I have been contemplating why it is that in the land that enshrines individual freedom as it's core philosophy, that there is at the same time so much fear around that many individuals see the need to consider aggresive self defense.
I am not wanting to be contentious, but just want to put out my thoughts for folk to consider and get us thinking, so here they are...
In pushing for 'our rights' and freedom from governmental control and preferring 'small government' are we in fact taking away a provision that God has given to control the evil in society? Let me explain.
In Romans 13 it says this:
Rom 13:1 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.
Rom 13:2 Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.
So God has ordained civil authority (government; rulers; etc). for the following purpose...
Rom 13:3 For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same:
Rom 13:4 For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to [execute] wrath upon him that doeth evil.
The purpose of civil government is to keep evil under control and stop anarchy, so we can live peaceable lives (1 Tim 2:1-2).
With a strong government that punishes wrong doing, such as stealing, murder, etc, those who are inclined to commit such crimes will be less likely to if they know they will be caught and severly dealt with. On the other hand if we want so much individual freedom and weak government, then the alternative is to seek to enforce our own protection, which in reality results in anarchy, because there is no accountability and it just feeds the cycle of fear and threat.
It is interesting to consider those Arab countries that have just 'won' their freedom from dictators. There is no denying that Mubarak of Egypt and Sadam Hussain of Iraq were dictators, but for the Christians in those countries there was quite a degree of protection and safety under them. Now with the freedom of 'democracy' from these 'dictators' the Christians are suffering lack of freedom and persecution.
I once heard it said that God's prefered government was Theocracy (God's rule), then Monarchy (earthly kings) and last would be democracy (people rule). I know this goes against the grain of our western ideology, but I think there is much truth in it. God can turn the heart of a king much easier that a whole nation of reprobate individuals that have conspired against His rule. Democracy is NOT the golden goose that we think it is.
I know that many rulers and governments (such as mentioned above) become evil tyrants, but that is why we are called to pray for them in 2 Timothy 2:1. We will get the government we deserve.
So to sum up, the thought I am presenting is that maybe our determination to seek our 'right' to be free, actually results in bondage to fear from those who use that 'freedom' to harm others.
As Christians we have the paradox that we are bond slaves of Christ, but are also the only true free persons on this earth! True freedom is not anarchy (lack of government), but submission to good government, which ultimately is only God's government of man. When Jesus comes he will 'rule the nations with a rod of iron'. Until this time He has ordained the earthly government of men to keep order.
