeithLaMothe
Nov 27, 2004
The full comments are not available (for free, at least), but the CT article did have a few quotes (from Mr. Mouw, I believe) :"Let me state it clearly. We evangelicals have sinned against you.""We've often seriously misrepresented the beliefs and practices of members of the LDS faith.""It's a terrible thing to bear false witness. … We've told you what you believe without first asking you.""I'm not being melodramatic when I say this is an historic occasion.""I remain convinced there are serious issues of difference that are of eternal consequence, but now we can discuss them as friends."I can agree with all 5 statements (though I'll have to take his word for it on the 4th, but that's not a particularly controversial one), and I'm glad he said the 5th, at least making somewhat clear that he isn't receiving the Mormon's as brethren in the sense that he thinks their going to heaven or anything like that.We have, no doubt, misrepresented the doctrine of the Mormons to some extent, particularly since there are two branches of that group. If Mr. Zacharias and the others thought that this kind of meeting and the kind of statements they made to be in line with the will of God in the matter, I won't necessarily say they were incorrect. Humbling oneself in repentance before an enemy that one has wronged is certainly in accordance with Scripture, my only concern is that the newfound friendliness not be misconstrued as support to the false idea that Mormons and Evangelicals are both right with God (one group or the other is deadly wrong, my position is that it's the Mormons).Lord, guide us as we tread the minefield...