BSBKJVWEBYLTASVBBEWMBT4TDBY|HymnsMusicDonate
Menu
Articles

The Jezebel Profile by Debi Pearl

P
proudpapa Oct 6, 2012


The Jezebel Profile by Debi Pearl

Every day I read many letters from women who are having trouble in their marriage. I also receive letters from women testifying of the victory they have received and of healing that has occurred.
I have developed a lot of insight through reading these testimonies of successes and failures. My husband and I have searched the Scriptures to find answers for the many domestic issues that are presented to us.
The causes of marital failure are many and varied. There is no one cause or single issue. The man is at fault just as much as the woman, but it is nearly always the woman who seeks answers. Men just go to work and learn to live with it—or flee from it. Women ask, “What can I do to heal my marriage?” I am a woman. Men don’t usually ask me for advice—which is as it should be. So I speak to women, and for that I am often accused of being one-sided. Women ask, “Why do you always blame the women; what about the men?” So to the women I say, you cannot change 100% of the marriage, but you can change 50% of it, and that may improve your marriage by 200%.
Our readers are a unique group. They are spiritually minded, church going, Bible believing, mostly homeschooling, and very family centered in perspective. This profile lends itself to several unique sources of irritation to the marriage. Your letters and testimonies have enabled us to identify one of the most common problem on the woman’s side. It is the Jezebel spirit.
When the name Jezebel comes to mind, most of us see the painted face of a seductively dressed woman gazing into the eyes of a man who lacks good sense. The Bible portrays Jezebel in a different light.
Revelation 2:20 says that Jezebel “calleth herself a prophetess,” and men received her as a teacher. This was given as a warning to the church. The one whom you have received as a spirit filled teacher comes to you in the great tradition of Jezebel. We have observed that many wives have stalled their half of the marriage by assuming the spiritual headship of the home. They would teach their husbands. But consider 1 Cor. 14:34-35, “Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.”
I went back to I Kings to see what the Bible had to say about this woman Jezebel. The first thing I noticed was that Jezebel was more religious than her husband. She was spiritually intense. The Bible says in 1 Cor 11:3, “But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.” As a woman, our place is under our husband, especially in the spiritual realm. Regardless of our circumstances, when we take the spiritual lead, we have stepped out from under our head. We have tried to rearrange God’s designated place for us. We are no longer in God’s will.
The second thing I observed was that Ahab was emotionally volatile—unstable. Is your husband prone to retreat? Is he bitter, angry, or depressed? When a woman takes the lead, she is playing the masculine role. Unless her husband fights her for supremacy, he must assume second place. And men who are forced into spiritual subjection to their wives tend to be angry and retreat like Ahab.
The third thing I noticed was that she used his emotional stress to endear herself to him—strange way of lording over the husband. Jezebel manipulated and accused an innocent man, then had him murdered so that Ahab might have the vineyard he wanted. Ahab kept his face to the wall and let her do her dark deeds. Today, if a woman is willing to play her husband’s role in directing the family, he will lose his natural drive to bear responsibility.
In the dominant role, a woman quickly becomes emotionally and physically exhausted. God made us the weaker vessels. If you are in this exhausted state, then chances are you’re carrying a load not meant for you. It is not for you to press your husband to do his duty to be spiritual. You are to live joyfully in the context he provides.
The fourth thing that jumped out at me was that Ahab could easily be manipulated by his wife to suit her purposes. Jezebel used him to set up images as aids to worship under her own prophets and to kill God’s prophets. Often, a man becomes involved in the Church, not because God has called him or because it is in his heart to do so, but because he is trying to please his wife and at least LOOK spiritual. When a husband steps into a spiritual role at his wife’s beckoning, he becomes vulnerable to her guidance in that role. This is against nature, and often brings conflict in the family and in the church.
Ahab chose not to notice when his wife worked behind the scenes. Many men turn their heads when they see their wives stepping out of their God-given role. These men would rather not have to deal with the stone-cold anger they would receive from their wives if they offered any resistance. Have you been there, done that?
Jezebel knew that she was not the rightful head, so she invoked her husband’s name to give her word authority. Did you ever say, “Oh, my husband will not let me do that,” when you knew in truth he really would not care? It is a way to maintain control and stop those who would question you. When a woman does this, she stops any ministry God has to her.
Jezebel was deeply concerned about spiritual matters and took steps to help promote her spiritual leaders. In the process, she provoked her husband to destroy those in spiritual authority she did not like. Have you ever influenced your husband to think evil of those in authority because you did not like something about them? When a woman comes to this place she might as well sign her name “Jezebel.”
God has a plan for women. He revealed his will in many verses in clear, concise commands. He gives a revealing picture of what he abhors in a woman by introducing us to Jezebel, then reaffirming in the New Testament just what it was about her character that he found so despicable.
He reveals his will in a positive note in the stories of the women whom he honored. The story of Ruth tells of a young girl who had known tragedy, extreme poverty, and hard menial work, yet she maintained a positive, thankful, and submissive attitude. God blessed Ruth because her own personal success and happiness were not the driving forces in her life.
Esther is the story of a girl who lost all of her family and was taken by force to become the wife of an older, divorced, heathen man. She was put (by her husband’s decree) in danger of losing her own life as well as the lives of all her people. Yet, she overcame her circumstances and her fear in order to honor her husband. The Scripture teaches that when her husband heard her honest appeal, delivered with gracious dignity, she won his heart, and he turned to save her people. God used Esther because God’s will was more important to her than her own fulfillment.
Proverbs 31 defines the virtuous woman. She is NOT a mousy, voiceless prude. She is confident, hard working, creative, and resourceful. She uses her time wisely, and contributes to the family income. Her first virtue is that the heart of her husband is safe with her. It says that she will do him good and not evil all the days of her life. That is, he can trust her with his thoughts and feelings, never fearing that she might use the private knowledge she has of him to hurt him in any way. Some men maintain a distance from their wives because if they reveal themselves, their wives will use it against them when they are out of sorts.
If this passage had been written from our modern perspective, it would have extolled her for having a “quiet time,” prayer time, fellowship time, and would have projected an image of a prayer warrior, teacher, or counselor. In all the Scriptural profiles of righteous women, including Proverbs 31, none of those concepts are even mentioned. A Proverbs 31 woman is busy helping her husband become successful. She is too busy being productive to spend time being his conscience. In our culture, we have lost a clear understanding of what constitutes a virtuous woman. We have accepted the modern concept of the “spiritual” woman, circulating in the realm of religious power, and have forgotten that God does not see them in this same “glorious” light. What we think is spiritual, God labels “Jezebel.” “For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD (Isa. 55:8).”
In order to become a righteous woman, reaping the benefits of having our man adore us, we must follow God’s principles of womanhood and totally reject the Jezebel tendency.
God laid down a few simple rules that must be followed because they are consistent with our feminine nature and the nature of men. It was Ruth’s virtuous and humble, yet feminine, bold example that caused Boaz to love and admire her. It was Esther’s submission to this principle that won the King’s love and appreciation for her as a woman and as his queen. These women showed themselves womanly and lovable in the midst of extreme circumstances. God honored them with favor from the men in their lives.
Dominance and control are always masculine. It is a hormonal thing. It is the way God designed male nature. It is important for a woman to understand that she has to be feminine (devoid of dominance and control) in order for her man to view her as his exact counterpart and thus respond to her protectively, with love and gentleness.
God designed us, so he knows what our husbands need in order to function properly in their roles as men who cherish the woman in their life. By nature, men need honor (this includes not questioning their decisions). They need respect (treated as if they are wise). They need reverence (daily admired as a man who is accomplishing great things). They need to be accepted for who and what they are, just like they are. Men need to feel they are in command and doing a good job.
An important part of man is a God-given, natural instinct to bring his wife pleasure. If a woman is to be greatly treasured she will choose to find pleasure in the way the man presents himself and his care. All these traits are basic masculine needs. We were created as a helpmeet to the man we married, fulfilling who and what he is. This is God’s will for us as women. When we as women obey God by responding to the needs of our husband, we are worshipping and honoring God. “Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man (1 Cor. 11:9).”
God created you to fulfill your husband’s basic masculine needs. Only in that role will you find peace and cause your man to respond to you in loving adoration. This role of submission is totally feminine. It is the exact counterpart for his masculine needs. “And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him. (Gen 2:18).”
A woman who criticizes her husband for watching too much TV no longer honors him. When a woman tries to control areas of their life together because she thinks she is right, she is usurping authority over him, and lording over him. A depressed, discontented woman, who feels that her husband does not meet her needs, is dishonoring God.
Hurt feelings are a way to control. Silence and emotional retreat are ugly, destructive ways to control both your husband and your children. Anger, sickness, exhaustion, and even fear are all used to control those you care about. Some women control their husband by having an intense spiritual hunger. Jezebel comes in many disguises.
There are many various and subtle ways to control and direct your husband. One of the ways to take control is to tell your husband that you want him to be the spiritual leader in the home and then let him know that you are waiting to follow. You can lead from behind just by clearing your throat at the right moment. Many nice homeschooling moms are the spiritual leaders in their homes. They play the masculine role spiritually. How this must grieve the Holy Spirit of God. Often the excuse is that we cannot serve two masters, and since our husband is carnal, we have to take the higher ground. Like Eve, we are so deceived. “And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression (1 Tim 2:14).”
A man cannot cherish a strong woman who has expressed her displeasure with him and is holding out until he fulfills her ideal. You say he should have Christ’s love. Is that what you want? Do you want your husband to have to seek supernatural power just to find a way to love you? What most men cherish in their wives is the memory when love was fun and free, with no demands—the time when she smiled at him with a sweet, girlish, “I think you are wonderful” look. She was so feminine then, so much the woman. It was a time when he wanted to hold her just because she was his, a time when he wanted to give her everything. A vague memory keeps him hoping. He is as disappointed in love as you are, maybe more. He is just as lonely. He just fills up his loneliness doing things that will distract him from the reality of the emptiness he knows is there but does not know how to fix. His helpmeet is not pleased with him. He is a loser.
The very first command God gave to a woman was, “Thy desire shall be unto thy husband and he shall rule over thee (Gen. 3:16).” Is your desire toward your husband? Do you desire him as a man? Do you live to please him? Does he rule over you? This is God’s will.
Being a Jezebel is an active role—actively controlling, actively doing our own thing. Being a Ruth or an Esther is just as active. It is a decision we make hundreds of times each day as we choose to joyfully honor our husbands.
God’s reward is without measure. Men are like clay in the hands of a woman whom they can trust with their hearts. A man, lost or saved, responds to a woman who honors him. When a woman looks to her husband with a face that is full of laughter and delight, he will look forward to being with her. If her voice speaks words of thanksgiving and joyful appreciation of him, he will want to listen to her. If her actions are full of service and creativity, and if she has goodwill towards him, he will be drawn to her as a bee is to honey. This kind of lady is altogether feminine. She is what God created and gave to Adam.
Deep in our heart we all want the same thing. We all want to be loved and cherished. We all cry out with our utmost being to be treasured in the heart of our husbands. It is the greatest honor on earth to know your husband is thrilled that you are his woman. It passes all of earth’s blessings to feel his gaze upon you and know that you are his greatest gift, his most prized possession, his best friend, his favorite pastime, his only chum, and his delight as a lover. It is a great joy to know that he is actually proud you are his. It is not remembering birthdays, opening the door of a car, or other silly customs that we crave, it is the knowledge that he is totally taken with us. We want him to want us. We simply want to be loved. It is God’s perfect will for our husbands to love us. It is God’s perfect will for us to honor, obey and reverence our husbands. God’s way works. If what you are doing this year has not worked, why not go God’s way?

1 Cor. 11:7 “For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man.”
1 Cor. 11:8 “For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man.”
1 Cor. 11:9 “Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.”

Debi Pearl

http://nogreaterjoy.org/articles/the-jezebel-profile/

P
pernvic Oct 6, 2012

This is timely, thank you!!! Vickie

E
ET101 Oct 9, 2012

Proudpapa, I so grateful for this article. Thank you so much for posting it. So many issues in my life make a lot of sense now.

Thank you.

sermonindex Oct 9, 2012

I've read the article about 4 times and I didn't really like the article that much. She said some things that were ok, but I think many of her comparisons and example were off base and portrayed a kind of submission that basically tells the wife to shut up, say nothing, never ask questions, and that her sole goal in life is to please her husband and that if she doesn't do all this she has a Jezebel spirit. Let me go through specific things I had problems with in the article.

First of all, Debbi Pearl is writing this article to women in the church. I think it's rather harsh and in some ways demeaning to compare, what are probably well intentioned women who are seeking after God, to Jezebel who was the most wicked woman in the entire bible. It would be like comparing a man to Judas for every time he was the least bit unfaithful to God, or if he got something wrong....like walking around telling men they have a "Judas" spirit. Jezebel was without a doubt the most wicked woman in the bible who sought to pervert the worship of the one true God, turn men and women away to worshiping false God's, and who murdered to accomplish her goals. She most definitely exerted her will and influence over her husband Ahab, but that would not have been possible without the will of Ahab. Like Francis Frangipaing says, "You can have no Jezebel without an Ahab".

The only time Jezebel is mentioned in the New Testament is when Jesus mentions a woman by the name of Jezebel in Revelations 2:20: "Nevertheless, I have this against you: You tolerate that woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess. By her teaching she misleads my servants into sexual immorality and the eating of food sacrificed to idols."

Here is what James Faucet Brown says about this passage:
that woman — Two oldest manuscripts read, “THY wife”; two omit it. Vulgate and most ancient versions read as English Version. The symbolical Jezebel was to the Church of Thyatira what Jezebel, Ahab’s “wife,” was to him. Some self-styled prophetess (or as the feminine in Hebrew is often used collectively to express a multitude, a set of false prophets), as closely attached to the Church of Thyatira as a wife is to a husband, and as powerfully influencing for evil that Church as Jezebel did Ahab. As Balaam, in Israel’s early history, so Jezebel, daughter of Eth-baal, king of Sidon (1Ki_16:31, formerly priest of Astarte, and murderer of his predecessor on the throne, Josephus [Against Apion, 1.18]), was the great seducer to idolatry in Israel’s later history. Like her father, she was swift to shed blood. Wholly given to Baal worship, like Eth-baal, whose name expresses his idolatry, she, with her strong will, seduced the weak Ahab and Israel beyond the calf-worship (which was a worship of the true God under the cherub-ox form, that is, a violation of the second commandment) to that of Baal (a violation of the first commandment also). She seems to have been herself a priestess and prophetess of Baal. Compare 2Ki_9:22, 2Ki_9:30, “whoredoms of ... Jezebel and her witchcrafts” (impurity was part of the worship of the Phoenician Astarte, or Venus). Her spiritual counterpart at Thyatira lured God’s “servants” by pretended utterances of inspiration to the same libertinism, fornication, and eating of idol-meats, as the Balaamites and Nicolaitanes (Rev_2:6, Rev_2:14, Rev_2:15). By a false spiritualism these seducers led their victims into the grossest carnality, as though things done in the flesh were outside the true man, and were, therefore, indifferent. “The deeper the Church penetrated into heathenism, the more she herself became heathenish; this prepares us for the expressions ‘harlot’ and ‘Babylon,’ applied to her afterwards” [Auberlen].
to teach and to seduce — The three oldest manuscripts read, “and she teaches and seduces,” or “deceives.” “Thyatira was just the reverse of Ephesus. There, much zeal for orthodoxy, but little love; here, activity of faith and love, but insufficient zeal for godly discipline and doctrine, a patience of error even where there was not a participation in it” [Trench].

I think that is a far cry from the "spirit of Jezebel" that Debbie Pearl is saying that many Christian women must have if they don't meet her standard of submission to their husband.

Let me go through some specific things that Debbie says that I don't agree with:

1. "Revelation 2:20 says that Jezebel “calleth herself a prophetess,” and men received her as a teacher. This was given as a warning to the church. The one whom you have received as a spirit filled teacher comes to you in the great tradition of Jezebel. We have observed that many wives have stalled their half of the marriage by assuming the spiritual headship of the home. They would teach their husbands. But consider 1 Cor. 14:34-35, “Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.”

Rev 2:20 is not just about her calling herself a prophetess and men receiving her as a teacher. It's also, and primarily, about what she taught and how she sought to led me into spiritual fornication (maybe physical as well) and idolatry. Then Debbie jumps to the passage in 1 Cor 14 that says women shouldn't speak in the church and they should ask their husbands questions at home. Then she relates this to how women should not teach their husbands anything spiritual. I don't think the two issues are related. I do think that primarily the man should be teaching his wife. But there are cases (quite frequently in India), where the woman comes to Christ first and for years grows in the Lord before her husband ever comes to know the Lord. Going with Debbie's premises it would be wrong for the obviously more spiritual and knowledgeable wife to share spiritual things with her husband. If she did Debbie would say she has a Jezebel spirit.

2. Debbie says: "The first thing I noticed was that Jezebel was more religious than her husband. She was spiritually intense. The Bible says in 1 Cor 11:3, “But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.” As a woman, our place is under our husband, especially in the spiritual realm. Regardless of our circumstances, when we take the spiritual lead, we have stepped out from under our head. We have tried to rearrange God’s designated place for us. We are no longer in God’s will."

Debbie says the she noticed that Jezebel was more religious and spiritually intense than her husband...as if that was a bad thing! Debbie equates taking the spiritual lead with having more zeal for God than her husband. She almost makes it sound as if a woman's spiritual and religious affections must be just a degree lower than her husbands so that he can "remain the head" in all things. I think that is utter non-sense. A woman's first love in life is to God. She is to grow as close to God and be as mature as she can in the faith regardless of the spiritual condition of her husband. Jezebels problem was the her spiritual intensity was towards a false God.

3. Debbie says: "And men who are forced into spiritual subjection to their wives tend to be angry and retreat like Ahab." Men are never forced into spiritual subjection to their wives. If their wives are truly rebellious, and they give into it, they are willingly giving in to it. While the women is wrong, the man is also wrong for giving into it. No man is "forced into subjection".

4. Debbie says: "Dominance and control are always masculine. It is a hormonal thing. It is the way God designed male nature." Just because dominance and control are masculine doesn't mean they way they are exerted is Godly.

5. Debbie says: "By nature, men need honor (this includes not questioning their decisions)." That is a completely bogus statement. She's basically saying the woman she hear what her husband says, shut up and obey. That is no basis for a Godly healthy relationship. That, to me, resembles more of the worldly macho way that men view submission. A wife should feel comfortable enough with her husband to ask why he wants to do a certain thing. The husband should love his wife enough to know that it's important to make her feel secure and safe, and if possible explain why he's doing what he's doing. Debbie also makes it seem as if the wife could have no godly input about family decisions. A husband should be able to (and want to) explain things to his wife because they "are one in the Lord" (the two become one flesh). If his wife is a godly wife, having the Spirit of God dwelling in her, (and she's aware of whatever situation they are dealing with) he should also value her opinion as his "other half" who also knows the Lord. Ultimately the final decision on matters is the husband responsibility and the wife needs to submit to whatever his decision is....but to say that she can't question his decision or talk about it is nonsense.

6. Debbie says: "We were created as a helpmeet to the man we married, fulfilling who and what he is. This is God’s will for us as women." I don't believe this just applies to stroking his ego (which she kinda what she's eluding to by emphasising the need to meet his masculine needs - in a worldly way). I think it also applies to helping him fulfill his God given duties as a man in the kingdom of God.

7. Debbie says: "A woman who criticizes her husband for watching too much TV no longer honors him." I think this is another one of those totally bogus statements. Is a wife to do the same thing if her husband spends all day on the Internet and never spends any time with the family or kids? Should she never say anything? Does she not also have a responsibility to exhort her husband in the Lord and also watch after his soul as should would any other brethren in Christ? If a husband, especially a Christian husband, just watches TV all day, and the wife never says anything, can she really say that she loves him?

8. Debbie says: "When a woman tries to control areas of their life together because she thinks she is right, she is usurping authority over him, and lording over him." There is no way a wife is "lording over her husband" because she says something to him about his useless time of watching too much TV. (Again, she is portraying this idea that a woman basically just lives in the shadows and never says anything to her husband).

9. Debbie says: "A depressed, discontented woman, who feels that her husband does not meet her needs, is dishonoring God" The bible never says that. If her husband is not meeting her needs spiritually, then her husband is dishonoring her and God - if he's not doing his duty. What a horrible statement to say that if a woman is discontented because of her husbands lack of attention and affection (not meeting her needs) that she is dishonoring God. This statement could really throw a lot of women under false condemnation.

10. Debbie says: "Hurt feelings are a way to control." They can be, but they can also not be. A woman may just have hurt feelings because of the actions of her husband that are ungodly. Debbie makes it seem that if a woman has hurt feelings there is no basis for this and she must have a Jezebel spirit.

11. Debbie says: "Some women control their husband by having an intense spiritual hunger." How is having an intense spiritual hunger controlling her husband?

12. Debbie says: "There are many various and subtle ways to control and direct your husband. One of the ways to take control is to tell your husband that you want him to be the spiritual leader in the home and then let him know that you are waiting to follow." So if a woman is more spiritual than her husband, it's wrong for her to tell her husband what the scriptures says on the subject and to "encourage" her husband to fulfill his God given role???

13. Debbie says: "The very first command God gave to a woman was, “Thy desire shall be unto thy husband and he shall rule over thee (Gen. 3:16).” Is your desire toward your husband? Do you desire him as a man? Do you live to please him? Does he rule over you? This is God’s will." Actually, that wasn't a command as much as it was a curse. If you read back in Genesis you will find out that this was part of the curse. It's still the truth, and needs to be followed, but it was the result of sin entering into the world. Here's what Barnes says on that verse:

"The third part of her sentence refers to her husband - “Thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.” This is evidently a piece of that retributive justice which meets us constantly in the administration of God. The woman had taken the lead in the transgression. In the fallen state, she is to be subject to the will of her husband. “Desire” does not refer to sexual desire in particular. Gen_4:7. It means, in general, “turn,” determination of the will. “The determination of thy will shall be yielded to thy husband, and, accordingly, he shall rule over thee.” The second clause, according to the parallel structure of the sentence, is a climax or emphatic reiteration of the first, and therefore serves to determine its meaning. Under fallen man, woman has been more or less a slave. In fact, under the rule of selfishness, the weaker must serve the stronger. Only a spiritual resurrection will restore her to her true place, as the help-meet for man. ~Barnes"

There are some things in the article that Debbie says that are good. She definitely touches on some area's of submission that women need to hear...but she is woefully off balanced and teaches things that the scripture does not teach. She sets up an argument that if a woman does not conform to what she has just listed then the woman has a Jezebel spirit - the spirit of the most wicked woman of the bible. Debbie's idea of submission is that the woman should basically be seen and not heard, that she should never question anything the husband says or does, that she should never feel disappointed or discontented, that she can never speak to him about his spiritual condition (watching to much tv), etc... and that if she does this she has a Jezebel spirit. I think that is totally wrong, especially given the way the Lord Jesus uses the phrase "Jezebel" in the book of Revelations to describe the type of person He refers to who has that spirit. The way she portrays a biblical marriage is that basically a husband does not have to love his wife by caring for her input and being ok with his wife questioning what he is doing, and him being willing to explain and wanting her to understand. The article comes across that a woman's role is to realize the man is in charge, that her sole purpose in life is to please him, and that she does this by realizing that he's the head, that she should never question anything and get her sole fulfillment from life by bringing him pleasure (very man centered and very little God centered). It seems to be a very worldly masculine way of looking at submission. She didn't touch on any of the open, transparent, and godly communication that there should be between a husband and wife. She even makes it seem that if a wife gives godly council to her husband that she is wrong!...because somehow if he (the husband) doesn't come to these conclusions by himself (without his wife's input) that he is not the head and the wife has usurp her authority. I find that absurd. People always use Abraham and Sarah's example, and rightly so, but they forget that there is an element missing in their situation that is present in ours. Abraham was the one who was hearing from God in his family matters. God was only speaking to Abraham. Sarah was to follow Abraham knowing that she was accountable to follower her husband and his leading. The same is true in the New Covenant, yet the difference is that both people, the husband and the wife, have the Spirit of God dwelling in them. God is speaking to them "both". God may give direction by speaking to the husband, OR God may even given direction and/or Godly council and advise through the wife... However, the ultimate decision about the family and it's direction is the husbands responsibility and decision. God may speak to the husband and the husband makes a decision and the wife follows.... or God may speak through the wife to the husband, and if the husband realizes that what was spoken if of God, then he makes the decision to follow it (or if not from God, he makes the decision not to follow it). The headship and the direction of the family still falls to the husband, and either way the wife must follow and submit... but for the wife to share what she also believes the Spirit of God is saying does not mean she has a Jezebel spirit.

sermonindex Oct 9, 2012

Debbie says: "The very first command God gave to a woman was, “Thy desire shall be unto thy husband and he shall rule over thee (Gen. 3:16).” Is your desire toward your husband? Do you desire him as a man? Do you live to please him? Does he rule over you? This is God’s will." Actually, that wasn't a command as much as it was a curse. If you read back in Genesis you will find out that this was part of the curse. It's still the truth, and needs to be followed, but it was the result of sin entering into the world. Here's what Barnes says on that verse: sscott7

"The third part of her sentence refers to her husband - “Thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.” This is evidently a piece of that retributive justice which meets us constantly in the administration of God. The woman had taken the lead in the transgression. In the fallen state, she is to be subject to the will of her husband. “Desire” does not refer to sexual desire in particular. Gen_4:7. It means, in general, “turn,” determination of the will. “The determination of thy will shall be yielded to thy husband, and, accordingly, he shall rule over thee.” The second clause, according to the parallel structure of the sentence, is a climax or emphatic reiteration of the first, and therefore serves to determine its meaning. Under fallen man, woman has been more or less a slave. In fact, under the rule of selfishness, the weaker must serve the stronger. Only a spiritual resurrection will restore her to her true place, as the help-meet for man. ~Barnes"

Your post is very lucid and meaningful. Here is a little passage from Mr Pearl which is added as an appendix to Mrs Pearls book “Created to be his help meet.” This should serve to make sense of her attitude and belief as to what should constitute a non Jezebelic woman.

“Has your husband reviled you and threatened you? You are exhorted to respond as Jesus did. When he was reviled and threatened, he suffered by committing himself to a higher judge who is righteous. You must commit yourself to the one who placed you under your husband’s command. Your husband will answer to God, and you must answer to God for how you respond to your husband, even when he causes you to suffer. Just as we are to obey government in every ordinance, and servants are to obey their masters, even the ones who are abusive and surly, ‘likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands’…You can freely call your husband ‘lord’ when you know that you are addressing the one who put him in charge and asked you to suffer at your husband’s hands just as our Lord suffered at the hands of unjust authorities…When you endure evil and railing without returning it, you receive a blessing, not just as a martyr, but as one who worships God.” Michael Pearl.

R
rainydaygirl Oct 9, 2012

“Has your husband reviled you and threatened you? You are exhorted to respond as Jesus did. When he was reviled and threatened, he suffered by committing himself to a higher judge who is righteous. You must commit yourself to the one who placed you under your husband’s command. Your husband will answer to God, and you must answer to God for how you respond to your husband, even when he causes you to suffer. Just as we are to obey government in every ordinance, and servants are to obey their masters, even the ones who are abusive and surly, ‘likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands’…You can freely call your husband ‘lord’ when you know that you are addressing the one who put him in charge and asked you to suffer at your husband’s hands just as our Lord suffered at the hands of unjust authorities…When you endure evil and railing without returning it, you receive a blessing, not just as a martyr, but as one who worships God.” Michael Pearl.


----

so is this saying that an abused wife should stay with and allow the abuse of her husband to continue with out seeking help? even if the abuse becomes violent?

trying to understand this
rdg

sermonindex Oct 9, 2012

I agree that a wife should honor her husband regardless of what he does. Both the husband and the wife will give an account to God for their actions regardless of what their spouses did or did not do. The problem with the article is that Debi says that many things are "Jezebel" and rebellious that Gods word never says are. If one wants to see an example of a New Testament Jezebel they should read the description that Jesus uses to describe this person in Rev 2:20. In Debi's article she says that a women has this spirit if they question their husband, speak to him about watching too much tv, and that they are dishonoring God if they are discontented with their husband in any way. That's crazy. A husband and wife relationship should be open, transparent, and comfortable enough that questions can be asked. And the husband should love his wife enough to know that it's ok for her to ask question and want to know why he's does or decides to do certain things. If a husband is spending all day watching tv or on the Internet, and neglecting his family, apparently the wife is supposed to say nothing or else she's manifesting a degree of Jezebel. That's not biblical. Is a wife not allowed to exhort her husband towards godliness? Does her godly exhortation make her a Jezebel? Debi's also says that if a wife feels discontented towards her husband that she is dishonoring God. The bible doesn't say that either. She may not like what her husband does, and she still has to submit to him, but that does not mean she has to feel contented. If her husband wants to spend hours on the net or watching tv Instead of spending time with his wife and kids, does she have to feel contented and good about that? If she doesn't is she a Jezebel?

R
rainydaygirl Oct 9, 2012

by sscott7 on 2012/10/9 15:18:23

I agree that a wife should honor her husband regardless of what he does. Both the husband and the wife will give an account to God for their actions regardless of what their spouses did or did not do.

----
would you mind clarifying for me just a bit, you don't believe a wife is to stay if her husband is abusing her violently do you?

rdg

P
proudpapa Oct 9, 2012

quote]“Has your husband reviled you and threatened you? You are exhorted to respond as Jesus did. When he was reviled and threatened, he suffered by committing himself to a higher judge who is righteous. You must commit yourself to the one who placed you under your husband’s command. Your husband will answer to God, and you must answer to God for how you respond to your husband, even when he causes you to suffer. Just as we are to obey government in every ordinance, and servants are to obey their masters, even the ones who are abusive and surly, ‘likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands’…You can freely call your husband ‘lord’ when you know that you are addressing the one who put him in charge and asked you to suffer at your husband’s hands just as our Lord suffered at the hands of unjust authorities…When you endure evil and railing without returning it, you receive a blessing, not just as a martyr, but as one who worships God.” Michael Pearl.

This Thought comes from 1 Pet ch 2 and ch 3 but just as we are not to obey the government when it dictates us to go against God neither should the wife follow her husbands lead when ever it goes against God. Sapphira should not have followed Ananias in keeping back part of the price of the land and telling a lie that they had given all of it away.

sermonindex Oct 9, 2012

Now to the married I command, yet not I but the Lord: A wife is not to depart from her husband. But even if she does depart, let her remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband. And a husband is not to divorce his wife. (1 Corinthians 7:10, 11 NKJV)

It is ideal, in the Lords eyes that husband and wife stay together. However, if a wife is being physically beaten she can live somewhere else, but she is not to divorce her husband. She should pray of her husband and his conversion and hope for reconciliation.

I would also imagine that if a wife is being physically beaten that the authorities would get involved and probably arrest the husband.

R
rainydaygirl Oct 9, 2012

by sscott7 on 2012/10/9 16:37:41

Now to the married I command, yet not I but the Lord: A wife is not to depart from her husband. But even if she does depart, let her remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband. And a husband is not to divorce his wife. (1 Corinthians 7:10, 11 NKJV)

It is ideal, in the Lords eyes that husband and wife stay together. However, if a wife is being physically beaten she can live somewhere else, but she is not to divorce her husband. She should pray of her husband and his conversion and hope for reconciliation.

I would also imagine that if a wife is being physically beaten that the authorities would get involved and probably arrest the husband.
--

sadly that is not always the case especially in some poorer countries around the world. thanks for coming back and clarifying what you meant though. appreciate that.
rdg

sermonindex Oct 10, 2012

The quote from Michael Pearl is complete wickedness. It is a charter for wife abuse. It is a careful woven text of words into which the Scripture is grafted with such subliminal skill that it gives an impression of truth. It is a complete parody of truth.

I kept my opinion out of my previous post of this man's words just to see what reaction or direction the OP would take. To my astonishment it has taken a strange "lets discuss it and pretend" sort of route. I make no apology for saying this. If no one can see that to say that it is admirable to call your husband "lord" because it really means that you are addressing the Lord Himself, or that a wife is to become a martyr to her husband then we have entered the time and space of madness. It is a complete wickedness without any doubt whatsoever.

What person claiming to be of Christ would advocate and promote an idea that was then presented to the body of Christ as teaching, which says that a man's wife is to be a punch bag for her husband and that the woman should still call him Lord. Have you all lost your sense or discernment. God have mercy when we are so removed from reality that we actually believe or even countenance this wickedness with a discussion. The fact that this man's wife can then agree ought to tell us something about spiritual deception and make you flee from it. Not post this rubbish on the internet as acceptable truth.

Where is the compassion of the men? Where is the understanding that no man has any right whatsoever to treat his wife with such contempt as this teaching of Michael Pearl teaches. Where is the courage to say that it is wicked. The naming of a woman as rebellious if she resists such abuse and to advocate an attitude that she could even bear with it and its ok because God will one day judge the man, is a mockery of the truth. Do you not know the compassion which Jesus had on women and why? Do you not understand that injustice which men have leveled against women in almost every age? Do you not know that Elijah was merciful to women and humbled himself for their sake. Do you not comprehend that God is going to pour out his anger on this generation because of wickedness arising from injustice which has been produced by injustice of men. Not the rebellion of women. Do you not know that a man is accountable for his wife and not a wife for her husband?

Do you not comprehend that it was God Himself who made the women a weaker vessel as a consequence of the fall. Eve did not rebel. She was deceived. Don't you get it? Eve was deceived she was not wicked. SHE WAS DECEIVED. She was innocent as was Adam and then she was deceived. In every generation men have laid against women misery upon misery because she was deceived. God did not intend this to be so. One day he will judge it. God's intention in making the women a weaker vessel after the fall was to provide a basis of accountability of men. The women has paid through increased child bearing pains. Not just giving birth but the pain of bringing up children with a weakened emotional heart. When men have simply disregarded their pains despising their sorrows God has been comprehending it.

God have mercy.

R
rainydaygirl Oct 10, 2012

armkelly thank you for saying what you have here. i asked about the content in this quote from Michael Pearl. i have some real issues with this article and especially that quote from her husband and i was hoping proudpapa might address my question but maybe he did not see it.


anyway thanks
rdg

P
proudpapa Oct 10, 2012

Hi brother amrkelly, Michael Pearl is not at all advocating mistreatment of wives or women. What an odd interpatation of his writings.

Brother you are so set on some kind of satanic subliminal messages being careful woven in anything that he writes, That you are completely missing the message and the point all together.

P
proudpapa Oct 10, 2012

Hi rdg I want everyone to know I am not mad at anyone but I am astonished at the rabit trails that everyone takes with the articals that I post.

The scripture is radical and the life it call us to live is radical. Our culture is very much anti Bible.
I answered the question about What Pearl was speaking of by Giving the text by which he used Read 1 Peter ch 2 and ch 3. Is it different than what Pearl wrote?? and if so how??

R
rainydaygirl Oct 10, 2012

Proudpapa

i have read the book by the Pearls that you mentioned in the other thread and while some of the things in it were useful much was taken to an extreme as i believe is the case in this quote. This mans understanding concerning wives and their husbands is extreme and not what the Lord has shown my husband or me. i realize you like these articles and so i will not argue with you about their content. i don't agree with much of what has been shared because i see it as being extreme but that is my opinion and you are entitled to yours.

i am glad there is no hard feelings though.

F
FreeSparrow Oct 10, 2012

Thank you for posting this article, there is much wisdom here. I have been weighed in the balance and found wanting. Read this with many tears.

P
proudpapa Oct 10, 2012

I am thankful that there are many getting a blessing from this artical it is sad that others just want to give a false impression of the motives behind it. It is a ridiculous absurdity to try and make this artical out as to endorse abusive husbands.

If anyone thinks that this artical is out to endorse abusive husbands I would encourage you to get the "Only for Men" by Michael Pearl, I have not read his "created to need a help meet" book so I can not comment on it.

sermonindex Oct 10, 2012

I certainly don't think that Michael Pearl is endorsing abusive husbands, but the article by Debi is filled with statements that aren't true. I've listed them in my first response and subsequent responses. It's really sad that she is calling certain things a "Jezebel" spirit when the word of God never does. I can see this article bringing women under a lot of false condemnation.

sermonindex Oct 10, 2012

I certainly don't think that Michael Pearl is endorsing abusive husbands, but the article by Debi is filled with statements that aren't true. I've listed them in my first response and subsequent responses. It's really sad that she is calling certain things a "Jezebel" spirit when the word of God never does. I can see this article bringing women under a lot of false condemnation. sscott7

No well he could hardly do that even if he intended it. That is the point. It is not the intentions of the man which matter it is its effect. Search the internet and read something of the reality of what happens when men believe their wives are to obey their commands. When they confuse submission with total obedience. Read 1 Peter and see that it is not a command to women but to all men (male and female) and wives and not all women are encouraged (not commanded) to submit to their husbands (not to call them Lord as though he were Christ Himself. It is "joint heirs of grace together" not the wife being an instrument in her body to facilitate her husbands folly and disobedience because he will not be gracious to his wife and merciful with all long suffering as was Christ.

It is a religious spirit which blinds the mind and prevents many men from seeing their duty, which they perceive as less than a duty and their wives duties as paramount.

To say that this teaching is an opportunity for abuse is to mean just that. If anyone needs to shed tears then let them shed tears according to their own conscience. But that has nothing to do with the presentation of women which amounts to an opportunity for the flesh and for unclean spirits to oppress women and drive men to abuse their wives.


This discussion is locked.

Archived
1 of 27 posts