BSBKJVWEBYLTASVBBEWMBT4TDBY|HymnsMusicDonate
Menu
Theology

Problems with a fairy tale future tribulation

sermonindex Mar 6, 2005

This whole mess of a future "Great Tribulation" is a fairy tale that is full of assumptions.Has anyone really taken the time and to see where this doctrine originates? Without consulting Grant Jefferies, Hal Lindsey, and Jack Van Impe, just to name a few of the phoney's that are out there. It's origin comes from Daniel 9:26-27. Which in truth is speaking about Jesus Christ and not some future anti-christ.John said that there would be many anti-christ that have "gone out from among us". These false teachers have inserted a 2000 year (and counting) gap, that isn't anywhere in scripture.When you hear the Angel speaking to Daniel after Daniel was offering up supplication for his people Israel, because the time of their 70 year release was at hand from Babylon, God gives another set of times in the form of 70 weeks instead of years.70 weeks x 7 days = 490 years. Now every bible student agrees with this number so there is no dispute.We can know the times from history if we carefully study it. The Angel said to Daniel, "From the going forth of the commandement to messiah........." would be a certain amount of weeks.Now this commandement went forth by decree by Cyrus king of Persia IIChronicles 36:22-23.Now friends, please understand that the Old Testement is not in chronological order, they are displaced. I have been told that Reese's chronological bible is most accurate in placing the books in their proper order. (which reminds me I need to get a copy).The timeline in the book of Daniel in regards to the resurection is accurate we can trust it, why is that we have to see it with our natural eyes in order for us to believe it. The kingdom of God resides in us, yet we still look up into the sky, and yet God sticks closer than a brother, why? Because He is in us, how close can you get, eh?I said that to say this, since we are looking for a literal kingdom to fall out of the sky it is difficult to believe that the king of the universe lives in men and He calls man the kingdom of God.That is why we still build temples and elaborate churches our eyes are still fixed upon something that is tangible, yet the scripture plainly say that those things that we do not see are eternal and not that which we see.It is you and I that should be ornate and beautiful, building one another up on your most holy faith, praying in the holy Ghost.Without consulting the soothsayers of bible prophecy, can someone please share with this forum where in the bible that there is a 2000 year gap between the 69th week and the 70th week?Karl

sermonindex Mar 6, 2005

What say ye, Karl, of the book of Revelation?

sermonindex Mar 6, 2005

I shall pray for you Karl. You presented a post that cannot even be taken seriously because you sinned at the beginning of it. You might be right and you might be wrong or both in your thoughts that you posted....but what is important is you over look the sins that come out of your mouth and harbor in your heart. It matters not if your wisdom is correct or not or somewhat....when sin comes out of a person's mouth .... it harbors in the heart. And the salvation of a person is more important than any wisdom that will pass away.May God show you your heart this day. I love reading your thoughts .... though I agree or not agree....it does not matter. It is a Sin to talk bad about people and name their names....and you have done so proudly. Might I suggest you ask forgiveness and then write these people down on your daily prayer list? I have prayed for you. And while you are at it...write my name down too...so that I may not perform the same sin in the future. ThanksPJ

C
crsschk Mar 6, 2005

PJ, reflect on what you wrote here.

D
disciplejosh Mar 6, 2005

HealingWaters,May I suggest this book to read? I don't know about the site it's on, I just 'google searched and found the book online here. Hopefully, this will help you in answering your question about the gap between the 69th and 70th week of Daniel's prophecy.Please let me know if this helps. Again, I would love to have your feedback on Sir Robert Anderson's work."The Coming Prince" by Sir Robert AndersenBlessings to you and yours,

sermonindex Mar 6, 2005

My dear brother, What on earth are you talking about?I ask the LORD many times a week to search my heart, in fact I just started asking Him that my mind would flow with His, or that He would somehow effect my decisions in every way possible.I have more problems than you know, but when my Father took on that task to clean me up, He was in for the long haul.I believe I am where I am supposed to be in Him, I can't go beyond that unless I turn back into perdition, then that is sin in itself, (been there done that).If your referring to the way that I had called Grant Jefferies, Hal Lindsey and Jack Van Impe phoneys, from the standpoint that I stand with bible prophecy, yes they are spreading a fairy tale doctrine that didn't originate from the bible, it was formed thru assumptions by crafty men in the form of disspensationalism.I wish that someone would please take the time to read the first Chapter of Revelations and see that the book is "The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto HIM (Jesus), to shew unto his servants (called out ones) things which MUST SHORTLY COME TO PASS........"John wrote down things that HE HAD SEEN (past), and THINGS THAT ARE (present) and THINGS THAT SHALL BE HEREAFTER (SHORTLY will come to pass). So when we read the book of Revelation, we need to take in consideration that which is PAST, that which He was referring to be in the PRESENT and that which was SHORTLY coming to pass.In our present day, everyone is throwing the whole book into the present circumstances and the future.Now let me tell you about David Wilkerson's book the Vision. He had a revelation back in 1974 and that book is now fulfilled. Christ gave John a message that was shortly to come to pass 2000 years ago and according to most it still hasn't come to pass.I think we need to quit reading the newspaper or watching the news looking for end time prophectic messages that might refer to the revelations or Matthew 24 Rexella van Impe will do that for us. Remember John was in the SPIRIT and was taken UP, wherever UP is. Which means that what he saw in the Spirit is spiritual and needs to be interpreted.When a message is given in tongues, should not it be interpreted? if not let that person be quiet.I would highly recommend anyone who is seeking for a better understanding on the last days, to go to www.lightofthecity.com and look for the audio page on your left. "last days" You WILL be convinced! If the links don't work, I will gladly send the message to you via email, just as me for it. I can feel the urgency in the writer of Revelation when he wrote ch 1 v3 "Blessed is he that readeth and they that hear the prophecy of this book, and keep those things which are written, for the TIME IS AT HAND.I sincerely covet your prayers brother, I only want to know His ways, so please pray that I know more of Him. I don't believe that I have much wisdom or knowledge, though I have prayed for it for many years, but the more I know Him the less I know of anything. (it's very humbling) Bible prophecy used to be cumbersome and awkward, because there was too many problems with the way I believed it being a Post Tribber.But now that I see it in a preterist view point, I see Jesus in a brand new light, in fact I see Jesus in all the scriptures. If anyone wants to know more about the end times THEN, 2000 YEARS AGO, you can go to www.planetpreterist.com or www.mikeblume.com from an Apostolic point of view.This way is the correct way, and if it causes division, then so be it, it needs to be told. If it was trivial and it was causing a division, then I would abandon it immediately for the sake of unity. But because I know it to be true, then we'll let the truth seperate.Karl

C
crsschk Mar 6, 2005

Will post this elsewhere but to help clarify.The original posting by PJ there has been edited.That's all well and good, except that if no one knows that it can be cause for confusion.Please, if anyone is going to edit their post/reply after the fact it would be a good idea to state so and would encouarge leaving in the unedited part with a correction;Something on the order of:"Edit:" And then explaining or correcting, making an apology or what have you. The reason being that often times there is a time lapse and many readers have come and gone, returned later and find that the subsequent replies no longer make any sense.

C
crsschk Mar 6, 2005

Your opinion, Karl.This way is the correct way, and if it causes division, then so be it, it needs to be told. If it was trivial and it was causing a division, then I would abandon it immediately for the sake of unity. But because I know it to be true, then we'll let the truth seperate.While agreeing with you that the aforementioned one's would not be where I would be studying eschatology, this still is a subject that many fine believers have a difference of opinion about.You are flat wrong about letting it cause division. Not to throw a blanket over the whole thing but the most convincing thing that I keep getting out of those that hold this view is just as you stated, that they believe they are the only ones that have the truth and are so adamant about it. That in itself is suspect.How does that square with your earlier comments?:I sincerely covet your prayers brother, I only want to know His ways, so please pray that I know more of Him. I don't believe that I have much wisdom or knowledge, though I have prayed for it for many years, but the more I know Him the less I know of anything. (it's very humbling) To reiterate, what is the expectation of the future to those that hold to this view point?

sermonindex Mar 6, 2005

Your original message was edited, as I can see. I am sincerely thinking about your advice. I can agree with you to a certain degree, yes we should be causious in NOT revealing names that might offend others.But for the sake of false teachings, should those names be revealed? So that others would be warned.Umm...For example, Hal Lindsey in his prophectic warnings in the 1980's had the church and the world in a tail spin. His book "the late great planet earth", 1980's countdown. The flurry that those books caused it was unbelievable, he sold millions.When the world is in turmoil, which it was then because of the Soviet Union and the United States, many jumped on the band wagon of prophecy and capped on the dividends. When everything cools down, you hear less of that stuff. When the war in the gulf started everyone jumped on that band wagon again, then it died down. Then the second invasion into Iraq every body is now on this kick about the rebuilding of Babylon. But according to the prophecies that brought her down so long ago, she became a desolation and a waste land to this day. She will never rise in her former glory for that head of Gold no longer sits on the shoulder of those former governments for they are all been brought down to ruin.What stands today is the Rock (Christ Jesus) that was hewn out of a mountain without hands, that was cast upon that statue which caused it to break in pieces, and they were thrown to the wind and no place was found for them. And that Rock became a Great Mountain (Our Mount Zion) and it filled the whole earth. But here we are 2005.We think we have it all together, there are things that are not even written in the bible that would knock our socks off when told.For,"He revealeth the DEEP and SECRET things; He knoweth what is in the darkness and the Light (Jesus) dwelleth with Him. Dan2:22Brother your o.k. I appreciate your input, when I am replying to your message, keep in mind that I am not just speaking to you but to all.Karl ;-)

C
crsschk Mar 6, 2005

Karl,To clarify a bit more.That was PJ's reply that was edited.On naming names, we have gone around the block on before, not an issue here, was only being lazy not putting them back in. Since it has come up though I do find some of the Van Empe's stuff rather amusing only in that one might wonder what say a program from ten years ago might look like now, everything being so 'eminent' all the time. Besides, he's got scripture memorization down pat.. :-) But was only alluding to the statement of "truth" in these regards to other, shall we say more qualified theolog's who have spent considerable time studying these things, not to the ones you mentioned necessarily, especially of the 'newspaper' variety.While I might think there is much to look across the horizon at as the days certainly appear to be evil and 2 Tim 3 the mantra for our times in my practically useless opinion, still...I don't know.Just a reminder though to put a refrence to who you are refering to here.

D
disciplejosh Mar 6, 2005

Just another reminder to look back at my first post and ask you to read the sir robert anderson 'The Coming Prince"

S
StevenL Mar 7, 2005

I must agree at least in part with brother Karl that most of the 'rapture', 'tribulation', teaching coming from our prophecy teachers today is a big basket of fairy tales derived from faulty applications of the Biblical prophecies. This is only one of the many fairy tales that the present-day church has forced upon us. And those who challenge the fairy tales are immediately accused of heresy and otherwise harangued. But God is having his sheep examine a lot of "church teachings" to discern their true character. None of us have to just swallow what "teachers" or "scholars" hand us. There's a LOT of stuff in that wonderful Word that just doesn't quiiite match up with a great deal of church doctrine today. May God's people have the courage to discern it for themselves without the approval of a mediator other than the Holy Spirit. :-)

sermonindex Mar 18, 2005

Brother Mike, We can't all just have opinions, how can any of the things that we hold true be solid, if all we have are opinions?There is nothing wrong in being adament and a bit obstinate on those things that we hold to be the truth, even you can agree with that, for even your posts give a strong impression that what you hold as the truth is more then just a mere opinion.And thank God that we do.The quote that you had placed regarding my ignorance regarding Wisdom and Knowledge was not suggesting that I don't know anything, but rather I was sharing with any like minded saint that as we become less and less and Christ becomes more and more it seems that what we know in the ways of Wisdom and Knowledge I don't know much of anything. At one point in Paul's ministry in Phi 3:7-8 he counted what he had gained in the past to be dung. I truly pray that you understand this in that light.But as regarding the Parousia of our LORD Jesus Christ, as this is what we are talking about, I know that by believing this way I am been heralded as a heretic. But let me say this, I wish that I grew up believing this, because it has taken much considerable time and study to change my view point, as now that I look back at what I used to believe in a Post Tribulation Rapture teaching, and how foolish I was to believe in such superstitions and fairy tales. When you consider Daniel 9:27 yourself, Where is the 2000 year gap between the 69th and 70th that today's bible teachers teach us at? Where do they get such a number and incert it between those years? And why is the "he" an Anti-Christ? Why can't it be Jesus Christ who came to "Confirm" the covenant with many for one week the final week of the 70 weeks that was determined, the week that He was cut off in the middle of. The one who caused the sacrifice and oblation to cease, and because of the overspreading of abomination He (Christ) shall make it desolate. God sent Israel into captivity for 70 years according to the word of Jeremiah, God had no problem with keeping time. They stayed in Babylon for exactly 70 years. Daniel knew that 70 years were just about up so he goes to prayer and God sends an Angel to tell him about the 70 weeks that was to be their end even to the consummation. But the Angel gives them a key when all this prophetic message of the 70 weeks would begin, it would begin from the going forth of the commandement to rebuild Jerusalem. In Which Cyrus also called Artaxeras gave the proclamation for the Jews to leave Babylon and to go back to rebuild. God moved upon Nehamiah and Esra to rebuild the wall even in troublous times, as you can read in thier books that they were having constant trouble building the wall. From that time to 69th week there would be a series of event that Daniel unfolds when you read about the king of the south and the king of the north, these were document in the books of the maccabeas. But God gave Daniel this time line because He was going to be silent for a space of 430-90 years, no prophet from God was going to be heard of during this time. The next time we hear of any prophet that comes on the scene was John the baptizer.When Jesus came on the scene, thus the 70th week begin to unfold. I won't dispute whether It started at His birth or when the Kingdom of God descended in bodily form like a dove and lighten upon Him. But I will add this that the law and the prophets were until John after that the Kingdom of God was preached. It suggests to me that before the 69th week is the law and the prophets and after John begins the 70th week. God has no problem bringing an age to an end.This an exhastive work, but well rewarding, as it reveals Christ in every detail. Thanks for your post, I enjoyed writing this.Karl

sermonindex Mar 18, 2005

Thank you for your input, I went to the site and read the preface and I gathered from that what his views were. Mind you I tried to read the text, but I get easily bored when swallowed up with much theological jargon. Simplicity is where it's at for me. Thanks again.Karl

C
crsschk Mar 18, 2005

Hi Karl,There is nothing wrong in being adamant and a bit obstinate on those things that we hold to be the truth, even you can agree with that, for even your posts give a strong impression that what you hold as the truth is more then just a mere opinion.Sure, to a point, not on essential issue's, there's no equivocation there. Might sound like the escape valve or even laziness, but "I don't know" is just the 'opinion' I am holding to at this point in time.Would also agree that much of what is taught nowadays is out of whack. The quote that you had placed regarding my ignorance regarding Wisdom and Knowledge was not suggesting that I don't know anything, but rather I was sharing... Wanted to cut that short there. Went back through this and not sure where you got that from. I may have missed it still, could you clarify what you mean? Seems like an assumption.Continuing:but rather I was sharing with any like minded saint that as we become less and less and Christ becomes more and more it seems that what we know in the ways of Wisdom and Knowledge I don't know much of anything. At one point in Paul's ministry in Phi 3:7-8 he counted what he had gained in the past to be dung. I truly pray that you understand this in that light.Without a doubt brother, oddly, it seems we are saying the same thing when it comes to our opinions here.But as regarding the Parousia of our LORD Jesus Christ, as this is what we are talking about, I know that by believing this way I am been heralded as a heretic. Again that sounds like an assumption brother, think the biggest issue I may have had was in the statement of your view being 'truth' and letting that be a dividing line if I am recalling correctly. But don't think anyone is calling for your head. So pardon my confusion on all this Karl, not exactly sure what you meant. A lot of times we do miss the intent in our writing around here.I know the inflection often gets lost, but the question I was asking wasn't to draw an inference from or be antagonistic, (maybe now I am assuming :) ) but honestly, what does the future unfolding look like to this particular point of view? I just have forgotten much of it and for others here as well, it might be helpful.

sermonindex Mar 18, 2005

Karl,From your posts, "simplicity", God available to everyone without need of an intermediary, your view that Revelations is not in the future, you sound like a Quaker. What is your faith?Bubbaguy

P
PreachParsly Mar 18, 2005

And why is the "he" an Anti-Christ? Why can't it be Jesus Christ who came to "Confirm" the covenant with many for one week the final week of the 70 weeks that was determined, the week that He was cut off in the middle of. The one who caused the sacrifice and oblation to cease, and because of the overspreading of abomination He (Christ) shall make it desolate. I dont understand... are you saying that Jesus the Christ is the Anti-Christ?

C
couch Mar 18, 2005

Parsly - Karl is definitely not saying that Jesus the Christ is the antichrist. A careful reading of what he has been saying shows that his point is this:Many people today teach a future tribulation, although in his and many others viewpoints, there is not a legitimate claim for this from the scriptures. He has stated that many take a passage out of Daniel that he (Karl) believes refers to Jesus the Christ and say that it is talking about an anti-christ to come.He is in no way saying that Jesus is not Lord, simply that many could be confusing the text of Daniel to be about Anti-christ when it could be speaking of Jesus the Christ. Our ulitmate goal, of course, is to follow the true Christ, the son of the Living God, who's testimony is the Spirit of Prophecy.To throw my own two cents in, I am definitely intrigued by the preteriest/amillenial position, when defended using scripture and not man's clever devices. I myself hold firm to historical premillenialism (not dispensational premill, which believes in a pre-trip rapture and many other scarcely biblical concepts) because it has been clearly seen as the eschatology of many (not all) church fathers in the early ages.I used to be a "Left-Behind" eschatology fan, until I started considering God's heart and His word. The first is a necessary acquisition in order to fully understand the second. I believe it has always been God's plan for us to be His people , His light, His salt in the earth regardless of suffering, persecution, and tribulation that may come about. An "escapist" mentality is dangerous in my perception, biblically and for the heart.However, I definitely want to remain teachable all my life, and am open to various interpretations, especially if they are spoken clearly and biblically by men of Godly character. In your own view of preterism, a man by the name of Steve Gregg comes to mind. He hosts a daily radio-broadcast at www.narrowpath.org and also has a myriad of teachings on numerous subjects. Although I disagree with some of his eschatological viewpoints, I respect and look up to his deep love for the word and his integrity and humility of heart.If anyone wanted a seriously biblical, step by step guide into the preterist/amill viewpoint, I would highly recommend listening to his teachings. Also, his radio program, in which people call in with random questions about the Bible that he answers thoroughly and respectfully both to the text and the caller.My main issue with the preterist viewpoint is this: God's heart and prophetic purpose for National Israel. Preterism holds no future fulfillment of God's ultimate promise to restore Israel to Himself, but simply says that we are now Israel and thats all there is. I am in agreement with Paul that we are now grafted in to the vine of Christ, the Israel of God, and are therefore partakers of the promise and the seed of Abraham in Christ Jesus. However, the gifts and callings of God are without repentance, and although present day Jewry rejects Messiah and is apostate, I believe that God will bring an ultimate and future restoration to His covenant people of old.Not for their sakes, but for His namesake in keeping His word (see Nehemiah 9). Additionally, Christ Himself said he would not return until the leaders of Israel declared "Blessed is He who comes in the Name of the Lord!" As Paul says, their acceptance into the Body of Christ will be "life from the dead"! (Romans 11)It is God's great desire to love and chase after us, wooing us back to Himself, and I believe He will do that with natural Israel; although it will take some severe Amos 9 judgment before that is to happen. In that vein, I hold definitely to Art Katz' view of eschatology, though I know some would disagree. Without going too long :), I appreciate this discussion, and may we all by grace in faith seek the Father's heart through His word, and the revelation of Jesus as the means of understanding prophecy concerning the "end of days". Remember, 1 John was written after John returned from Patmos, and after seeing the end of all things his greatest desire and teaching was "Little children, love one another."May that be our heart's cry as well.

C
couch Mar 18, 2005

Parsly - does this make sense? are you clear from confusion?Karl - what else has brought you to this understanding of eschatology?- curious

P
PreachParsly Mar 18, 2005

Yup, thanks.. I understand his viewpoint.

This discussion is locked.

Archived
1 of 29 posts