RFID Chip Implant Technology In Students Without Parental Consent

"....the latest "MINI RFID” is able to hold over 100GB of data which can be easily updated to include medical records, insurance information, drivers license number as well as criminal history and some outstanding credit debts."

"Some parents took issue with the school’s approach, claiming the schools did so without their foreknowledge or consent. Superintendent Gerald Morgan of the Carbon County school district tells National Report that most of these complaints come from families with heavily rooted religious backgrounds."

http://nationalreport.net/wyoming-school-implant-rfid/

Note-worthy phrasings in the official argumentation supporting the forced implantation:

"fringe Christian sects"

"Xenophobia and superstitions are a common affliction among rural communities."

"Unfortunately we still have some locals who are very old fashioned. They like to buy into all these nutty conspiracy theories and what-not."

it's not mandatory yet as per official law....so Wyoming clearly
would have no authority to enforce it.

And: a few words have changed from the original proposal
bill that calls it a "class II device that is implantable" - in detail:

‘‘(B) In this paragraph, the term ‘data’ refers to in-
formation respecting a device described in paragraph (1),
including claims data, patient survey data, standardized
analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of
data from disparate data environments, electronic health
records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the Secretary"

I'm sure that's enough base material to write fictive stories about,
since that device is still in the latest bill.

In my early years one of the subjects I was studying was german literature,
and these kind of articles were the actual way to spread information
packed inside the presentation of 'satire' during the 3rd Reich there.

As long as the content was classified as art form or entertainment
it was not under persecution by the state.

Most of the real news were transported that way, because mainstream
media was 100% government propaganda, nothing of it was uncensored.

Is it possible that this 'forward conclusion' gets a reaction, at least a denial,
where the bare dry facts do not? When would you talk about the fundamental
facts, the writer no doubts has a problem swallowing in silence. Well, as far
as I can tell, you don't. You wait for some kind of public development
in the hope it all goes away. Or stay with its a "conspiracy theory"

But here it comes: I was looking for some reprints of the article,
and one christian site has it presented and editorial commented on.

And the first thing the editor remarked "this chip is not the mark of the beast"
with a long fictional explanation how the "real mark" will be later introduced to
the world. We spoke about that here a few months ago how these kind
of arguments are created, he's a strong pretrib believer, and his
reasoning has no orientation in scripture, it's really pure fiction,
so most likely builds on that foundation: "it cannot be....because
the rapture has to come first".

Looks to me like nobody thinks in terms of how that beast tech infrastructure
of total control of the buying selling process has to be developed in advance,
before it is used for simply one purpose. That strategy was a longterm project
and doesn't just pop out of nowhere.

QUOTE:
______________________________________________________________

"Xenophobia and superstitions are a common affliction among rural communities."
______________________________________________________________

Too bad these brilliant people do not realize it is these rural folks who produce the bulk of their food. If there would be no profit incentive they would have to grow and scratch for their own food.