The rapture before WWIII, a prophecy that has come true from 1968!!

Then suddenly, Jesus will come and the Third World War breaks out. It will be a short war." (She saw it in the vision.)

I promised no more links. So therefore search Norway 1968 prophecy. It is in the news and also you can get it from Charisma.

Read it carefully and know that this was prophecy from a 90 year old women from 1968.

The Lord is coming for his church before WWWIII we are so very very near!

Even 90 year old ladies can be wrong.

Just finished reading it. Interesting to say the least, surprised that Charisma would publish that since its pretty hard core repentance Christianity, almost felt like reading Wilkerson.

Todd it is a true prophecy because ALL of it has come true except for the rapture and WW3.

1968 There was massive cold war, how could it end?

1968 Most of the world only had one TV station, or a couple, how could there be many.

1968 How could there be such violence and sex on TV? Nonsense!

1968 the poor invasion? We see it with the Muslims.

1968 the church THE CHURCH to be about material gain? The apostosy of the church all that she wrote could have been written today. By you! This is from 50 years ago.

No my friend, the rapture is very very soon.

50 years ago she said

A lukewarmness without parallel will take hold of the Christians, a falling away from true, living Christianity. Christians will not be open for penetrating preaching. They will not, like in earlier times, want to hear of sin and grace, law and gospel, repentance and restoration. There will come a substitute instead: prosperity (happiness) Christianity.

"The important thing will be to have success, to be something; to have material things, things that God never promised us in this way. Churches and prayer houses will be emptier and emptier. Instead of the preaching we have been used to for generations -like, to take your cross up and follow Jesus, - entertainment, art and culture will invade the churches where there should have been gatherings for repentance and revival. This will increase markedly just before the return of Jesus.

50 years ago she said this

4. "People from poor countries will stream to Europe. (In 1968 there was no such thing as immigration. E. Minos.) They will also come to Scandinavia - and Norway. There will be so many of them that people will begin to dislike them and become hard with them. They will be treated like the Jews before the Second World War. Then the full measure of our sins will have been reached (I protested at the issue of immigration. I did not understand it at the time. E. Minos.)

The tears streamed from the old woman’s eyes down her cheeks. "I will not see it, but you will. Then suddenly, Jesus will come and the Third World War breaks out. It will be a short war." (She saw it in the vision.)

"All that I have seen of war before is only child’s play compared to this one, and it will be ended with a nuclear atom bomb. The air will be so polluted that one cannot draw one’s breath. It will cover several continents, America, Japan, Australia and the wealthy nations. The water will be ruined (contaminated?). We can no longer till the soil. The result will be that only a remnant will remain. The remnant in the wealthy countries will try to flee to the poor countries, but they will be as hard on us as we were on them.

"I am so glad that I will not see it, but when the time draws near, you must take courage and tell this. I have received it from God, and nothing of it goes against what the Bible tells.

"The one who has his sin forgiven and has Jesus as Savior and Lord, is safe."

Hi Blaine,

My thoughts are on Jesus's soon return! Never ever will be convinced of post trib or mid trib rature because it isnt true. The proof is in the Bible and the early church in the Bible.

The Bible is true!

I will sooner be out of internet and Roku. And then I will no longer involve myself in this worldly chess game of kings and queens and pawns. I dont know what day it goes screen dark here, but very soon. And I couldnt be happier. Any internet searches I go on, news pages and I am accosted visually. I search anything Christian on Youtube and I am offended by what videos I can see on the right side. I am running away both from internet and streaming into the TV.

Even though so many here do not believe in pre-trib rapture, it doesnt matter, bless the Lord he's gonna pick you up anyhow. And you wont even care or say wait.

So Jesus could not say when he would return but this lady knew. Awesome!

Sci-fi novels and movies have made incredible predictions for years, well before 1968.

My sister Linda, I know your heart longs to see our Lord as He is, to know as you are known, to be with Jesus in the ultimate and final ushering into His presence. I think we all long for that. I won't detail how differently I see the Scriptures than you see them as to the Lord's return. We have all been round that mulberry bush with one another here. Keep gathering with believers. Keep praying. Urge us here to do the same. The days of heartbreak are only beginning, and we do not yet know what we will be required to endure. We desperately need Jesus, and He has given us to one another in Himself. Let's all contend for the faith. Let's contend by openly displaying our contempt for this present order and our singular desire for the kingdom to come.

Todd you are one cranky Christian!

I will see Jesus face to face and very soon! Before knowing about this prediction I knew that the rapture was coming up shortly.

I study the signs. There is no pause button God is gonna push. I am sure of that.

You all are looking for a revival instead of rapture. Revival yes, no, maybe? Doesnt matter either way. Does the Bible say there will be a brighter than ever revival before the tribulation? NO! The Bible says there will be apostacy.

Apostasy could not be more opposite to revival in the church. You think beating a dead horse is gonna work? Neigh!

I do not mean to be a naysayer but I must! Numbers 1, 2, & 3 are ALL in the Bible. Nothing new.

Now #4, states that "there was no immigration in 1968." Yes, there was immigration in Europe even when the man says the dream was given.

The woman in question never wrote down what SHE dreamed or saw, it was someone else and then it sat in a drawer for 30 years. We are essentially taking this man's word about a little old Godly woman who had a vision.

The whole thing is suspect in my book.

Haha Linda- I can see where you got that from my posts. I'm not cranky- most everyone who knows me would affirm that-

But I do have a healthy dose of skepticism for date setters and alarmists- especially date setters and alarmist who are paid handsomely for their prognostications. And doing some reading on this guy who "wrote down" this prophecy causes me to second Lysa's motion.

I agree there will be a rapture- but there will only be one when Jesus returns and He's only returning once. When that may be is entirely up to God and He and only He has the slightest inkling of when that will be. It might be 10,000,000 years from now for all we know. We could see 500 cycles of revival and apostasy before He returns. How can we really know? The apostles thought he was coming "soon." They were sorely disappointed.

Good point.

What proof that this was from 1968. It could have been written last week. True.

P.S. I am out of here by the 10th. That is my internet shut off. Yay! Then Ill no longer look for news or this or that. It is a compulsion the internet. Good riddance!

I've learned to take modern day prophecies, dreams, visions, mysteries, "words from the Lord", and every manner of extra-biblical signs with a grain of salt, BUT prayerfully.

Just as some are quick to believe they're real, others (even Christians) are even more quick to shout, "Fake!" My question to people on both sides is this: Have you researched it at all to back up what you think? Or is it just exactly that... what YOU think, based on YOUR feelings after just hearing it?

I've been aware of the 1968 Valdres Prophecy for six or seven years. It's hardly far-fetched or unbelievable by any means. I find it quite reasonable. An old woman was telling a visiting evangelist about a dream she had and he found it fascinating or prudent to write down.

The last part says (the old woman to the evangelist): "I am so glad that I will not see it, but when the time draws near, you must take courage and tell this. I have received it from God, and nothing of it goes against what the Bible tells. The one who has his sin forgiven and has Jesus as Savior and Lord, is safe."

I see nothing wrong there.

And that's how I take the prophecy, whether real or not. My first litmus test is this: Does it point people to Jesus? If no, I move on content that it's sensationalism. If it does point people to Jesus, I'll listen further.

And dear naysayer Lysa, #1, #2, and #3 may be found in the Bible (proving that this prophecy isn't UN-scriptural) but the details given are not in the Bible. You ARE correct about the comment you referred to in #4, BUT that comment was said by the evangelist, not the old woman. So, you can't hold that against the prophecy. And just because SHE didn't write it down, but told it to someone else who did, also doesn't negate the validity of the prophecy. Why would it? Even the disciples used scribes. The woman was (supposedly) 90 years old, after all.

DISCLAIMER: I'm not saying it's true. And I'm not saying it isn't. What I AM saying is that I don't think it's wise to immediately accept OR dismiss such things without prayer and a little research of your own. Discernment is easier on the crackpot cases, but when they DON'T violate scripture and they DO point people to Jesus, it's just wise to consider them.

What I took away from the prophecy is this: I don't know if the story of it is true or not. There's no way of proving it. So, what's the takeaway? The very last line:

"The one who has his sin forgiven and has Jesus as Savior and Lord, is safe."

P.S. To get it off my chest, I don't like or respect Charisma. They stand for nothing specific, cater to many, and err often. Their penchant for entertainment and celebrity gossip is horrible. In my opinion, for the most part, they are tabloid journalism with a religious bent.

Todd,

But I do have a healthy dose of skepticism for date setters and alarmists- especially date setters and alarmist who are paid handsomely for their prognostications. And doing some reading on this guy who "wrote down" this prophecy causes me to second Lysa's motion.

1. There was no date setting in this prophecy.

2. How do you define "alarmist"? The Bible's description of the last days before Christ's return is pretty alarming stuff, so I can't help but wonder what would make a person today who talks about the last days an alarmist. Doomsday Preppers who want bunkers, a cache of all kinds of weapons to use on anyone who dares come near their 10 year supply of food is my definition of an alarmist.

3. I agree with your skepticism of those who are paid, handsomely or not. Freely they received, freely they should give. I'm also weary of date setters, HOWEVER we ARE commanded to watch for the signs of the times. And we ARE to recognize the season of His return. I've seen these obedient brothers and sisters get lumped in with the date setters and it's NOT right.

4. What research did you find on evangelist Emanuel Minos? I'm very good at researching but I haven't found much on him. The only negative things I've found come from bloggers who feel it's their job to "expose" everyone. I also research the sources of the information I find. I'd be very interested in reading your sources.

I agree there will be a rapture- but there will only be one when Jesus returns and He's only returning once. When that may be is entirely up to God and He and only He has the slightest inkling of when that will be. It might be 10,000,000 years from now for all we know. We could see 500 cycles of revival and apostasy before He returns. How can we really know? The apostles thought he was coming "soon." They were sorely disappointed.

Forgive my bluntness, but I don't think using extremes is helpful or kind because, in truth, if people were honest, they're actually veiled insults.

Hi Keith-

I appreciate your questions and comments. As to your questions--

1. Well, not an actual date- but a definite placement in time (right before WW3- whatever that is and assuming there will be a WW3)
2. Alarmist to me is someone who tries to scare people for some personal gain, be it money or attention. It is also a person who sees Armageddon in every headline.
3. The apostles, who knew Jesus best and heard Him directly, thought he was returning in their lifetimes. If they were unable to accurately recognize the "signs of the times,” how are we supposed to? The best we can do is guess. WW2 would have seemed to be a "sign of the times”- more so than everything before or since. Yet here we still are, trying to determine the "signs of the times.” I think it would be more fruitful to concentrate on our relationship with the Lord.
4. I probably found the same sources you did. What I read bothered me; if it didn’t bother you I’m okay with that!
In regard to portion of my post you quoted, I have re-read it several times and I do not see where anything I said might not be true. Do I really think humans will still be on this same earth 10,000,000 years from now? (I am not talking about the "New Earth”). I doubt it, but we might be.

I really intended no insult but I was using exaggeration to make a point.

From Wikipedia:
"In rhetoric, a rhetorical device or resource of language is a technique that an author or speaker uses to convey to the listener or reader a meaning with the goal of persuading him or her towards considering a topic from a different perspective, using sentences designed to encourage or provoke a rational argument from an emotional display of a given perspective or action. Note that although rhetorical devices may be used to evoke an emotional response in the audience, this is not their primary purpose."

A good rule of thumb when reading my posts is that if I say something outrageous or ridiculous I am probably using a rhetorical device.

You are certainly correct that scripture doesn't specifically state the apostles were sorely disappointed as time passed and Jesus did not return. Assuming they longed to see him again face to face, it would not be too much of a stretch to assume they had some disappointment. Not saying they lost faith or anything like that.