Hi bear
Bear wrote: ////The early Anabaptist saw the danger of theology rooted in the Old Testament to believers professing faith in Jesus. This is why much of their faith is grounded in the reality of truth as taught by Jesus and His disciples in the New Testament.
While the Reformers such as Calvin and Luther saw church and state as one, no different from their Catholic predecessors. The Anabaptist saw that the church was a spiritual reality with Jesus Christ as its head. They saw that the church was composed of people who had undergone the new birth. Evidence of that new birth being issued forth in a righteous life in Jesus.////
This is true and I agree, very good point.
Church and state do not mix.
Protasants and Catholics tried to christendom geographic locations, what a mess that created.
We certaintly all must agree that the Bible does not promote political obsession, nor the spreading of the gospel by means of governmental force,
But if we are honest with the Scriptures, than we must becareful that we do not pride ourselves above others with a position that has more traditional support than what it does Scriptural support.
I was given a book by a friend written by Dean Talor "change of allegiance" in that book Dean tells about being in the military in Berlin during the fall of the wall. Him and his wife started reading the Scriptures, they got to the "thou shall not kill" and they felt convicted to leave the military.
In the book Dean gives information for those whom are currently in the military and how to get out as a conscientious objector.
He makes a point in the book to make sure that you do not take just a noncombatant status because that is what they will offer, and if you agree to that, it is hard to get out.
But the inspired Scripture does not support that view.
The question is asked in Scripture of what a soldier should do, of which John the Baptist gives command : "Do violence to no man, neither accuse any falsely ; and be content with your wages."
John preached a straight and narrow message, but he never told the soldier's to stop being soldier's.
Edit add : John told the soldier's to be content with their wages and neither accuse any falsely, If we believe that God has of his Sovereignty inspired the KJV for the english speaking people, as what I do, than we must confess that, a Christian soldier should take a noncombatant status.
If however we believe that one translation is not above another, than John is only commanding the soldier's not to "take money from anyone by force", and would their by be indorseing the right of a soldier to use the sword in a lawfull way.
Lets becareful that our traditions do not cause us to use selective blindness toward certain scriptures.