I have a question that I hope someone will be able to help me understand. First, let me explain what I think is the issue that concerns me. The woman that was caught in the act of adultery that was rescued by our Lord was broken and wounded spiritually and I am certain emotionally. She was about to be stoned if Christ had not intervened. The wrath of the crowd against her was directed at her and in a sense indirectly at and in opposition of her sin. Had the crowd not condemned her would she have been driven to a point of true repentance and brokenness that prepared her to receive the mercy of Christ? And was the wrath exhibited then a good thing? Was this wrath not similar to the novel "Scarlet Letter" that was written in a manner that "exposed" the cruelty that was exhibited in the novel against the woman who had committed adultery? Was not the example that Christ gave us when he rescued the woman an act of supernatural wisdom that circumvented the effects of sin and the law and brought us a wonderful example of redemption? But is it needed in a godly society to remain steadfast in maintaining our culture in a manner that rebukes sin strongly? I think it certainly is. If that is true then didn't books like the "Scarlet Letter" actually water down the word of God and help to negate the stigma of sin in our culture? Did it (the novel) help to stigmatize any believers who in the time after the book dared to take a strong stand against sin? The minister and the victim in the novel did not appear to me to ever come to a true resolution with God and actually experience complete redemption or actual godly repentance. It was almost an endorsement of rebellion -- I have often wondered if it might have been a better and more godly novel had it been more open to having more truly godly people in it leading all parties to clean and pure repentance and to be reestablished with honor in the community. I think this was part of the attributes that David exhibited as the leader of his nation -- He acknowledged his sin openly and before the people. His repentance inspired the people to repent and to be restored to God and each other. So as good a book as Scarlet Letter was I think it may have been one of the first attacks in our country against the church and the people who were exemplified in the fictional community who in their frailty failed in conducting themselves as mature and forgiving believers. What would happen if Americans fell before God openly and honestly repented -- even our leaders -- and inspired us all to repent and forgive each other. What are some thoughts you all may have on this issue? Without mercy and forgiveness we only have the wrath of the law -- But the wrath of the law points us to repentance and forgiveness. Without the wrath of the law we find our path to forgiveness and redemption obscured -- don't we?
