Please I'd like someone to help me understand the following comment of Dr Marty Lloyd-Jones.
"No revival that has ever been experienced in the long history of the Church has ever been an official movement in the Church."
He said this at about 23mins into his sermon designated SID14811 here on SI.
This is not aimed at criticising the Doctor. In fact, so far, I agree with him hook, line and sinker. So much that I took his word for it, the first time I heard him say that years ago and haven't stopped quoting him.
But I'd be addressing a more informed audience at the 3rd annual Revival Conference hosted by Ministers for Revival Network here in Calabar Nigeria next week. And chances are that I may not resist the temptation to quote MLJ.
My headache has been to ballance his assertions with the experience of the Moravians 1727. Bearing in mind that the Count took time to convince all the heads of the deeply divided sects to find common notes that resonated unity among them before they got prayin together and Revival broke out.
Woudn't their's be said to be an official movement?
Also by way of tickling my fancy, please I'd like anyone who had the privilege of meeting MLJ in person to tell me what it was like to sit under his ministry.
Dr Martyn Lloyd-Jones was of a higher caste of mind. Its sad his people at mljtrust.org wouldnt make it easier for me to get his mp3 files.
