My dear brothers and sisters in Christ,
Greetings! . . . My name is Nathan. I am writing because I have been really struggling with some theological questions that are beginning to affect my ability to praise God and trust his love. I was hoping that I might find some insight or encouragement by hearing from other Christians, especially those who may have already dealt with these questions.
I just want to mention that I accepted Christ 14 years ago (when I was 18 years old) and have been walking with Him since then. I am an active member of a healthy local church (named Harvest Bible Chapel) and I have also greatly appreciated the ministry of Sermon Index. In fact, I have listened to hundreds of sermons and posted in the forum on a few occasions.
I mention these things just to clarify that I am not questioning if Christianity is true. It’s simply that these theological questions continue to return to my mind and make it difficult for me to freely worship the Lord.
I also hesitated to share these questions because I do not want to be offensive to the Lord or to be ungrateful for my salvation in Christ. I also don’t want to cause any doubt or confusion in other believers. And yet I feel that if I do not address these questions then I am going to continue having difficulties in my personal spiritual life. I realize it may not be possible to get complete answers to these questions, but I hope I could at least address them and know how other Christians have coped with them. . . .
-------------------------------------
The main question that I struggle with is this:
Why did God let mankind fall into sin and condemnation and then provide salvation through Christ instead of preventing the fall from happening in the first place?
I am assuming that we all agree that God is the ultimate Creator and thereby fully sovereign over all things. Nothing in all the universe can happen without his control or permission (otherwise He is not truly omnipotent). So we know that He had the choice not to allow sin and the fall of man in the first place. Yet he allowed the fall to happen. As a result of the fall, mankind suffers on earth (war, disease, starvation, etc.) and then suffers eternal torment in hell forever. However, God stepped into the world as Savior and provided salvation through Christ. For this reason the saints praise Him and thank him for this salvation.
But the problem I have with this is that it seems analogous to the idea of a parent allowing his child to drink poison and then after the child drinks it and is dying, the parent comes to the rescue by providing the child with the antidote that saves him. Then the parent receives praise and adoration from the child for being saved. However, the entire scenario could have been avoided if the parent simply kept the child from consuming the poison in the first place. This leaves me with the impression that I am praising God for saving me from sin and death when in actuality He could have prevented sin and death in the first place.
So my dilemma happens often times when I am singing songs in church that thank God for this salvation. The question comes to mind: “Are we praising God for saving us from something that He could have prevented in the first place?” Again, I feel so bad to say this because I don’t want to be unthankful toward God or to doubt his love. It’s simply the logical side of me that seems to rise up and question things. (Or maybe it’s the sinful side of me that resists giving glory to God.)
I have asked other Christians before about this question but I can’t seem to find an explanation that will quiet my mind and make it possible to just happily praise God. My logical mind continues to beckon me with questions.
One answer that I used to hold to is that God had to allow the fall of man because man had to be given freewill and the opportunity to choose to love God. With the option of disobedience, man’s obedience and love would be meaningless. Then man chose to disobey God and this was simply the “risk” that God had to take for man to have free choice.
However, it seems to me that God not only gave man freewill but he arranged the environment in the garden in such a way as to make man’s disobedience very likely or even guaranteed. God placed the tree with the forbidden fruit right in the middle of the Garden of Eden next to the tree of life. Every time Adam and Eve went to eat from the tree of life (which was allowed), they would have the tree of the knowledge of good and evil right there next to them as a source of temptation. The fruit was very easily accessible and required nothing more than reaching out one’s hand to take some and eat it. Day after day, it would always be there. Even if they lived for ages and ages, eventually it would only take one failure. Even a momentary impulse to eat it would be enough to plunge the entire human race into complete death and destruction, both on earth and in hell forever.
In addition, God cast Satan to the earth to be in the presence of Adam and Eve which furthered tempted them to disobey God and eat the forbidden fruit. (I assume there are other places God could have cast Satan such as to another planet or directly to hell.) Therefore, it seems that God not only placed the object of temptation amidst Adam and Eve for very easy access at all times, but he also placed there a powerful and clever entity who would further enhance the temptation and drastically increase the likelihood that sin would occur. Therefore, it’s hard for me to believe that God intended that Adam and Eve would never sin and that salvation through Christ would not be necessary.
So this leads me back to the question . . . . Why would God let mankind fall into sin and condemnation and then provide salvation through Christ instead of preventing the fall from happening in the first place?
Another answer that I thought was helpful is that God allowed the fall and then provided salvation through Christ in order to demonstrate his sacrificial love for mankind. It is true that God demonstrates his love for mankind through Christ’s sacrifice. However, is this the only way that God could demonstrate his love? Does demonstrating love require God to allow all of mankind to plummet into destruction and then rescue only some of them?
Here I return again to the parent-child analogy. What if a parent chose to show his love to a child by allowing the child to consume poison and then reviving the child? This would probably be considered improper parenting in our society. I think the parent would be deemed as unfit to be a parent and would lose the right to have guardianship of the child. I think most of us would agree that a parent should demonstrate his love for his child by caring for and protecting the child, not by allowing the child to approach destruction and then rescuing the child. It seems that preventing tragedy to begin with would probably be the most loving thing to do.
So this leads me back to the question . . . . Why would God let mankind fall into sin and condemnation and then provide salvation through Christ instead of preventing the fall from happening in the first place?
More recently in my Christian life, I began to understand that God’s glory is the supreme purpose for all the things that God does. Therefore, even if all the human race and all of creation should suffer to the greatest extent, it would be worth it as long as God is ultimately glorified. In other words, there is nothing as valuable or as important as God’s glory so this should be our measuring rod of how the universe should be run.
However, at the same time I know that God is the most loving and benevolent being that exists. This means that he desires the greatest good and happiness of the subjects in his kingdom. So the only reason that he allows calamity and suffering is because it will ultimately bring him glory (such as by exhibiting his righteous wrath against the wicked) or because the suffering will ultimately bring the greatest good (such as when his children suffer but are ultimately refined through it and bring glory to God by trusting him through it).
\tAt the same time, I also know that God is infinitely wise and creative. So I assume that he could have chosen to have the universe and the human race operate in an infinite number of ways. So the ultimately question would be this:
If God is infinite in wisdom and creativity, and infinite in love and good-will, why wouldn’t He be able to design and implement a universe and a human race that would bring him the greatest glory and yet not require earthly suffering and even eternal suffering for his creatures ?
As it stands, the current universe (physical and spiritual) operates in such a way that the entire human race must suffer in various forms while on earth and the vast majority of the human race will suffer extreme torment for all eternity in hell. It is difficult to conceive that this the only plan that would bring God the greatest glory and yet be the most loving and kind manner in which to establish His creation and treat His creatures.
So I guess that if I had to summarize my question into one statement it would be this:
Why did God (who is infinite in love and wisdom) have to allow mankind to fall into sin and eternal destruction and then provide salvation through Jesus Christ in order to be most glorified and express his love to the greatest degree?
I sincerely appreciate anyone’s input on the matter. . .
