BSBKJVWEBYLTASVBBEWMBT4TDBY|HymnsMusicDonate
Menu
General

Please, no more Catholic bashing

M
moreofHim Apr 24, 2005

brothers and sisters,I am appealing to you all that we stop this. Though we may not agree with all of their beliefs, still a hungry soul is a hungry soul. I have some dear friends who are catholic whom i have sent here to listen to a sermon. I feel terrible that they have come here and seen the title of sooo many of the posts.I have had a few catholics who, on their own, have subscribed to my xanga journal as well as my website because they search for the truth, and they love Jesus. I suggest sermons on SI and different articles. That is my understanding of how to be a light to them or anyone else.Why would they even stay long enough to listen to a sermon if they see these posts? I don't want my witness to be lost or the witness of SI.There are hungry people in every denomination- Catholic, methodist, baptist, whatever. In ever church and every denomination there are lost and decieved people- as well as hungry ones whom the Lord is calling softly to Himself. Let us not be a hindrence to that. Let us be waiting with love and open arms, with "food" and living water for those who are searching for truth.I can't imagine how many might have hardened their hearts already by coming by SI and reading just the title of the posts lately.In His love, Chanin

R
ReceivedText Apr 24, 2005

Chanin,The Roman Catholic Church is NOT a denomination of true Christianity. It is a cult. The reason we expose the RCC is because we LOVE precious Roman Catholics and want to lead them to Christ. You cannot agree with a lie and expose it at the same time.We must speak the truth in love. Only the knowledge of the Truth will set people free. If you really love Roman Catholics, you will tell them the truth. You will be honest with them about their pagan institution and gently lead them to the Saviour.This is our goal. You can't pretend they are Christians. It would be deceptive to do so. It would be against my conscience in the Holy Ghost. The love of God constrains us to preach the truth.I would rather a Roman Catholic be mad at me now, than have them scream at me from Hell for not telling them. I hope you would too.Blessings,TR

M
MrBillPro Apr 24, 2005

You accused us of bashing the Catholic church, but it seems that you don't even believe what they believe. I do disagree with them on salvation. They say it is by works and we say it is through faith alone. But you know what, we both agree that Jesus Christ died for the sins of the world and that makes Him the Savior. So it seems you don't even believe what your own church is teaching. I have many problems with the Catholic churches beliefs, but I don't go around bashing them. We will all stand before God one day and have to account for what we did with the knowledge we had of His Son Jesus Christ. Jesus is the only door leading to heaven and the Father. All other doors lead straight to hell. That might sound blunt or uncaring but it isn't. It is just the truth and I will continue to proclaim it so that maybe a few more people will come through the right door.

sermonindex Apr 24, 2005

I agree with my sister Chanin. I feel in the Holy Spirit, that the bashing of catholics on this website is not the best possible witness of the Love of Christ, especially on a non-exclusive public website that is global.I've noticed that you have linked stuff to chick dot com. I have handed out many many Chick tracts in my outreach to the homeless. I LOVE the tracts, however I'm not wild about his witness regarding the Word of God.I have given much prayer and thought to the recent continuing 'controversy' on this website regarding the "KJV only" debate. I have recieved much blessing and succor from God's precious and inerrant Word in my NIV Study Bible. The Deity of Christ is a truth buried deep in my heart. I'm going to say this as clearly as I can; those who would say that the Bible I read, is "corrupt", or "corrupted", are perilously close to committing the unpardonable sin of blaspheming the Holy Spirit.The onus, the thrust of this website is towards prayer and revival, and the forum towards discussion OF prayer and revival. Many times people burst onto the website spreading themselves forward in opinion, dissent and controversies. They don't last long here, the Spirit winds them in short order, and they leave.

R
ReceivedText Apr 24, 2005

Neilgin1,Who's Catholic bashing? I haven't seen ANY Catholic bashing (i.e. bashing Roman Catholics). All I have seen is a love for them. As per the RCC institution, it IS all over the news ALL of the time now. The only reason I think it is receiving so much attention here is because it is timely.Folks want to know the truth. I hope you wouldn't deny them that.As per your fear of calling the NIV "corrupted," lets get a definition of corruption: Corrupt: "changed in meaning or form, or deviating from the standard (of language usage or of manuscript reading). Ex. "Sparrowgrass" is a corrupt spelling of "asparagus." The corrupt manuscript was full of errors made in copying from the original."In this definition of the word "corrupt", the NIV is corrupt. Jesus thought it NOT robbery to be equal with God. (Phil. 2:6) The NIV denies this. Definition: Corruption.If you want to settle for a little corruption in your Bible, that is your business. I'm not bashing, blaming, or accusing you. I am just stating fact and discussing the issue. Jesus loves you and so do I.Blessings,TR

sermonindex Apr 24, 2005

Its Neil, that's my name.As per your fear of calling the NIV "corruptedbrother "TR" (textus receptus?)I have no fear. You can term a version of the Bible as corrupt if you want, all I am saying is that the Bible I hold, is God's Holy Word, and for anyone to call it "corrupt" is to veer perilously close to committing the unpardonable sin.Walk as you will though.you make two other statements using the word "truth" and the word "fact", they are two diiferent things. Fact is the stuff you see on the TV and the news, the poo of the world, the dross of man. Truth is "Jesus Christ and Him crucified", and that is all I know.You register on this forum one day ago, and already you're steaming forward into a sea of dissent on this forum in the name of truth.I've seen this before.

T
taco Apr 24, 2005

There is a place for correcting an error in love, I think we will all agree. There is also such a thing as an obsession. Lets look very quickly at the example of Paul the apostle. Did he preach truth? Certainly. He preached the truth of the gospel. Did he show people error? Yes, read Acts 17 he told the idol worshipers that God was not worshiped with men's hands. Was he obsessed? Obsessed with the gospl and with it's Author, but no with tearing down falsehood. He courteoulsy and quickly showed the error to those practicing it, and went on to decalre the truth. Read Acts 17 again.Here is the testimony of the town clerk of epheses about Paul:Ac 19:37 For ye have brought these men, who are neither temple-plunderers, nor speak injuriously of your goddess.Paul certainly did not promote the worship of anyone or anything other than the God of Israel, nor was he secretive about his belief - but neither was he unmannerly. If one truly has a desire to reach the lost he will have compassion for them, this will be evident in their speech.

R
RobertW Apr 24, 2005

If you want to settle for a little corruption in your Bible, that is your business. I'm not bashing, blaming, or accusing you. I am just stating fact and discussing the issue. Jesus loves you and so do I.There are two words here that need never be in the same sentence in my estimation: corruption and Bible. Certainly there are translations that I would refrain from using when studying or teaching; but 'corrupt' is a strong word and it casts doubt on all versions as people simply don't know what to trust. Not only that, not all God fearing scholars agree on all the particulars of these things. It is topics like this that the enemy uses to 'sift' the faith of new converts or those who are unstable when the posts are strong and come off like this. We must not allow our strong convictions to become a weapon in the enemies hand.

R
ReceivedText Apr 24, 2005

RobertW,What do you think of this sentence?:Jehovah's Witnesses have translated a corrupt Bible version called the New World Translation.Was that sentence blasphemy? Or was it the truth?Try not to let your emotions rule your posting. Blessings,TR

sermonindex Apr 24, 2005

There is a way that seemth right unto a man and the end there of are the ways of death.I think what Chanin is trying to say is this, What is the purpose of Catholic bashing? She knows the truth as much as we do, BUT what is it doing for you and I by doing what we are doing? Is it strengthing our faith by bashing or it making us look like we are good stewarts by bashing?I think that Chanin is right in what she is saying, let me explain using Pauls own words. I really want you to read this post, don't skim thru it looking for an argument, read into what it is being said, and then reply."19 For though I be free from all men, yet have I made myself servant unto all, that I might gain the more.20 And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law;21 To them that are without law, as without law, (being not without law to God, but under the law to Christ,) that I might gain them that are without law.22 To the weak became I as weak, that I might gain the weak: I am made all things to all men, that I might by all means save some."I knew of a missionary a United Pentecostal who went to south America and he had a devil of a time getting any converts. He preached against false doctrine, but he wasn't winning any converts. After 2 fruitless years, he was ready to pack up and go home. He went to prayer and the LORD gave him instructions on what to do. Instead of condemning thier doctrine which they held sacred, he went in with a different approach. He told them, "Did you know that Mary was in the upper room and received the holy Ghost", would you like to receive what Mary received?", He went in that direction, instead of trying to take something away from them, He added to them a greater promise. These people werre filled with the holy Ghost, and after awhile they began to abandon idol worship and marion worship, why? Because it is the holy Spirits job to lead and guide us into all truth.This was a true story.I am not saying that we should become soft and accept the teachings of the Catholic church, if that is what you are seeing in this post then I question your sincerity in wanting to save catholics. But what I am saying is that there are other approaches and the above story is one of them. It is not an all time forumula, God cannot be put in a box, but He has other ways of reaching the masses if we can only tune in to His wave.Weary :-(

sermonindex Apr 24, 2005

Oh Bless God!! That was a good word, a good post!love, Neil

R
RobertW Apr 24, 2005

Jehovah's Witnesses have translated a corrupt Bible version called the New World Translation.I am quite familiar with the JW's and their teachings. I am also familiar with their version of the scriptures. When debating with them always establish YOUR sources before you begin discussions. For me, I lay aside my KJV and pull out my Interlinear Bible. Was that sentence blasphemy? Or was it the truth?Was it Truth as in "inspired by the Holy Ghost" or truth as in "accurate based upon the known facts" in the case? Your words are not to be juxtaposed as Truth over against blasphemy as the canon of scripture is closed and the revelation of eternal Truth is complete.Try not to let your emotions rule your posting.I do. I try to employ wisdom.

C
crsschk Apr 24, 2005

Thanks Karl,Whew... you guys are taxing this poor moderator dude (poor guy) ;-) Of course I am trying to lighten things up here a bit.In the other recent rant of want of expression was just trying to get some balance brought in here. It's not an either/or construct and not that it matters all that much in opinion, but some of the same things Karl is stating here were attempted there. Our newest member here, RecievedText and a warm welcome to you again brother, is not out of line in what he brought forth originally, this is a topic ready on our lips because of recent developments. Had spoken with him a bit earlier and he was very cordial, being somewhat unfamiliar with the site and very appreciative of his understanding in what the attempts around here are.So to allude back to the 'plea' shall we not be so quick to make presumptions and also not so quick to be 'offended' all these things are not to sidestep anyone or accuse anyone, goodness it is toward the whole.Agree with both Chanin and even with Krispy and RT. There must be a better way of going about these things and maybe it is just in reading into to much that is said or misunderstanding the context or motives behind it all. Surely some of it could be couched in different language at times but shouldn't it all be taken into consideration?I know I am just as guilty of offering up a problem without a proposed solution and the sentiment is not towards doing away with anything because it is uncomfortable nor is it necessary to be blasting caps towards those that may be caught up in it. This particular issue is one where I cannot think of one disagreement that the 'system' is corrupt and frankly in many ways with more things being brought to consider even worse than we might have come to know. These things need not be dismissed or relegated to some kind of 'off limits' approach. There are terrible things being done in the name of our Lord and they are not limited to just the RCC, again the danger is in going to extremes, 'either/or', as soon as one brings this up the sense is to stop talking about it, an imaginary line is drawn in the sand and it feeds into the idea of taking 'sides', totally unnecessary. Same goes for the opposite, that by keeping it 'alive', it is open season to just beat the thing into the ground. Surely that in itself is a bit over the top as an example.Some of the pronouncements we could certainly do without, don't think that is an area we have any business meddling in and there is a need for some tact here, as Chanin well brought up, what of those who are caught up in these things?There are many other issues we have had strong discussions about here, the PDL, WOF, BH and it can get the best of us, while we lose sight of the people being affected.I don't have a perfect answer here for any of this, just caution and being aware of others, a bit to chew on and pray about.

C
CJaKfOrEsT Apr 24, 2005

ReceivedText wrote:Chanin,The Roman Catholic Church is NOT a denomination of true Christianity. It is a cult. The reason we expose the RCC is because we LOVE precious Roman Catholics and want to lead them to Christ. You cannot agree with a lie and expose it at the same time.In that case, neither is protestantism. Consider Luther's reaction to the Anabaptist, and not to mention his antisemitism. What about Calvinist persecution of the Arminians. Now, the whole faith movement, prosperity, third wave, holiness, grace... When are we going to figure out, that every banner is corrupt, and that every banner is flown over a remnant minority within. I believe that this is Channin's point.

L
lastblast Apr 24, 2005

There must be a better way of going about these things and maybe it is just in reading into to much that is said or misunderstanding the context or motives behind it all. Surely some of it could be couched in different language at times but shouldn't it all be taken into consideration?I don't have a perfect answer here for any of this, just caution and being aware of others, a bit to chew on and pray about.Good Word Mike. I've been posting very little lately, but reading much. Personally, I like exposure. I like things upfront and honest so I can weigh things out and take it to the Word of God........or just put it on a shelf for later use/ponderings. The problem as you said is that some people do this in such a way that some become offended (rightly or wrongly). I am offended with much in the RC Church (was myself baptized as an infant and partook of first communion in the RC Church), but in the same breath, personally know and love people in this organization. I'm not shy about my views on their practices and the Lord has been good to provide plenty of opportunities to share the Word of God with a Catholic neighbor who struggles much in her understanding of the Lord. As much as I am grieved with RC doctine and practice, I was a bit taken aback by David Ravenhill's words on the Pope. I think what some may see (rightly or wrongly) is that there "seems" to be an element of glee in knowing the Pope is burning in hell........or that he is now living a nightmare. That bothers me. That is the type of stuff which should not be occurring, if that was the intent/heart of that writing. Did the Pope lead many, many astray? Absolutely. However, he was a human being and it is grieving to think he may be spending an eternity in torment. I say "may" because I personally will not be so presumptuous to believe and teach that anyone is unredeemable who believes that Christ is the Saviour of mankind, but teaches false doctrine. Truth be told, the Catholic Church does not hold the market on false doctrine. There is plenty of false doctrine going around these days in the protestant churches. It is even believed by some in the election/predestination camp (of which I belong), that freewill proponents are lost in their sins because they believe in a "works salvation"----they have to "do" something to be saved----they have to say "yes", which to some Calvinists is a work. I do not believe this. Sigh......I'm just not that smart. I will leave that final decision of destination up to God. What I think we should do is preach the truth IN LOVE and let the chips fall where they may. The Word of God doesn't say we are only to preach the Word when it's convenient, when it "seems" like the right time----it says to preach the Word IN SEASON and OUT of season. Unless I misunderstand that, it means to preach the truth at ALL times. So, in a VERY long-winded way I am agreeing with Mike. Doctrine/practices DO need to be discussed, but IMHO determining as fact someone's lack of salvation who professes Christ, that we should not do.I think as believers we need to remember this important truth: believers (yes, even mature ones) get wounded too by other believers. I think we are seeing this with some of the posters who have voiced they are leaving or "standing back" for awhile. Sometimes those who are more evangelistically minded/gifted lose focus on the importance of the portion of the Body of Christ that is "Body focused"----because their main focus is on the lost. We should respect and value ALL our brothers and sisters and realize that God has not called us to be cookie cutter believers. We are all unique and gifted sometimes very differently. Sometimes it seems so differently that we seem to be on opposite planes, but in reality that is not so. Each of us was formed and is being formed as God sees fit----for the benefit of HIS purposes. I think we lose sight of that sometimes. At least I know I do when I get frustrated or irritated at another's walk. The understanding of the value of each and every member of the Body is important. We may not like someone's demeanor/personality or their ministry "bent", but that's where we need to "get over ourselves" and we need to quit looking into heart motives of someone and just address their words, if those words are sinful/unbiblical. It's much more productive and much less destructive to the Body. I think it was either Oswald Chambers or Tozer (can't remember cause I've read so much lately).......that certain types of people who rub us the wrong way are placed in our lives for a reason-----the reason is GROWTH and GRACE. It's easy to like someone who is nice and pleasant. It is a real struggle to get along with others and have grace towards those who are brash, abupt, no holes barred, etc. I am living this right now and it's NOT fun, but I do know that the Lord is using this to purge stuff from me that is not pretty, stuff that would lay hidden if it were not brought to the surface. We each should thank the Lord for every person, believer or unbeliever who rubs us the wrong way and look at it as an occasion to grow in Grace and God's love. He loves us, doesn't He and there's a whole bunch of yuk in most of us? The reason I even bring up the rubbing the wrong way is due to the many offenses I've seen here lately. I dont' really think it is doctrinal discussions as much as personality/ministry bent differences. At least it appears that way to me. Anyways, I love you all and am thankful for each and every one of you----even those who may rub me the wrong way. I have grown here. The one thing that led me and kept me reading the forums is the manner in which things were discussed (upfront AND respectful). The fact that "hard things" were even allowed to be discussed here in depth was refreshing. That is VERY different from most Christian boards. I hope the openness and respectful nature of discussion continues............Blessings in Jesus, Cindy :-)

R
ReceivedText Apr 24, 2005

In that case, neither is protestantism.So do to wrongs make a right? I am not a Lutheran nor a Calvinist. I am a Bible Believing Christian. What you write does not have anything to do with Rome being the whore of Rev. 17 and an antichrist church.You are right. We should not desire meaningless labels. But when we recognize an organized institution such as this that embodies blasphemy, the truth must be said. If everyone agreed that Rome was a cult, we wouldn't be having this discussion. Unfortunately the opposite is true today.You have Billy Graham, Benny Hinn, and Pat Robertson singing the pope's praises calling him a man of God. You can't be pope and be a man of God. You can't preside over blatantly damning heresy (i.e. doctrine that if you believe it disqualifies you for heaven) and be a man of God. Or can you? Was Joseph Smith a man of God? Help me here. Was Brigham Young a man of God?

sermonindex Apr 24, 2005

the truth must be saidok, we did that.Rome being the whore of Rev. 17 and an antichrist church.ok, we've established that.Billy Graham, Benny Hinn, and Pat Robertson there have been long tortured threads on these men. You can't be pope and be a man of God.we've all agreed on this in the past.now I ask you, whats next?now that you clambered onto your cyber pulpit and denounced those you've denounced in your 28 hour tenure here, now I ask you, whats next?How do you propose to love these cult member's, apostates, and various whores of rome into the Kingdom of Heaven?hmmm?once you've torn them down, how do you plan in the Holy Ghost to build them up in Jesus?whats next?

H
Heavenlyman Apr 24, 2005

:-) :-D To Be United in the name of Jesus Christ who bring peace to us through the Holy Spirit that gives understading to our dim minds.Be of good cheers my brothers and sister concern yourself in your own salvation that you may be welcome by our savior as a good and faithful servant of Christ.

L
lastblast Apr 24, 2005

by Heavenlyman on 2005/4/24 3:12:50To Be United in the name of Jesus Christ who bring peace to us through the Holy Spirit that gives understading to our dim minds.Be of good cheers my brothers and sister concern yourself in your own salvation that you may be welcome by our savior as a good and faithful servant of Christ.Amen.

M
moreofHim Apr 24, 2005

Be of good cheers my brothers and sister concern yourself in your own salvation that you may be welcome by our savior as a good and faithful servant of Christ. AMEN as well.as we have said that it is good to expose things and state the truth (which we have done numerous, numerous times) i stil believe that we have got to say "work out your own salvation with fear and trembling".Peter, seeing him, said to Jesus, "But Lord, what about this man?" 22 Jesus said to him, "If I will that he remain till I come, what is that to you? You follow Me."in Christ, Chanin

This discussion is locked.

Archived
1 of 76 posts