BSBKJVWEBYLTASVBBEWMBT4TDBY|HymnsMusicDonate
Menu
Theology

Help! I've got 10 wives!!

I
inotof May 14, 2005

Okay Bible Scholars. . . Why did God sanction muliple wives in the old testament? I've ruled out pro-creation,culture and symbolic(still open to a relevant thought though) reasons. Now i am stuck. Anyone got any answers that hold water scriptually, I suppose im open to interpetations, but would really like to know what saith the scriptures--i've searched but come up blank.thanks d

R
RobertW May 14, 2005

Hi inotof,I don't know that God ever 'sanctioned' multiple wives. I believe it would be more accurate to say that He 'tolerated' it. Just like He tolerated concubines. Jesus said "from the beginning it was not so." It was God's plan for marriage to be one man and one women together forever. I don't mean one man and one woman 'married' - I mean one man and one women PERIOD. Not a life of fornication with multiple partners and then 'settling down' with a spouse and calling it God's plan. That was NOT His plan any more than multiple wives was His plan. His plan was that one man meet one woman, leave the Father and Mother be joined unto each other and become one flesh. That is, they consumate the marriage covenant through the shedding of the blood and the two living together until death. Anything more or less is NOT God's plan- but is a compromise of that plan. Marriage is a blood covenant and carried in the OT all the penalties of breaking a blood covenant. As a child I remember an old sit com in which the mother was arguing with a daughter over her "moving in" with her boyfriend so she can "try the shoes on before she buys them." Her mother retorted- "Nobody wants to buy a pair of used shoes!" We can talk about marriage all we want. We can go to seminars and read and write books- but until we we decide it will be 'one pair of shoes', put on once they were actually purchased, laced up and worn for life- we will have nothing but disaster in marriages. God's plan is for one woman and one man to know each other until death. No one else ever having 'known' them before or after the consummation. This is Adam and Eve. There were no Adam's before Adam for Eve and there were no Eve's before Eve for Adam. All they knew were each other. Not 700 wives and 300 concubines as with Solomon. Not 30 premarital relationships. No handling the merchandise and putting it back on the shelf. Not 'trying on the shoes' before the commitment was made (they were actually paid for). I'm sure this will greatly increase my popularity, but as simple as it is- I see no other plan of God in scripture. Anything else is compromise. Anything else is missing the mark. Anyone care to start a series on this at the local church level? :-D God Bless,-Robert

sermonindex May 15, 2005

1Cr 6:16 What? know ye not that he which is joined to an harlot is one body? for two, saith he, shall be one flesh.one flesh here sounds like husband and wife to me. So what then consumates a legitimate marriage in God's eyes? Is it not anytime a man joins himself to a woman? Now I have to ask you, how many wives do you have sir? Of course you can ask me the same thing. With my head bowed low, I would have to tell you far too many.

C
crsschk May 15, 2005

Here's an old thread:Polygamy, Slavery, why was God silent?

sermonindex May 15, 2005

What consitutes marriage anyway? "A man that is joined to a harlot is one flesh".So how does he join himself with her?The fact of the matter is, western society has a warped sense of the principles of marriage. People will go out and join with several different partners and then after several years of that decide to settle down. To whom do you settle down with? The first one that you joined yourself to or another fresh victim that has no idea what they are getting into.Pastors will ask couples if they have ever been married before, but what they don't ask is have you had sex with others in your past. If yes, how many?A woman may have had several men before she "settles down" but the man who marries her is marrying a whore, basically. Someone told me once that when you get saved all that is in the past and is done away with. Don't get me wrong I agree with him to a degree, you have to understand the conversation we were having. So I asked him a question, based upon a story. Let say you had were living common law and through that common law you had a house full of kids. Then Christ found you and you got saved. Old things are passed away, so the kids gotta go and the wife's got to go as well, after all, all things have become new.I said that because of this, even though your past is forgiven, your still living with these other realities. What is to be done with those things that are now past?According to the book of Ezra, if you wanted to be apart of the inheritance the strange women and those that were born of you while you were in the world would have to be sent away, because now we are in the land and old things must be done away with.I know that this sounds far fetched, but what do you do with such a situation. Someone might say, they should get married, well according to Paul that which is joined to a harlot are one flesh, so they are already married, so I ask what constitutes marriage?Karl

D
dohzman May 15, 2005

I believe God winked , as it were for a time with this sin inorder to show us in these last days how our own hearts looked in His sight when we committ adulatry (worldily lusts) and had ,as it were, multiple wives(GODS). The marriage is a symbol of covenant, therefore anything that is sin that we seek to live with in peace(even a false peace), we have in essence covenanted with and therefore in a type we are married to or in covenant with. ?????What ya think? Bro. Daryl

L
letsgetbusy May 15, 2005

I agree with your direction, but I would say that whether or not one should leave would be a case by case basis. Paul gave instruction for a Christian that has an unbelieving wife in 1 Corinthians 7:12: "But to the rest speak I, not the Lord: If any brother hath a wife that believeth not, and she be pleased to dwell with him, let him not put her away." If the man is converted, he should, by the moral law, not "lay with her" until the are married. I don't think it would be godly to leave just for the sake of conversion, but there may be other factors. As far as Paul speaking of things being done away with, Paul is talking about the way God sees the newly converted soul. The new Christian will want to do right, and can now point all those he exposed to to Christ, and should be doing so. He will now want to make all his crooked places straight. What a fine witness he would be if he turned from all his evil ways in front of all these who knew him, and preached the gospel. Sounds sort of like some bad guys from the Bible that God got ahold of (Joseph, Moses, Samson, Paul, etc).

L
letsgetbusy May 15, 2005

RobertW, I was going to reply in full, but you pretty much covered it. Agreed, having multiple partners was never God's plan. Look at what happened with Ishmael. Or what about Lot's kids as a result of sleeping with his daughters. Go through Scripture and look at the results of the kids from these situations. Many times you will find curses. Remember this from the ten commandments, "I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers of the children unto the third and fourth generation that hate me." Haven't most of us seen a son that has an addiction that he got from his father. David had a problem with lust (remember his loyal servant Urriah?) that lust passed to his son, Solomon. Lust has always been a deviation of God's plan. To find out God's plan, go to the beginning. "An help meet for him." Notice that it is singular, "an help." Not "many" helps. The word "an" is synonymous with the number one.Anyway Robert is right. One man and one woman.

R
ReceivedText May 15, 2005

I know that this sounds far fetched, but what do you do with such a situation. Someone might say, they should get married, well according to Paul that which is joined to a harlot are one flesh, so they are already married, so I ask what constitutes marriage?If fornication (we call it pre-marital sex) constitutes marriage, then fornication is not sin, but the start of a new covenant. And what if a virgin first commits fornication with a non-virgin? The non-virgin would be "bound" to the person who they lost their virginity to, since this made them "one flesh." This begs the question, How many people can be "one flesh" with one another at the same time?For example, if Jack (virgin) sleeps with Jill (non-virgin), who has slept previously with James (non-virgin), who previously slept with Amy (non-virgin), who previously slept with Joe (non-virgin), who previously slept with...on and on....Are they all one flesh with each other????Sounds more like an orgy than a marriage. Where am I wrong?This is gonna be good. ;-) Blessings,RT

Z
ZekeO May 15, 2005

Healingwaters wrote:What consitutes marriage anyway? "A man that is joined to a harlot is one flesh".If you read the original design of joining:23And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man. 24Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh. 25And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed.Genesis 2:23-25KJVYou will notice the order of how the oneness occured. The one flesh occured because of the sanctioning of the first two requirements which validated 'the one flesh' as constituting marraiage.In those first two: leaving of mother and father and cleaving to his wife it is the transferring of legitamate authourity between the parents to the son and now becoming the head of his particular family.Look at Jesus' words: Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.Matthew 19:6KJV God has to join the marriage for it to be considered 'official' and not man acting out of his own glands.In regards to where this discussion is headed, even though a man or woman has joined themselves as one flesh, there has not been any legitemate transference of authourity into that relationship. I believe therefore that there is no 'marriage' in the sight of God.Coming to multiple marriages. We were in Malawi recently and this exact subject came up. One of the comments was that the man was following OT pattern of having multiple wives. First of all any man taking more than one wife is being selfish, because any woman does not want her husbands affections shared with any other. So this man is not fulfilling the law of Christ and causing his sister to stumble.If you look at how this all started:21And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof...Genesis 2:21KJVYou will notice that he took one of his ribs not any more. There is not place for more ribs to be joined. When this last point was mentioned it brought rapterous applause from the audience.In regards to men who have more than one wife. The issue I believe is this. The first covenant stands before God as being legitamate. All the others are not. There simply is not room in Gods economy of marriage for an 'official' marriage that he has sanctioned. So a man must put those wives away and not share the relationship of marraiage with them, but in regards to caring for them and their children that remains his responsibilty. Something along the lines of you made your bed, so sleep in it.

sermonindex May 15, 2005

Very good Zeke, I had written up something that yesterday and decided not to post it, but now that are into this subject, I will put here, it's a good thing that I saved it.So here it is:Actually there is something regarding this very thing, and Jesus comes head on with the issue. Matthew 19:3"The Pharisees also came unto him, tempting him, and saying unto him, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause?4 And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female,5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?6 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.7 They say unto him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away?8 He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so."Multiple wives came about because of the hardness of mens hearts. This is a spiritual lesson here and one to take note. The reason why Israel was given to Idolotry it's because they had this hard heartedness towards the ONE God. By wanting more wives phsyically, they were in essense saying they wanted more gods spiritually.When Christ came He came to correct this and restore the idea that the SECOND MAN ADAM will be married to only ONE WOMAN EVE the Church. The New Jerusalem is now the Mother of all living (that is all those who have been made alive thru the new birth).That is why Jesus said, "if your eye be single, then your whole body is full of light", thats because your eye is fixed only on one lover, Christ Jesus and not on another. The words "Love" and "Light" are used interchangeably in the New Testament.I hope that sheds some light on the subject.Karl

I
inotof May 15, 2005

Thanks for the response people. I do however think some might have missed the spirit of the post though. i was not stating that I litterly have 10 wives nor was i looking for an exposition on what marriage was--simply wondering why there would be levitcial laws goverening multiple wives. mostly because the patriarchs Abe and Jake had mulitiples Isaac ((type and shadow of the bride and christ did not). I will admit i never thought about the statment "from the beginning it was not so" forgive my ignorance. I see satisfactory evidnece that it was indeed tolerated.

L
lastblast May 15, 2005

The first covenant stands before God as being legitamate. All the others are not. There simply is not room in Gods economy of marriage for an 'official' marriage that he has sanctioned. So a man must put those wives away and not share the relationship of marraiage with them, but in regards to caring for them and their children that remains his responsibilty. Something along the lines of you made your bed, so sleep in it.That is exactly what I've gleaned through my studies on marriage as well, though it is not a popular viewpoint. Blessings in Him, Cindy

sermonindex May 15, 2005

....Jesus told the woman at the well that the man she was with now was not her husband. I think it does not take a stretch of scripture here to believe that she was living with a man who she was likely having sex with. Jesus said he was not her husband.

L
lastblast May 15, 2005

Jesus told the woman at the well that the man she was with now was not her husband. I think it does not take a stretch of scripture here to believe that she was living with a man who she was likely having sex with. Jesus said he was not her husband. That's right Laury. Scripture does not teach sex=marriage. Sex is a "type" of joining, this is true. There has to be an acknowledged/jointly agreed upon "leaving and cleaving" for a marriage to be binding.Those who teach sex=marriage would have to then say that any adultery dissolves the previous union and now obligates them to stick to their new union, and that certainly would be a hard thing to prove with scripture. Blessings in Him, Cindy

sermonindex May 15, 2005

"Those who teach sex=marriage would have to then say that any adultery dissolves the previous union and now obligates them to stick to their new union, and that certainly would be a hard thing to prove with scripture."Perhaps, Cindy. Thank you for posting. I don't see where adultery would "dissolve" a previous union. But I do see some evidence that a man is obligated to the woman he has sex with for her welfare and well being. One thing about all of this that has always intrigued me, especially as a man, is that Soloman had 700 wives and 300 concubines. But that did not "seem" to bother God. God commanded him not to take "heathen wives". He ignored God and married them and that was his downfall, for they led him into idolatry.Wives have a very important influence upon their husbands. Men of this hour are not taught to be as discriminate about their choice of mate as they should be. I know I wasn't, and I've paid dearly for it. I'm not bashing my wife. I'm just stating what I believe to be so. She is good to me. But I did not seek God in choosing her. I don't want to get sidetracked here, but to focus on being obedient to God in all things. If we choose not to be obedient, then we will pay a price, just as Soloman did. It's the leaven that's the problem, you understand. God is a God of purity. He knows full well, that even the slightest bit of dirt will ruin impurity. So does satan know this as well. When a man finds a good wife, he has found a good thing. But a contentious woman is like a dripping faucet or a foot out of joint.I want to thank God for all you Godly ladies out there. Bear the burdens of your husband, don't invent your own. Live your life to live God's life by being there for your husband. Present yourself a living sacrafice to God and to your husband, not as a slave, but as a joint heir. Let the Godly leadership of your husband be received by you as leadership from God, sent to you and for you. To God be the glory, now and forever amen.

D
dohzman May 16, 2005

Soloman had 700 wives and 300 concubines. But that did not "seem" to bother God. ever read the book of ecclesiates, that is one dissolutioned and tormented man. I've often pondered how instrumental the Lord is in the marriages his children are in. Here's what I mean--One man who 's not saved marries and then becomes a christian but his wife doesn't or visa versa, Did the soverienty of God extend back to that union or not? Amos says can two walk together unless they agree..... I often see christian couples walking in different directions and then they complain about thier mates as if God isn't in the whole marriage process or wasn't in thier marriage choices, How big is our God? I believe in the Soverienty of God, that all things (can)work together for good to them that LOVE the Lord and are called.....according to His purposes. Even what we think are our mistakes.

sermonindex May 16, 2005

Thanks for sharing.

L
lastblast May 16, 2005

One man who 's not saved marries and then becomes a christian but his wife doesn't or visa versa, Did the soverienty of God extend back to that union or not? Amos says can two walk together unless they agree..... I often see christian couples walking in different directions and then they complain about thier mates as if God isn't in the whole marriage process or wasn't in thier marriage choices, How big is our God? I believe in the Soverienty of God, that all things (can)work together for good to them that LOVE the Lord and are called.....according to His purposes. Even what we think are our mistakes.Very good insight Dohzman. Blessings in Jesus, Cindy

I
inotof May 16, 2005

Someone had mentioned the woman at the well, this brings up an intresting point and to further the discussion i do have another question.First why, did it seem, that men where allowed to have mulitple wives yet wives only one husband? The second question is, why did God use 4 different women to birth the 12 tribes of israel? (Leah, Rachel and thier handmadiens?) Is there something of a proverb or prophetic illustration I'm missing? sorry to be so persistant but it is like a splinter in my mind.

This discussion is locked.

Archived
1 of 149 posts