Hi Sister Ginnyrose,
Chris, you hobnob with the professionals - can you offer an explanation or do these numbers reflect the opinions of the less educated?
I think that many educated individuals place varying degrees of "trust" in the words of the Bible on the basis of what they think that they know of this world.
In my experience, I have met different kinds of people who react to faith in different ways.
There are angry, bitter atheists who hate the very notion of "God" and Christians and look down upon those who embrace faith as "less intelligent" and even "gullible" human beings.
There are agnostics who are almost as bitter about God and "religion" as the militant atheists, but they are willing to concede that there "could" be something to spiritualism or even the Bible.
There are "honest atheists" (actually agnostics) who will admit that they don't know one way or the other in terms of faith and religion. However, to the best of their understanding, the things found in the Bible are incompatible with what they believe from science and history.
Next, you have people who claim to believe in something, but they just aren't sure what it is. They believe that "God" exists, but they are unsure whether or not that "God" is the God of the Bible, Jesus, Allah or any other named "higher power" -- or if that everyone is simply calling that same perceived "higher power" by a particular sectarian name.
Then, you have people who do believe in God and that the Bible, more or less, is his sacred book. They believe Jesus existed too. However, they are less inclined to believe in the miracles of the Bible and see much of the teachings, history, anecdotes and doctrines as more or less "allegory" written for those times. They see the Bible as a "moral" book rather than a literal history and set of doctrinal truths.
There are also people who believe in Jesus, believe in life after death and even the miracles of the Bible; however, they doubt the authenticity of the standards found in the Bible (e.g., place faith in and live for Jesus or burn eternally in the Lake of Fire). They perceive God as a "loving God" who would only be more gracious and forgiving than they are, so they can't see it as "fair" that such a loving God punishing anyone for all of eternity.
There are also individuals who believe in the Word of God yet struggle with weighing what is found in the Word of God with what they have been taught in school, life, etc... They don't voice such inner wrestling in public or among believers, but they wrestle with doubt about both the existence of God and the validity of His Word.
Of course, there are people who believe in the existence of the God of the Bible and everything written within it, but still do not live for God -- fully -- due to the fact that they are trapped by the lusts and enticements of this world.
Finally, you have believers. They have converted to the faith and trust God -- no matter what this world tries to tell them. God is first and foremost of importance in their lives. They search for, find and realize the hope that is found from God's Word and applied in their daily lives.
There are many people who might be a combination of several of the above types.
In general, I think that many highly educated people have difficulty with trusting the Bible because they trust themselves and what they believe what they were told to believe by teachers, professors, parents, etc... Many individuals that I have spoken to have said that they know Christians who fit into those silly stereotypes perpetrated by this world (e.g., the unintelligent, the gullible, those needing a crutch, etc...).
Ironically, I have also met and interacted with believers who almost boast in their ignorance or lack of intelligence. They point to how the apostles were mocked by those in Jerusalem for Pentecost as being "ignorant and unlearned" and then almost seek a similar accusation as some sort of badge of honor. I have tried to reason with such individuals that many Christians have been educated and/or intelligent.
While the apostles may have been "unlearned" (in terms of formal Pharisaical education), most had accomplished "trades" (the training of their day) and could read and write (which was exceptionally rare in the world). Moreover, there have been missionaries and preachers who were exceptionally "learned" and intelligent men.
History is filled with educated believers who discovered planets, mapped continents, plotted solar activity, practiced medicine, invented machines and, of course, translated the Bible into other languages (such as English). Yet, I will be the first to admit that the stereotype of "ignorant" and "gullible" Christians exists because some of the loudest Christians continue to speak about things (and even misrepresent them) when it would be better for them to not speak of things that they know little about.
I have met people who do not believe in the completely literal nature of the Bible while pointing out those who are hypocrites, hateful, uncaring, gossipers, prideful or holding to other sins in the Church and they wonder how those "believers" could ever question their eternal condition given their own hypocrisies.
I suppose that many people don't believe that the Bible should be taken literally because they honestly don't believe everything in it OR they don't see many Christians live like they take it all literally either.
Someone on the forum posted something about a television show called Duck Dynasty this week. I clicked on the links to learn more. One of those links had a man named Phil Robertson share his testimony.
http://gnli.christianpost.com/video/interview-duck-dynastys-si-robertson-on-life-marriage-proposals-and-his-unwavering-belief-in-the-creator-15619
While I am not very knowledgeable about his Christian background (and I read what seemed to be much discussion about the validity of it here on the SermonIndex forums), something that he said did strike my wife and I as a very profound yet simple truth about those who find hope in the Son of God and those who "hope" for something else.
Mr. Robertson said, "If you're not a believer and you don't believe God exists at all, about the only hope that you have is that he not be there. That's your hope."
I think that there is a real truth in this. Those who don't believe -- or those who only PARTIALLY believe -- only have one real "hope" for the end of their life. They hope that either God doesn't exist after all OR that the Bible is not completely true. If God DOES exist and the Bible IS completely true, then those individuals are facing eternal consequences for living life for themselves and neglecting their Creator and His Word.
So, no, I don't think that the opinion about taking God's Word literally reflects the opinions of the less educated. I have sat under and worked alongside highly educated individuals who took God's Word to contain 100% literal truth.
In addition, I think that the Western World -- with its longstanding historic dominance of the Christian religion -- has approached the concept of faith and inspiration of Scriptures (and those who embrace such a belief) with a measure of contempt that is unseen in other parts of the world and with other religions.
There are scientists, engineers and doctors who are Muslims yet embrace a literal view of Islam and the Koran. There are highly educated Hindus who take their religious beliefs seriously. They are not treated with consternation that is directed as professing Christians (or "fundamentalists") in America, Canada, the U.K., Europe, Australia, etc...
I'm not quite sure of the reason for such ridicule and dismissal of apparent intelligence of Christians in America. However, I do think that there is a "consensus peer pressure" in academia and science today where atheists are "loud and proud" and will generally dismiss the mind of anyone "gullible" enough to believe in God. It is sort of akin to the "consensus peer pressure" of professional climatologists who endeavor to find man-made links to global warming or biologists and anthropologists pressured to embrace the notion of inherent homosexuality from birth (e.g., gays are "born this way").
I suppose that it doesn't help when Christians often reinforce negative stereotypes -- often gladly.
So, I do think that the numbers of individuals who believe in God yet not a literal interpretation of the Bible is at least partially due to what is really an honest lack of "faith" in what is written in the Word of God -- as well as a lack of "faith" in the very people who claim to follow the literal interpretation of that God and His Word.
I know that I was a bit long with my response but I do hope that I was clear with my opinion in regard to your question.