I have been a little disturbed at the appearence of new grace message that i see appearing in Asia and Australia (and of course it is seen in the US as well). It is all well and good and appears in many places to be biblical and inspires much freedom from legalistic religion.I will name names so that you may understand the context of this messgae. Bob George, Andrew Womack, Joseph Prince (Singapore) , Dr James B Richards and others have a particular slant on grace that appears biblical yet...That is how i would describe it. 'It appears biblical yet...' Now i know Spurgeon was a preacher of grace, yet he also did not water down sin, repentance, revival, the cross, sacrifice etcThe real concern I see is a passivity it tends to breed concerning Christian disciplines. I had one brother tell me some time ago that he was debating in his cell group over whether 'believing is a work'. Now this is dangerous ground. Anyone who comes and preaches a strong message of holiness, a call to sacrifice for the gospel, a call to radical discipleship, a call to urgent prayer or revival - would just tend to be preaching a works based Christianity that grace has done away with. I am not saying that these men above teach that or say that but there seems to be a silent implication that that could be so. It is the unwritten theology and the implications of this unwritten theology of silence that disturbs me. For example one church I know will not call people to prayer - that is works. There are no prayer meetings. To call believers to fervant prayer seems to invite the acusation of 'you are into works based righteousness; that is law and legalistic...' Does anyone see a danger here!Preachings that have so impacted my life (Wilkerson, Conlon, Ravenhill etal) would be considered far to works orientated and not in tune with the current love-grace trip. As I said before this new emphasis does not see God as angry at sin, bringing judgment etc etc. Repentence and weeping over sin and having anguish of heart seem to find little place. The call to authentic revival seems to have little place. When they speak of revival there is very little preaching against sin or the bringing of a corrective word. This trend disturbs me.Again i wasnt to say that there is much good and i have been blessed with many messages (especially Joseph Prince in Singapore) however I am concerned at what is not being said, what is being left out, what is missing in much of this type of 'grace' preaching. I would value some dialogue and comment on this and have you encountered anything like this. :-(
