BSBKJVWEBYLTASVBBEWMBT4TDBY|HymnsMusicDonate
Menu
Articles

Debating On Non-essentials

sermonindex Apr 16, 2015

I appeal to you, brothers and sisters, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that all of you agree with one another in what you say and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be perfectly united in mind and thought. - 1 Corinthians 1:10

Having a healthy discussion on a topic, doctrine or important issue can be good, yet in the end if it results in debates, hurt feelings and objections we have to consider if it is good to be done at all. It seemed much more important to the early believers to be united together then to figure out all different types of doctrines together. There was a simplicity that has been reflected in what is called the Apostles Creed or other statements of faith throughout the ages. The naming of that creed is because it was believed to convey basic truths that the Apostles themselves would agree with and was a continuation of the faith once delivered to the saints as we read of in the book of Jude (Jude 1:3). Does that mean we cannot discuss things in the Church? By no means. The Church has discussed many issues which were debated at times, but those issues were important usually towards the fundamental believes. The first 5 Church councils centred on the doctrine of the Divinity and manhood of Jesus Christ. As is stated in Scriptures that if we do not believe Jesus came in the flesh then we are not of His Spirit (1 John 4:2).

So we should discuss different truths and Scriptures in the Church. But if the subject discussion becomes heated and there is quarrelling it would be better to agree with your brother publicly in what you can and and hold to what you believe privately. This calls for great maturity and wisdom in speaking in humility. It is better to agree with a brother that you are Christians and not divide over non-essentials. Let us go forward with meekness towards each other and having in mind the larger picture of the entire body of Christ. This is the way of love and meekness to agree with sister and brothers and not divide, backbite or speak against because we simply do not understand their view. Lord, help keep us small and allow us to gain a greater perspective of your universal Church and how you see it. Amen.

C
ccchhhrrriiisss Apr 16, 2015

A very good and timely encouragement, Greg!

J
JHerndon Apr 16, 2015

Well said! In the essentials unity, non essentials liberty, but in all things charity!

A
AbideinHim Apr 16, 2015

I don't even believe that as believers we
should be debating on doctrine. We all
should be seeking the truth, and allowing
the Holy Spirit to teach us. It is the
holding to our own opinions that causes
strife and discord in the Body.

Every time Christians break fellowship
over a disagreement the enemy has
achieved his purpose. It is much better
for a Christian to take the high road
and drop the discussion even though he
might be right rather than risk a break
in fellowship. That doesn't mean that we
allow error to be spread that would cause
those that are weak in the faith to stumble.

T
TMK Apr 16, 2015

"That doesn't mean that we
allow error to be spread that would cause
those that are weak in the faith to stumble."

I guess that begs the question as to when it is ok not to drop the discussion; i.e. which doctrinal points are worth going to the mat over.

No one can agree on what the "essentials" are. That itself, ironically, would trigger a HUGE debate.

M
MrBillPro Apr 16, 2015

Here is some food for thought. There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God.
Romans 3:11

A
AbideinHim Apr 16, 2015

"And the servant of the Lord must not strive
; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach,
patient. (2 Timothy 2:24)

The word strive in this verse means to war,
quarrel, dispute, or fight.

I Jude 1:3, the Word of God exhorts us to
"earnestly contend for the faith that was
once delivered unto the saints." (Jude 1:3)

The word contend in this verse means to
struggle. There are false teachings that
bring error that could possibly cause a
brother to fall away from the faith. In the
early church there were some that were
turning the grace of God into
lasciviousness. Any teaching that perverts
the grace of God should be withstood.

However, there are many disagreements
within the church that are more a matter
of preference or opinion, and very often
both parties have some light on the subject
and we should not have a falling out and
get in strife on the non essentials of the
faith.

W
wayneman Apr 16, 2015

I once posted "Christians Do Not Quarrel About Doctrine" by Jacob Boehme. The mods eventually had to lock the thread because people started fighting about what Boehme really meant.

D
dolfan Apr 16, 2015

I have been in court all day. This is WAY better. 😊

T
TMK Apr 16, 2015

I agree Tim.

I like to talk Bible, and doctrine, etc. because I find it interesting, and of course edifying. Generally I don't get to do that out in the real world, except on occasion. Most Christians just don't give a hoot, sad to say. So a forum like this is a good place to discuss various theological things.

I agree it shouldn't turn into nastiness like I have seen in the past, but lately things have been fairly tame around here.

M
MrBillPro Apr 17, 2015

TMK...but lately things have been fairly tame around here.

Yes they have! can I get an Amen. :-)

J
JFW Apr 17, 2015

At the end of the day we're all in it for the same thing ( Christ being magnified) and are all compelled by the same thing (the love of the truth). Even in years past when there were intensely personal exchanges, they were immensely helpful to my growth as there was, before it became unprofitable, a wealth of wisdom being passed on. Not just head knowledge but actual real world experience of ordinary people who met truth and followed Him. While I'm not advocating any sort of carnal exchanges and have not only respect but a deep gratitude to the moderators for their attentiveness and patience, when we are all at differing levels of maturity and have differing cultural backgrounds it's almost inevitable that our rough edges are gonna get knocked off when we're in a rock tumbler, tho what comes out is smooth stones.
I mean this respectfully, SermonIndex has been instrumental in my growth in Christ and what's more His growth in me, yes even and especially the sometimes heated exchanges as they've served to keep me out of the ditches of disobedience and deception more than once in my walk.
Seems that this life with Christ is bound to get messy at times, but He abides faithfully to the end and Praise be unto God for that!
If His faithfulness toward us was exclusively based on our faithfulness toward Him,...none would stand a chance.
Btw didn't Paul and John Mark have an incident that took quite a while to be reconciled?
I believe that if we were all together in the same room for fellowship and prayer there'd be more love, respect and humility than most had ever previously experienced, kinda like it's supposed to be.

S
savedtoserve Apr 17, 2015

I like the balance you've spelled out here, JFW. I couldn't agree with you any more, what a great post! It's hard (for us all) to keep that balance, at least for myself. Of course I don't enjoy fighting and arguing either (except to get in a much-needed laugh!) but have always loved a healthy debate...that doesn't mean that makes it right or wrong; it's just part of my personality/preferences. But somewhere in the back of my mind, I've always had this thought that if Jesus or Paul or any assertive Biblical character lived on earth today, in our churches, we would think they're so intolerant the way they would hurt feelings and spare no punches...honestly, it can be uncomfortable to imagine myself in their shoes and having the guts to say what they said! ...Especially in love, in the Spirit.

That being said, I recognize the rules of this forum so I'm not going to debate this. :)

T
twayneb Apr 17, 2015

The purpose of any debate (discussion if you will) is to come to a knowledge of truth. Too often we debate in order to advance our own ideas and prove ourselves right and others wrong. But what fruit is there in that approach. I have had to seriously question some of the things I believe through discussions here on SI. I find that my perspective on the interpretation of many minor points of doctrine is constantly changing and, I hope, coming more into line with Biblical truth. But I am not there yet, nor will I ever totally arrive. I find the discussion helpful to me as it makes me take a closer look at doctrines. I have blind spots...plenty of them. I need other brothers to help me see those blind spots and to make me at least consider their perspectives. If we lose sight of this...well, we only have strife and debate rather than fruitful discussion.

sermonindex Apr 17, 2015

Could we make a list of what is 'non-essential'. Since, we can't agree on what is essential/non-essential.

I think details and clarity are important since these issues tend to continue to pop up.

In a few different threads people would be strongly convicted of their belief and they'd believe it so strongly, it was an essential to them.

I'll start by listing some non-essentials:

1. Sabbath day (which day, every day, one day, etc)
2. Pre/post Trib (and other end times related doctrines)

Those two were very heated, partly due to one or two people's perspective that they were non-negotiable, that everyone had to have their perspective.

T
TMK Apr 17, 2015

Calvinism, Christian perfection, age of earth, bible versions. I could name another but I will forbear since it will get people riled.

This discussion is locked.

Archived
1 of 16 posts