I have struggled with this area alot. I am very interested in psychology but in this field it tends to put away the notion of the spiritual realm and instead suggests that those who are 'tormented' suffer from mental issues. I would agree to an extent on this but I have also seen many Christians be quick to point out it is the DEVIL doing such thing.
I recently came across a comment from a blog I read dealing with demon possession and psychology and he said something that really gave me food for thought about the Christian community how much is really authentic in terms for spiritual warfare.
Here is a comment that struck me:
"OMG! My mom was totally into this for years. I like to call it, The Wacky World of Spiritual Warfare. I’ve never met Frank Perretti, but I have met and had dinner with a number of them: Dr, Ed Murphy who wrote The Handbook for Spiritual Warfare, Neil Anderson, Mark Bubeck, Tom White, and others. My mom used to organize seminars and recruited me to help with box lunches and selling their books.
What a weird time that was! They used to sit around our living room, trying to upstage each other with shocking and dramatic stories of demon possession. You would not believe the stories I have heard.
The worst part is that they rejected psychology and actively discouraged therapy of any kind. It’s not a mental problem. It’s Satan! The whole thing was utter nonsense and from someone (reluctantly) on the inside, I can tell you they were nutters and charlatans who took complete advantage of vulnerable people."
***I changed one word in the above because it was not a cuss word but a crude word.***
Now, this sentence
"They used to sit around our living room, trying to upstage each other with shocking and dramatic stories of demon possession." really stuck out at me because it caused me to wonder when reading of tales of possession just how authentic authors are with them. I have the book 'The Twilight Labrynth' by George Otis Jr. I found it a fascinating read yet some situations in it really seem 'out there' and I wondered then how much more of that book is really genuine vs. sensationalistic.
The end of this post leads me to wonder if they say what they say because they see a game being played and those who buy into these guys books are the fools or is he not seeing the whole picture and being a denying of the things that are not seen. Does this make sense?
What are your opinions.
